Mountain pine beetle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Mountain Pine Beetle
Adult mountain pine beetle
Dendroctonus ponderosae
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Coleoptera
Family: Curculionidae
Subfamily: Scolytinae
Genus: Dendroctonus
Species: D. ponderosae
Binomial name
Dendroctonus ponderosae
Hopkins, 1902

The mountain pine beetle (MPB) Dendroctonus ponderosae, is a species of bark beetle native to the forests of western North America from Mexico to central British Columbia. It has a hard black exoskeleton, and measures approximately 5 mm, about the size of a grain of rice.

Mountain pine beetles inhabit ponderosa, whitebark, lodgepole, Scotch, and limber pine trees. Normally, these insects play an important role in the life of a forest, attacking old or weakened trees, and speeding development of a younger forest. However, unusual hot, dry summers and mild winters throughout the region during the last few years, along with forests filled with mature lodgepole pine, have led to an unprecedented epidemic.[1]

It may be the largest forest insect blight ever seen in North America.[2] Climate change is said by some to have contributed to the size and severity of the outbreak, and the outbreak itself may, with similar infestations, have significant effects on the capability of northern forests to remove greenhouse gas (CO2) from the atmosphere.[3]

Because of its impact on forestry, the transcriptome[4] and the genome[5] have been sequenced. This is only the second beetle genome to be sequenced to date.

Contents

Tree infestations [edit]

Mountain pine beetles can damage whole regions of forest.

Mountain pine beetles affect pine trees by laying eggs under the bark. The beetles introduce blue stain fungus into the sapwood that prevents the tree from repelling and killing the attacking beetles with tree pitch flow. The fungus also blocks water and nutrient transport within the tree. On the tree exterior, this results in popcorn-shaped masses of resin, called "pitch tubes", where the beetles have entered.[6] The joint action of larval feeding and fungal colonization kills the host tree within a few weeks of successful attack (the fungus and feeding by the larvae girdles the tree, cutting off the flow of water and nutrients). When the tree is first attacked, it remains green. Usually within a year of attack, the needles will have turned red. This means the tree is dying or dead, and the beetles have moved to another tree. In three to four years after the attack, very little foliage is left, so the trees appear grey.[1]

As beetle populations increase or more trees become stressed because of drought or other causes, the population may quickly increase and spread. Healthy trees are then attacked, and huge areas of mature pine stands may be threatened or killed. Warm summers and mild winters play a role in both insect survival and the continuation and intensification of an outbreak. Adverse weather conditions (such as winter lows of -40°) can reduce the beetle populations and slow the spread, but the insects can recover quickly and resume their attack on otherwise healthy forests.

Life cycle [edit]

Beetles develop through four stages: egg, larva, pupa and adult. Except for a few days during the summer when adults emerge from brood trees and fly to attack new host trees, all life stages are spent beneath the bark.[7]

In low elevation stands and in warm years, mountain pine beetles require one year to complete a generation. At high elevations, where summers are typically cooler, life cycles may vary from one to two years.

Female beetles initiate attacks. As they chew into the inner bark and phloem, pheromones are released, attracting male and female beetles to the same tree. The attacking beetles produce more pheromones, resulting in a mass attack that overcomes the tree’s defenses, and results in attacks on adjacent trees.

Natural predators of the mountain pine beetle include certain birds, particularly woodpeckers, and various insects.

Management techniques [edit]

Management techniques include harvesting at the leading edges of what is known as “green attack”, as well as other techniques that can be used to manage infestations on a smaller scale, including:[8]

  • Pheromone baiting - is luring beetles into trees ‘baited’ with a synthetic hormone that mimics the scent of a female beetle. Beetles can then be contained in a single area, where they can more easily be destroyed.
  • Sanitation harvesting - is removing single infested trees to control the spread of beetle populations to other areas.
  • Snip and skid - is removing groups of infested trees scattered over a large area.
  • Controlled, or mosaic, burning - is burning an area where infested trees are concentrated, to reduce high beetle infestations in the area or to help reduce the fire hazard in an area.
  • Fall and burn - is cutting (felling) and burning beetle-infested trees to prevent the spread of beetle populations to other areas. This is usually done in winter, to reduce the risk of starting forest fires.

The concept of natural plant defense holds hope for eliminating pine beetle infestation. Beneficial microbial solutions are being researched and developed that work with the plant to activate and enhance its resistance mechanisms against insects and disease. Research has shown that blue stain fungus precedes the pine beetle infestation and the cause of blue stain fungus is most likely due to diminished energy levels in the tree caused by environmental stresses such as poor air quality, inadequate mineralization and diminished hydration. [9]

The US Forest Service tested chitosan,[10][11] an ecofriendly biopesticide, to pre-arm pine trees to defend themselves against MPB. The US Forest Service results show AgriHouse's EPA-registered ODC Collodial Chitosan elicited a 40% increase in pine resin (P<0.05) in southern pine trees. One milliliter ODC chitosan per 10 gallons water was applied to the ground area within the drip ring of loblolly pine trees. The application was repeated three times from May through September in 2008. The ODC chitosan was responsible for eliciting natural defense responses of increased resin pitch-outs, with the ability to destroy 37% of the pine beetle eggs.[12] Dr. Jim Linden, Microbiologist, Colorado State University, stated the chitosan increased resin pitch-outs to push the boring pine beetle out of the tree, preventing the MPB from entering the pine tree and spreading blue stain mold.[13]

Aggressively searching out, removing, and destroying the brood in infested trees is the best way to slow the spread of mountain pine beetles; however, it may not protect specific trees. Spraying trees to prevent attack is the most effective way to protect a small number of high-value trees from mountain pine beetles. Carbaryl (Sevin SL and XLR, and others), permethrin (Astro, Dragnet, and others), and bifenthrin (Onyx) are registered in the United States for use in the prevention of pine beetle infestations. Carbaryl is considered by the EPA to likely be carcinogenic to humans. It is moderately toxic to wild birds and partially to highly toxic to aquatic organisms. Permethrin is easily metabolized in mammalian livers, so is less dangerous to humans. Birds are also practically not affected by permethrin. Negative effects can be seen in aquatic ecosystems, as well as it being very toxic to beneficial insects. Bifenthrin is moderately dangerous to mammals, including humans; it is slightly more toxic to birds and aquatic ecosystems than permethrin, as well as extremely toxic to beneficial insects.[14]

Spraying can be an effective option for large scale application and treatment for pines, so long as products used are natural and safe. In August of 2011, 350 acres of pine forest in the Black Hills of South Dakota were sprayed aerially with Soil Pro, a solution of beneficial microbes and structured water. A follow up evaluation in spring of 2012 revealed a complete eradication of the pine beetle in the area sprayed with one application of a product developed by ABC Organics and Greenfield Naturals. Costs per acre averaged $22.00 which included product, air drop services and yearly evaluation surveys. Further information on the Black Hills Pine Beetle Eradication project can be obtained from Greenfield Naturals and ABC Organics.

Verbenone is the main compound for the antiaggregate pheromone for the mountain pine beetle. This compound has traditionally been formulated by three companies: Contech, Synergy Semiochemicals Corp., Hercon Environmental. Verbenone is a behavior-modifying pheromone that tricks the pine beetle into believing the tree is no longer useful to more beetles, so they will leave the tree alone. It is useful in campsites and places close to creeks and rivers where spraying cannot be used. Verbenone does not kill the insects; it simply pushes them away to another tree or area. Current verbenone formulations have been fairly successful in areas with low beetle populations, but have not been very successful in areas with higher populations. So far the use of verbenone formulations has proven to be useful only in small-scale operations.[15]

As new player in this market, ISCA Technologies www.iscatech.com has developed and tested a new flowable verbenone formulation called SPLATverb. Field work in Wyoming on the past two years indicate that SPLATverb has great promise in protecting individual pine trees even in areas under very high mountain pine beetle density. In these field trials 93% (2011) and 92% (2012) of the untreated trees (control) were mass-attacked by the mountain pine beetle and killed whereas 0% (2011, 2012), i.e., none of the SPLATverb-treated trees suffered mountain pine beetle mass attacks: all SPLATverb treated trees survived. In addition to protecting single trees, SPLATverb also has shown a great potential to protect pine trees in areawide programs. In a replicated areawide field work, SPLATverb-treated plots experienced an 84% suppression of mountain pine beetle mass attacks when compared to untreated plots. SPLATverb's suppression performance has shown to be 20% better than that observed in plots treated with the traditional verbenone 'pouch' formulation.

Colorado’s forests are much more densely wooded, making them much more susceptible to the beetles. Current legislation is in place to help with the growing beetle problem. Colorado Senators Mark Udall and Michael Bennet announced that Colorado will receive $30 million of the $40 million dollars being diverted by the U.S. Forest Service to fight the millions of acres of damage caused by the mountain pine beetle in the Rocky Mountain region.

Timber quality [edit]

Wood from beetle-affected trees retains its commercial value for eight to 12 years after the tree has died. This so-called ‘shelf life’ is dependent on a number of factors, including economic and stand site conditions. The trees remain commercially viable longer under drier conditions. In areas where it is wetter, the trees tend to rot at the base and fall faster, especially if they are larger.[16] The blue stain fungus has no effect on the wood’s strength properties.

The timber can be used for any wood product from standard framing lumber to engineered wood products, such as glue-laminated products and cross-laminated panels. The epidemic in British Columbia is also creating opportunities for the emerging bioenergy industry.

Fire hazards [edit]

The long-held belief that beetle infestations and resulting deadkill lead to more devastating forest fires is currently being challenged. Ongoing NASA studies have shown beetle kill may actually reduce available small fuels and consequently limit the effect and reach of fires.[17]

Current outbreak [edit]

The current outbreak of mountain pine beetles is ten times larger than previous outbreaks.[18] Huge swaths of central British Columbia (BC) and parts of Alberta have been hit badly, with over 40 million acres (160,000 km2) of BC's forests affected.[19] Under the presumption that the large areas of dead pine stands represent a potential fire hazard, the BC government is directing fuel management activities in beetle areas as recommended in the 2003 Firestorm Provincial Review.[20] Harvesting affected stands aids fire management by removing the presumed hazard and breaking the continuity of the fuels. These fuel management treatments are specifically designed to reduce interface fire threats to communities and First Nations located in the infestation zone. The interface is the area where urban development and wilderness meet.

The mountain pine beetle has affected more than 900 miles (1,400 km) of trail, 3,200 miles (5,100 km) of road and 21,000 acres (85 km2) of developed recreation sites over 3,600,000 acres (15,000 km2) in Colorado and southeastern Wyoming; other outbreaks encompass the Black Hills of South Datkota and extend as far south as Arizona. The US Forest Service is working on a hazard tree removal strategy, prioritizing high-use recreation areas, such as campgrounds, roads and National Forest Service lands adjacent to vulnerable public infrastructure such as power lines and near communities.[21]

The outbreaks may be a consequence of global warming. Previously, cold spells had killed off bark beetles which are now attacking the forests.[22][23] The longer breeding season is another factor encouraging beetle proliferation. The combination of warmer weather, attack by beetles, and mismanagement during past years has led to a substantial increase in the severity of forest fires in Montana.[23][24] According to a study done for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency by the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Science, portions of Montana will experience a 200% increase in area burned by wildland fires, and an 80% increase in air pollution from those fires.[25][26]

Effect on the carbon cycle [edit]

Researchers from the Canadian Forest Service have studied the relationship between the carbon cycle and forest fires, logging and tree deaths. They concluded by 2020, the pine beetle outbreak will have released 270 megatonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere from Canadian forests. There is yet to be an accepted study of the carbon cycle effect over a future period of time for North American forests.[18]

Effect on water resources [edit]

Hydrologists from the University of Colorado have investigated the impacts of beetle-infested forests on the water cycle, in particular, snow accumulation and melt. They concluded that dead forests will accumulate more snowpack as a result of thinner tree canopies and decreased snow sublimation. These thinned canopies also cause faster snow melt by allowing more sunlight through to the forest floor and lowering the snowpack albedo, as a result of needle litter on the snow surface.[27] Augmented snowpack coupled with dead trees that no longer transpire will likely lead to more available water.

Biofuel/alternative energy production from beetle-killed trees [edit]

The huge number of beetle-killed trees poses a substantial risk of devastating forest fires. Forest thinning to mitigate fire danger is expensive and resource-intensive.[28] Attention is turning to ways to turn this liability into a source of cellulosic ethanol.

Leaders in western U.S. states and Canadian provinces have promoted legislation to provide incentives for companies using beetle-killed trees for biofuel or biopower applications. Sellable commodities resulting from MPB damage can help subsidize the cost of forest thinning projects and support new job markets. Colorado's Department of Energy recently provided $30 million toward construction of the state's first cellulosic ethanol plant, to convert beetle kill into ethanol. Lignin, a byproduct of the process, can be sold for applications in lubricants and other goods.[29]

See also [edit]

References [edit]

Wikispecies has information related to: Mountain pine beetle
  1. ^ a b Natural Resources Canada Mountain Pine Beetle
  2. ^ Petit, Charles (2007-01-30). "In the Rockies, Pines Die and Bears Feel It". The New York Times. Retrieved 2009-02-09. 
  3. ^ "Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change". 2008-04-24. Retrieved 2009-07-16. 
  4. ^ Transcriptome and full-length cDNA resources for the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, a major insect pest of pine forests
  5. ^ Draft genome of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, a major forest pest
  6. ^ Colorado State University Fact Sheet: Mountain Pine Beetle
  7. ^ US Forest Service Forest Insect and Disease Leaflet Mountain Pine Beetle
  8. ^ Government of British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Mines and Natural Resource Operations
  9. ^ Ayres, P.G. 1984. The interaction between environmental stress injury and abiotic disease physiology. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 22:53-75 Hadwiger, L.A.1999 Host-parasite interactions: Elicitation of defense responses in plants with chitosan. Pages 185-200 : Chitin and Chitinases. Heidel, A.J., and Baldwin, I.T. 2004. Microarray analysis of salicylic acid- and jasmonic acid- signaling in responses of Nicotianna attenuata to attack by insects from multiple feeding guilds. Plant cell environment. 27: 1362-1373 Hammerschmidt, R. 1999 –Induced disease resistance: How do induced plants stop pathogens? Physiol. Mol. Plant. Pathol. 55: 77-84 Dietrich, R. Ploss, K. and Heidi, M. 2005 Growth responses and fitness costs after induction of pathogen resistance depend on environmental conditions. Plant cell environment. 28: 211-222 6. Iwata,M. 2001. Probenazole- a plant activator. Pest. Outlook Feb. 2001:28-31 Jakab, G., Cottier, V., Toquin, V., V Rigoli, G., Zimmerli, L Metraux, J.-P., and Mauch-Mani, B. 2001 B-Aminobutyric acid- induced resistance in plants. Eur.J Plant Pathol.107:29-37 Kuc, J. 1982.Induced Immunity to plant diseases. BioScience 32: 854-860 Van Wees, S.C.M., Pieterse, C.M.J., Trijssenaar,.A., Van,t Westende. Y. A.M., Hartog, F., and Van Loon, L.C. 1997 Differential inductioin of systemic resistance in Arabidopsis by biocontrol bacteria. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 6:716-724
  10. ^ Mason, M. (1997), Defense Response in Slash Pine: Chitosan Treatment Alters the Abundance of Specific mRNAs, US Forest Service 
  11. ^ Klepzig, K. (2003), Cellular response of loblolly pine to wound inoculation with bark beetle-associated fungi and chitosan, US Forest Service 
  12. ^ O'Toole, Erin (2009-09-10). "Solution for Pine Bark Beetles May Help Front Range Trees". NPR Morning Edition - KUNC 91.5 FM Greeley, CO. 
  13. ^ Porter, Steve (2009-09-11). "Arming trees against pine beetle invasions". Northern Colorado Business Report. 
  14. ^ Colorado State University Spraying Trees to Protect Against Mountain Pine Beetle: Common Questions for Landowners to Consider
  15. ^ http://www.csfs.colostate.edu/pages/documents/Thoughts_about_Verbenone_April_2009.pdf
  16. ^ Naturally:wood
  17. ^ "NASA Satellites Reveal Surprising Connection Between Beetle Attacks, Wildfire". 
  18. ^ a b "Beetles may doom Canada's carbon reduction target: study". 2008-04-23. Retrieved 2008-04-28. 
  19. ^ "Mountain Pine Beetle - Ministry of Forests and Range - Province of British Columbia". 
  20. ^ BC 2003 Firestorm Provincial Review
  21. ^ US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Bark Beetle Management
  22. ^ "Beetles shaping Montana's forest lands". The Missoulian. July 31, 2005. [dead link]
  23. ^ a b "Forest Service finds varied beetle activity". The Missoulan. February 14, 2010. 
  24. ^ "UM climate expert says triple-digit Julys will be norm". Billings Gazette. August 27, 2007. 
  25. ^ "Forecast: More air pollution, Study predicts global warming will increase fires in Northern Rockies". Billings Gazette. July 29, 2009. 
  26. ^ "Impacts of climate change from 2000 to 2050 on wildfire activity and carbonaceous aerosol concentrations in the western United States". Journal of Geophysical Research. 
  27. ^ Science Daily
  28. ^ (Kumar 2009)
  29. ^ (MacLachlan)

External links [edit]

Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Dendroctonus ponderosae
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mountain_pine_beetle&oldid=554293240"