Nabhani dynasty

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Bani Nabhan
Country Oman
Titles Kings muluk
Founded 1154
Ethnicity Arab

The Nabhani dynasty (or Nabahina dynasty), members of the Bani Nabhan family, were rulers of Oman from 1154 until 1624, when the Yaruba dynasty took power.[a] One of their most visible legacies is the Bahla Fort, a large complex of mud brick buildings on stone foundations which is registered as a UNESCO world heritage site.

Background[edit]

After the early days of Islam, the tribes in the interior of Oman were led by Imams, who held both spiritual and temporal power. The Yahmad branch of Azd tribes gained power in the 9th century.[1] They established a system where the ulama of the Banu Sama, the largest of the Nizari tribes of the interior, would select the Imam.[2] The authority of the Imams declined due to power struggles.[2] During the 11th and 12th centuries Oman was controlled by the Seljuk Empire. They were expelled in 1154, when the Nabhani dynasty came to power.[3]

Rule[edit]

Bahla Fort in 2013 after major restoral work in the 1990s

The best quality frankincense, a valuable product in the Middle Ages, comes from Dhofar in the interior of southern Oman.[4] The Banu Nabhan controlled the trade in frankincense on the overland route via Sohar to the Yabrin oasis, and then north to Bahrain, Baghdad and Damascus.[5] Muhammed al-Fallah of the Banu Nabhan emerged as a powerful leader in 1151 and had taken control by 1154. He lived until 1176.[5]

The Nabhanis ruled as muluk, or kings, while the Imams were reduced to largely symbolic significance. The Imams lost moral authority since the title came to be treated as the property of the dominant tribe at any time.[2] According to the historian Sirhan bin Said there were no records of Imams from 1153, when Imam Musa bin Abu Ja'afar died, until 1406, when Imam Hubaise bin Muhammad died.[6]

The Nabhani made their capital at Bahla.[2] The Bahla Fort is called Hisn Tammah, and is said to take its name from an Iranian ruler of the town before the Islamic period.[7] There are probably some pre-Islamic structural elements, but most of the buildings date from the Nabhani period. Buildings include the Friday Mosque, which probably dates from the 14th century and has an elegantly carved mihrab. The most recent buildings appear to date to the start of the 16th century. The fort testifies to the power of the Nabhani in their heyday.[8]

The period is poorly documented. It seems that at times the Nabhani only controlled part of the interior of the country, and at other times also ruled over the coastal lands. Oman suffered from Persian invasions, and at one point the coast was controlled by the Kingdom of Hormuz.[9] The Banu Nabhan were dominant over the other tribes until the end of the 15th century.[8] There are records of personal visits by Nabhani rulers to Ethiopia, Zanzibar, the Lamu Archipelago of what is now Kenya, and Persia.[5] The al-Nabhani dynasty of Pate Island in the Lamu Archipelago claimed descent from the Omani dynasty.[10][11]

Decline and fall[edit]

Oman had an elected Imam and a hereditary Nabhani sultan from the 15th century into the 17th century, with the Imams gaining the ascendancy. The Nabhani ruler Suleiman bin Mudhafar was removed by the Imam Muhammad ibn Ismail (1500–29).[6] However, the Nabhanis clung to power in the Bahla region.[12] In 1507 the Portuguese captured the coastal city of Muscat, and gradually extended their control along the coast up to Sohar in the north and down to Sur in the southeast.[9] Omani histories record that the Bahla fort was destroyed in the early 17th century shortly before the Ya'aruba dynasty took control of Oman, although it is possible that parts of the old structure remained and were used as the basis for later construction.[13] In 1624 Nasir bin Murshid of the Ya'aruba took over control of Oman.[2]

Later years[edit]

The Nabahina retained power at the beginning of the Ya'rubi state and they treated Jabal al-akhdar (The Green Mountains located in the interior of Oman)as an emirate.[14] Thus, the Nabahinah transferred their loyalties from the Banu Rawahah to the Banu Riyam at the beginning of the seventeenth century.[14] They became the tamimah of the Banu Riyam and princes of the Jabal al-Akhdar, and survived as such until they were defeated in the war of Jabal Akhdar in 1956.[14] At the time the Sheikh of the Bani Riyam was Suleiman bin Himyar Al-Nabhani, Lord of the Jebel Akhdar-and descendant of the ancient Nabahina dynasty.[15] After the war Suleiman bin Himyar fled to Saudi Arabia where he remained in exile until he returned to Oman on Thursday, 28 November 1996, where he lived his remaining days in Muscat until he passed away on Thursday, 7 May 1998 - most of his kin remain to this day living in Muscat the capital of Oman.[citation needed]

Although the Ya'aruba ruled under the title of Imam, since they originated from the Nabahina kings dynasty they actually continued to rule as kings inheriting the title of Imam through vertical succession, thereby contradicting the Imamate tradition which provides that the Imam must be chosen from amongst the ahl al-hal wal ‘aqd transliterated as "those who loosen and bind". (This concept evolved during the period of the Khulafa ar-Rashidoon as a mechanism to choose the leader of the Muslims. The ahl al-hal wal ‘aqd are the leading personalities of society who are knowledgeable and have a proven track record of sincerity and sacrifice. They have no personal or class interests. The person who is appointed leader also does not covet such a position but is seen as most suitable for the job.)[citation needed]

Notes and References[edit]

Notes

  1. ^ The Ya'aruba were a branch of the Bani Nabhan. See Ibn Ruzaiq "Alfat-h", p. 261; Ibn Adeem's poem النونية; and Al-Siyabi "Al-Is'af",p. 116.

Citations

  1. ^ Rabi 2011, p. 23.
  2. ^ a b c d e Rabi 2011, p. 24.
  3. ^ Oxford Business Group 2007, p. 6.
  4. ^ Nabhan 2008, p. 78.
  5. ^ a b c Nabhan 2008, p. 79.
  6. ^ a b Nowell 2011, p. 32.
  7. ^ Limbert 2010, p. 22.
  8. ^ a b Bahla Fort: Unesco.
  9. ^ a b Thomas 2011, p. 221.
  10. ^ Laet 2000, p. 1275.
  11. ^ Donzel 1994, p. 202.
  12. ^ Ghubash 2006, p. 47.
  13. ^ Limbert 2010, p. 23.
  14. ^ a b c Al-Salimi 2002, p. 262.
  15. ^ Smiley & Kemp 1975, p. 11.

Sources