Monarch butterfly

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Monarch (butterfly))
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about the species Danaus plexippus. For monarch migration, see Monarch butterfly migration.
Monarch butterfly
Monarch In May.jpg
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Male 2664px.jpg
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Lepidoptera
Family: Nymphalidae
Tribe: Danaini
Genus: Danaus
Kluk, 1802
Species: D. plexippus
Binomial name
Danaus plexippus
(Linnaeus, 1758)
  • Papilio plexippus Linnaeus, 1758
  • Danaus archippus (Fabricius, 1793)[1]
  • Danaus menippe (Hübner, 1816)[2]
  • Anosia plexippus Dyar, 1903

The monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) is a milkweed butterfly (subfamily Danainae) in the family Nymphalidae. It may be the most familiar North American butterfly. Its wings feature an easily recognizable orange and black pattern, with a wingspan of 8.9–10.2 cm (3½–4 in)[3] The viceroy butterfly appears similar in color and pattern, but is markedly smaller and has an extra black stripe across the hind wing.

The eastern North American monarch population is notable for its annual southward late-summer/autumn migration from the United States and southern Canada to Mexico. During the fall migration, it covers thousands of miles, with a corresponding multi-generational return North. The western North American population of monarchs west of the Rocky Mountains most often migrate to sites in California but have been found in overwintering Mexico sites.[4][5] Monarchs were transported to the International Space Station and were bred there.[6]


The monarch’s wingspan ranges from 8.9 to 10.2 centimetres (3.5–4.0 in).[3] The upper side of the wings is tawny-orange, the veins and margins are black, and in the margins are two series of small white spots. The forewings also have a few orange spots near the tip. The underside is similar, but the tip of the forewing and hindwing are yellow-brown instead of tawny-orange and the white spots are larger.[7] The shape and color of the wings change at the beginning of the migration and appear redder and more elongated than later migrants.[8] Wings size and shape differ between migratory and non-migratory monarchs. Monarchs from the eastern population of North America have larger and more angular forewings than those in the western population.[6]

Its flight has been described as "slow and sailing".[9]

Adults exhibit sexual dimorphism. The male has a black patch or spot of androconial scales on either hindwing (in some butterflies, these patches disperse pheromones, but are not known to do so in monarchs), and the black veins on its wing are lighter and narrower than those on the female’s.[10] The male is also slightly larger.[6][7] One variation has been observed in Australia, New Zealand, Indonesia and the United States termed nivosus by lepidopterists. It is grayish-white in all areas of the wings that are normally orange and is only about 1% or less of all monarchs, but populations as high as 10% exist on Oahu in Hawaii.[11]

Like all insects, the monarch has six legs, but uses the four hindlegs as it carries its two front legs against its body.[12]


The range of the western and eastern populations of the monarch butterfly expands and contracts dependent upon the season. The range differs between breeding areas, migration routes and winter roosts.[6]:(p18)

In North America, the monarch ranges from southern Canada to northern South America. It has also been found in Bermuda, Cook Islands,[13] Hawaii, Cuba[14] and other Caribbean islands[6]:(p18) the Solomons, New Caledonia, New Zealand,[15] Papua New Guinea,[16] Australia, New Guinea, Sri Lanka, India, Nepal, the Azores, the Canary Islands Philippines, North Africa[17] and Honolulu.[18][19] It appears in the UK in some years as an acccidental.[20] No genetic differences between monarch populations exist.[21] Reproductive isolation has had no effect in creating sub species.[6]:(p19)


The monarch butterfly is not currently listed under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) or protected specifically under U.S. domestic laws.[22] On 14 August 2014, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Center for Food Safety filed a legal petition requesting Endangered Species Act protection for the monarch and its habitat.[6]


Overwintering populations of D. plexippus are found in Mexico, California, along the Gulf coast, year-round in Florida, and in Arizona where the habitat provides the specific conditions necessary for their survival.[23][24] The overwintering habitat typically provides access to streams, plenty of sunlight (for body temperatures that allow flight), appropriate vegetation on which to roost, and is relatively free of predators. Overwintering, roosting butterflies have been seen on sumacs, locusts, basswood elm, oak, osage orange, mulberry, pecan, willow, cottonwood, and mesquite.[25] While breeding, its habitat can be found in agricultural fields, pasture land, prairie remnants, urban and suburban residential areas, gardens, trees, and roadsides – anywhere where there is access to larval host plants.[26] Habitat restoration is a primary goal in monarch conservation efforts. Habitat requirements change during migration. During the fall migration, butterflies must have access to nectar-producing plants. During the spring migration, butterflies must have access to larval food plants and nectar plants.

Life cycle[edit]

The monarch undergoes the four stages of complete metamorphosis:


The eggs are derived from materials ingested as a larvae and from the spermataphores received from males during mating.[27] Eggs are laid singly on the underside of a young leaf of a milkweed plant during the spring and summer months.[28] The eggs are cream-colored or light green, ovate to conical in shape, and about 1.2 x 0.9 mm in size. The eggs weigh less than 0.5 mg each and have raised ridges that form longitudinally from the point to apex to the base. Though each egg is 1/1000th the mass of the female, she may lay up to her own mass in eggs. Females lay smaller eggs as they age. Larger Females lay larger eggs.[27] The number of eggs laid by a female, who may mate several times, is from 290-1179 eggs. [29] Females lay their eggs on milkweed that make their offspring less sick.[30][31] Eggs take 3 to 8 days to develop and hatch into larva or caterpillars.[6]:(p21)Monarchs will lay eggs along the southern migration route.[32]


The caterpillar goes through five major, distinct stages of growth and after each one, it molts. Each caterpillar, or instar, that molts is larger than the previous as it eats and store energy in the form of fat and nutrients to carry it through the nonfeeding pupal stage.

5th instar with the white spots visible on the prolegs.

The first instar caterpillar that emerges out of the egg is pale green and translucent. It lacks banding coloration or tentacles. The larvae or caterpillar eats its egg case and begins to feed on milkweed. It is during this stage of growth that the caterpillar begins to sequester cardenolides. The circular motion a caterpillar uses while eating milkweed prevents the flow of latex that could entrap it.

The second instar larva develops a characteristic pattern of white, yellow and black transverse bands. It is no longer translucent but is covered in short setae. Pairs of black tentacles begin to grow. One pair grows on the thorax and another pair on the abdomen.

The third instar larva has more distinct bands and the two pairs of tentacles become longer. Legs on the thorax differentiate into a smaller pair near the head and larger pairs further back. These third stage caterpillars began to eat along the leaf edges.

The fourth instar has a different banding pattern. It develops white spots on the prolegs near the back of the caterpillar.

The fifth instar larva has a more complex banding pattern and white dots on the prolegs, with front legs that are small and very close to the head.

At this stage of development, it is relatively large compared to the earlier instars. The caterpillar completes its growth. At this point, it is 25 to 45 mm long and 5 to 8 mm wide. This can be compared to the first instar which was 2 to 6 mm long and 0.5 to 1.5 mm wide. Fifth instar larvae increase 2000 times from first instars. Fifth-stage instar larva chew through the petiole or mid-rev of milkweed leaves and stop the flow of latex. After this, they eat more leaf tissue. Before pupation, larva must consume milkweed to increase their mass prior to pupation. Larva stop feeding and search for a pupation site. The caterpillar attaches itself securely to a horizontal surface, using a silk pad. At this point, it latches on with its hind legs and hangs down. It then molts into an opaque, blue-green chrysalis with small gold dots. At normal summer temperatures, it matures in a few weeks. The cuticle of the chrysalis becomes transparent and the monarch's characteristic orange and black wings become visible. At the end of metamorphosis, the adult emerges from the chrysalis, expands and dries its wings and flies away. Monarch metamorphosis from egg to adult occurs during the warm summer temperatures in as little as 25 days, extending to as many as seven weeks during cool spring conditions. During the development, both larva and their milkweed hosts are vulnerable to weather extremes, predators, parasites and diseases; commonly fewer than 10% of monarch eggs and caterpillars survive.[6]:(pp21-22)


In the pupa or chrysalis stage, the caterpillar spins a silk pad on to a horizontal substrate. It then hangs from the pad by the last pair of prolegs upside down, resembling the letter 'J'. It sheds its skin, leaving itself encased in an articulated green exoskeleton. During this pupal stage, the adult butterfly forms inside. The exoskeleton becomes transparent before it ecloses (emerges), and its adult colors can finally be seen.


The adult butterfly emerges after about two weeks, and hangs until its wings are dry. Fluids are pumped into wings and they expand and stiffen. The monarch expands and retracts its wings, and once conditions allow it then flies to feed on a variety of nectar plants. During the breeding season adults reach sexual maturity in four or five days, however, the migrating generation will not reach maturity until overwintering is complete.[33] Monarchs typically live two to five weeks during the breeding season.[6]:(pp22-23) Larvae growing in high densities are smaller, have lower survival, and weigh less as adults compared to lower densities.[34]


Monarch butterfly mating

Males that are fit are more likely to mate. Females and males typically mate more than once. Females that mate several times lay more eggs.[35] Mating for the overwintering populations occurs in the spring, prior to dispersion. Mating is less dependent on pheromones than other species in its genus.[36]

Courtship occurs in two phases. During the aerial phase, the male pursues and often forces the female to the ground. During the ground phase, the butterflies copulate and remain attached for about 30 to 60 minutes.[37] Only 30% of mating attempts end in copulation, suggesting that females may be able to avoid mating, though some have more success than others.[38][39] During copulation, the male transfers the spermatophore to the female. Along with sperm, the spermatophore provides the female with nutrition to aid her in egg-laying. An increase in spermatophore size increases the fecundity of female monarchs. Males that produce larger spermatophores also fertilize more females' eggs.[40]

Pictorial lifecycle[edit]


White morph of the monarch in Hawaii called White Monarch

The name "monarch" may be in honor of King William III of England.[41] The monarch was originally described by Linnaeus in his Systema Naturae of 1758 and placed in the genus Papilio.[42] In 1780, Jan Krzysztof Kluk used the monarch as the type species for a new genus Danaus.

There are three species of Monarch butterflies:

  • D. plexippus, described by Linnaeus in 1758, is the species known most commonly as the monarch butterfly of North America. Its range actually extends worldwide and can be found in Hawaii, Australia, New Zealand, Spain and on Oceanic Islands.
  • D. erippus, the southern monarch, was described by Cramer in 1775. This species is found in tropical and subtropical latitudes of South America, mainly in Brazil, Uruguay, Paraguay, Argentina, Bolivia, Chile and southern Peru. The south American monarch and the North American monarch may have been one species at one time. Some researchers believe the southern monarch separated from the monarch's population some 2 mya, at the end of the Pliocene. Sea levels were higher, and the entire Amazonas lowland was a vast expanse of brackish swamp that offered limited butterfly habitat.[43]

Six subspecies and two color morphs of D. plexippus have been identified:[45]

  • D. p. plexippus – nominate subspecies, described by Linnaeus in 1758, is the migratory subspecies known from most of North America.
    • D. p. p. form nivosus, the white monarch commonly found on Oahu, Hawaii and rarely in other locations.[11]
    • D. p. p. (as yet unnamed) – a color morph lacking some wing vein markings.[46]

The percentage of the white morph in Oahu is nearing 10%. On other Hawaiian islands, the white morph occurs at a relatively low frequency. White Monarchs (nivosus) have been found throughout the world, including Australia, New Zealand, Indonesia, and the United States.[11]

Some taxonomists disagree on these classifications.[43][47]

Monarchs were classified under the family Danaidae, but have been re-classified under Nymphalidae since at least 1958.[48]

Larvae host plants[edit]

The host plants used by the monarch caterpillar include:

Swamp milkweed, one of many species of Asclepias milkweeds used by the monarch

North America[edit]

Asclepias curassavica has been planted as an ornamental and naturalized. Its distribution is probably worldwide. Year-round plantings may be the cause of new overwintering sites along the Gulf coast and in Spain.

Adult food sources[edit]

Nectaring on purple coneflower Echinacea purpurea.

Although larvae eat only milkweed, adult monarchs feed on the nectar of many plants including:

Monarchs obtain moisture and minerals from damp soil and wet gravel, a behavior known as mud-puddling. The monarch has also been noticed puddling at an oil stain on pavement.[24]

Origin of name[edit]

Danaus (Greek Δαναός), a great-grandson of Zeus, was a mythical king in Egypt or Libya, who founded Argos; Plexippus was one of the 50 sons of Aegyptus, the twin brother of Danaus.

In Homeric Greek plexippos (πληξιππος) means "one who urges on horses", i.e. "rider or charioteer". In the 10th edition of Systema Naturae, at the bottom of page 467,[52] Linnaeus wrote that the names of the Danai festivi, the division of the genus to which Papilio plexippus belonged, were derived from the sons of Aegyptus. Linnaeus divided his large genus Papilio, containing all known butterfly species, into what we would now call subgenera. The Danai festivi formed one of the 'subgenera', containing colourful species, as opposed to the Danai candidi, containing species with bright white wings. Linnaeus wrote: "Danaorum Candidorum nomina a filiabus Danai Aegypti, Festivorum a filiis mutuatus sunt." (= The names of the Danai candidi have been derived from the daughters of Danaus, those of the Danai festivi from the sons of Aegyptus).

Robert Michael Pyle suggested Danaus is a masculinised version of Danaë (Greek Δανάη), Danaus’s great-great-granddaughter, to whom Zeus came as a shower of gold, which seemed to him a more appropriate source for the name of this butterfly.[53] He masculinized the genus name because it had to agree in gender with the species name. If the species-group name is not a noun in apposition, Pyle could have been right and the genus name and specific epithet have to agree in gender, but in that case it is the specific epithet and not the genus name, that is to be altered. In the case of Danaus plexippus, however, the specific epithet is a noun in apposition, formed from a personal name in the nominative case, which should not be altered (see ICZN art. 31.1 and art. 32.3). If, instead of Danaus, Danaë had been intended, the name would simply have been Danae plexippus. Moreover, in Systema Naturae, there is a very strong connection of the names with Danaus, and not a single one with Danaë.


The eastern population migrates both north and south on an annual basis. The population east of the Rocky Mountains migrates to the sanctuaries of the Mariposa Monarca Biosphere Reserve in Mexico. The western population overwinters in various coastal sites in central and southern California. The overwintered population of those east of the Rockies may reach as far north as Texas and Oklahoma during the spring migration. The second, third and fourth generations return to their northern locations in the United States and Canada in the spring.[54] Commercially bred monarchs migrate to overwintering sites in Mexico adding to already existing data of migratory behavior. Not all monarchs in the eastern population migrate to Mexico.[55]

Defense against predators[edit]

In both caterpillar and butterfly form, monarchs are aposematic—warding off predators with a bright display of contrasting colors to warn potential predators of their undesirable taste and poisonous characteristics.

Large larvae are able to avoid wasp predation by dropping from the plant or by jerking their bodies.[56]


Chemical structure of oleandrin, one of the cardiac glycosides

Monarchs are foul-tasting and poisonous due to the presence of cardenolide aglycones in their bodies, which the caterpillars ingest as they feed on milkweed.[36] By ingesting a large amount of plants in the genus Asclepias, primarily milkweed, monarch caterpillars are able to sequester cardiac glycosides, or more specifically cardenolides, which are steroids that act in heart-arresting ways similar to digitalis.[57] It has been found that monarchs are able to sequester cardenolides most effectively from plants of intermediate cardenolide content rather than those of high or low content.[58]

Additional studies have shown that different species of milkweed have differing effects on growth, virulence, and transmission of parasites.[59] One species, Asclepias curassavica, appears to reduce the proportion of monarchs infected by parasites. There are two possible explanations for the positive role of A. curassavica on the monarch caterpillar: that it promotes overall monarch health to boost the monarch's immune system; or that chemicals from the plant have a direct negative effect on the parasites.[59]

After the caterpillar becomes a butterfly, the toxin shift to different parts of the body. Since many birds attack the wings of the butterfly, having three times the cardiac glycosides in the wings leaves predators with a very foul taste and may prevent them from ever ingesting the body of the butterfly.[57] In order to combat predators that remove the wings only to ingest the abdomen, monarchs keep the most potent cardiac glycosides in their abdomens.[60]


Monarch (left) and viceroy (right) butterflies exhibiting Müllerian mimicry

Monarchs share the defense of noxious taste with the similar-appearing viceroy butterfly in what is perhaps one of the most well-known examples of mimicry. Though long purported to be an example of Batesian mimicry, the viceroy is actually reportedly more unpalatable than the monarch, making this a case of Müllerian mimicry.[61]

Human interaction[edit]

The monarch is the state insect of Alabama,[62] Idaho,[63] Illinois,[64] Minnesota,[65] Texas,[66] Vermont,[67] and West Virginia.[68] It was nominated in 1990 as the national insect of the United States,[69] but the legislation did not pass.[70]

Monarchs can be attracted by cultivating a butterfly garden with specific milkweed species and nectar plants. Efforts are underway to establish these Monarch Waystations. Monarchs are raised as a hobby and for educational purposes.[71]

An IMAX film Flight of the Butterflies describes the story of the Urquharts, Brugger and Trail to then unknown migration to Mexican overwintering areas.[72]

Sanctuaries and reserves have been created at over-wintering locations in Mexico and California to limit habitat destruction. These sites can generate significant tourism revenue.[73]

Organizations and individuals participate in tagging programs. Tagging information is used to study migration patterns.[74]

Monarchs are bred and used in schools, hospices, memorial services and weddings.[75] Memorial services for 911 include the release of captive bred monarchs.[76][77][78] Monarchs are used in schools and nature centers for educational purposes.[79]


There is increasing concern related to the ongoing decline of monarchs; based on a 2014 twenty-year comparison, the population west of the Rocky Mountains has dropped more than 50 percent since 1997 and the numbers east of the Rockies have declined by more than 90 percent since 1995.[6]


Larva feed exclusively on milkweed and consume protective cardiac glycosides. Toxin levels in Asclepias sp.vary. Not all monarchs are unpalatable, but exhibit Batesian or automimics. Cardiac glycosides levels are higher in the abdomen and wings. Some predators can differentiate between these parts and consume the most palatable ones.[80] Bird predators include brown thrashers, grackles, robins, cardinals, sparrows, scrub jays, pinyon jays,[80]Black-headed Grosbeak, and orioles.[18]

Some mice are able to withstand large doses of the toxin. Overwintering adults become less toxic over time making them more vulnerable to predators. In Mexico, about 14% of the overwintering monarchs are eaten by birds and mice.[23]

In North America, eggs and first instar larvae of the monarch are eaten by larvae and adults of the introduced Asian lady beetle (Harmonia axyridis).[81] The Chinese mantis ("Tenodera sinensis") will consume the larvae once the gut is removed thus avoiding cardenolides.[82] Wasps commonly consume larvae.[83]

Several birds have also adapted various methods that allow them to ingest monarchs without experiencing the ill effects associated with the cardiac glycosides. The oriole is able to eat the monarch through an exaptation of its feeding behavior that gives it the ability to identify cardenolides by taste and reject them.[84] The grosbeak, on the other hand, has adapted the ability an insensitivity to secondary plant poisons which allows it to ingest monarchs without vomiting. As a result, orioles and grosbeaks will periodically have high levels of cardenolides in their bodies, and they will be forced to go on periods of reduced monarch consumption. This cycle of predation effectively reduces the potential predation of monarchs by 50 percent and indicates that monarch aposematism has a legitimate purpose.[84]

On Oahu, a white morph of the monarch has emerged. This is because of the introduction, in 1965 and 1966, of two bulbul species, Pycnonotus cafer and Pycnonotus jocosus. They are now the most common insectivore birds, and probably the only ones preying on insects as large as the monarch. Monarchs in Hawaii are known to have low cardiac glycoside levels, but the birds may also be tolerant of the chemical. The two species hunt the larvae and some pupae from the branches and undersides of leaves in milkweed bushes. The bulbuls also eat resting and ovipositing adults, but rarely flying ones. Because of its colour, the white morph has a higher survival rate than the orange one. This is either because of apostatic selection (i.e. the birds have learned the orange monarchs can be eaten), because of camouflage (the white morph matches the white pubescence of milkweed or the patches of light shining through foliage), or because the white morph does not fit the bird's search image of a typical monarch, so is thus avoided.[85]


Parasites include the tachinid flies Sturmia convergens[86] and Lespesia archippivora. Lesperia-parasitized butterfly larvae complete the formation of their crysalid but die before they emerge as an adult. Before pupation is complete, one white maggot comes out of the chrysalid. The maggot forms a brown pupa on the ground then emerges as an adult.[87]

The bacterium Micrococcus flacidifex danai also infects larvae. Just before pupation, the larvae migrate to a horizontal surface and die a few hours later, attached only by one pair of prolegs, with the thorax and abdomen hanging limp. The body turns black shortly after. The bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa has no invasive powers, but causes secondary infections in weakened insects. It is a common cause of death in laboratory-reared insects.[87]

The protozoan Ophryocystis elektroscirrha is another parasite of the monarch. It infects the subcutaneous tissues and propagates by spores formed during the pupal stage. The spores are found over all of the body of infected butterflies, with the greatest number on the abdomen. These spores are passed, from female to caterpillar, when spores rub off during egg-laying and are then ingested by caterpillars. Severely infected individuals are weak, unable to expand their wings, or unable to eclose, and have shortened lifespans, but parasite levels variy in populations. This is not the case in laboratory rearing, where after a few generations, all individuals can be infected.[88] Infection with this parasite creates an effect known as culling whereby migrating monarchs that are infected are less likely to complete the migration. This results in overwintering populations with lower parasite loads.[89] The control of the parasite can be controlled in commercial breeding operations.[90]

Confusion of host plants[edit]

The black swallow-wort (Cynanchum louiseae) and pale swallow-wort (Cynanchum rossicum) plants are problematic for monarchs in North America. Monarchs lay their eggs on these relatives of native vining milkweed (Cynanchum laeve) because they produce stimuli similar to milkweed. Once the eggs hatch, the caterpillars are poisoned by the toxicity of this invasive plant from Europe.[91]

Habitat loss due to herbicide use[edit]

Conservationists attribute the disappearance of mikweed speices to agricultural practices in the Midwest, where genetically modified seeds are bred to resist herbicides that eliminate milkweed nearby. Growers eliminate milkweed that previously grew between the rows of food crops. Corn and soybeans are resistant to the effect of the herbicide glyphosate. The increased use of these crop strains is correlated with the decline in Monarch populations between 1999 and 2010.[92][93] Chip Taylor, director of Monarch Watch at the University of Kansas, said the Midwest milkweed habitat "is virtually gone" with 120–150 million acres lost.[94][95] To help fight this problem, Monarch Watch encourages the planting of “Monarch Waystations”.[71]

Loss of overwintering habitat[edit]

The area of forest occupied has been declining and reached its lowest level in two decades in 2013. The decline is continuing but is expected to increase during the 2013–2014 season. Mexican environmental authorities continue to monitor illegal logging of the oyamel trees. The Oyamel is a major species of evergreen on which the overwintering butterflies spend a significant time during their winter diapause, or suspended development.[96]

A 2014 study acknowledged that while “the protection of overwintering habitat has no doubt gone a long way towards conserving monarchs that breed throughout eastern North America", their research indicates that habitat loss on breeding grounds in the United States is the main cause of both recent and projected population declines.[97]


Climate variations during the fall and summer affect butterfly reproduction. Rainfall, and freezing temperatures affect milkweed growth. Omar Vidal, director general of WWF-Mexico, said "The monarch’s lifecycle depends on the climatic conditions in the places where they breed. Eggs, larvae and pupae develop more quickly in milder conditions. Temperatures above 95°F can be lethal for larvae, and eggs dry out in hot, arid conditions, causing a drastic decrease in hatch rate." [98]


The monarch was the first butterfly to have its genome sequenced.[6]:(p12) The 273-million base pair draft sequence includes a set of 16,866 protein-coding genes. The genome provides researchers insights into migratory behavior, the circadian clock, juvenile hormone pathways and microRNAs that are differentially expressed between summer and migratory monarchs.[99][100][101] More recently, the genetic basis of monarch migration and warning coloration has been described.[102]

There is no genetic differentiation between the migratory populations of eastern and western North America.[6]:(p16) Recent research has identified the specific areas in the genome of the monarch that regulate migration. There appears to be no genetic difference between a migrating and nonmigrating monarch but the gene is expressed in migrating monarchs but not expressed in nonmigrating monarchs.[21]


The Center for Biological Diversity, The Center for Food Safety, The Xerces Society and Lincoln Brower have filed a petition to the United States Department of the Interior to protect the monarch by having it declared an endangered species.[6]

Conservationists are lobbying transportation departments and utilities to reduce their use of herbicides and specifically encourage milkweed to grow along roadways and power lines. Reducing roadside mowing and application of herbicides during the butterfly breeding season will encourage milkweed growth. Conservationists lobby agriculture companies to set aside areas that remain unsprayed to allow the butterflies to breed.[93] Butterfly gardening is thought to increase the populations of butterflies.[103]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Committee On Generic Nomenclature, Royal Entomological Society of London (2007) [1934]. The Generic Names of British Insects. Royal Entomological Society of London Committee on Generic Nomenclature, Committee on Generic Nomenclature. British Museum (Natural History). Dept. of Entomology. p. 20. 
  2. ^ Scudder, Samuel H.; William M. Davis; Charles W. Woodworth; Leland O. Howard; Charles V. Riley; Samuel W. Williston (1989). The butterflies of the eastern United States and Canada with special reference to New England. The author. p. 721. ISBN 0-665-26322-8. 
  3. ^ a b Garber, Steven D. (1998). The Urban Naturalist. Courier Dover Publications. pp. 76–79. ISBN 0-486-40399-8. 
  4. ^ Groth, Jacob (10 November 2000). "Monarch Migration Study". Swallowtail Farms. Retrieved 21 July 2014. 
  5. ^ "Monarch Migration". Monarch Joint Venture. 2013. 
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n "Petition to protect the Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus plexippus) under the endangered species act". Xerces Society. Retrieved 1 September 2014. 
  7. ^ a b Braby, Michael F. (2000). Butterflies of Australia: Their Identification, Biology and Distribution. CSIRO Publishing. pp. 597–599. ISBN 0-643-06591-1. 
  8. ^ Satterfield, Dara A.; Davis, Andrew K. (April 2014). "Variation in wing characteristics of monarch butterflies during migration: Earlier migrants have redder and more elongated wings". Animal Migration 2 (1). doi:10.2478/ami-2014-001 (inactive 2015-01-06). 
  9. ^ Klots, Alexander B. (1951). A Field Guide to the Butterflies of North America, East of the Great Plains (Tenth ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. pp. 78, 79. ISBN 0395078652. 
  10. ^ "Monarch, Danaus plexippus". Retrieved 27 August 2008. 
  11. ^ a b c Gibbs, Lawrence; Taylor, O.R. (1998). "The White Monarch". Department of Entomology University of Kansas. Retrieved 17 July 2014. 
  12. ^ Darby, Gene (1958). What is a Butterfly. Chicago: Benefic Press. p. 10. 
  13. ^ Gerald McCormack (7 December 2005). "Cook Islands' Largest Butterfly – the Monarch". Cook Islands Biodiversity. 
  14. ^ Davis, Donald (27 November 2014). "DPLEX-L:59250 THE possibility of a trans-Gulf migration, oil rigs, Dr. Gary Ross, and more". Dplex (Mailing list) (Monarch Watch, University of Kansas). 
  15. ^ "Monarch Sightings Map". Monarch Butterfly New Zealand Trust. Retrieved 15 December 2014. 
  16. ^ "The lonely flight of the monarch butterfly"., Lynchburg, Virginia Area. Retrieved 7 October 2014. 
  17. ^ Pais, Miguel. "Northwestern African sightings of D.plexippus, Maroc>Pappilons>Danaus plexippus". Google Maps. Retrieved 19 September 2014. 
  18. ^ a b c Scott, James A. (1986). The Butterflies of North America. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. ISBN 0-8047-2013-4
  19. ^ Brower, Lincoln P.; Malcolm, Stephen B. (1991). "Animal Migrations: Endangered Phenomena". Amer. Zool. 31 (1): 265–276. doi:10.1093/icb/31.1.265. 
  20. ^ Coombes, Simon. "1995 Monarch Invasion of the UK". Retrieved 19 September 2014. 
  21. ^ a b Zhan, Shuai; Merlin, Christine; Boore, Jeffrey L.; Reppert, Steven M. (23 November 2012). "The monarch butterfly genome yields insights into long-distance migration". Cell 147 (5): 1–25. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.052. PMC 3225893. PMID 22118469. 
  22. ^ "Monarch Butterfly". Retrieved 26 March 2014. 
  23. ^ a b Rick Cech and Guy Tudor (2005). Butterflies of the East Coast. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. ISBN 0-691-09055-6
  24. ^ a b c David C. Iftner, John A. Shuey, and John C. Calhoun (1992). Butterflies and Skippers of Ohio. College of Biological Sciences and The Ohio State University. ISBN 0-86727-107-8
  25. ^ Pyle, Robert Michael (2014). Chasing monarchs: Migrating with the butterflies of passage. Yale University Press,. p. 2. ISBN 0395828201. 
  26. ^ Halpern, Sue (2002). Four Wings and a Prayer. Kindle edition location 1594. New York, New York: Random House. ISBN 978-0-307-78720-0. 
  27. ^ a b Oberhauser 2009, p. 3.
  28. ^ "Monarch Butterfly Life Cycle and Migration". National Geographic Education. 24 October 2008. Retrieved 15 August 2013. 
  29. ^ Oberhauser 2009, p. 23.
  30. ^ Lefevre, T.; Chiang, A.; Li, H; Li, J; de Castillejo, C.L.; Oliver, L.; Potini, Y.; Hunter, M.D.; de Roode, J.C. (January 2012). "Behavioral resistance against a protozoan parasite in the monarch butterfly". Journal of Animal Ecology (81): 70–9. doi:10.111/j.1365-2656.2011.01901.x (inactive 2015-01-06). 
  31. ^ "The other butterfly effect – A youth reporter talks to Jaap de Roode". TED Blog. Retrieved 12 December 2014. 
  32. ^ Oberhauser 2009, p. 51.
  33. ^ "Reproduction". Monarch Lab. Regents of the University of Minnesota. Retrieved 13 December 2014. 
  34. ^ Flockhart, D. T. Tyler; Martin, Tara G.; Norris, D. Ryan (2012). "Experimental Examination of Intraspecific Density-Dependent Competition during the Breeding in Monarch Butterflies (Danaus plexippus)". PLOS One 7 (9): e45080. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...745080F. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045080. PMID 22984614. 
  35. ^ Oberhauser, K.S. (1989). "Effects of spermatophores on male and female monarch butterfly reproductive success". Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 25 (4): 237–246. doi:10.1007/bf00300049. 
  36. ^ a b "ADW: Danaus plexippus: Information". Retrieved 27 August 2008. 
  37. ^ Emmel, Thomas C. (1997). Florida's Fabulous Butterflies. p. 44, World Publications, ISBN 0-911977-15-5
  38. ^ Solensky, M.J. and K.S. Oberhauser (2004). "Behavioral and genetic components of male mating success in monarch butterflies", pp. 61–68 in: Oberhauser, K.S. and M.J. Solensky (eds.) The Monarch Butterfly: Biology and Conservation. Cornell University Press. Ithaca NY.
  39. ^ Frey, D.; Leong, K.L.H.; Peffer, E.; Smidt, R.K.; Oberhauser, K.S. (1998). "Mating patterns of overwintering monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus (L.)) in California". J. Lepid. Soc. 52: 84–97. 
  40. ^ Solensky, M.J.; K.S. Oberhauser (2009). "Sperm Precedence in Monarch Butterflies (Danaus plexippus)". Behavioral Ecology 20 (2): 328–34. doi:10.1093/beheco/arp003. 
  41. ^ Adams, Jean Ruth (1992). Insect Potpourri: Adventures in Entomology. CRC Press. pp. 28–29. ISBN 1-877743-09-7. 
  42. ^ Linnaeus, Carl (1758). Systema Naturae (in Latin) 1. Stockholm: Laurentius Salvius. p. 471. OCLC 174638949. Retrieved 5 June 2012. 
  43. ^ a b Smith, David A.; Gugs Lushai and John A. Allen (2005). "A classification of Danaus butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) based upon data from morphology and DNA". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 144 (2): 191–212. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2005.00169.x. 
  44. ^ "IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, Version 2014.1.". IUCN. Retrieved 13 July 2014. 
  45. ^ Danaus plexippus,
  46. ^ Groth, Jacob (10 November 2000). "Monarch Migration Study". Swallowtail Farms. Retrieved 22 July 2014. 
  47. ^ a b Hay-Roe, Miriam M. et al. (2007). "Pre- and postzygotic isolation and Haldane rule effects in reciprocal crosses of Danaus erippus and Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Danainae), supported by differentiation of cuticular hydrocarbons, establish their status as separate species". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 91 (3): 445–453. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00809.x. 
  48. ^ Ackery, P. R.; Vaine-Wright, R. I. (1984). Milkweed butterflies, their cladistics and biology: being an account of the natural history of the Danainae, subfamily of the Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae. British Museum (Natural History), London. p. 17. ISBN 0-565-00893-5. 
  49. ^ "Plant Milkweed for Monarchs". MONARCH JOINT VENTURE Partnering across the U.S. to conserve the monarch migration. MONARCH JOINT VENTURE. Retrieved 25 August 2014. 
  50. ^ Wagner, David L. (2005). Caterpillars of Eastern North America. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. ISBN 0-691-12144-3
  51. ^ Butterfly Gardening.
  52. ^ Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema Naturae ed. X: 467 (in BHL)
  53. ^ Pyle, Robert Michael (2001). Chasing Monarchs: Migrating with the Butterflies of Passage. Houghton Mifflin Books. pp. 148–149. ISBN 0-618-12743-7. 
  54. ^ "North American Monarch Conservation Plan". Commission for Environmental Cooperation. Retrieved 17 October 2014. 
  55. ^ Taylor, O.R. (28 June 1998), Monarch Watch 1999 Season Recoveries, pp. 1–11 
  56. ^ Oberhauser, Karen S.; Michelle J. Solensky (2004). The Monarch Butterfly: Biology and Conservation. Cornell University Press. p. 44. ISBN 0-8014-4188-9. 
  57. ^ a b Parsons, J.A. (1965). "A Digitallis-like Toxin in the Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus L". J. Physiol 178 (178): 290–304. PMC 1357291. PMID 14298120. 
  58. ^ Malcolm, S.B.; L.P. Brower (1989). "Evolutionary and ecological implications of cardenolide sequestration in the monarch butterfly". Experientia 45 (3): 284–295. doi:10.1007/BF01951814. 
  59. ^ a b de Rood, J.C.; De Castillejo, C. L.; Faits, T; Alizon, S (2011). "Virulence evolution in response to anti-infection resistance: toxic food plants can select for virulent parasites of monarch butterflies". Journal of Evolutionary Biology 4 (4): 712–722. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02213.x. PMID 21261772. 
  60. ^ Glazier, Lincoln; Susan Glazier (1975). "Localization of Heart Poisons in the Monarch Butterfly". Science 188 (4183): 19–25. Bibcode:1975Sci...188...19B. doi:10.1126/science.188.4183.19. PMID 17760150. 
  61. ^ Ritland, D.; L. P. Brower (1991). "The viceroy butterfly is not a Batesian mimic". Nature 350 (6318): 497–498. Bibcode:1991Natur.350..497R. doi:10.1038/350497a0. Viceroys are as unpalatable as monarchs, and significantly more unpalatable than queens from representative Florida populations. 
  62. ^ "Official Alabama Insect". Alabama Emblems, Symbols and Honors. Alabama Department of Archives & History. 12 July 2001. Retrieved 19 March 2007. 
  63. ^ "Idaho Symbols, Insect: Monarch Butterfly". Idaho State Symbols, Emblems, and Mascots. SHG resources, state handbook & guide. Retrieved 26 March 2008. 
  64. ^ "State Symbol: Illinois Official Insect — Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus)". [Illinois] State Symbols. Illinois State Museum. Retrieved 26 March 2008. 
  65. ^ "Minnesota State Symbols" (PDF). Minnesota House of Representatives. Retrieved 26 March 2008. 
  66. ^ "Texas State Symbols". The Texas State Library and Archives. Retrieved 26 March 2008. 
  67. ^ "(Vermont) State Butterfly". Vermont Department of Libraries. Archived from the original on 18 May 2008. Retrieved 26 March 2008. 
  68. ^ "West Virginia Statistical Information, General State Information" (PDF). Official West Virginia Web Portal. Archived from the original on 11 April 2008. Retrieved 26 March 2008. 
  69. ^ Wade, Nicholas (1 June 1990). "Choosing a National Bug". The New York Times. Retrieved 26 March 2008. 
  70. ^ "Frequently Asked Questions on Entomology". Entomological Society of America. Retrieved 26 March 2008. 
  71. ^ a b "Monarch Watch". University of Kansas, Entomology Department. Retrieved 20 February 2014. 
  72. ^ "Flight of the Butterflies". Reuben H. Fleet Science Center. Retrieved 18 February 2013. 
  73. ^ "Saving Butterflies: Insect Ecologist Spearheads Creation of Oases for Endangered Butterflies". ScienceDaily. 1 January 2005. Retrieved 27 May 2008. 
  74. ^ "Monarch Monitoring Project". Cap May Bird Observatory. 2008. Retrieved 5 December 2008. 
  75. ^ "Live butterfly release for funerals and butterfly weddings". Frangrant Acres Butterfly Farm. Retrieved 14 November 2014. 
  76. ^ "In Memory of 9/11 "Wings of Hope"". 4 September 2014. Retrieved 14 November 2014. 
  77. ^ Johnson, Pam (24 August 2010). "Join Branford Rotary’s 9/11 Town Green Event/Butterfly Release". Shure Publishing. The Day. Retrieved 14 November 2014. 
  78. ^ "Ormond Beach Flying US Flags On Granada Bridge T0 Mark 9\17". WNDB Local News First. 2013. Retrieved 14 November 2014. 
  79. ^ "Monarch Butterfly release at Children's Museum of Fond du Lac". FDL Reporter. Retrieved 14 November 2014. 
  80. ^ a b Barbosa, Pedro; Deborah Kay Letourneau (1988). "5". Novel Aspects of Insect-plant Interactions. Wiley-Interscience. pp. 29–31. ISBN 0-471-83276-6. 
  81. ^ Koch, R. L.; W. D. Hutchison; R. C. Venette; G. E. Heimpel (October 2003). "Susceptibility of immature monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Danainae), to predation by Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)". Biological Control 28 (2): 265–270. doi:10.1016/S1049-9644(03)00102-6. 
  82. ^ Rafter, Jamie; Anurag Agruwal; Evan Preisser (2013). "Chinese mantids gut caterpillars: avoidance of prey defense?". Ecological Entomology 38 (38): 78–82. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.2012.01408.x. 
  83. ^ Zalucki, Myron P.; Malcolm, Stephen B.; Paine, Timothy D.; Hanlon, Christopher C.; Brower, Lincoln P.; Clarke, Anthony R. (2001). "It's the first bites that count: Survival of first-instar monarchs on milkweeds". Austral Ecology 26 (5): 547–555. doi:10.1046/j.1442-9993.2001.01132.x. 
  84. ^ a b Brower, Lincoln (1988). "Avian Predation on the Monarch Butterfly and Its Implications for Mimicry Theory". American Society of Naturalists 131: S4–S6. doi:10.1086/284763. 
  85. ^ Stimson, John; Mark Berman (1990). "Predator induced colour polymorphism in Danaus plexippus L. (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Hawaii". Heredity 65 (3): 401–406. doi:10.1038/hdy.1990.110. Lay summary. 
  86. ^ Clarke, A.R.; Zalucki, M.P. (2001). "Taeniogonalos raymenti Carmean & Kimsey (Hymenoptera: Trigonalidae) reared as a hyperparasite of Sturmia convergens (Weidemann) (Diptera: Tachinidae), a primary parasite of Danaus plexippus (L.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)". Pan-Pacific Entomologist 77 (?): 68–70. 
  87. ^ a b Brewer, Jo; Gerard M. Thomas (1966). "Causes of death encountered during rearing of Danaus plexippus (Danaidae)" (PDF). Journal of the Lepidopterist's Society 20 (4): 235–238. Retrieved 13 April 2008. Lay summary. 
  88. ^ Leong, K. L. H.; M. A. Yoshimura, H. K. Kaya and H. Williams (1997). "Instar Susceptibility of the Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus) to the Neogregarine Parasite, Ophryocystis elektroscirrha". Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 69 (1): 79–83. doi:10.1006/jipa.1996.4634. PMID 9028932. 
  89. ^ Bartel, Rebecca; Oberhauser, Karen; De Roode, Jacob; Atizer, Sonya (February 2011). "Monarch butterfly migration and parasite transmission in eastern North America". Ecology 92 (2): page. 
  90. ^ "Do My Monarch Butterflies Have OE? Ophryocystis elektroscirrha". Butterfly Fun Facts. Retrieved 2015-03-24. 
  91. ^ Invasive species alert: Black swallow-wort (Cynanchum louisea) and pale swallow-wort (Cynanchum rossicum).]
  92. ^ Pleasants, John M.; Oberhauser, Karen S. (2012). "Milkweed loss in agricultural fields because of herbicide use: effect on the monarch butterfly population". Insect Conservation and Diversity. 
  93. ^ a b Brennen, Shannon. "For Love of Nature: Annual monarch butterfly migration in peril". The News & Advance, Lynchburg, Virginia. Retrieved 4 July 2014. 
  94. ^ Conniff, Richard (1 April 2013). "Tracking the Causes of Sharp Decline of the Monarch Butterfly". Yale University. 
  95. ^ Wines, Michael (13 March 2013) Monarch Migration Plunges to Lowest Level in Decades. NYTimes
  96. ^ Paz, Fátima (18 June 2014) En espera de aprobación de la Profepa por tala ilegal en la Reserva de la Mariposa Monarca.
  97. ^ "Habitat Loss on Breeding Grounds Cause of Monarch Decline, U of G Study Finds". University of Guelph. 04 June 2014. Retrieved 17 March 2015.  Check date values in: |date= (help)
  98. ^ Monarch Population Hits Lowest Point in More Than 20 Years. WWF. 29 January 2014
  99. ^ Zhan S, Merlin C, Boore JL, Reppert SM; Merlin; Boore; Reppert (November 2011). "The Monarch Butterfly Genome Yields Insights into Long-Distance Migration". Cell 147 (5): 1171–85. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.052. PMC 3225893. PMID 22118469. 
  100. ^ Stensmyr MC, Hansson BS; Hansson (November 2011). "A Genome Befitting a Monarch". Cell 147 (5): 970–2. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.009. PMID 22118454. 
  101. ^ Johnson, Carolyn Y. (23 November 2011). "Monarch butterfly genome sequenced". The Boston Globe (Boston, MA). Retrieved 9 January 2012. 
  102. ^ Zhan, Shuia; Zhang, Wei; Niitepold, Kristjan; Hsu, Jeremy; Haeger, Juan Fernandez; Zalucki, Myron P.; Altizer, Sonia; de Roode, Jacobus C.; Reppert, Stephen M.; Kronforst, Marcus R. (1 October 2014). "The genetics of Monarch butterfly migration and warning coloration". Nature 514 (7522): 317. Bibcode:2014Natur.514..317Z. doi:10.1038/nature13812. 
  103. ^ Glassberg, J. (1995). Enjoying butterflies more: attract butterflies to your backyard. Marietta, OH: Bird Watcher's Digest Press.

External links[edit]