New York energy law
|This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
New York energy law is the statutory, regulatory, and common law of the state of New York concerning the policy, conservation, taxation, and utilities involved in energy. Secondary sources have also influenced the law of energy in the Empire State.
The myriad legal issues concerning hydrofracking in New York has in the 2010s spawned a new body of legal authority with primary authorities such as case law, statutes, and zoning regulations, as well as secondary sources such as law review and newspaper articles, for this rapidly changing field of law.
- 1 Energy Law (Consolidated Laws)
- 2 Recent legislation and Legislative committees
- 3 Related statutes
- 4 Case law
- 5 Rules, regulations, and benefits
- 6 Energy-related authorities
- 7 Secondary sources
- 8 Hydrofracking
- 9 See also
- 10 References
- 11 Bibliography
- 12 External links
Energy Law (Consolidated Laws)
"Energy" means work or heat that is, or may be, produced from any fuel or source whatsoever. ... "Energy resources" shall mean any force or material which yields or has the potential to yield energy, including but not limited to electrical, fossil, geothermal, wind, hydro, solid waste, tidal, wood, solar and nuclear sources.—N.Y. Energy Law § 1-103 (5) and (6).
This code is divided into these articles, which are not sequential:
1. Short Title; Definitions
3. State Energy Policy
5. State Energy Office, etc.
7. Transfer of Functions
8. Light Efficiency Standards (for existing buildings) Act
9. Energy Performance (for public buildings)
10. Fuel Set-aside Act
11. Conservation Construction Code Act
12. Solar Energy Products Warranty Act
13. State Green Building Construction Act (new, "Effective Date: 03/24/2009")
16. Appliance Efficiency Standards (new)
17. Energy Information
18. Temporary Nuclear Waste Repositories
21. Energy Supply and Production
Appendix – Rules
Recent legislation and Legislative committees
Democratic Senator Darrel Aubertine, of upstate Cape Vincent, Jefferson County, was formerly chair of the committee. In 2008, the Senate referred six bills to the Assembly Energy committee, but none of them were passed. Senate Majority Leader Malcolm Smith replaced Senator Kevin Parker, of Kings County (Brooklyn), then chair, with Aubertine on May 11, 2009, after Parker's arrest on harassment charges. Aubertine supported an extenstion to the "Power for Jobs" state program. In November 2010, Aubertine lost re-election, and the Republicans garnered a majority.
Assemblyman Kevin Cahill, representing Upstate Ulster and Dutchess counties, had been chair of that committee. As of early 2009, the Committee on Energy had an extensive agenda on its "plate". These include hearings on the New York Independent System Operator's Electricity Commodity Pricing, and the December Ice Storm power outages, and an annual report.
The Assembly Energy committee "has jurisdiction over legislation related to energy availability and sources, policy and planning, conservation, and electric and gas rate-making in New York State." These includes any amendments to N.Y. Energy Law and Public Service Law. It has concurrent jurisdiction over the authorities and agencies dealing with energy, including NYSERDA, the Long Island Power Authority, Department of Environmental Conservation, and the Power Authority of the State of New York.
Congressman Paul Tonko is a past chair of the Assembly Committee on Energy. Thomas O'Mara is the current ranking member of that committee. Andrew Hevesi, a Democrat from Queens, is chair of the Assembly Renewable Energy subcommittee.
Recently enacted laws
The state has enacted, in 2007, a number of recent laws to control carbon emissions. There is also a new Article 13 of N.Y. Energy Law, the State Green Building Construction Act, in 2008. This new Act is composed of four sections, including N.Y. Energy L. § 13–107, "Agency green building construction requirements." They also passed a law to establish a "Green Residential Building Grant Program," which directs NYSERDA to grant moneys subject to LEED. Finally, the legislature also enacted three closely related laws to expand "Net metering" of alternative energy generating systems.
Senator Kevin Parker, the past Senate committee chair, stated that he had been "aiming for a long time" to work on energy and environmental issues. Among the issues he wanted to address are "enrgy generation and transmission ... public transportation ... [and] Renewable energy...." Assemblyman Cahill notes equally "ambitious goals for renewable power and energy conservation," especially by funding the State Energy Plan, "mass transit", repowering "Old hydro facilities" and modernizing the states "electric grid." NYSERDA president Francis Murray, Jr. echoes "the most ambitious clean-energy program in the nation."
The Power New York Act, enacted in July 2011, re-establishes the Article 10 energy plant siting law, which had expired (sunsetted) over seven years prior. The new law had overwhelmingly favorable editorial support.
In 2012, several items on Governor Andrew Cuomo's agenda were done:
- Launch of the New York Energy highway (see below)
- Passage of tax credits for solar leasing
- Passage of tax exemptions for solar power for all building classes.
In Consolidated Laws, there are many sections that have cross-references to, or relate to, N.Y. Energy Law.
Within N.Y. Environmental Conservation Law are several articles relevant to energy, including the Mineral Resources laws, article 23. This is also called the N.Y. Oil, Gas, and Solution Mining Law, which includes permitting, fees, and related laws.
The state collects an effective rate of 24.4 cents per gallon tax on gasoline and gasohol ("motor fuel"), and 22.65 cents per gallon on diesel. New York collects one of the smallest amounts of revenue from extraction taxes of any state—only 5.8 percent of its overall sources. The state also has a "highway use tax".
New York has a statute that regulates the "Recording of solar energy easements." It requires that such easements be in writing, signed, and acknowledged with the same formalities as recording other conveyances. It also requires, "Any instrument creating a solar energy easement shall include ... (a) The vertical and horizontal angles, expressed in degrees, at which the solar energy easement extends over the real property ... (b) Any terms or conditions ... [and] (c) Any provisions for compensation of the owner of the property...."
The state has an "alternative fuels (tax) credit" at N.Y. Tax Law § 187-b that applies to certain hybrid cars, against the franchise taxes in Tax Law §§ 183, 184, 185. It does not apply to any individual income tax.
Other related sections of the N.Y. Consolidated laws include:
- Executive Law § 11 Fuel and energy shortage state of emergency
- Executive Law § 29-G Emergency management assistance compact
- Executive Law § 201-A State clean-fueled vehicle program
- Public Service Law § 66 General powers of commission in respect to gas, etc.
- Public Service Law § 66-C Conservation of energy
- Public Service Law § 66-G Sale of indigenous natural gas for generation of energy
- State Finance Law § 127-A Energy conservation in state-aided programs
- Tax Law § 19 Green building credit
- Tax Law § 186-a Tax on the furnishing of utility services (a tax of 2 1/2% starting January 1, 2000, on gross income is imposed on "every provider of telecommunication services")
- Tax Law § 301-I Energy business
- Tax Law § 1105-A Reduced tax rate on certain energy sources and services
- Social Services Law § 153-F State reimbursement of home energy grant expenses
- Real Property Tax Law § 487 Exemption from taxation for certain solar or wind.
There are also at least two unconsolidated sections of law that refer to Energy Law, which allow for a credit against certain local taxes.
The motor fuel excise tax is collected from a "distributor" – usually a wholesaler – even though the ultimate burden to pay the tax may be on a retailer or purchaser. There is a presumption of taxability, so taxing authorities can allow reasonably for only a 1% loss for "evaporation and spillage" in long-term storage tanks. A bus company, such as Greyhound bus, is considered a distributor for the purposes of the motor fuel excise tax. A retailer is liable for the amount of tax due bought from a supplier from New Jersey.
The issue of taxation of Native Americans for motor fuel has created a moderately large body of case law in itself. While the state can not impose excise taxes directly on "Indians", it can tax the sale of fuel to non-Indians even on Indian reservations. This statute, dictating the collection of gas and similar taxes, does not violate the Commerce clause. The law has also been upheld as not in violation of the Equal protection clause, based on the rational basis test.
Rules, regulations, and benefits
Regulatory law, generally
New York regulation has "allowed consumers and businesses to choose their own supplier" of gas and electricity, in the hope that this will lower retail prices, as well as to spur the development of "more innovative products." However, these energy choices have not saved the ultimate consumer very much, because the price of natural gas, and any energy produced from it, had fallen relatively low as of 2012. The news report cited studies by AARP, the Public Utility Law Project, and the Retail Energy Supply Association (RESA), "an energy supplier trade group", were made between 2010 and 2012. Only if consumers switch from oil to gas would they save much money.
New York Energy Highway
The New York Energy Highway is a project developed by Governor Andrew Cuomo, and announced in his 2012 state of the state address. The purpose of the initiative is "to ensure that New York's energy grid remains the most advanced in the nation and to promote increased business investment in the state." A Task force was charged with "its implementation and enlisting the private sector." The Task Force is co-chaired by NYPA CEO Gil Quiniones and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation commissioner Joseph Martens. In April 2012, the Task Force held a summit at Columbia University to explore the issues involved. They also called for more ideas through an administrative request process, which that lasted from April 11 through May 30, 2012. According to co-chair Quiniones, writing in the industry paper EnergyBiz, the results were that 400 people attended the Energy Highway Summit, and 85 entities submitted over 100 suggestions and ideas for the Task Force.
The Energy Highway Blueprint is the Task Force's October 2012 report with 13 proposals, including investment of over $1 billion "new electric transmission capacity [and] new renewable energy projects," the retrofitting of "existing inefficient, high emission plants," the development of "Smart Grid technologies," and conducting "field studies of Atlantic Ocean offshore wind development potential."
In December of that year, Cuomo announced progress on the plan that included a $726 Million upgrade to the state's transmission network.
In early 2013, the Public Service Commission solicited comments and accepted a report filed by ConEd and the state Power Authority about the future of the Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant, in particular the permitting process. Cuomo has indicated that he is against the continued use of Indian Point. The October 2012 Blueprint called for alternatives to Indian Point, which was the only plant named specifically by his administration for closure and replacement. However, the Task Force has no administrative authority to close Indian Point. Furthermore, the Task Force's Blueprint is not directly linked to Cuomo's opposition to renewal of that plant's permit by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Nonetheless, in a December 2012 press release about the transmission upgrade funding, Cuomo noted in dictum that:
other actions undertaken to advance the Energy Highway Blueprint include ... A PSC order for Con Edison to work with NYPA on contingency plans for the potential closing of Indian Point in Westchester County.—Governor Andrew Cuomo, Press release, December 19, 2012
The Task Force identified two coal-operated energy plants' reliability issues, and are working with the Public Service Commission and two utilities, National Grid and NYSEG, on the matter. They also have worked on the "key items" of "easing transmission congestion [and] expanding natural gas delivery".
Benefits in NY law
In his 2014 State of the State address, Governor Cuomo pushed for more renewable energy benefits. This resulted in NYSERDA's "Renewable Heat NY" that provides subsidies for wood pellet burners.
The chief regulator for the Energy Law is the "Commissioner" or "president" of the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (also called NYSERDA). The board of directors of NYSERDA includes—as a matter of law – several utility insiders, as well as ex officio commissioners. Richard L. Kauffman is chairman of the board, and John B. Rhodes has been President and CEO since September 2013.
New York has an Independent System Operator, the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO). NYISO is the non-profit agency charged by New York with auctions of energy supplies. Specifically, NYISO
operates New York's bulk electricity grid, administers the state's wholesale electricity markets, and provides comprehensive reliability planning for the state's bulk electricity system. A not-for-profit corporation, the NYISO began operating in 1999.—NYISO statement of purposes
NYISO also organizes symposia on New York energy law. Stephen Whitley is the Chief Executive of NYISO. The past chairperson of the board, Karen Antion, has been replaced as of April 19, 2011, by Robert Hiney, the past vice-chairman.
New York Public Service Commission
The Power Authority's proposed contract to buy hydroelectric power from the Canadian province of Quebec has generated controversy. The Sierra Club, the Innu community, and the National Lawyers Guild are fighting to prevent the proposed contract, which would have to be approved by Governor Paterson under his regulatory authority.
The Power Authority has been criticized by scholars for "missed opportunities" in using its administrative powers.
New York has long taxed and regulated energy sources and utilities.
Scholarship and research
The New York State Bar Association offered a continuing legal education class in 2012 on "Marcellus Shale: New Regulations and Challenges", which is available as of February 2014 as an audio course. A panel of "multidisciplinary faculty of professionals addresse[d] the new body of law being created in New York to address the substantial development that is expected in the Marcellus Shale region." NYSBA's environmental law section followed up in May 2014 with a legislative forum on the regulation of rail cars carrying shale oil through cities such as Albany.
The energy industry is represented by the Energy Association of New York, which lobbies on behalf of the state's larger energy-producing corporations and utilities.
A total of 17 wind energy companies have agreed to a set of ethics guidelines, which will delineate the companies' relationships with employee, contractors, and local governments. Governor Andrew Cuomo announced that 14 companies had joined the Wind Industry Ethics Code in August 2009, joining three others who had signed on earlier, in 2008-2009.
The myriad legal issues concerning hydrofracking in New York has spawned a whole body of law, with primary authorities such as case law, statutes, and zoning regulations, as well as secondary sources such as law review and newspaper articles, on this rapidly changing field of law.
Court cases and analysis
Dryden and Middletown
In February 2012, two cases of first impression, Anschutz Exploration Corp. v. Town of Dryden and Cooperstown Holstein Corp. v. Town of Middletown, dealt with the issue of whether towns in New York can use local zoning laws to ban hydrofracking, within their police powers, or whether such action would be preempted by N.Y. Environmental Conservation Law § 23-0303 (2).  In each of these two cases, New York Supreme Court ruled in favor of the defendant towns, that the state Oil, Gas, and Solution Mining Law's superseding language did not preempt their zoning laws.
The Anschutz case got the most publicity and analysis in the immediate aftermath, because it was decided a week earlier than the Cooperstown court. Opponents of hydrofacking "emerged trimphant" after winning Anschutz. Justice Phillip R. Rumsey relied in part on cases from Colorado that allowed local governments to regulate gas drilling, as well as from Pennsylvania, which concerned the very same Marcellus shale that is being drilled in Upstate New York. Anschutz distinguished this zoning situation from a bonding requirement, which is a direct regulation of the industry that is preempted by the N.Y. Department of Environmental Conservation's permit fees and regulatory scheme.  That court also relied on cases that allowed "exclusionary zoning" that prohibits of "natural resources within the town as a permitted use if limiting that use is a reasonable exercise of its police powers ...."
In Cooperstown, a farmer named Jennifer Huntington leased 400 acres of her land for natural drilling, and she sued after the town changed its zoning laws to ban fracking. This case has a similar outcome; the town of Middlefield won at the trial court level, in a decision by Acting Justice Daniel F. Cerio. An attorney at Earthjustice lauded the Cooperstown decision, while the attorney who had represented Anschutz criticzed both decisions.
Since both courts are within the Third Department of the Appellate Division, and they will likely be appealed, they may be consolidated upon appeal. Attorneys for the town of Dryden indicated they are in the process of perfecting the appeal as of September 2012. While Albany Times-Union columnist Fred LeBrun noted that while opponents are expecting a win, "plenty in our government" predict a successful appeal, so he "wouldn't bet either way." However, two bloggers noted that the appeals have not been perfected as of August 2012. Searches of the website for, and an inquiry into, the Third Department shows that neither losing party has perfected their appeals as of October 17, 2012.
Further complicating the appeals, Norse Energy has also become involved in the Anschutz case. Back in October 2011, Norse Energy put up their leases for sale, claiming the moratorium by Governor Paterson had hurt the international company's prospects. Instead, Norse bought Anschutz's leases, and thus would have to be replaced as lead plaintiff against the Town of Dryden. Norse Energy's attorneys appear to be arguing that a "greater good" will come about if they are allowed to drill despite the local government's opportunity.
On March 21, 2013, the Third Department issued their ruling in Matter of Norse Energy Corp. USA v. Town of Dryden, upholding the decision of the N.Y. Supreme Court. For a unanimous court, Presiding Justice Karen A. Peters upheld the lower court's denial of intervenor status for the environmental group, DRAC, and the constitutionality of the Town of Dryden's zoning ordinance. The Court allowed Norse Energy to be substituted for Anschutz. "As a preliminary matter," they approved "Supreme Court's denial of DRAC's motion to intervene", based on the group's failing to prove "a substantial interest ... different from other residents of the Town." Rather, noting the Town could do a good job at defending its interests, instead granted amicus status to DRAC and a half dozen others. Citing the New York State Constitution and four New York Court of Appeals cases, the Third Department noted that the state's local governments have broad home rule powers under its state constitution. It agreed with the lower court that the local law is not pre-empted, either expressly or by implication.
Also in July 2012, Justice Ferris Lebous ruled in the Broome County, New York case of Jeffrey v. Ryan that, while the city of Binghamton has the right to enact a local regulation, they did not enact a proper moratorium.
While those appeals were pending, the New York Times reported in mid-June 2012 that Governor Cuomo and his staff were deliberating on a plan to restrict hydrofracking to five counties in the southern tier of New York, along the Pennsylvania border, where the Marcellus shale is deepest and drilling is least likely to pollute well water supplies in those aquifers. Drilling would not be allowed in these areas:
- New York City and its watershed
- Towns that have banned or not agreed to the practice (over 100 towns and villages have banned it, but several dozen have asked for it)
- The Catskill State Park (which is 'forever wild' under the New York State Constitution)
- Areas of surface land directly over certain aquifers
- Land within national historic district[disambiguation needed]s.
In August 2012, LeBrun filed a column that a limited plan was moving forward to allow hydrofracking in the Southern Tier, which he characterized as the "[e]nd of the anti-frack world." Wading through 60,000 comments, the New York Department of Environmental Conservation was looking at a "ramp up" period, allowing 50 wells in 2013, and 100 wells in 2014, and only in towns that want them.
Joe Martens, the Commissioner of DEC, has overall responsibility for regulating all hydrofracking programs. Eugene Leff, his Deputy Commissioner for Remediation and Materials Management, has responsibility for "Materials Management, Environmental Remediation and Mineral Resources", which would include hydrofracking regulations, is any were to be released. Bradley Field is the Director for "Management and regulation of mineral resource development [and] Oil & Gas Regulation ... [to] Oversee permitting, compliance and enforcement of all regulated wells in New York." All media and other press inquiries must go directly through Emily DeSantis, at Press Operations, who is the Department spokesperson and who issues all press releases. Leff was one of the panelists on NYSBA's 2012 seminar on "Marcellus Shale: New Regulations and Challenges".
As of early 2014, administrative inaction lead to what the Sierra Club called a "de facto moratorium ... for new drilling of natural gas wells" in the State "using hydrofracking technology." Susan Lawrence, writing an open letter to the group, cited six reasons for the effective ban:
- The DEC had "not finalized" the environmental impact statement.
- Governor Cuomo and the DEC were waiting for the Department of Health to issue a report first.
- The state budget for FY 2013-2014 had no funding for state employees to process the necessary applications.
- Cuomo had stated publicly that he would not decide on the issues until after the November election.
- The Dryden and Middletown cases were pending before the New York Court of Appeals.
- The public had concerns in light of the recent increase in rail shipments of oil from hydraulically fractured Bakken formation wells in North Dakota through Upstate New York.
- Gasoline and diesel usage and pricing
- Nonbusiness Energy Property Tax Credit
- NRG Energy
- Wind power in New York
- N.Y. Energy Law § 1-101, found at New York State Legislature official web site, go to "ENG", then "Article 1", finally "1–101 – Short title". Accessed August 6, 2008.
- N.Y. Energy Law § 1-103 (5) and (6), found at New York State Legislature official website, go to "ENG", then "Article 1", finally "1–103 – Definitions". Accessed February 4, 2009.
- See Preface, N.Y. Energy Law (McKinney's); L. 1976, Chap. 819, sec. 2.
- N.Y. Energy Law, at Consolidated Laws, at New York State Legislature official website, go to "ENG". Accessed February 4, 2009.
- N.Y. Energy Law, Art. 13, of Consolidated Laws, at New York State Legislature official website, go to "ENG", then "Article 13". Accessed February 4, 2009.
- N.Y. Energy Law (McKinney's supp. 2008).
- N.Y. Energy Law (McKinney's appendix).
- New York State Senate Energy and Telecommunications committee website. Retrieved March 18, 2010, and updated version on January 24, 2011.
- New York State Senate website Darrel J. Aubertine's page. Retrieved June 1, 2009 and updated version on January 24, 2011.
- New York State Assembly website Updates from the Committee on Energy. Retrieved March 6, 2009.
- Delen Goldberg, "North Country Sen. Darrel Aubertine promoted after Brooklyn Sen. Kevin Parker arrested," The Post-Standard, May 17, 2009, found at Syracuse.com website. Retrieved June 1, 2009.
- Jude Seymour, "Aubertine to lead panel on energy after shakeup," Watertown Daily Times, May 12, 2009, found at Watertown Daily Times . Retrieved June 1, 2009.
- "Aubertine Named Chair of Energy Committee," posted May 11, 2009, found at NY Senate Press release. Retrieved June 1, 2009.
- "Aubertine: Power for Jobs should be extended at least a year for certainty, continuity," posted May 27, 2009, found at NY Senate Press release. Retrieved June 1, 2009.
- NYSenate.gov website. Retrieved January 24, 2011.
- New York State Assembly website Committee on Energy listing. Retrieved April 7, 2014.
- [New York State Assembly website Member Kevin Cahill's page]. Retrieved March 6, 2009.
- New York State Assembly website Committee on Energy listing. Retrieved March 6, 2009 and January 24, 2011.
- Notice of Public Hearing, from the New York State Assembly website Committee on Energy pages. Retrieved March 6, 2009.
- Larry Rulison, "NYISO openness needed, critic says: Author of study urges transparency in system's bidding process," Albany Times Union, March 5, 2009, found at Albany Times Union website, and "Assemblyman blasts NYISO over rates: Brodsky touts new study critical of its method of setting electric prices," Albany Times Union, March 4, 2009, found at Albany Times Union website. Both articles retrieved March 6, 2009.
- Hearing on December Ice Storm Power Outages, Report at New York State Assembly website Committee on Energy pages and Notice of Public Hearing at New York State Assembly website Committee on Energy pages. Retrieved March 6, 2009.
- New York State Assembly website Committee on Energy pages and Annual Report in .pdf format. Retrieved March 6, 2009.
- Lamendola, Michael (2008-11-05). "Tonko wins to succeed McNulty". The Daily Gazette (Schenectady, New York). Retrieved 2009-03-10.
- Andrew Hevesi, "Promoting Solar Energy and Job Creation in New York State," NY Capitol News , April 26, 2010. Found at NY Capitol News archives. Accessed August 5, 2010.
- website of Member of Assembly Sandy Galef. Accessed August 27, 2008.
- New York Laws, Chapter 565 of the Laws of 2008.
- New York Laws, Chapter 631 of the Laws of 2008.
- New York Laws, Chapters 452, 480, and 483 of the Laws of 2008.
- "Issue Forum: Energy," NY Capitol News, February 2009, pp. 4–9, found at NY Capitol News website(.pdf document). Retrieved March 9, 2009.
- Bracewell & Giuliani LLP (17 August 2011). "Power NY Act of 2011 Swings the Door Open for Renewable Development". The National Law Review. Retrieved 12 January 2012.
- "Article 10 - Board on Electric Generation Siting and the Environment". New York State Public Service Commission. Retrieved July 6, 2011.
- Hawkins, Andrew (June 22, 2011). "Article X, Green Jobs To Be Part Of End-Of-Session Deal". Capitol news. Retrieved July 6, 2011.
- "Power-plant siting act is welcome". Poughkeepsie Journal. July 2, 2011. Retrieved July 6, 2011.
- "Agenda: energy". City and State. September 17, 2012. Retrieved October 8, 2012.
- N.Y. Form IT-255, , instructions here: . Both accessed April 11, 2013.
- N.Y. ECL, art. 23. Found at N.Y. State Assembly website. Retrieved February 29, 2012.
- N.Y. ECL, § 23-0102. Found at N.Y. State Assembly website. Retrieved February 29, 2012.
- N.Y. Tax L. §§ 523(b), 524 (c), 1111, 1136 (a)(7); see also the entire N.Y. Tax L. Article 21-A for context.
- Motor Fuel Excise Tax Rates as of January 1, 2008 from the Federation of Tax Administrators website. Retrieved February 24, 2009.[dead link]
- 2007 State Tax Collection by Source from the Federation of Tax Administrators website. Retrieved February 24, 2009.
- N.Y. Tax L. Article 21.
- For all of the tax laws in New York, see New York state assembly official website, then go TAX. Retrieved February 24, 2009.
- N.Y. Tax L. §§ 282-289F, Art. 12-A; 20 N.Y.C.R.R. Parts 410, 430; 102 N.Y. Jur. 2d § 2535.
- N.Y. Tax L. §§ 285-a (3)(d) (motor fuel generally), 285-b (4)(d) (diesel motor fuel); 20 N.Y.C.R.R. § 412.4; 102 N.Y. Jur. 2d § 2537.
- N.Y. Tax L. § 286 (1); 20 N.Y.C.R.R. §§ 413.4 (b), 418.1 (b); 102 N.Y. Jur. 2d § 2538.
- N.Y. Real Property Law § 335-b, found at New York state assembly official website, then go to RPP. Retrieved February 5, 2009.
- N.Y. Tax Law § 187-b, citing Tax Law §§ 183, 184, 185. Found at NY state assembly website. Retrieved February 16, 2011.
- New York state Assembly official website. Retrieved February 9, 2009.
- Local Corporation Taxes § 4-f, about "Credit relating to certain sales and compensating use taxes on electricity used in manufacturing, processing or assembling," and § 101, "Imposition of tax," from New York state Assembly official website, then search for "Energy law." Retrieved February 5, 2009.
- 102 N.Y. Jur. 2d Taxation and Assessment §§ 2535–2604.
- Mark Fass, "Panel Finds D.A. Can Prosecute Polluter Under N.Y. Law", New York Law Journal (N.Y.L.J.), August 22, 2008, may be found at Bloglines website or N.Y.L.J. website (Subscription Required). Citing People v. Quadrozzi, No. 2006-065575 (2d dep't 2008), which cited N.Y. ECL §§ 71-0403 and 71-1933 (9), see NY Laws at the Assembly official website, go to "ENV – Environmental Conservation", then "ARTICLE 71 – ENFORCEMENT". Links accessed August 27, 2008.
- In re Conklin, 110 F.2d 178 (2d Cir. 1940); see 102 N.Y. Jur. 2d Taxation and Assessment § 2543, citing this case.
- Evans v. Gallman, 48 A.D.2d 466, 370 N.Y.S.2d 223 (3d Dep't 1975); see 102 N.Y. Jur. 2d Taxation and Assessment § 2541, citing this case.
- Central Greyhound Lines v. Graves, 274 A.D.2d 679, 87 N.Y.S.2d 441 (3d Dep't 1949); see 102 N.Y. Jur. 2d Taxation and Assessment § 2541, citing this case.
- Mira Oil Co. v. Chu, 114 A.D.2d 619, 494 N.Y.S.2d 458 (3d Dep't 1985); see 102 N.Y. Jur. 2d Taxation and Assessment § 2544, citing this case.
- New York State Dept. of Taxation & Finance v. Bramhall, 235 A.D.2d 75, 667 N.Y.S.2d 141 (4th Dep't 1997); see 102 N.Y. Jur. 2d Taxation and Assessment § 2548, citing this case.
- Snyder v. Wetzler, 84 N.Y.2d 941, 620 N.Y.S.2d 813, 644 N.E.2d 1369 (1994), found at Leagle.com website, March 13, 2013; see 102 N.Y. Jur. 2d Taxation and Assessment § 2548, citing this case.
- N.Y. Association of Convenient Stores v. Urbach, 275 A.D.2d 520, 712 N.Y.S.2d 220 (3d Dep't 2000); see 102 N.Y. Jur. 2d Taxation and Assessment § 2548, citing this case.
- Conservation easements at the New York State Deopartment of Environmental Conservation. Accessed October 18, 2011.
- 9 N.Y.C.R.R. Parts 7840–7863, online at NYCRR Title 9, accessed April 15, 2009; see also West's NY Digest 4th, Public Utilities ## 101 et seq., 53 NY Jur. 2d §1; see also 21 N.Y.C.R.R. Parts 500–506, for NYSERDA, q.v..
- New York Register website. Accessed October 22, 2009.
- Rulison, Larry (October 17, 2012). "Energy chocie saves little: With gas and electricity rates so low, switching energy supplier not likely to change your bill". Albnany Times Union. pp. D1–D2.
- Rulison, Larry (January 10, 2011). "PSE holds hearings on GlobalFoundries gas line". Albany Times-Union. pp. D1–D2.
- "Governor's Energy Highway Initiative Moves Forward". New York Power Authority. n.d. Retrieved February 27, 2013.
- "Energy Highway Task Force Members". New York Energy Highway. n.d. Retrieved February 27, 2013.
- "Newsroom (press release)". NYSERDA. April 4, 2012. Retrieved February 27, 2013.
- "Call for Ideas". New York Energy Highway. n.d. Retrieved February 27, 2013. Brochure at Request for Information.
- Quiniones, Gil (n.d.). "Building New York State's Energy Highway: DEALING WITH AGING LINES". Energy Biz (November and December 2012). Retrieved February 27, 2013.
- Hinds, Kate (October 22, 2012). "Blueprint for New York’s "Energy Highway" Unveiled". Transportation Nation. Retrieved February 27, 2013.
- Cuomo, Andrew (December 19, 2012). "Governor Cuomo Announces $726 Million Transmission Upgrade Program for Advancing "Energy Highway" Blueprint". Governor's Press Office. Retrieved February 27, 2013.
- "Steps taken". New York Energy Highway. n.d. Retrieved February 27, 2013.
- Wald, Matthew (March 27, 2012). "$1.2 Million Fine for Indian Point Fire". New York Times. Retrieved February 27, 2013.
- Lentz, Jon (January 28, 2013). "Dead End? "Energy Highway" Seeks Indian Point Alternatives". City and State. Retrieved February 27, 2013.
- "Upcoming events". Albany Law School. n.d. Retrieved February 27, 2013.
- "Canestrari: HEAP Expansion Will Help Heat More Homes This Winter," from New York State Assembly government website. See also Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance government website and New York State Benefits government website. Retrieved March 3, 2009.
- Waldman, Scott (January 9, 2014). "More renewable energy for state". Capital New York. Retrieved July 29, 2014.
- "Renewable Heat NY to Build Market for High-Efficiency, Low-Emissions Wood-Fired Heating Systems". The Harlem valley News. July 29, 2014. Retrieved July 29, 2014.
- N.Y. Energy Law § 1-103 (4), found at New York State Legislature official website, go to "ENG", then "Article 1", finally "1–103 – Definitions". Accessed August 6, 2008.
- NYSERDA official website About webpage. Accessed August 6, 2008.
- NYSERDA official website Board of Directors webpage. Accessed August 6, 2008.
- "Richard L. Kauffman, Chair of the NYSERDA Board: Appointed 6/19/2013". NYSERDA. April 28, 2014. Retrieved July 29, 2014.
- "John B. Rhodes, NYSERDA President and CEO". NYSERDA. April 28, 2014. Retrieved July 29, 2014.
- N.Y. Public Authorities Law §§ 1850 et seq., found at New York State Legislature official website, go to "PBA", then "Article 8", finally "Title 9 – (1850–1883) NEW YORK STATE ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY". Accessed August 6, 2008.
- NYSERDA law from its official website (pdf document). Accessed August 6, 2008.
- 21 N.Y.C.R.R. Parts 500–506 (New York Secretary of State, amended as of November 15, 2007). See online at NYCRR Title 21, Chapter XI, accessed April 15, 2009.
- 21 N.Y.C.R.R. §§ 500.1–500.2.
- 21 N.Y.C.R.R. § 500.3, citing N.Y. Public Authorities L. § 1853.
- 21 N.Y.C.R.R. Part 501, §§ 501.1–501.10 (eff. March 27, 1979), pursuant to N.Y. Public Authorities L. §§ 1852, 1855 & N.Y. Public Officers L. § 87.
- 21 N.Y.C.R.R. Part 502, §§ 501.1–501.10 (eff. March 2, 1987, amend. eff. December 5, 2007), pursuant to N.Y. Public Authorities L. §§ 1852, 1854-d, 1855 & N.Y. Public Officers L. § 87, citing Chapter 673 of the Laws of 1986, the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Act.
- 21 N.Y.C.R.R. Part 503, §§ 503.1–503.3 (eff. February 27, 1987, amend. eff. July 7, 1999), pursuant to N.Y. Environmental Conservation L. § 8-0113 & N.Y. Public Authorities L. §§ 1852, 1855, citing N.Y. Environmental Conservation L. § 8-0105 & 6 N.Y.C.R.R. § 617.2.
- 21 N.Y.C.R.R. Part 504, §§ 504.1–504.12 (eff. November 30, 1988, amend. eff. December 15, 1993), pursuant to N.Y. Executive L. § 102, N.Y. Public Authorities L. §§ 1852, 1855, 2880 & N.Y. Public Officers L. § 87; citing N.Y. Eminent Domain Procedure L. & N.Y. Public Authorities L. § 2880.
- 21 N.Y.C.R.R. Part 505, §§ 505.1–504.11 (eff. February 21, 2001, amend. eff. December 5, 2007), pursuant to N.Y. Public Authorities L. §§ 1852, 1855 & N.Y. Public Officers L. Art. 6A, §§ 87, 94; citing N.Y. Public Officers L. Art. 6A.
- 21 N.Y.C.R.R. Part 506, §§ 506.1–506.6 (eff. February 4, 2004, amend. eff. April 4, 2007), pursuant to N.Y. Public Authorities L. §§ 1852, 1855, N.Y. Energy L. § 5-108-a (q.v.) & N.Y. Executive L. § 102.
- Anna Helhoski, "NYSERDA helps farmers turn waste into electricity," Legislative Gazette, February 23, 2009, p. 10, see Legislative Gazette website. Retrieved February 25, 2009.
- New York Independent System Operator official website Public information page. Retrieved March 6, 2009.
- New York Independent System Operator official website 2009 Symposium on "Today's critical topics in energy" page. Retrieved March 6, 2009.
- Larry Rulison, "Bringing new energy to NYISO: At the helm since July, Whitley brings "impressive array of talents" to job," Albany Times Union, December 23, 2008, found at Albany Times Union website. Retrieved March 6, 2009.
- Larry Rulison, "New chairman named for NYISO," Times Union, March 29, 2011, p. D 1.
- "Companies Regulated by the Commission". New York Public Service Commission. October 17, 2013. Retrieved June 25, 2014.
- 21 N.Y.C.R.R. Parts 450–463 (New York Secretary of State, amended as of January 1, 1995, reissued July 1995).
- Katrina Kieltyka, "Sierra Club fighting plan to buy Canadian power: Say hydroelectic dams would harm indigenous people," Legislative Gazette, March 16, 2009, p. 21, available at Legislative Gazette archives (.pdf file). Retrieved March 20, 2009.
- John L. Parker James Malatras, "Missed Opportunities: California Energy Fears, New York Energy Policy and the New York Power Authority's New York City Turbine Projects," Pace Environmental Law Review (Pace University 2003). Found at Digital Commons website. Accessed September 11, 2010.
- Morgan & 1985 p. 323.
- Fordham University website. Accessed January 20, 2011.
- Aravella Simotas, at the time a law student, moderated the Fordham University Law School panel, years before she was elected to New York State Assembly. Aravella Simotas, "Discussion: Panel III: Electric Generators in New York City: Balancing the Energy and Environmental Needs of the Community," 8 Fordham Envtl. Law J. 531 (2002). Abstract found at Lexi-Nexis website. Accessed January 20, 2011.
- Nearing, Brian (October 11, 2012). "Cimate (sic.) change's lightning rod: In Union College speech, Michael Mann likens himself to hunted prey". Albany Times Union. p. A7. Retrieved October 11, 2012.
- "Marcellus Shale: New Regulations and Challenges". New York State Bar Association. 2012. Retrieved February 6, 2014.
- "Crude Awakening: A Discussion on Oil Transportation through New York State". New York State Bar Association, Environmental Law Section, Committee on Legislation. May 14, 2014. Retrieved June 25, 2014.
- Eric S. Turner, "Fourteen more wind power companies in New York agree to ethics guidelines," Legislative Gazette, August 3, 2009, pp. 7, 10.
- Charles Gottlieb, Hydrofracking, Local Zoning, and State Preemption, paper presented at the Warren M. Anderson Legislative Breakfast Series, "Hydrofracking - Balancing the 3 E's: Energy, Environment, and Economic Development," February 28, 2012 (Albany Law School).
- Anschutz Exploration Corp. v. Town of Dryden __ N.Y.S.2d ___ (Index # 2012-0902) (N.Y. Supreme Ct. Tompkins Co. February 21, 2012).
- Andrew Carden, "Another victory for anti-frackers," Legislative Gazette, March 6, 2012, pp. 8, 19.
- Cooperstown Holstein Corp. v. Town of Middletown, __ N.Y.S.2d ___ (Index # 2012-0930) (N.Y. Supreme Ct. Otsego Co. February 24, 2012).
- N.Y. Environmental Conservation Law § 23-0303 (2), found at N.Y. State assembly website. Retrieved February 29, 2012.
- LeBrun, Fred (March 4, 2012). "Time is on our side in hydrofracking fight". Albany Times Union. Retrieved October 17, 2012.
- Patricia Salkin (February 13, 2012). "First Anderson Legislative Seminar of 2012 to Tackle Hydrofracking". Retrieved February 29, 2012.
- Andrew Carden, "Judge rules local governments can ban fracking," Legislative Gazette, February 28, 2012, page 13.
- Specifically, the Anschutz relied on Huntley & Huntley, Inc. v. Borough Council of the Borough of Oakmont, 964 A.2d 855, 858 (Penn. 2009); see also Charles Gottlieb, Hydrofracking, Local Zoning, and State Preemption, op.cit., 4-5, notes 12-13.
- Compare Envirogas, Inc. v. Town of Kiatone, 112 Misc. 2d 432, 434 (N.Y. Supreme Ct. Erie Co. 1982), aff'd 89 A.D.2d 1056 (4th Dept. 1982), lv. den'd 58 N.Y.2d 602 (1982).
- Charles Gottlieb, Hydrofracking, Local Zoning, and State Preemption, op.cit., 4, n. 11, citing Anschutz Exploration Corp. v. Town of Dryden __ N.Y.S.2d ___ (Index # 2012-0902) (N.Y. Supreme Ct. Tompkins Co. February 21, 2012), slip opinion at 12-13; in turn citing Matter of Gernatt Asphalt Prods., Inc. v. Town of Sardina, 87 N.Y.2d 668, 681-682, 684 (1996) and Envirogas, Inc. v. Town of Kiatone, op cit..
- Sabratino, Dan (September 25, 2012). "Drilling bands to face appeal". Legislative Gazette. pp. 2, 15.
- "LeBrun–Cuomo about to permit fracking–Aug. 2012". GDACC: Gas Drilling Awareness for Cortland County blog. August 5, 2012. Retrieved October 17, 2012.
- "Fracker’s Complete Lack of Appeal". Shaleshock media blog. August 5, 2012. Retrieved October 17, 2012.
- "Appellate Division, Third Judicial Department Calendar Pages". New York State Unified Court System website. October 17, 2012. Retrieved October 17, 2012.
- "Norse Energy puts N.Y. land rights for sale: Gas company hurt by moratorium on drilling". Gannette News. October 21, 2011. Retrieved October 17, 2012.
- Northrup, Chip (September 30, 2012). "Anschutz Quits Dryden Suit". Solid Shale (blog). Retrieved October 17, 2012.
- Northrup, Chip (September 23, 2012). "Norse Energy as Zombie Plaintiff". Shale Shock (blog). Retrieved October 17, 2012.
- Cail, Krys (September 30, 2012). "Analysis: Is There a Seachange on Fracking in New York?". Solid Shale (blog). Retrieved October 17, 2012.
- Matter of Norse Energy Corp. USA v. Town of Dryden, ___ A.D.3d ____ (3d Dept. March 21, 2013) (docket 515227).
- Matter of Norse Energy Corp. USA v. Town of Dryden, slip op. at 5-15.
- Matter of Norse Energy Corp. USA v. Town of Dryden, slip op. at 3, note 2, citing N.Y. CPLR 1018, 1021.
- Matter of Norse Energy Corp. USA v. Town of Dryden, slip op. at 5.
- Matter of Norse Energy Corp. USA v. Town of Dryden, slip op. at 6, note 4, citing Matter of Pace-O-Matic, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Auth., 72 A.D.3d 1144, 1144 (3d Dept. 2010) and Quality Aggregates v. century Concrete Corp., 213 A.D.2d 919, 920-921 (3d Dept. 1995).
- Matter of Norse Energy Corp. USA v. Town of Dryden, slip op. at 6-7, citing N.Y. Const. Article IX; DJL Rest. Corp. v. City of New York, 96 N.Y.2d 91, 96 (2001), and three other cases.
- Matter of Norse Energy Corp. USA v. Town of Dryden, slip op. at 6-15.
- In the Matter of Mark S. Wallach, as Chapter 7 Trustee for Norse Energy Corp. USA, v. Town of Dryden, cases 130 and 131 (2014), see slip opinion. Accessed June 30, 2014.
- Associated Press (August 1, 2012). "Driller threatens state over local shale gas bans". Albany Times-Union. p. A3.
- Decision on Jeffrey v. Ryan. Accessed October 17, 2012.
- Navarro, Mireya (October 4, 2011). "Judge Rejects Binghamton’s Fracking Ban". New York Times. Retrieved October 17, 2012.
- Hakim, Danny (June 13, 2012). "Cuomo Plan Would Limit Gas Drilling to a Few Counties in New York". New York Times. Retrieved June 13, 2012.
- Karlin, Rick (June 14, 2012). "Is trial balloon full of shale gas?: A report that Gov. Andrew Cuomo backs limited hydrofracking draws quick criticism, some support". Retrieved June 14, 2012.
- LeBrun, Fred (August 4, 2012). "End of the anti-frack world near". Albany Times Union. Retrieved October 17, 2012.
- Vielkind, Jimmy (August 6, 2012). "A.M. Roundup: Limited hydrofracking on the way". Albany Times Union 'Capitol Confidential' blog. Retrieved October 17, 2012.
- Coin, Glen (August 6, 2012). "Columnist: Limited hydrofracking plan moving forward". Syracuse Post-Standard. Retrieved October 17, 2012.
- Northrup, Jimmy (n.d.). "New York State Gas Production Tax". scribd.com. Retrieved October 17, 2012.
- New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. n.d. http://www.dec.ny.gov/about/556.html. Retrieved February 6, 2014. Missing or empty
- Lawrence, Susan (Winter 2014). Sierra Club Hudson/Mohawk Group 48 (1). Missing or empty
- NYSERDA official website
- NYS Public Service Commission official website and NYS Public Service Commission consumer website
- Oil and Gas Leases page at the website of the New York Attorney General
- The Energy Association of New York State website
- Energy news archives at City and State, weekly New York newspaper
- Legal Updates on Energy Issues in New York
- Roberta Macklin website with links about energy, sustainability, and the environment
- U.S. Energy Information Administration website
- GBCI official website
- USGBC official website
- Environmental events calendar for NY, NJ, DE and PA
- New York Truth in Heating Law manual at UtilityProject.org
- New York City energy code