Noncentral chi-squared distribution
| Probability density function |
|
| Cumulative distribution function |
|
| Parameters | degrees of freedom
|
|---|---|
| Support | ![]() |
![]() |
|
| CDF | with Marcum Q-function QM(a,b) |
| Mean | ![]() |
| Variance | ![]() |
| Skewness | ![]() |
| Ex. kurtosis | ![]() |
| MGF | for 2t < 1 |
| CF | ![]() |
In probability theory and statistics, the noncentral chi-squared or noncentral χ2 distribution is a generalization of the chi-squared distribution. This distribution often arises in the power analysis of statistical tests in which the null distribution is (perhaps asymptotically) a chi-squared distribution; important examples of such tests are the likelihood ratio tests.
Contents |
[edit] Background
Let Xi be k independent, normally distributed random variables with means μi and variances
. Then the random variable
is distributed according to the noncentral chi-squared distribution. It has two parameters: k which specifies the number of degrees of freedom (i.e. the number of Xi), and λ which is related to the mean of the random variables Xi by:
λ is sometime called the noncentrality parameter. Note that some references define λ in other ways, such as half of the above sum, or its square root.
This distribution arises in multivariate statistics as a derivative of the multivariate normal distribution. While the central chi-squared distribution is the squared norm of a random vector with N(0k,Ik) distribution (i.e., the squared distance from the origin of a point taken at random from that distribution), the non-central χ2 is the squared norm of a random vector with N(μ,Ik) distribution. Here 0k is a zero vector of length k, μ = (μ1,...,μk) and Ik is the identity matrix of size k.
[edit] Definition
The probability density function is given by
where Yq is distributed as chi-squared with q degrees of freedom.
From this representation, the noncentral chi-squared distribution is seen to be a Poisson-weighted mixture of central chi-squared distributions. Suppose that a random variable J has a Poisson distribution with mean λ / 2, and the conditional distribution of Z given J = i is chi-squared with k+2i degrees of freedom. Then the unconditional distribution of Z is non-central chi-squared with k degrees of freedom, and non-centrality parameter λ.
Alternatively, the pdf can be written as
where Iν(z) is a modified Bessel function of the first kind given by
Using the relation between Bessel functions and hypergeometric functions, the pdf can also be written as:[1]
Siegel (1979) discusses the case k=0 specifically (zero degrees of freedom), in which case the distribution has a discrete component at zero.
[edit] Properties
[edit] Moment generating function
The moment generating function is given by
[edit] Moments
The first few raw moments are:
The first few central moments are:
The nth cumulant is
Hence
[edit] Cumulative distribution function
Again using the relation between the central and noncentral chi-squared distributions, the cumulative distribution function (cdf) can be written as
where
is the cumulative distribution function of the central chi-squared distribution with k degrees of freedom which is given by
- and where
is the lower incomplete Gamma function.
The Marcum Q-function QM(a,b) can also be used to represent the cdf.[2]
[edit] Approximation
Sankaran [3] discusses a number of closed form approximations for the cumulative distribution function. In an earlier paper,[4] he derived and states the following approximation:
where
denotes the cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution;


This and other approximations are discussed in a later text book.[5]
To approximate the Chi-squared distribution, the non-centrality parameter,
, is set to zero.
For a given probability, the formula is easily inverted to provide the corresponding approximation for
.
[edit] Derivation of the pdf
The derivation of the probability density function is most easily done by performing the following steps:
- First, assume without loss of generality that
. Then the joint distribution of
is spherically symmetric, up to a location shift. - The spherical symmetry then implies that the distribution of
depends on the means only through the squared length,
. Without loss of generality, we can therefore take
and
. - Now derive the density of
(i.e. k=1 case). Simple transformation of random variables shows that :
where
is the standard normal density. - Expand the cosh term in a Taylor series. This gives the Poisson-weighted mixture representation of the density, still for k=1. The indices on the chi-squared random variables in the series above are 1+2i in this case.
- Finally, for the general case. We've assumed, without loss of generality, that
are standard normal, and so
has a central chi-squared distribution with (k-1) degrees of freedom, independent of
. Using the poisson-weighted mixture representation for
, and the fact that the sum of chi-squared random variables is also chi-squared, completes the result. The indices in the series are (1+2i)+(k-1) = k+2i as required.
[edit] Related distributions
- If V is chi-squared distributed
then V is also non-central chi-squared distributed: 
- If
and
and V1 is independent of V2 then a noncentral F-distributed variable is developed as 
- If
, then 
- Normal approximation[6]: if
, then
in distribution as either
or
.
[edit] Transformations
Sankaran (1963) discusses the transformations of the form z = [(X − b) / (k + λ)]1 / 2. He analyzes the expansions of the cumulants of z up to the term O((k + λ) − 4) and shows that the following choices of b produce reasonable results:
- b = (k − 1) / 2 makes the second cumulant of z approximately independent of λ
- b = (k − 1) / 3 makes the third cumulant of z approximately independent of λ
- b = (k − 1) / 4 makes the fourth cumulant of z approximately independent of λ
Also, a simpler transformation z1 = (X − (k − 1) / 2)1 / 2 can be used as a variance stabilizing transformation that produces a random variable with mean (λ + (k − 1) / 2)1 / 2 and variance O((k + λ) − 2).
Usability of these transformations may be hampered by the need to take the square roots of negative numbers.
| Name | Statistic |
|---|---|
| chi-squared distribution | ![]() |
| noncentral chi-squared distribution | ![]() |
| chi distribution | ![]() |
| noncentral chi distribution | ![]() |
[edit] Notes
- ^ Muirhead (2005) Theorem 1.3.4
- ^ Nuttall, Albert H. (1975): Some Integrals Involving the QM Function, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 21(1), 95-96, ISSN 0018-9448
- ^ Sankaran , M. (1963). Approximations to the non-central chi-squared distribution Biometrika, 50(1-2), 199–204
- ^ Sankaran , M. (1959). "On the non-central chi-squared distribution", Biometrika 46, 235–237
- ^ Johnson et al. (1995) Section 29.8
- ^ Muirhead (2005) pages 22–24 and problem 1.18.
[edit] References
- Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I.A. (1972), Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover. Section 26.4.25.
- Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., Balakrishnan, N. (1970), Continuous Univariate Distributions, Volume 2, Wiley. ISBN 0-471-58494-0
- Muirhead, R. (2005) Aspects of Multivariate Statistical Theory (2nd Edition). Wiley. ISBN 0471769851
- Siegel, A.F. (1979), "The noncentral chi-squared distribution with zero degrees of freedom and testing for uniformity", Biometrika, 66, 381–386
- Press, S.J. (1966), "Linear combinations of non-central chi-squared variates", The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 37 (2): 480–487, JSTOR 2238621
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
degrees of freedom
non-centrality parameter

with 



for 


















is the 

denotes the 


. Then the joint distribution of
is spherically symmetric, up to a location shift.
depends on the means only through the squared length,
. Without loss of generality, we can therefore take
and
.
(i.e. k=1 case). Simple transformation of random variables shows that :
is the standard normal density.
are standard normal, and so
has a central chi-squared distribution with (k-1) degrees of freedom, independent of
. Using the poisson-weighted mixture representation for
then 
and
and 
, then 
, then
in distribution as either
or
.


