Native American reservation politics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Native American politics remain divided over different issues such as assimilation, education, healthcare, and economic factors that affect reservations. As a nation living within the United States of America, the Native American people face conflicting opinions within their tribes, essentially those living on federally approved reservations. Interactions with the federal government and the overall American culture surrounding them influence day-to-day tribal life. Native American culture as a whole rests between the divide of the traditionalists and those who wish to trade the old ways for improved conditions.

Poverty and culture[edit]

1940 government photo of Chippewa baby teething on a magazine titled Indians at work

“Approximately 14 percent of all American Indians in 1980 lived on large reservations with poverty rates of 40 percent or higher.” ([1]) Despite the conditions, Natives continue to live on the reservations because they see it as a cultural center for their particular tribe, value the implied sense of community, and receive government-funded benefits that they wouldn't gain otherwise. ([1]). As a cultural center, the reservations serve as a holding place for the old ways of Native American customs. “In the southeastern or Woodland tradition, those old ways are most often connected to myths, stories, music, and dance.” [2] There are some unwilling to share the “old ways” with outsiders because they feel it is sacred knowledge not easily given away to someone not of Native lineage.[2]

As an example of continuing the traditional ways, one Native American[who?] said, "Time evolves and comes to a place where it renews again. There is first a purification time. Then there is renewal time. We are getting really close to this time now. We were told, we would see America come and go. In a sense America is dying, from within. Because we forgot the instructions on how to live on earth.”

Organizations such as Native American Community Development Institute have been created “as an alliance of the major Indian nonprofits and several Indian businesses in the metropolitan area committed to community-building through sector economic development and large-scale development.” [3] They are devoted to the increase in economic innovation, and accomplish their mission by focusing on the growing number of Native youths and not placing a priority on traditional ways.

Native Americans suffer not only the highest poverty rates of all ethnic groups in America, but also the highest unemployment and disease rates.[4] Drug and alcohol abuse is common among the youth as well as teenage pregnancy and suicide. One native says, "Indians don't want to be dependent, but when it's either that or starve, the choice is clear."

Alcohol in reservation life[edit]

In a 2008 study by the Prevention Research Center, “Native American youth were more likely to have consumed alcohol in their lifetime and been intoxicated in the [time period of the test] than Whites. Native American drinkers were almost twice as likely to have gotten alcohol from an adult and twice as likely to have obtained alcohol from someone under 21.” [5] From 1994 to 1996, the alcoholism death rate among Natives was seven times that of the nation. “Lifetime prevalence of alcohol dependence was high among all tribes (men: 21%–56%, women: 17%–30%), but one (men: 1%, women: 2%).” [6]

Healthcare: improvements vs. shortcomings[edit]

One aspect of reservation life that discourages tribal members is healthcare, a service provided by the United States government for approximately 800,000 Natives. According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Native Americans receive lower quality healthcare than other minorities such as Hispanics.

With the addition of the HR3200 healthcare bill comes the promise of better services provided for the Native people. There will be an approximate 13% increase in funding for the Indian Health Service. Dr. Roubideaux, the head of the HIS, praises this addition saying, “There is not a Native American alive today who has not witnessed the many shortcomings of the Indian Health Service, but as Dr. Roubideaux has said, most of the failures were due to an extreme shortage of funds.” [7]

Cultural barriers[edit]

According to Elaine Watson Jordan, Ph.D., the Native American education system is severely flawed with respect to cultural barriers. In Breaking Barriers, Jordan notes that “it is important to describe the complexities of culture and language to illuminate how limited standardized practices and measures might be to summarize the skills of many children from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.” [8] She states that total “indoctrination to a new culture” [8] is not the answer to a healthy education. Jordan argues that barriers must be identified to be overcome and uses the compulsory attendance law of 1898 as an example of overlooking cultural boundaries. “Guided by the belief that American Indians should be assimilated into mainstream society,” Congress put into effect this law which would give the federal government the power to place American Indian children in boarding schools, “by force” [8] if necessary.

Family values[edit]

In March 1974, the Department of Labor issued the results of their research concerning Native youth integrating American culture into their lives after leaving the reservation for educational and occupational pursuits.[9] Research was done to determine the “occupational adjustment” of American Indian youth coming from reservations and seeking education away from home.

The study found that “the family is perhaps the most important aspect of the traditional Indian’s life.” [9] Cultural values of Native American individuals are described as, “The traditional Indian’s view of the world and his own place in it is one of living in harmony with nature.”[9]

In also studying the parents of the children observed, “they distrust the white man as one who wants to destroy their culture, and are likely to see the problems of the Indians as having been created by the white man.”[9] In response to this research, a counselor for a youth organization said, “We want to be assured that we are not misused at all, but that the project will be used in a good way for the benefit of our people.”

Natives did not welcome the research because “there is very little history of community involvement”[9] and trying to get Native youths who were taught early to be community-oriented is a difficult process in this aspect.

Educational interests[edit]

In June 2004, 90% of high school age natives attended public school, although the dropout rate was the highest of any minority. Beyond the fourth grade, academic performance drops quickly. A survey of schools indicates the reasoning behind the dropouts:

  • Student-teacher relationships (teachers do not care about me-37%; teachers do not provide enough assistance-39%; disagreements with teacher-33%)
  • Content of schooling (school is not important to what I want to do in life-44%; school is not important to me as a Native American-24%)
  • Lack of parental support (problems at home-44%; lack of parental encouragement-39%)[10]

Despite the dropout rate, some Native students have elected to go to college of their own accord, though the transition is difficult in regards to financing and receiving support from home. “Hispanics and Native Americans trail substantially behind blacks in terms of college enrollment, retention, and graduation despite the fact that they, like blacks, may benefit from Affirmative Action.” A National Educational Longitudinal Survey revealed that in the late 1990s, the United States Education system served 1.4% of Natives. Also, Native Americans are the second most disadvantaged minority group in the nation when it comes to transitioning from single parent households to a continued education.[11]

In her book Living Through the Generations: Continuity and Change in Navajo Women’s Lives, Joanna McCloskey addresses a growing desire to receive a further education among her Native youth. “Younger generations recognize the necessity of further training and education to compete in the labor force, and high school graduation remains symbolic of the vast gulf between the elders who never attended school.” [12]

Changing gender roles[edit]

"The Great Law of Peace included a section akin to the U.S. Bill of Rights, protecting the freedom of worship, speech, and assembly. The Cherokees limited town size so that all citizens could have the opportunity to speak in each council session if they so desired. Both republics were gender-blind, allowing women and men the same opportunities to participate and, if elected, to lead.” [13]

As late as 1989, some Native women retained the belief that raising families was their duty. One woman, Cindy Negale describes, “I prefer the traditional life because I was brought up very traditional by my grandparents…I am telling [my children] that Navajo is important.”[12] Also, she reveals that having large families is discouraged by the Indian Health Service because there is not enough healthcare money available for them. This opposes the Native standard that “prenatal values, integral to matrilineal clan membership, were expressed in pride in children” [12]

As well, other Native women have chosen to decrease the size of their families. The grandmothers would choose a path of natural fertility and give birth until they no longer could. In the present day, most mothers decided to limit their families to three to four children. “No longer sources of labor, the children become investments during long years of growth and education.”[12]

Self-government[edit]

AIM flag

“The Iroquois and the Cherokees did not value the process of a democratic republic because it consumed their identity; they valued it because it protected their individuality. The political debate from the Cherokee town council to the Iroquois Grand Council limited by law what the group could do to the person.”[13] The Natives place a high importance on individuality in government and thus, the issues dividing them will be resolved using a democratic-like resolution.

Through the self-determination policy proposed by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1968, tribal governments have the right to control federal programs directed at the Native Americans. Instead of supervising the tribes, the Bureau of Indian Affairs “began to serve”.[14] Congress then passed legislation recognizing the tribal judicial system and the decisions made through it.

Groups such as the American Indian Movement (AIM) support this movement because it allows them to act independent of the United States government while still securing their voting rights.

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Sandefur, Gary D. American Indian reservations: The first underclass areas?
  2. ^ a b Gregory , H.F. "Pete”. The Stories of the Old People. http://www.louisianafolklife.org/LT/Art[dead link] icles_Essays/creole_art_stories_old_peo.html
  3. ^ Native American Community Development Institute. http://www.nacdi.org/default/index[dead link]. cfm/about-us/background/
  4. ^ Carlson, Peter. In the year of 'Dances with Wolves,' everybody wanted to be on the Senate Indian Affairs Committee. Nearly a decade later, it can hardly get a quorum The Washington Post. February 23, 1997.
  5. ^ Friese, Bettina, Ph.D., Grube, Joel, Ph.D. Differences In Drinking Behavior And Access To Alcohol Between Native American and White Adolescents. Journal of Drug Education, 38(3):273-284, 2008
  6. ^ Dightman, Douglas MPH, Goldman, David MD, Koss Mary P. PhD, Polacca, Mona MSW, Prince, Ronald J. MS, Sanderson, Byron MSW, Yuan, Nicole P. PhD. Adverse Childhood Exposures and Alcohol Dependence Among Seven Native American Tribes. Print
  7. ^ Giago, Tim. How Will Universal healthcare affect Native Americans? (2009) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tim-giago/how-will-universal-health_b_218636.html
  8. ^ a b c Jordan, Elaine Watson Ph.D. Breaking the Barriers: Educational Empowerment in an Era of Standardization. (2007) ISBN 978-0977946303
  9. ^ a b c d e Belding, Nancye, Miles, H. Guy, Sparks, L. Tamara. Perspective of Adjustment: Rural Navajo and Papago Youth. (1974) Print.
  10. ^ Alanis, Luisa and Tsai, Grace."Journey to Thinking Multiculturally." NASP Communiqué, Vol. 32, #8." June 2004
  11. ^ Charles, Camille Z, Roscigno, Vincent J, and Torres, Kimberly C. Racial inequality and college attendance: The mediating role of parental investments. (2006)
  12. ^ a b c d McCloskey, Joanne. Living Through the Generations: Continuity and Change in Navajo Women’s Lives. (2007) Print.
  13. ^ a b Sturgis, Amy H.Liberty in Perfection: Freedom in Native American Thought. (1999)
  14. ^ Fouberg, Erin Hogan. Tribal Territory, Sovereignty, and Governance: A Study of the Cheyenne River and Lake Traverse Indian Reservations. (2000) Print.

See also[edit]