Molecular scale electronics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Molecular scale electronics, also called single molecule electronics, is a branch of nanotechnology that uses single molecules, or nanoscale collections of single molecules, as electronic components. Because single molecules constitute the smallest stable structures imaginable this miniaturization is the ultimate goal for shrinking electrical circuits.

The field is often referred to as simply "molecular electronics", but this term is also used to refer to the distantly related field of conductive polymers and organic electronics, which uses the properties of molecules to affect the bulk properties of a material. A nomenclature distinction has been suggested so that molecular materials for electronics refers to this latter field of bulk applications, while molecular scale electronics refers to the nanoscale single-molecule applications discussed here.[1][2]

Fundamental concepts[edit]

Conventional electronics have traditionally been made from bulk materials. Ever since its invention in 1958 the performance and complexity of integrated circuits has been growing exponentially (a trend also known as Moore’s law) and has forced the feature sizes of the embedded components to shrink accordingly. As the structures become smaller, the sensitivity for deviations increases and in a few generations, when the minimum feature sizes reaches 13 nm, the composition of the devices must be controlled to a precision of a few atoms [3] for the devices to work. With the bulk approach having inherent limitations in addition to becoming increasingly demanding and expensive, the idea was born that the components could instead be built up atom for atom in a chemistry lab (bottom up) as opposed to carving them out of bulk material (top down). This idea is the reasoning behind molecular electronics with the ultimate miniaturization being components contained in single molecules.

In single molecule electronics, the bulk material is replaced by single molecules. That is, instead of creating structures by removing or applying material after a pattern scaffold, the atoms are put together in a chemistry lab. This way billions of billions of copies are made simultaneously (typically more than 10 20 molecules are made at once) while the composition of molecules are controlled down to the last atom. The molecules utilized have properties that resemble traditional electronic components such as a wire, transistor or rectifier.

Single molecule electronics is an emerging field, and entire electronic circuits consisting exclusively of molecular sized compounds are still very far from being realized. However, the continuous demand for more computing power together with the inherent limitations of the present day lithographic methods make the transition seem unavoidable. Currently, the focus is on discovering molecules with interesting properties and on finding ways to obtaining reliable and reproducible contacts between the molecular components and the bulk material of the electrodes.

Theoretical basis[edit]

Molecular electronics operates in the quantum realm of distances less than 100 nanometers. The miniaturization down to single molecules brings the scale down to a regime where quantum effects are important. As opposed to the case in conventional electronic components, where electrons can be filled in or drawn out more or less like a continuous flow of charge, the transfer of a single electron alters the system significantly. This means that when an electron has been transferred from the source electrode to the molecule, the molecule gets charged up and makes it much harder for the next one to transfer (see also Coulomb blockade). The significant amount of energy due to charging must be taken into account when making calculations about the electronic properties of the setup and is highly sensitive to distances to conducting surfaces nearby.

The theory of single molecule devices is particularly interesting since the system under consideration is an open quantum system in nonequilibrium (driven by voltage). In the low bias voltage regime, the nonequilibrium nature of the molecular junction can be ignored, and the current-voltage characteristics of the device can be calculated using the equilibrium electronic structure of the system. However, in stronger bias regimes a more sophisticated treatment is required, as there is no longer a variational principle. In the elastic tunneling case (where the passing electron does not exchange energy with the system), the formalism of Rolf Landauer can be used to calculate the transmission through the system as a function of bias voltage, and hence the current. In inelastic tunneling, an elegant formalism based on the non-equilibrium Green's functions of Leo Kadanoff and Gordon Baym, and independently by Leonid Keldysh was put forth by Ned Wingreen and Yigal Meir. This Meir-Wingreen formulation has been used to great success in the molecular electronics community to examine the more difficult and interesting cases where the transient electron exchanges energy with the molecular system (for example through electron-phonon coupling or electronic excitations).

Further, connecting single molecules reliably to a larger scale circuit has proven a great challenge, and constitutes a significant hindrance to commercialization.


Common for molecules utilized in molecular electronics is that the structures contain a lot of alternating double and single bonds (see also Conjugated system). The reason for this is that such a pattern delocalizes the molecular orbitals making it possible for electrons to move freely over the conjugated area.


This animation of a rotating carbon nanotube shows its 3D structure.

The sole purpose of molecular wires is to electrically connect different parts of a molecular electrical circuit. As the assembly of these and their connection to a macroscopic circuit is still not mastered, the focus of research in single molecule electronics is primarily on the functionalized molecules: molecular wires are characterized by containing no functional groups and are hence composed of plain repetitions of a conjugated building block. Among these are the carbon nanotubes that are quite large compared to the other suggestions but have shown very promising electrical properties.

The main problem with the molecular wires is to obtain good electrical contact with the electrodes so that the electrons can move freely in and out of the wire.


Single molecule transistors are fundamentally different than the ones known from bulk electronics. The gate in a conventional (field-effect) transistor determines the conductance between the source and drain electrode by controlling the density of charge carriers between them, whereas the gate in a single molecule transistor controls the feasibility of a single electron to jump on and off the molecule by modifying the energy of the molecular orbitals. One of the effects of this difference is that the single molecule transistor is almost binary: it is either ON or OFF. This opposes its bulk counterparts, which have quadratic responses to gate voltage.

It is the quantization of charge into electrons that is responsible for the markedly different behavior compared to bulk electronics. Because of the size of a single molecule, the charging due to a single electron is significant and provides a mean to turn the transistor ON or OFF (see Coulomb blockade). For this to work, the electronic orbitals on the transistor molecule cannot be too well integrated with the orbitals on the electrodes. If they are, an electron cannot be said to be located on the molecule or the electrodes and the molecule will function as a wire.

A popular group of molecules, that can work as the semiconducting channel material in a molecular transistor, is the oligopolyphenylenevinylenes (OPVs) that works by the Coulomb blockade mechanism when placed between the source and drain electrode in an appropriate way.[4] Fullerenes work by the same mechanism and have also been commonly utilized.

Semiconducting carbon nanotubes have also been demonstrated to work as channel material but although molecular, these molecules are sufficiently large to behave almost as bulk semiconductors.

The size of the molecules and the low temperature the measurements are being conducted at makes the quantum mechanical states well defined. It is therefore being researched if the quantum mechanical properties can be used for more advanced purposes than simple transistors (e.g. spintronics).

Physicists at the University of Arizona, in collaboration with chemists from the University of Madrid, have designed a single molecule transistor using a ring-shaped molecule similar to benzene. Physicists at Canada's National Institute for Nanotechnology have designed a single-molecule transistor using styrene. Both groups expect (their designs have yet to be experimentally verified) their respective devices to function at room temperature, and to be controlled by a single electron. [5]

Rectifiers (diodes)[edit]

Molecular rectifiers are mimics of their bulk counterparts and have an asymmetric construction so that the molecule can accept electrons in one end but not the other. The molecules have an electron donor (D) in one end and an electron acceptor (A) in the other. This way, the unstable state D+ – A- will be more readily made than D- – A+. The result is that an electric current can be drawn through the molecule if the electrons are added through the acceptor end, but not so easily if the reverse is attempted. An example of a molecular rectifier was made by Geoffrey J. Ashwell's Ph.D. students.


One of the biggest problems with measuring on single molecules is to establish reproducible electrical contact with only one molecule and doing so without shortcutting the electrodes. Because the current photolithographic technology is unable to produce electrode gaps small enough to contact both ends of the molecules tested (in the order of nanometers) alternative strategies are put into use.

Molecular gaps[edit]

One way to produce electrodes with a molecular sized gap between them is break junctions, in which a thin electrode is stretched until it breaks. Another is electromigration. Here a current is led through a thin wire until it melts and the atoms migrate to produce the gap. Further, the reach of conventional photolithography can be enhanced by chemically etching or depositing metal on the electrodes.

Probably the easiest way to conduct measurements on several molecules is to use the tip of a scanning tunneling microscope (STM) to contact molecules adhered at the other end to a metal substrate.[6]


A popular way to anchor molecules to the electrodes is to make use of sulfur's high affinity to gold. In these setups, the molecules are synthesized so that sulfur atoms are placed strategically to function as crocodile clips connecting the molecules to the gold electrodes. Though useful, the anchoring is non-specific and thus anchors the molecules randomly to all gold surfaces. Further, the contact resistance is highly dependent on the precise atomic geometry around the site of anchoring and thereby inherently compromises the reproducibility of the connection.

To circumvent the latter issue, experiments has shown that fullerenes could be a good candidate for use instead of sulfur because of the large conjugated π-system that can electrically contact many more atoms at once than a single atom of sulfur.[7]

Fullerene nanoelectronics[edit]

Rotating view of a graphite crystal (2 graphene layers)

In polymers, classical organic molecules are composed of both carbon and hydrogen (and sometimes additional compounds such as nitrogen, chlorine or sulphur). They are obtained from petrol and can often be synthesized in large amounts. Most of these molecules are insulating when their length exceeds a few nanometers. However, naturally occurring carbon is conducting. In particular, graphite (recovered from coal or encountered naturally) is conducting. From a theoretical point of view, graphite is a semi-metal, a category in between metals and semi-conductors. It has a layered structure, each sheet being one atom thick. Between each sheet, the interactions are weak enough to allow an easy manual cleavage.

Tailoring the graphite sheet to obtain well defined nanometer-sized objects remains a challenge. However, by the close of the twentieth century, chemists were exploring methods to fabricate extremely small graphitic objects that could be considered single molecules. After studying the interstellar conditions under which carbon is known to form clusters, Richard Smalley's group (Rice University, Texas) set up an experiment in which graphite was vaporized using laser irradiation. Mass spectrometry revealed that clusters containing specific "magic numbers" of atoms were stable, in particular those clusters of 60 atoms. Harry Kroto, an English chemist who assisted in the experiment, suggested a possible geometry for these clusters – atoms covalently bound with the exact symmetry of a soccer ball. Coined buckminsterfullerenes, buckyballs or C60, the clusters retained some properties of graphite, such as conductivity. These objects were rapidly envisioned as possible building blocks for molecular electronics.



When trying to measure electronic characteristics of molecules, artificial phenomena can occur that can be hard to distinguish from truly molecular behavior.[8] Before they were discovered these artifacts have mistakenly been published as being features pertaining to the molecules in question.

Applying a voltage drop in the order of volts across a nanometer sized junction results in a very strong electrical field. The field can cause metal atoms to migrate and eventually close the gap by a thin filament, which can be broken again when carrying a current. The two levels of conductance imitate molecular switching between a conductive and an isolating state of a molecule.

Another encountered artifact is when the electrodes undergo chemical reactions due to the high field strength in the gap. When the bias is reversed the reaction will cause hysteresis in the measurements that can be interpreted as being of molecular origin.

A metallic grain between the electrodes can act as a single electron transistor by the mechanism described above thus resembling the characteristics of a molecular transistor. This artifact is especially common with nanogaps produced by the electromigration technique.


One of the biggest hindrances for single molecule electronics to be commercially exploited is the lack of techniques to connect a molecular sized circuit to bulk electrodes in a way that gives reproducible results. At the current state, the difficulty of connecting single molecules vastly outweighs any possible performance increase that could be gained from such shrinkage. The picture becomes even worse if the molecules are to have a certain spatial orientation and/or have multiple poles to connect.

Also problematic is the fact that some measurements on single molecules are carried out in cryogenic temperatures (close to absolute zero), which is very energy consuming. This is done to reduce signal noise enough to measure the faint currents of single molecules.

History and recent progress[edit]

Graphical representation of a rotaxane, useful as a molecular switch.

In their 1940's discussion of so-called "donor-acceptor" complexes, Robert Mulliken and Albert Szent-Gyorgi advanced the concept of charge transfer in molecules. They subsequently further refined the study of both charge transfer and energy transfer in molecules. Likewise, a 1974 paper from Mark Ratner and Ari Aviram 1 illustrated a theoretical molecular rectifier. In 1988, Aviram described in detail a theoretical single-molecule field-effect transistor. Further concepts were proposed by Forrest Carter of the Naval Research Laboratory, including single-molecule logic gates. A wide range of ideas were presented, under his aegis, at a conference entitled Molecular Electronic Devices in 1988.[9] These were all theoretical constructs and not concrete devices. The direct measurement of the electronic characteristics of individual molecules awaited the development of methods for making molecular-scale electrical contacts. This was no easy task. Thus, the first experiment directly-measuring the conductance of a single molecule was only reported in 1995 on a single C60 molecule by C. Joachim and J. K. Gimzewsky in their seminal Physical Revie Letter paper and later in 1997 by Mark Reed and co-workers on a few hundred molecules. Since then, this branch of the field has progressed rapidly. Likewise, as it has become possible to measure such properties directly, the theoretical predictions of the early workers have been substantially confirmed.

Recent progress in nanotechnology and nanoscience has facilitated both experimental and theoretical study of molecular electronics. In particular, the development of the scanning tunneling microscope (STM) and later the atomic force microscope (AFM) have facilitated manipulation of single-molecule electronics. In addition, theoretical advances in molecular electronics have facilitated further understanding of non-adibatic charge transfer events at electrode-electrolyte interfaces.[10][11]

The concept of molecular electronics was first published in 1974 when Aviram and Ratner suggested an organic molecule that could work as a rectifier.[12] Having both huge commercial and fundamental interest much effort was put into proving its feasibility and 16 years later in 1990 the first demonstration of an intrinsic molecular rectifier was realized by Ashwell and coworkers for a thin film of molecules.

The first measurement of the conductance of a single molecule was realised in 1994 by C. Joachim and J. K. Gimzewski and published in 1995 (see the corresponding Phys. Rev. Lett. paper). This was the conclusion of 10 years of research started at IBM TJ Watson, using the scanning tunnelling microscope tip apex to switch a single molecule as already explored by A. Aviram, C. Joachim and M. Pomerantz at the end of the 80's (see their seminal Chem. Phys. Lett. paper during this period). The trick was to use an UHV Scanning Tunneling microscope to allow the tip apex to gently touch the top of a single C
molecule adsorbed on an Au(110) surface. A resistance of 55 MOhms was recorded together with a low voltage linear I-V. The contact was certified by recording the I-z current distance characteristic, which allows the measurement of the deformation of the C
cage under contact. This first experiment was followed by the reported result using a mechanical break junction approach to connect two gold electrodes to a sulfur-terminated molecular wire by Mark Reed and James Tour in 1997.[13]

A single-molecule amplifier was implemented by C. Joachim and J.K. Gimzewski in IBM Zurich. This experiment involving a single C
molecule demonstrated that a single C
molecule can provide gain in a circuit just by playing with through C
intramolecular quantum interference effects.

A collaboration of researchers at HP and UCLA, led by James Heath, Fraser Stoddart, R. Stanley Williams, and Philip Kuekes, has developed molecular electronics based on rotaxanes and catenanes.

Work is also being done on the use of single-wall carbon nanotubes as field-effect transistors. Most of this work is being done by IBM.

Some specific reports of a field-effect transistor based on molecular self-assembled monolayers were shown to be fraudulent in 2002 as part of the Schön scandal.[14]

Until recently entirely theoretical, the Aviram-Ratner model for a unimolecular rectifier has been unambiguously-confirmed in experiments by a group led by Geoffrey J. Ashwell at Bangor University, UK.[15][16][17] Many rectifying molecules have so far been identified, and the number and efficiency of these systems is expanding rapidly.

Supramolecular electronics is a new field that tackles electronics at a supramolecular level.

An important issue in molecular electronics is the determination of the resistance of a single molecule (both theoretical and experimental). For example, Bumm, et al. used STM to analyze a single molecular switch in a self-assembled monolayer to determine how conductive such a molecule can be.[18] Another problem faced by this field is the difficulty of performing direct characterization since imaging at the molecular scale is often difficult in many experimental devices.

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Petty, M.C.; Bryce, M.R. & Bloor, D. (1995). Introduction to Molecular Electronics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 1–25. ISBN 0-19-521156-1. 
  2. ^ Tour, James M.; et al. (1998). "Recent advances in molecular scale electronics". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 852: 197–204. Bibcode:1998NYASA.852..197T. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09873.x. 
  3. ^ Waser, Rainer; Lüssem, B. & Bjørnholm, T. (2008). Nanotechnology. Volume 4: Information Technology II. Chapter 8: Concepts in Single-Molecule Electronics. Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. pp. 175–212. ISBN 978-3-527-31737-0. 
  4. ^ Kubatkin, S.; et al. (2003). "Single-electron transistor of a single organic molecule with access to several redox states". Nature 425 (6959): 698–701. Bibcode:2003Natur.425..698K. doi:10.1038/nature02010. PMID 14562098. 
  5. ^ "Honey, I Shrunk the PC" by Mark Anderson 2005
  6. ^ Gimzewski, J.K.; Joachim, C. (1999). "Nanoscale science of single molecules using local probes". Science 283 (5408): 1683–1688. Bibcode:1999Sci...283.1683G. doi:10.1126/science.283.5408.1683. PMID 10073926. 
  7. ^ Sørensen, J.K.. (2006). “Synthesis of new components, functionalized with (60)fullerene, for molecular electronics”. 4th Annual meeting – CONT 2006, University of Copenhagen.
  8. ^ Service, R.F. (2003). "Molecular electronics – Next-generation technology hits an early midlife crisis". Science 302 (5645): 556–+. doi:10.1126/science.302.5645.556. PMID 14576398. 
  9. ^ F. L. Carter, R. E. Siatkowski and H. Wohltjen (eds.), Molecular Electronic Devices, 229–244, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1988.
  10. ^ C.Gupta, M. A. Shannon & P.J.A. Kenis, Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 113, 4687 (2009)
  11. ^ C. Gupta, M. A. Shannon & P. J. A. Kenis, Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 113, 9375 (2009)
  12. ^ Aviram, Arieh; Ratner, M.A. (1974). "Molecular rectifiers". Chemical Physics Letters 29 (2): 277–283. Bibcode:1974CPL....29..277A. doi:10.1016/0009-2614(74)85031-1. 
  13. ^ Reed, M.A.; et al. (1997). "Conductance of a Molecular Junction". Science 287 (5336): 252–254. doi:10.1126/science.278.5336.252. 
  14. ^ Jacoby, Mitch (27 January 2003). "Molecule-based circuitry revisited". Chemical and Engineering News. Retrieved 24 February 2011. 
  15. ^ Ashwell, Geoffrey J.; Hamilton, Richard; High, L. R. Hermann (2003). "Molecular rectification: asymmetric current?voltage curves from self-assembled monolayers of a donor?(?-bridge)?acceptor dye". Journal of Materials Chemistry 13 (7): 1501. doi:10.1039/B304465N. 
  16. ^ Ashwell, Geoffrey J.; Chwialkowska, Anna; High, L. R. Hermann (2004). "Au-S-CnH2n-Q3CNQ: self-assembled monolayers for molecular rectification". Journal of Materials Chemistry 14 (15): 2389. doi:10.1039/B403942D. 
  17. ^ Ashwell, Geoffrey J.; Chwialkowska, Anna; Hermann High, L. R. (2004). "Rectifying Au?S?CnH2n?P3CNQ derivatives". Journal of Materials Chemistry 14 (19): 2848. doi:10.1039/B411343H. 
  18. ^ Bumm, L. A.; Arnold, J. J.; Cygan, M. T.; Dunbar, T. D.; Burgin, T. P.; Jones, L.; Allara, D. L.; Tour, J. M.; Weiss, P. S. (1996). "Are Single Molecular Wires Conducting?". Science 271 (5256): 1705. Bibcode:1996Sci...271.1705B. doi:10.1126/science.271.5256.1705.