Multiple representations (mathematics education)
Multiple representations are ways to symbolize, to describe and to refer to the same mathematical entity. They are used to understand, to develop, and to communicate different mathematical features of the same object or operation, as well as connections between different properties. Multiple representations include graphs and diagrams, tables and grids, formulas, symbols, words, gestures, software code, videos, concrete models, physical and virtual manipulatives, pictures, and sounds. Representations are thinking tools for doing mathematics.
- 1 Higher-order thinking
- 2 Motivation
- 3 Assessment
- 4 Special education and differentiated instruction
- 5 Qualitative and quantitative reasoning
- 6 NCTM representations standard
- 7 Four most frequent school mathematics representations
- 8 Systems of manipulatives
- 9 Use of technology
- 10 Concerns
- 11 References
Use of multiple representations supports and requires tasks that involve decision-making and other problem-solving skills. The choice of which representation to use, the task of making representations given other representations, and the understanding of how changes in one representation affect others are examples of such mathematically sophisticated activities. Estimation, another complex task, can strongly benefit from multiple representations 
Curricula that support starting from conceptual understanding, then developing procedural fluency, for example, AIMS Foundation Activities, frequently use multiple representations.
Supporting student use of multiple representations may lead to more open-ended problems, or at least accepting multiple methods of solutions and forms of answers. Project-based learning units, such as WebQuests, typically call for several representations.
Some representations, such as pictures, videos and manipulatives, can motivate because of their richness, possibilities of play, technologies involved, or connections with interesting areas of life. Tasks that involve multiple representations can sustain intrinsic motivation in mathematics by supporting higher-order thinking and problem solving.
Multiple representations may also remove some of the gender biases that exist in math classrooms. Explaining probability solely and only through baseball statistics may potentially alienate students who have no interest in sports. When showing a tie to real-life applications, teachers should choose representations that are varied and of interest to all genders and cultures.
Tasks that involve construction, use, and interpretation of multiple representations can lend themselves to rubric assessment  and to other assessment types suitable for open-ended activities. For example, tapping into visualization for math problem solving manifests multiple representations. These multiple representations arise when each student uses their knowledge base, and experience to create a visualization of the problem domain on the way toward a solution. Since visualization can be categorized into two main areas, schematic or pictorial, most students will provide on or the other or sometimes both methods to represent the problem domain.
Comparison of the different visualization tools created by each student is an excellent example of multiple representations. Further, the instructor may glean from these examples elements which they incorporate into their grading rubric. In this way, it is the students that provide the examples and standards against which scoring is done. This crucial factor places each student on equal footing and links them directly with their performance in class.
Special education and differentiated instruction
Students with special needs may be weaker in their use of some of the representations. For these students, it may be especially important to use multiple representations for two purposes. First, including representations that currently work well for the student ensures the understanding of the current mathematical topic. Second, connections among multiple representations within the same topic strengthens overall skills in using all representations, even those currently problematic.
It is also helpful to ESL/ELL (English as a Second Language/English Language Learners) to use multiple representations. The more you can bring a concept to "life" in a visual way, the more likely the students will grasp what you are talking about. This is also important with younger students who may have not had a lot of experience/prior knowledge on the topics we are teaching.
Qualitative and quantitative reasoning
Visual representations, manipulatives, gestures, and to some degree grids, can support qualitative reasoning about mathematics. Instead of only emphasizing computational skills, multiple representations can help students make the conceptual shift to the meaning and use of mathematical entities, and to develop algebraic thinking. By focusing more on the conceptual representations of algebraic problems students will become more capable problem solvers.
NCTM representations standard
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics has a standard dealing with multiple representations. In part, it reads  "Instructional programs should enable all students to do the following:
- Create and use representations to organize, record, and communicate mathematical ideas
- Select, apply, and translate among mathematical representations to solve problems
- Use representations to model and interpret physical, social, and mathematical phenomena"
Four most frequent school mathematics representations
While there are many representations used in mathematics, the secondary curricula heavily favor numbers (often in tables), formulas, graphs and words.
Systems of manipulatives
Several curricula use extensively developed systems of manipulatives and the corresponding representations. For example, Cuisinaire rods, Montessori beads, and Algebra Tiles, Base-10 blocks, counters
Use of technology
Use of computer tools to create and to share mathematical representations opens several possibilities. It allows to link multiple representations dynamically. For example, changing a formula can instantly change the graph, the table of values, and the text read-out for the function represented in all these ways. Technology use can increase accuracy and speed of data collection and allow real-time visualization and experimentation. It also supports collaboration.
Computer tools may be intrinsically interesting and motivating to students, and provide a familiar and comforting context students already use in their daily life.
Spreadsheet software such as Excel, OpenOffice.org, Google Documents, is widely used in many industries, and showing students the use of applications can make math more realistic. Most spreadsheet programs provide dynamic links among formulas, grids and several types of graphs.
Carnegie Learning curriculum is an example of emphasis on multiple representations and use of computer tools. More specifically, Carnegie learning focuses the student not only on solving the real life scenarios presented in the text, but also promotes literacy through sentence writing and explanations of student thinking. In conjunction with the scenario based text Carnegie Learning provides a web based tutoring program called the "Cognitive Tutor" which uses data collected from each question a student answers to direct the student to areas where they need more help.
Project Interactivate  has many activities linking visual, verbal and numeric representations. There are currently 159 different activities available, in many areas of math, including numbers and operations, probability, geometry, algebra, statistics and modeling.
Another helpful tool for mathematicians, scientists, engineers is LaTeX. It is a typsetting program that allows you to create tables, figures, graphs etc. in order to give a precise visual of the problem being worked on. Here is more information on LaTeX http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaTeX
There are concerns that technology for working with multiple representations can become a distraction from mathematical content, and an end in itself.
Care should be taken that informal representations do not prevent students from progressing toward formal, symbolic mathematics.
- S. Ainsworth, P. Bibby, and D. Wood, “Information technology and multiple representations: New opportunities – new problems,” Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education 6, no. 1 (1997)
- B. Moseley and M. Brenner, Using Multiple Representations for Conceptual Change in Pre-algebra: A Comparison of Variable Usage with Graphic and Text Based Problems., 1997, http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED413184
- Hegarty, M., and Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of Visual-Spatial Representations and Mathematical Problem Solving. Journal of Educational Psychology v91, no 4 p.684 – 689.
- J. Schultz and M. Waters, “Why Representations?” Mathematics Teacher 93, no. 6 (2000): 448–53
- M. Hohenwarter and J. Preiner, “Dynamic mathematics with GeoGebra,” Journal of Online Mathematics and its Applications 7 (2007)