No Gun Ri Massacre

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from No Gun Ri)
Jump to: navigation, search
No Gun Ri Massacre
Part of Korean War
The twin-underpass railroad bridge at No Gun Ri, South Korea, in 1960. Ten years earlier, the U.S. military killed a large number of South Korean refugees under and around the bridge, early in the Korean War.
The twin-underpass railroad bridge at No Gun Ri, South Korea, in 1960. Ten years earlier, the U.S. military killed a large number of South Korean refugees under and around the bridge, early in the Korean War.
No Gun Ri Massacre is located in South Korea
No Gun Ri Massacre
Location Nogeun-ri, South Korea
Coordinates Coordinates: 36°10′30″N 127°46′30″E / 36.17500°N 127.77500°E / 36.17500; 127.77500
Date July 26, 1950 (1950-07-26) – July 29, 1950 (1950-07-29)
Deaths At least 163 dead or missing (according to South Korea)
About 400 dead (according to survivors)
Unknown (according to the US)
Victim South Korean refugees
Assailants U.S. military

The No Gun Ri Massacre (also referred to as the Nogeun-ri incident[1]) occurred on July 26–29, 1950, early in the Korean War, when an undetermined number of South Korean refugees were killed by the 2nd Battalion, 7th U.S. Cavalry Regiment (and a U.S. air attack) at a railroad bridge near the village of No Gun Ri, 100 miles (160 km) southeast of Seoul, South Korea. Estimates of the dead have ranged from dozens to 500: in 2005, a South Korean government report listed 163 dead or missing and 55 wounded and added that many other victims' names were not reported; the U.S. Army cites the number of casualties as "unknown".

The massacre allegations were little known outside Korea until the publication of a disputed Associated Press (AP) story in 1999, containing interviews with 7th Cavalry veterans some of whom corroborated Korean survivors' accounts. The AP also uncovered orders to fire on refugees approaching U.S. positions due to the KPA's use of these groups to cloak troop and guerrilla movements. The United States Department of the Army conducted an investigation and, in 2001, concluded the three-day event was "an unfortunate tragedy inherent to war and not a deliberate killing", rejecting survivors' demands for an apology and compensation.

South Korean investigators disagreed with Pentagon findings, saying they believed 7th Cavalry troops were ordered to fire on the refugees. The survivors' group called the U.S. report a whitewash. Additional archival documents later emerged showing U.S. commanders authorizing the use of lethal force against refugees during this period, declassified documents found but not disclosed by the Pentagon investigators. Among them was a report by the U.S. ambassador in South Korea in July 1950 that the U.S. military had adopted a theater-wide policy of firing on approaching refugee groups based on the KPA’s infiltration of refugees during the battle of Taejon. Despite demands, the U.S. investigation was not reopened.

Prompted by the exposure of No Gun Ri, survivors of similar alleged incidents in 1950–1951 filed reports with the Seoul government. In 2008 an investigative commission said more than 200 cases of alleged large-scale civilian killings by the U.S. military had been registered, mostly through air attacks.


Main article: Korean War
Hundreds of thousands of South Koreans fled south in mid-1950 after the North Korean army invaded. North Korean forces used the refugee crisis to cloak the movement of infiltrators and guerrilla forces.

The division of Japan's former Korean colony into two zones at the end of World War II led to years of border skirmishing between U.S.-allied South Korea and Soviet-allied North Korea. On June 25, 1950, the North Korean army invaded the south to try to reunify the peninsula, touching off a war that would draw in both the U.S. and Chinese militaries and end in an armistice and stalemate three years later.

The U.S. dispatched occupation forces from Japan to fight alongside the South Korean army. These American troops were insufficiently trained, poorly equipped and often led by inexperienced officers. In particular, they lacked training in how to deal with war-displaced civilians.[2]:iv-v In the two weeks after the Americans first arrived on July 5, 1950, the U.S. Army estimated that 380,000 South Korean civilians fled south, passing through U.S. and South Korean lines, as the defending forces reeled in retreat.[3]:251

North Korean snipers dressed in the white garments common among refugee groups being searched and interrogated by American and South Korean troops in early August of 1950.

With large gaps in their front lines and refugees fleeing the onrush of the North Korean advance, the Americans were sometimes attacked from behind, and reports spread that disguised North Korean soldiers were infiltrating south with refugee columns, a continuing concern throughout the war's first year.[2]:v An official 25th ID war diary describes the refugee predicament they were faced with in the early days of the war:

A July 24, 1950, entry in the 1st Cavalry Division war diary described the predicament: “No one desired to shoot innocent people, but many of the innocent-looking refugees dressed in the traditional white clothes of the Koreans turned out to be North Korean soldiers”.[4]:101

During the Battle of Taejon later in mid-July, hundreds of North Korean soldiers, many dressed in white to disguise themselves as refugees, infiltrated behind the lines of the U.S. 24th Infantry Division and played a crucial role in the defeat of the 24th at Taejon resulting in the capture of Major General William Dean, the conflict's highest ranking prisoner of war.[5] Two days before the incident at No Gun Ri, a company from the 8th U.S. Cavalry Regiment was reportedly attacked by North Korean irregulars who infiltrated a crowd of refugees west of Yongdong [6] with the KPA driving hundreds of refugees towards US positions to clear minefield.[7] On July 24 a man dressed in the traditional white peasant clothing accompanied by a seemingly pregnant woman were searched by members of the 8th Cavalry Regiment and the woman's "pregnancy" proved to be a small radio hidden under her clothes used to report American positions to KPA forces.[3]:199

Adding to this confusing situation, a July 23, 1950, Eighth United States Army intelligence report stated almost all refugees were searched over one 24-hour period on the main road and none was found carrying arms or uniforms.[8] But three days later Maj. Gen. Hobart R. Gay, 1st Cavalry Division commander, told rear-echelon reporters he suspected most of the refugee movement towards the U.S. defensive positions were North Korean infiltrators.[9] It was on that day, July 26, that one of Gay's front-line units, the 2nd Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment, dug in near the village of No Gun Ri, was faced with an approaching throng of hundreds of refugees, mostly from the nearby villages of Chu Gok Ri and Im Ke Ri.


Events of 25–29 July 1950[edit]

As North Korean forces seized the central South Korean town of Yongdong on July 25, 1950, 1st Cavalry Division troops began evacuating villages in front of the enemy advance, including hundreds of residents of Chu Gok Ri and Im Ke Ri. As they headed down the main road south, they were joined by other refugees. That first night the refugees were ordered to camp on a riverbank near the town of Ha Ga Ri. Several refugees were killed that first evening [2]:143 and accounts differ as to why there were casualties among the refugees that first night. According to some Korean survivors, American soldiers shot several refugees as they strayed from a roadside assembly area or ignored instructions to remain in place.[10]:110–114 Other Survivors recall refugees being injured in the crossfire between the advancing KPA and defending U.S. forces.[2]:144

The next day, July 26, the refugees awoke to find most of the U.S. soldiers had left the positions they held the night before. The refugee column then proceeded towards the No Gun Ri area, 5 miles (8.0 km) from their homes, when they arrived at a U.S. roadblock, were searched for weapons or contraband and made to move to the parallel railroad tracks to clear the road for vehicle traffic. Survivors said the U.S. troops who searched them radioed to overhead warplanes to attack the refugee group.[11] In a 2007 German television documentary Yang Hae-chan described the air attack: "Suddenly bombers flew over and opened fire without warning. They came back again and again firing at us. Chaos broke out among the refugees. We ran around wildly trying to get away. But in that first attack very many people were hit and killed."[12] Due to the lack of a Tactical Air Control Party (TACP) assigned to the regiment, it was deemed highly improbable by both investigation teams that the soldiers who searched the civilians called in this airstrike as they lacked the technical capability to do so.[2]:204[13]

An explanation for the refugee strafing was never confirmed by investigators. While several of the U.S. veterans stated that airstrikes were occurring in the valley out of their line of sight and many Korean refugees recalled an attack from the air that day, no flight logs or action summaries from any air assets operating in or around the No Gun Ri area reported an attack of this type in this area.[2]:181 With aircraft flying too fast to accurately make a positive identification on a target and with a shortage of TACP’s, friendly fire was always a concern; earlier on the 26th, the 1st Battalion of the 7th Cavalry’s regimental command post was attacked by a F-80[2]:97[14]:244 and the strafing of the refugees was dangerously close to U.S. forces.[14]:126

Early on the 25th the 2nd battalion of the 7th cavalry regiment broke ranks, abandoned its equipment and began a disorganized easterly retreat away from Yongdong believing they were being enveloped by the KPA.[14]:99 Beginning that evening and continuing through the early hours of the 27th, the 2/7 was reorganized by Major William Witherspoon the regimental operations officer and ordered to dig in on a ridgeline just east of and overlooking No Gun Ri in a position adjacent to the 1st Battalion, 7th Cavalry.[2]:87

According to the South Korean government’s investigation, over the course of the next three days, dug-in troops of the 2nd Battalion, 7th Cavalry, opened fire on the refugees, some of whom took shelter in a low, narrow culvert beneath the railroad embankment. The small arms and mortar fire forced them into a larger double tunnel beneath a railroad bridge.[11] Survivor Park Sun-yong said corpses were piled up as shields against the gunfire: "Children were screaming in fear and the adults were praying for their lives, and the whole time they never stopped shooting."[15] Chung Koo-ho said in a 2009 South Korean documentary, "Even now if I close my eyes I can see the people who were dying, as they cried out someone's name."[16]

Interviews by news organizations and the Inspector General of the Army discovered a wide variety of recollections from the 7th Cavalry veterans. Joseph Jackman, a G Company rifleman, told the BBC that he had deliberately shot people who congregating around the tunnels: “I don't know if they were soldiers or what. Kids, there was kids out there, it didn't matter what it was, 8 to 80, blind, crippled or crazy, they shot 'em all," [17] Norman L. Tinkler, an H Company machine gunner remembered firing on white-clad people coming down the railroad tracks toward the bridge, including "a lot of women and children” stating further that he had fired roughly 1,000 rounds and assumed "there weren't no survivors".[18][19] Other veterans such as Buddy Wenzel recalled that they fired warning shots over the refugees to keep them contained when the group panicked and the refugees “started to run towards us. We were firing over them all this time. Then somebody yelled, “We’re being fired at,” then there was a bunch that started shooting into the refugees [14] Wenzel and several other veterans stated that weapons, including a Russian burp gun and several grenades were recovered after the shooting stopped.[14]:120 Retired Colonel Robert Carroll, then a 25-year-old first lieutenant reconnaissance officer assigned to 2nd Battalion’s H Company, stated there was no order given to any machine gunner under his command to open fire and that none did. Carroll said that he did stop some sporadic shooting at refugees but they were over 300 yards away and not hitting anyone. After a young child running down the track was hit Carroll carried the child back to the tunnel where the battalion surgeon was treating a half a dozen individuals injured by shrapnel.[20]

Veterans from the nearby 1st battalion also witnessed the unfolding events. Thomas H. Hacha, dug in nearby with the 1/7 said that he “could see the tracers (bullets) spinning around inside the tunnel ... and they were dying down there. I could hear the people screaming."[21] The 7th Cavalry treated and evacuated a number of the wounded but they did not allow the rest of the surviving refugees passage behind their lines and kept them under the rail bridge.[22]:91 Over next two days, the refugees were kept in tunnel by the 2-7 on the one side and by the 1-7 who were defending against repeated infantry and armor incursions, probing attacks, and artillery barrages by the KPA’s 3rd division.[22]:70

On July 29, 1950, three days after the killings began, the 7th Cavalry Regiment was withdrawn from those positions to Hwanggan as the U.S. retreat continued.[3]:203


In the earliest published account of the killings, three weeks afterward, Chun Wook, a journalist with the North Korean 3rd Division troops who advanced to No Gun Ri, reported finding the area covered with layers of bodies and said about 400 people had been killed.[23] Over the years, the survivors' own estimates of dead ranged from 300 to 500, with perhaps 150 wounded. In Pentagon interviews in 2000, 7th Cavalry veterans' estimates of No Gun Ri dead ranged from dozens to 300.[24]:107 Homer Garza, a retired command sergeant major who as a corporal led a patrol through one No Gun Ri tunnel, said he saw 200 to 300 bodies piled up there, and most may have been dead.[15][25]

The U.S. Army's 2001 investigative report, citing 1950 aerial imagery, questioned the higher casualty estimates.[2]:190–191 (See "Aerial imagery, excavations" below.) In 2005, the South Korean government's Committee for the Review and Restoration of Honor for the No Gun Ri Victims, after a yearlong process of verifying claims through family registers, medical reports and other documents and testimony, certified the names of 150 No Gun Ri dead, 13 missing and 55 wounded, including some who later died of their wounds. It said reports were not filed on many other victims because of the passage of time and other factors. Of the certified victims, 41 percent were children under 15, and 70 percent were women, children or men over age 61.[24]:247–249,328,278 [26]


This 2008 photo shows a concrete abutment outside the No Gun Ri bridge, where investigators' white paint identifies bullet marks and embedded fragments from U.S. Army gunfire in the 1950 shooting of South Korean refugees.

At the war’s outbreak, the United States declared it would abide by the 1907 Hague Convention and the 1949 Geneva Conventions' articles regarding protection of civilians during wartime.[24]:113 The Hague Convention and the U.S. Army's own contemporaneous Rules of Land Warfare manual said that belligerents must distinguish non-combatants from combatants and treat them humanely.[27][28]

Information about the refugee killing reached the U.S. command in Korea and the Pentagon by late August 1950, in the form of a captured and translated North Korean military document that described the discovery.[29] Evidence of high-level knowledge also appeared a month later in a New York Times article from Korea, which reported, without further detail, that an unnamed high-ranking U.S. officer told the reporter of the “panicky” shooting of “many civilians” by a U.S. Army regiment that July.[30] No evidence has emerged, however, that the U.S. military investigated the incident at the time.[10]:170


During the U.S.-supported postwar autocracy of President Syngman Rhee, survivors of No Gun Ri did not file any public complaints. Following the April Revolution in 1960, which briefly established democracy in South Korea, former policeman Chung Eun-yong filed the first petition to the South Korean and U.S. governments. His two small children, a four-year-old son and two-year-old daughter, had been killed while his wife, Park Sun-yong, was badly wounded at No Gun Ri.[31][32] Over 30 petitions, calling for an investigation, apology and compensation, were filed over the next decades, by Chung and later by a survivors' committee.[24]:129,126

It goes beyond comprehension why they attacked and killed them with such cruelty. The U.S. government should take responsibility.

— excerpt from Chung's 1960 petition.[24]:129,126

In 1994, the U.S. Armed Forces Claims Service in Korea dismissed one No Gun Ri petition by asserting that any killings took place during combat. The survivors' committee retorted that there was no battle at No Gun Ri,[33] but U.S. officials refused to reconsider. In 1997, the survivors filed a claim with a South Korean compensation committee under the binational Status of Forces Agreement. This time, the U.S. claims service responded by again citing what it claimed was a combat situation and saying there was no evidence the 1st Cavalry Division was at No Gun Ri, as the survivors' research indicated.[24]:132,133 The 1961 official Army history made clear, however, that the division was in the area in late July 1950.[3]:179

On April 28, 1998, the Seoul government committee made a final ruling against the No Gun Ri survivors, citing the long-ago expiration of a five-year statute of limitations.[24]:135

Associated Press story[edit]

In October 1999, after release of the Associated Press report confirming the No Gun Ri refugee killings, Chung Eun-yong, leader of the survivors committee, reads a petition in Seoul, South Korea, calling for a "truthful and speedy" investigation.

Survivor group leader Chung had published a book in 1994 about the events of 1950, but it received little attention outside South Korea.[24]:128 In April 1998, however, the U.S.-based news agency Associated Press reported on the rejection of the 1997 claim, after having begun what would prove to be months of investigative reporting on the allegations, focusing on finding 1st Cavalry Division veterans who were at No Gun Ri.[10]:269–284 On Sept. 29, 1999, after a year of AP internal struggle over releasing the article,[34] the AP published its investigative report on the incident, based on the accounts of 24 No Gun Ri survivors corroborated by a dozen 7th Cavalry Regiment veterans. The journalists' research into declassified archives uncovered recorded instructions that frontline units shoot South Korean refugees approaching their positions.[35] A liaison officer of the sister 8th Cavalry Regiment had relayed word to his unit from 1st Cavalry Division headquarters to fire on refugees trying to cross U.S. front lines. Maj. Gen. William B. Kean of the 25th Infantry Division advised that any civilians found in areas supposed to be cleared by police should be considered enemies and “treated accordingly.”[nb 1] On the day the No Gun Ri killings began, the Eighth Army ordered[36] all units to stop refugees from crossing their lines.[37] The AP reported in subsequent articles that many more South Korean civilians were killed when refugee columns were strafed by U.S. warplanes in the war's first months and when the U.S. military blew up two Naktong River bridges packed with refugees on Aug. 4, 1950.[38] The No Gun Ri reporting by AP's Sang-hun Choe, Charles J. Hanley, Martha Mendoza and Randy Herschaft was awarded the 2000 Pulitzer Prize for Investigative Reporting, along with 10 other major national and international journalism awards.[10]:278

The AP report, however, came under criticism in May 2000. U.S. News & World Report reported that one of the key AP witnesses, Edward L. Daily, was not present for the events he described.[39] Another of the AP's sources, Eugene Hesselman, stated that he overheard an order from company commander Captain Melbourne Chandler directing his men to fire on the refugees when it was later discovered that Hesselman had been injured and evacuated before the incident took place.[14]:166 Another one of the AP's sources, Delos Flint, told the AP he witnessed U.S. forces attacking refugees in the rail tunnels but according to the 7th Cavalry's war diary Flint was also medically evacuated before the events took place.[39] According to military historian and former 7th Cavalry officer Robert Bateman, who first discovered Daily's fraud, he informed the AP team of Daily's deception weeks before their submission to the Pulitzer committee, but the AP team did not disclose this information.[40] Additional sources used by the AP later informed the U.S. Army's investigators and Bateman that they had been misquoted or their interviews had been taken out of context to support events that did not occur.[14]:xii A Pentagon spokesman said this would not affect the Army's No Gun Ri investigation, referring to Daily as "just one guy of many we've been talking to".[41] A May 2000 article in the New York Times weighed the criticism, citing the U.S. News and other reports, and concluded that "in the end, the crucial centerpiece of The A.P. report, the American soldiers killed at least 100 Korean civilians--possibly under direct orders--has been chipped but hardly shattered by the latest revelations".[42]

Still, additional evidence continued to be made public. In June 2000, CBS News reported the existence of a U.S. Air Force memo from July 1950 in which the operations chief in Korea said the Air Force was strafing refugee columns approaching U.S. positions at the Army's request.[43][nb 2] A Navy document later emerged in which pilots said the Army had told them to attack any groups of more than eight people in South Korea.[44]:81[nb 3]

U.S. and South Korean military investigations[edit]

In March 1999, six months before the AP story was published, the U.S. Army said in private correspondence it had looked into the No Gun Ri allegations and "found no information to substantiate the claim" in the operational records of the 1st Cavalry and 25th Infantry Divisions, the same records in which the AP journalists earlier found directives to fire on civilians. The letter from an Army official was sent to the U.S. National Council of Churches, which had requested an inquiry on behalf of the Korean National Council of Churches.[10]:275–276[nb 1]

After publication of the AP report, Defense Secretary William Cohen ordered Army Secretary Louis Caldera to initiate an investigation. The Seoul government also ordered an investigation, proposing the two inquiries conduct joint document searches and joint witness interviews. The Americans refused.[45]

In the ensuing 15-month probes, conducted by the U.S. Army inspector general's office and Seoul's Defense Ministry, interrogators interviewed or obtained statements from some 200 U.S. veterans and 75 Koreans. The Army researchers reviewed 1 million pages of U.S. archival documents.[2]:i-ii The final weeks were marked by press reports from Seoul indicating sharp disputes between the U.S. and Korean teams.[24]:168[46]

On Jan. 11, 2001, the two governments issued their reports. The U.S. report concluded the U.S. military had killed "an unknown number" of South Korean refugees at No Gun Ri with "small-arms fire, artillery and mortar fire, and strafing that preceded or coincided with the NKPA's advance and the withdrawal of U.S. forces in the vicinity of No Gun Ri during the last week of July 1950" but no orders were issued to fire on the civilians, and the shootings were the result of a perceived enemy threat.[2]:x–xi Retired Marine Lt. Gen. Bernard E. Trainor, an investigation adviser, described the events as "an act of desperation by frightened, green troops who acted out of self-preservation" and "not the deliberate murder of innocents".[47] The US investigators also noted on the know reliability concerns with eyewitness accounts. Memories of traumatic events are known to be influenced by factor such as stress, age at the time of the event and at the time of recall, passage of time since the event, bias and witness contamination as was shown with the AP’s key eyewitness Edward Dailey and the American and Koreans who stated they remember him being present.[2]:114–119 President Bill Clinton issued a statement that day declaring, "I deeply regret that Korean civilians lost their lives at No Gun Ri in late July, 1950", but stopping short of an apology acknowledging wrongdoing.[48][49] Although established international laws of war, such as the 1907 Hague Convention, held belligerents responsible for the conduct of their subordinates,[50] Clinton later told reporters, "The evidence was not clear that there was responsibility for wrongdoing high enough in the chain of command in the Army to say that, in effect, the government was responsible."[51]

The U.S. offered a $4 million plan for a memorial at No Gun Ri and scholarship fund, but not the individual compensation survivors demanded.[52] The survivors later rejected the plan because the memorial would be dedicated to all the war's South Korean civilian dead rather than just the No Gun Ri victims.[53]

South Korean investigators acknowledged a lack of documentation of specific orders at No Gun Ri to shoot refugees, but pointed out gaps in U.S.-supplied documents, gaps that included the 7th Cavalry's journal, or communications log, for July 1950, the crucial document that would have carried No Gun Ri orders. It was missing from its place at the National Archives.[54]:14 [55]

The South Koreans’ final report referred to testimony from five former Air Force pilots that they were directed to strafe civilians during this period, and from 17 veterans of the 7th Cavalry that they believed there were orders to shoot the No Gun Ri refugees. The Koreans noted that two of the veterans were battalion radiomen and, as such, were in an especially good position to know which orders had been relayed.[4]:100–101 [54]:176[56] “We believe there was an order to fire,” said Oh Young-ho, the South Korean prime minister’s national security director.[57]

Former U.S. congressman Pete McCloskey of California, the only one of eight outside advisers to the U.S. inquiry to write a detailed analysis afterward, agreed with the Koreans, saying the finding that there was no order to shoot and a suggestion that the refugees were not intentionally strafed were “a glaring falsity” and “so misleading as to suggest a deliberate whitewash.” [58] He counted nine enlisted men and one officer as having testified to orders to shoot.[59]

Surviving documents said nothing about infiltrators at No Gun Ri, even though they would have been the 7th Cavalry's first enemy killed-in-action in Korea. However, several of the battalion soldiers interviewed said their unit was returning hostile fire from the tunnels.[2]:120,x The Korean survivors, by contrast, stated there were no infiltrators in their group, and the South Korean investigative report, arguing the illogic of trapped infiltrators firing on the surrounding battalion, doubted that such a scenario took place.[22]:83

Writing to the Army inspector general's office after issuance of its report, American lawyers for the survivors said that whether the 7th Cavalry troops acted under formal orders or not, "the massacre of civilian refugees, mainly the elderly, women and children, was in and of itself a clear violation of international law for which the United States is liable under the doctrine of command responsibility and must pay compensation".[60] Four years later, in 2005, the South Korean government’s victims review committee, citing the laws of war and international humanitarian law, concluded, "The United States of America should take responsibility for the No Gun Ri incident."[24]:119

Additional criticism of the U.S. investigation[edit]

A joint U.S.-South Korean "statement of mutual understanding"[61] issued with the separate 2001 investigative reports did not include the assertion that no orders to shoot refugees were issued at No Gun Ri.[44]:94 But that remained a central "finding"[2]:xiii of the U.S. report itself, a report that journalists and scholars subsequently noted either did not address or presented incomplete versions of key declassified documents, some previously reported in the news media.

In this excerpt from a July 25, 1950, memo, the U.S. Air Force operations chief in Korea, Col. Turner C. Rogers, reports U.S. warplanes are strafing South Korean refugees at the U.S. Army's request because of reports of North Korean infiltrators disguising themselves as civilians. The Army's 2001 investigative report on the No Gun Ri refugee massacre excluded this passage from its description of the memo. Full text.[62]

News reports pointed out that the U.S. review, in describing the July 1950 Air Force memo,[62] did not acknowledge it said refugees were being strafed at the Army's request.[2]:98[51][63] Later research found such U.S. air attacks on refugees were common in mid-1950.[64] The report did not address the commanding general’s July 26, 1950, instruction [65] in the 25th Infantry Division saying civilians in the war zone would be considered unfriendly and shot.[2]:xiii[4]:99[51] In saying no such orders were issued at No Gun Ri,[2]:xiii the Army did not disclose that the 7th Cavalry log, which would have held such orders, was missing from the National Archives.[55]

After the Army issued its report, it was learned it also had not disclosed its researchers' discovery of at least 14 additional declassified documents showing high-ranking commanders ordering or authorizing the shooting of refugees in certain areas in the Korean War's early months,[44]:85 such as communications from 1st Cavalry Division commander Gay and a top division officer to consider refugees north of the firing line "fair game"[66] and to "shoot all refugees coming across river".[67]

In this excerpt from a 1950 letter to Dean Rusk, John J. Muccio, U.S. ambassador to South Korea outlined guidelines and polices agreed upon by US and ROK forces regarding the increasingly severe refugee crisis. The document detailed curfew policies, evacuation procedures and leaflet operations warning refugees fleeing south that they would be fired on if they advanced on US positions and ignored warning shots.. The letter, dated July 26, the day the killings began at No Gun Ri, was deliberately omitted from the Army’s 2001 investigative report.[68][69]

In 2005, American historian Sahr Conway-Lanz reported his discovery of a declassified document[68][69] at the National Archives in which the United States Ambassador to Korea in 1950, John J. Muccio, notified the State Department on the day the No Gun Ri killings began that the U.S. military, fearing infiltrators, had adopted a policy of shooting South Korean refugee groups that approached U.S. lines despite warning shots.[4]:97–99[70] Pressed by the South Korean government, the Pentagon eventually acknowledged it deliberately omitted the Muccio letter from its 2001 report.[71][72]

Aerial imagery[edit]

As part of the U.S. Army's 2001 report into the incident, thousands of feet of aerial film taken by USAF reconnaissance were also analyzed. Among the reconnaissance films, investigators discovered aerial images taken of the area on Aug. 6, 1950, 11 days after the events. These images were analyzed by two separate groups within the United States: the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NIMA). The AFIP has many experts who specialize in the location and identification of mass graves and have recently been used to locate these sites in places such as Bosnia. According to the both NIMA and the AFIP, they saw no indication of scavenger activity on corpses, bodies being dragged off site, decomposition, blood stained soil, mass graves or any photographic indication that a mass killing had taken place.[73] This analysis is significant because several Korean eyewitnesses have stated that mass graves were used to bury the dead and that they had returned to bridge and saw “many dead decomposing bodies in the area and that some bodies had been temporarily buried” and other Korean eyewitnesses stated that many of the bodies had not been buried until mid August. According to the US Army report, this suggested the No Gun Ri death toll was lower than Korean estimates.[2]:xiv

The 2001 South Korean investigative report drew primarily on accounts from survivors and nearby residents and said many bodies had been taken away by relatives or buried in soldiers' abandoned foxholes in the days following the killings, and some remained inside one underpass tunnel, under thin layers of dirt, out of sight of airborne cameras and awaiting later burial in mass graves [54]:197,204 however the aerial footage analyzed by the US showed fighting holes used by 2-7 Cavalry still intact on August 6, 1950. South Korean military specialists questioned the U.S. reconnaissance photos because they had been spliced and were not original copies. In response, the US team verified the reconstructed film matched the originals and made recommendations for a process to better document reconstruction efforts on damaged archival footage.[2]:App. C, Tab 2, 13

Archaeological survey[edit]

In July 2007 a team from Chungbuk National University began an archaeological excavation of the site to search for the physical remains of those killed at No Gun Ri. The team, led by professor of History of Ancient Art Park Seon-ju, planned on excavating several sites where eyewitnesses said they had buried the remains of the victims and DNA analysis of the remains would be performed to determine the identities of this found.[1] By the end of August, the excavation had turned up nothing, though officials said that "the remains may have been damaged by heavy rains or taken away by their bereaved families".[74]

Later developments[edit]

Continuing appeals[edit]

Though often supported by South Korean politicians and newspaper editorials, the No Gun Ri survivors' repeated demands for a reopened U.S. investigation and compensation went unheeded. Meeting with South Korean officials in 2001, the survivors asked that their government seek action at the International Court of Justice at The Hague and in U.N. human rights forums, but were rebuffed.[75]:267,306 In 2002, a spokesman for South Korea's then-governing party called for a new U.S. inquiry,[76] but the Defense Ministry later warned the National Assembly a reopened probe might damage U.S.-South Korean relations.[24]:202

The Memorial Tower in the No Gun Ri Peace Park, with its three- and two-dimensional depictions of the refugees of 1950, and two arches representing the No Gun Ri tunnel entrances. The 29-acre park, adjacent to the massacre site in Yongdong County in central South Korea, opened in October 2011. It also contains a museum and a peace education center.

The disclosure in 2007 that Pentagon investigators had omitted the Ambassador Muccio letter from their final report, along with other incriminating documents and testimony, prompted more calls for action. Two leaders of the National Assembly appealed to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee for a joint investigation, but no U.S. congressional body ever took up the No Gun Ri issue.[77]

Memorial park[edit]

After the United States refused to offer compensation, and the survivors rejected the plan for a war memorial and scholarship fund, South Korea's National Assembly on February 9, 2004, adopted a Special Act on the Review and Restoration of Honor for the No Gun Ri Victims. It established the committee that examined and certified the identities of dead and wounded, and it provided medical subsidies for surviving wounded. The act also envisioned a memorial park at the No Gun Ri site, which had begun attracting 20,000 to 30,000 visitors a year. The 29-acre (12-ha.) No Gun Ri Peace Park, built with $17 million in government funds and featuring a memorial, museum and peace education center, opened in October 2011.[24]:219,190,311–312[78] A publicly financed No Gun Ri International Peace Foundation also sponsored an annual peace conference, a No Gun Ri Peace Prize and a summer peace camp at the park for international university students.[75]:19

No Gun Ri in culture[edit]

In South Korea, the No Gun Ri story inspired works of nonfiction, fiction, theater and other arts. In 2010, a major Korean studio, Myung Films, released a No Gun Ri feature film, A Little Pond, written and directed by Lee Saang-woo and featuring Song Kang-ho, Moon So-ri and other Korean stars who donated their work. Besides commercial release in South Korea, the movie was screened at international film festivals, including in New York and London.[79] In 2006, artist Park Kun-woong and Chung Eun-yong published Nogunri Story, Volume 1; Recollecting That Summer Day, a 612-page graphic narrative that told the story through thousands of drawings. The Korean-language work, based on Chung Eun-yong's 1994 book, was also published in translation in Europe.[80] In the United States, No Gun Ri was a theme of four English-language novels, including the National Book Award finalist Lark & Termite of 2009, by Jayne Anne Phillips.[81]

Truth and Reconciliation Commission[edit]

The 1999 No Gun Ri articles prompted hundreds of South Koreans to come forward to report other alleged incidents of large-scale civilian killings by the U.S. military in 1950–1951, mostly air attacks. In 2005 the National Assembly created the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of the Republic of Korea to investigate these, as well as other human rights violations in southern Korea during the 20th century. The commission's docket eventually held more than 200 cases of what it described as "civilian massacre committed by U.S. soldiers".[82]:288,294

By 2009, the commission's work of collating declassified U.S. military documents with survivors' accounts confirmed eight representative cases of what it found were wrongful U.S. killings of hundreds of South Korean civilians, including refugees crowded into a cave attacked with napalm bombs, and those at a shoreline refugee encampment deliberately shelled by a U.S. warship.[83][84][85]:118–119[86]:121

The commission alleged that the U.S. military repeatedly conducted indiscriminate attacks, failing to distinguish between combatants and non-combatants.[85]:106 In its most significant finding, the commission also confirmed that South Korean authorities had summarily executed thousands of suspected leftists in South Korea – possibly 100,000 to 200,000 – at the outbreak of the war, sometimes with U.S. Army officers present and taking photographs.[84]

Of all American wars, the Korean conflict is believed to have been the deadliest for civilians as a proportion of those killed, including North Korean non-combatants killed in extensive U.S. Air Force bombing of North Korea, and South Korean civilians summarily executed by the invading North Korean military.[82]:109 The Truth and Reconciliation Commission recommended the Seoul government negotiate with the United States for reparations for large-scale civilian killings by the U.S. military.[85]:49 This did not occur. Assistant U.S. Secretary of State Stanley Roth had been quoted as saying in Seoul at the outset of the No Gun Ri investigation in 1999 that the United States would consider investigating any similar Korean War killings that came to light.[87] The 1999-2001 investigation was the last conducted by the United States.[44]:x

See also[edit]



  1. ^ a b "Nogeun-ri excavations begin". The Hankyoreh. 9 May 2007. Retrieved 20 November 2013. 
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s Office of the Inspector General, Department of the Army. No Gun Ri Review. Washington, D.C. January 2001
  3. ^ a b c d Appleman, Roy E. (1961). South to the Naktong, North to the Yalu (June–November 1950). Washington, D.C.: Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army. Retrieved February 8, 2012. 
  4. ^ a b c d Conway-Lanz, Sahr (2006). Collateral damage: Americans, noncombatant immunity, and atrocity after World War II. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-97829-7. 
  5. ^ Bill Sloan. "The Darkest Summer: Pusan and Inchon 1950: The Battles That Saved South Korea--and the Marines--from Extinction". Simon and Schuster, Nov 10, 2009. pg 72
  6. ^ Johnston, Richard J.H. (July 27, 1950). "Guile Big Weapon of North Koreans". The New York Times. p. 1. 
  7. ^ Korea Institute of Military History. The Korean War: Volume 1. University of Nebraska Press. 2000
  8. ^ Eighth U.S. Army. July 23, 1950. Interrogation report. "North Korean methods of operation". Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff, G-2. Cited in Hanley, Charles J. (2012). "No Gun Ri: Official Narrative and Inconvenient Truths". In Jae-Jung Suh. Truth and Reconciliation in South Korea: Between the Present and Future of the Korean Wars. London and New York: Routledge. p. 74. ISBN 978-0-415-62241-7. 
  9. ^ The Associated Press, American and British Task Force Supports Yank Retreat July 26, 1950.
  10. ^ a b c d e Hanley, Charles J.; Choe, Sang-Hun; Mendoza, Martha (2001). The Bridge at No Gun Ri. New York, New York: Henry Holt and Company. ISBN 0-8050-6658-6. 
  11. ^ a b Truth and Reconciliation Commission of the Republic of Korea. 2007.December Newsletter. Retrieved January 28, 2012.
  12. ^ ARD Television, Germany. "The Massacre of No Gun Ri," March 19, 2007, 11:20–12:18 mins , retrieved January 28, 2012.
  13. ^ Donghee Sinn. "Room for archives? Use of archival materials in No Gun Ri research". Archival Science. May 2010.
  14. ^ a b c d e f g Robert Bateman (2002). No Gun Ri: A Military History of the Korean War Incident. Stackpole Books. ISBN 978-0811717632. . pg 118
  15. ^ a b ARD Television, Germany. "The Massacre of No Gun Ri," March 19, 2007. Retrieved January 28, 2012.
  16. ^ Munwha Broadcasting Corp., South Korea, "No Gun Ri Still Lives On: The Truth Behind That Day," September 2009.
  17. ^ Timewatch: Kill 'Em All - American War Crimes in Korea. BBC, October Films. February 1, 2002, 20:53 mins (Jackman), 30:50 mins (McCloskey).
  18. ^ "Memories of a Massacre". Wichita (Kansas) Eagle. July 23, 2000. Retrieved February 17, 2012. 
  19. ^ "Kansas veteran's memories vivid of civilian deaths". The Kansas City Star. September 30, 1999. 
  20. ^ Reliable Sources? Examining the Discrepancies in Eyewitness Accounts," U.S. News and World Report, 12 May 2000
  21. ^ ARD Television, Germany. "The Massacre of No Gun Ri," March 19, 2007, 21:10–22:00 mins, retrieved January 28, 2012.
  22. ^ a b c Kuehl, Dale C. "What happened at No Gun Ri? The challenge of civilians on the battlefield". U.S. Army Command and General Staff College. Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. June 6, 2003. Retrieved February 10, 2012. Biblioscholar (2012). ISBN 1249440270
  23. ^ Cho Sun In Min Bo newspaper, North Korea, August 19, 1950.
  24. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Committee for the Review and Restoration of Honor for the No Gun Ri Victims (2009). No Gun Ri Incident Victim Review Report. Seoul: Government of the Republic of Korea. ISBN 978-89-957925-1-3. 
  25. ^ "1950 "shoot refugees" letter was known to No Gun Ri inquiry, but went undisclosed". Associated Press. April 13, 2007. 
  26. ^ "No Gun Ri victims officially recognized: 218 people". Hankyoreh (in Korean). 2005-05-23. Retrieved 2014-01-04. 
  27. ^ Hague Convention. 1907. Convention (IV) respecting the laws and customs of war on land, Article 46. The Hague, Netherlands. Retrieved February 14, 2012
  28. ^ U.S. War Department (1940). Rules of Land Warfare. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. p. 6. 
  29. ^ "Captured North Korean document describes mass killings by U.S. troops". Associated Press. June 15, 2000. 
  30. ^ "Stranded Enemy Soldiers Merge With Refugee Crowds in Korea". The New York Times. September 30, 1950. Retrieved February 17, 2012. 
  31. ^ Martin, Douglas (2014-08-22). "Chung Eun-yong,Who Helped Expose U.S. Killings of Koreans, Dies at 91". New York Times. Retrieved 2014-08-31. 
  32. ^ "South Korean who forced US to admit massacre has died". Associated Press. 2014-08-06. Retrieved 2014-08-31. 
  33. ^ Young, Marilyn (2002). Omar Bartov, Atina Grossman and Mary Nolan, ed. An Incident at No Gun Ri. Crimes of War: Guilt and Denial in the Twentieth Century (New York: The New Press). p. 245. ISBN 1-56584-654-0. 
  34. ^ Port, J. Robert (2002). "The Story No One Wanted to Hear". In Kristina Borjesson. Into the Buzzsaw: Leading Journalists Expose the Myth of a Free Press. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books. pp. 201–213. ISBN 1-57392-972-7. 
  35. ^ Archives are maintained by the U.S. National Archives#National Archives at College Park. For these purposes, mostly at College Park, Maryland facility
  36. ^ "File:No Gun Ri 07 - Eighth Army 26 July - Stop all refugees.jpg". Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved 2012-08-29. 
  37. ^ "War's hidden chapter: Ex-GIs tell of killing Korean refugees". Associated Press. September 29, 1999. 
  38. ^ "Veterans: Other incidents of refugees killed by GIs during Korea retreat". The Associated Press. October 13, 1999.  "Korean, U.S. witnesses, backed by military records, say refugees strafed". The Associated Press. December 28, 1999. 
  39. ^ a b Galloway, Joseph L. (May 14, 2000). "Doubts About a Korean "Massacre"". U.S. News & World Report. 
  40. ^ Bateman, Robert. "Did the Associated Press Misrepresent the Events that Happened at No Gun Ri?". History News Network. 
  41. ^ "Ex-GI acknowledges records show he couldn't have witnessed killings". Associated Press. May 25, 2000. 
  42. ^ Barringer, Felicity (22 May 2000). "A Press Divided: Disputed Accounts of a Korean War Massacre". The New York Times. p. 1. Retrieved 18 November 2013. 
  43. ^ "Orders To Fire On Civilians?". CBS News. June 6, 2000. Retrieved February 13, 2012. 
  44. ^ a b c d Hanley, Charles J. (2012). "No Gun Ri: Official Narrative and Inconvenient Truths". In Jae-Jung Suh. Truth and Reconciliation in South Korea: Between the Present and Future of the Korean Wars. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 68–94. ISBN 978-0-415-62241-7. 
  45. ^ Cable, U.S. Embassy, Seoul. October 14, 1999. "A/S Roth puts focus on cooperation in Nogun-ri review". Cited in Hanley, Charles J. (2012). "No Gun Ri: Official Narrative and Inconvenient Truths". In Jae-Jung Suh. Truth and Reconciliation in South Korea: Between the Present and Future of the Korean Wars. London and New York: Routledge. p. 71. ISBN 978-0-415-62241-7. 
  46. ^ Dong-a Daily, Seoul. December 7, 2000. (In Korean).
  47. ^ Trainor, Bernard E. (January 21, 2001). "The Anguish of Knowing What Happened at No Gun Ri". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2014-01-05. 
  48. ^ BBC News (January 11, 2001). "US 'deeply regrets' civilian killings". BBC News Online. Retrieved 2007-04-15. 
  49. ^ Clinton, William J. 2001. Statement on the Korean War incident at No Gun Ri Washington, D.C.: Presidential Papers, Administration of William J. Clinton. 11 January. Retrieved January 14, 2012
  50. ^ Hague Convention. 1907 Article 3. The Hague, Netherlands. Retrieved February 14, 2012
  51. ^ a b c "No Gun Ri: Unanswered". Associated Press. January 13, 2001. 
  52. ^ "Army says GIs killed South Korean civilians, Clinton expresses regret". Associated Press. January 11, 2001. 
  53. ^ "US sticks to 2001 offer for shooting victims". Yonhap news agency. August 5, 2005. 
  54. ^ a b c Ministry of Defense, Republic of Korea. The Report of the Findings on the No Gun Ri Incident. Seoul, South Korea. January 2001.
  55. ^ a b Mendoza, Martha (Winter 2002). "No Gun Ri: A Cover-Up Exposed". Stanford Journal of International Law 38 (153): 157. Retrieved 2014-01-06. 
  56. ^ Pyle, Richard (November 21, 2000). "Ex-GIs: U.S. troops in Korea War had orders to shoot civilians". The Associated Press. 
  57. ^ Kirk, Don (January 13, 2001). "Korean Group Rejects U.S. Regret for War Incident". International Herald Tribune. Retrieved 2014-01-06. 
  58. ^ Cassel, Doug (March 26, 2001). "No Gun Ri: Still No Answers". Chicago Daily Law Bulletin. 
  59. ^ "Newspaper: Army Confirms No Gun Ri". ABC News. December 6, 2000. Retrieved 2014-01-16. 
  60. ^ Chung, Koo-do (2008). The Issue of Human Rights Violations During the Korean War and Perception of History: Focusing on the No Gun Ri and Other U.S. Military-Related Cases. Seoul, South Korea: Dunam Publishing Co. p. 440. 
  61. ^ Governments of the United States of America and the Republic of Korea. "Statement of Mutual Understanding"Washington, D.C., and Seoul. January 2001
  62. ^ a b "File:No Gun Ri 04 - USAF 25 July - Memo tells of policy to strafe refugees.jpg". Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved 2012-08-29. 
  63. ^ Sloyan, Pat (January 19, 2001). "New Account of No Gun Ri; AF Memo: Army Sought Strafing". Newsday. 
  64. ^ Kim, Taewoo (2012). "War against an Ambiguous Enemy: U.S. Air Force Bombing of South Korean Civilian Areas, June-September 1950". Critical Asian Studies 44 (2): 223. doi:10.1080/14672715.2012.672825. Retrieved 2014-01-06. 
  65. ^ "File:No Gun Ri 12 - 25th Infantry Division 26 July - Shoot civilians.jpg". Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved 2012-08-29. 
  66. ^ "File:No Gun Ri 17 - Maj. Gen. Gay 29 August - Refugee are fair game.jpg". Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved 2012-08-29. 
  67. ^ "File:No Gun Ri 15 - 8th Cavalry 9 August - Shoot all refugees.jpg". Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved 2012-08-29. 
  68. ^ a b "File:No Gun Ri 06a - Muccio letter 26 July - Decision to shoot refugees.png". Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved 2012-08-29. 
  69. ^ a b "File:No Gun Ri 06b - Muccio letter 26 July - Decision to shoot refugees.png". Wikimedia Commons. 2012-01-14. Retrieved 2012-08-29. 
  70. ^ Conway-Lanz, Sahr (2005). "Beyond No Gun Ri: Refugees and the United States military in the Korean War". Diplomatic History 29 (1): 49–81. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7709.2005.00459.x. 
  71. ^ Park, Song-wu (June 2, 2006). "Seoul Awaits US Explanation on No Gun Ri". The Korea Times. 
  72. ^ "US Still Says South Korea Killings `Accident' Despite Declassified Letter". Yonhap news agency. October 30, 2006. 
  73. ^ Joseph L. Galloway . A Verdict in A Korean Tragedy. US News and World Reports. January 14th, 2001
  74. ^ "Search for remains of Nogeun-ri massacre likely to end with no remains found". Yonhap. 22 August 2007. Retrieved 20 November 2013. 
  75. ^ a b Chung, Koo-do (2010). No Gun Ri Still Lives On. Seoul, South Korea: Yongdong County Office; Dunam Publishing Company. 
  76. ^ "MDP Calls for Reinvestigating Nogun-ri Case". Korea Times. January 18, 2002. 
  77. ^ "Korean commission finds indiscriminate killings of civilians by US military". The Associated Press. August 3, 2008. 
  78. ^ "Gov't to Build Memorial Park for Victims of Nogeun-ri Massacre". Yonhap News Agency. March 22, 2007. Retrieved 2013-11-21. 
  79. ^ "Film to depict No Gun Ri". The Korea Herald. May 23, 2006.  "Movie about civilian killings at Nogeun-ri to debut". Yonhap news agency. October 26, 2006. Retrieved March 20, 2012.  "A Little Pond". Internet Movie Database. Retrieved March 12, 2012. 
  80. ^ "Nogeun-ri tragedy retold in cartoon book". Yonhap news agency. November 27, 2006. Retrieved March 20, 2012.  Park, Kun-woong; Chung, Eun-yong (2006). Massacre at the Bridge of No Gun Ri. Seoul: Sai Comics. ISBN 89-90781-18-3. 
  81. ^ Phillips, Jayne Anne (2009). Lark & Termite. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. ISBN 978-0-375-40195-4. Other novels: The Good Man, The Post-War Dream, Keeping Score
  82. ^ a b Tirman, John (2011). The Deaths of Others: The Fate of Civilians in America's Wars. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-538121-4. 
  83. ^ "Korean War Panel Finds U.S. Attacks on Civilians". The New York Times. July 9, 2010. Retrieved March 16, 2012. 
  84. ^ a b "Korea bloodbath probe ends; US escapes much blame". Associated Press. July 11, 2010. 
  85. ^ a b c "Truth and Reconciliation: Activities of the Past Three Years". Truth and Reconciliation Commission of the Republic of Korea. March 20, 2009. 
  86. ^ "Comprehensive Report, Volume 1, Part I". Truth and Reconciliation Commission of the Republic of Korea. December 2010. 
  87. ^ Dong-a Daily, Seoul. October 13, 1999. (In Korean).

Further reading[edit]

  • Choi, Suhi (January 2011). "Communicating Trauma: Female Survivors' Witnessing the No Gun Ri Killings". Qualitative Inquiry 17 (1). ISSN 1077-8004.
  • Cumings, Bruce (1990). The Origins of the Korean War, Volume 2: The Roaring of the Cataract, 1947–1950. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-02538-X.
  • Bateman, Robert. No Gun Ri: A Military History of the Korean War Incident. Stackpole Books. 2002
  • Hanley, Charles J. (December 2010). "No Gun Ri: Official Narrative and Inconvenient Truths". Critical Asian Studies 42 (4). doi:10.1080/14672715.2010.515389.
  • Hanley, Charles J., and Mendoza, Martha (Fall 2000). "The Bridge at No Gun Ri: Investigative Reporting, Hidden History and Pulitzer Prize". The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 5 (4). ISSN 1081-180X.
  • Kim, Dong-Choon (2009). The Unending Korean War: A Social History. Larkspur, California: Tamal Vista Publications. ISBN 978-0-917436-09-3.
  • Kim, Ki-jin (2006). The Korean War and Massacres. Seoul: Blue History. (In Korean, with 260 pages of English-language archival material.) ISBN 89-91510-16-7.
  • Noble, Harold Joyce (1975). Embassy at War. Seattle, Washington: University of Washington Press. ISBN 0-295-95341-1.
  • Ryoo, Maj. Moo-Bong, Republic of Korea Army (May 2001). "No Gun Ri Incident: Implications for the U.S. Army". Monograph, U.S. Army Command and General Staff College. Biblioscholar (2012). ISBN 1288290934.
  • Sinn, Donghee (May 2010). "Room for archives? Use of archival materials in No Gun Ri research". Archival Science 10 (2). doi:10.1007/s10502-010-9117-y.
  • Young, Marilyn (2002). "An Incident at No Gun Ri". In Crimes of War: Guilt and Denial in the Twentieth Century. New York: The New Press. ISBN 1-56584-654-0.

External links[edit]