Oberon (programming language)
|Paradigm||imperative, structured, modular, object-oriented|
|Designed by||Niklaus Wirth|
|strong, hybrid (static and dynamic)|
Oberon is a general-purpose programming language created in 1986 by Professor Niklaus Wirth and the latest member of the Wirthian family of ALGOL-like languages (Euler, Algol-W, Pascal, Modula, and Modula-2). Oberon was the result of a concentrated effort to increase the power of Modula-2, the direct successor of Pascal, and simultaneously to reduce its complexity. Its principal new feature is the concept of type extension of record types: It permits the construction of new data types on the basis of existing ones and to relate them, deviating from the dogma of strictly static data typing. Oberon was developed as part of the implementation of the Oberon operating system at ETH Zurich in Switzerland. The name is from the moon of Uranus, Oberon.
Oberon is still maintained by the original author and the latest revision is dated 18 March 2015.
Oberon is designed with a motto attributed to Albert Einstein in mind: “Make things as simple as possible, but not simpler.” The principal guideline was to concentrate on features that are basic and essential and to omit ephemeral issues. Another factor was recognition of the growth of complexity in languages such as C++ and Ada: in contrast to these, Oberon emphasizes the use of the library concept for extending the language. Enumeration and subrange types, which were present in Modula-2, have been removed; similarly, set types have been limited to small sets of integers, and the number of low-level facilities has been sharply reduced (most particularly, type transfer functions have been eliminated). Elimination of the remaining potentially-unsafe facilities concludes the most essential step toward obtaining a truly high-level language. Very close type-checking even across modules, strict index-checking at run time, null-pointer checking, and the safe type extension concept largely allow the programmer to rely on the language rules alone.
The intent of this strategy was to produce a language that is easier to learn, simpler to implement, and very efficient. Oberon compilers have been viewed as compact and fast, while providing adequate code quality compared to commercial compilers.
The following features characterise the Oberon language:
- Case sensitive syntax with uppercase keywords
- Type-extension with type test
- Modules and separate compilation
- String operations
- Garbage collector
- Isolation of unsafe code
- Support for system programming
Oberon supports extension of record types for the construction of abstractions and heterogeneous structures, but doesn't have a dispatch mechanism as a language feature but rather as programming technique or design pattern. This gives great flexibility in the OOP world. In the Oberon operating system two programming techniques have been used in conjunction for the dispatch call: Method suite and Message handler.
In this technique a table of procedure variables is defined and a global variable of this type is declared in the extended module and assigned back in the generic module:
MODULE Figures; (* Abstract module *) TYPE Figure* = POINTER TO FigureDesc; Interface* = POINTER TO InterfaceDesc; InterfaceDesc* = RECORD draw* : PROCEDURE (f : Figure); clear* : PROCEDURE (f : Figure); mark* : PROCEDURE (f : Figure); move* : PROCEDURE (f : Figure; dx, dy : INTEGER); END; FigureDesc* = RECORD if : Interface; END; PROCEDURE Init* (f : Figure; if : Interface); BEGIN f.if := if; END Init; PROCEDURE Draw* (f : Figure); BEGIN f.if.draw(f); END Draw; (* Other procedures here *) END Figures.
We extend the generic type Figure to a specific shape:
MODULE Rectangles; IMPORT Figures; TYPE Rectangle* = POINTER TO RectangleDesc; RectangleDesc* = RECORD (Figures.FigureDesc) x, y, w, h : INTEGER; END; VAR if : Figures.Interface; PROCEDURE New* (VAR r : Rectangle); BEGIN NEW(r); Figures.Init(r, if); END New; PROCEDURE Draw* (f : Figure); VAR r : Rectangle; BEGIN r := f(Rectangle); (* f AS Rectangle *) (* ... *) END Draw; (* Other procedures here *) BEGIN (* Module initialisation *) NEW(if); if.draw := Draw; if.clear := Clear; if.mark := Mark; if.move := Move; END Rectangles.
Dynamic dispatch is only done via procedures in Figures module that is the generic module.
This technique consists of replacing the set of methods with a single procedure, which discriminates among the various methods:
MODULE Figures; (* Abstract module *) TYPE Figure* = POINTER TO FigureDesc; Message* = RECORD END; DrawMsg* = RECORD (Message) END; ClearMsg* = RECORD (Message) END; MarkMsg* = RECORD (Message) END; MoveMsg* = RECORD (Message) dx*, dy* : INTEGER END; Handler* = PROCEDURE (f : Figure; VAR msg : Message); FigureDesc* = RECORD (* Abstract *) handle : Handler; END; PROCEDURE Handle* (f : Figure; VAR msg : Message); BEGIN f.handle(f, msg); END Handle; PROCEDURE Init* (f : Figure; handle : Handler); BEGIN f.handle := handle; END Init; END Figures.
We extend the generic type Figure to a specific shape:
MODULE Rectangles; IMPORT Figures; TYPE Rectangle* = POINTER TO RectangleDesc; RectangleDesc* = RECORD (Figures.FigureDesc) x, y, w, h : INTEGER; END; PROCEDURE Draw* (r : Rectangle); BEGIN (* ... *) END Draw; (* Other procedures here *) PROCEDURE Handle* (f: Figure; VAR msg: Figures.Message); VAR r : Rectangle; BEGIN r := f(Rectangle); IF msg IS Figures.DrawMsg THEN Draw(r) ELSIF msg IS Figures.MarkMsg THEN Mark(r) ELSIF msg IS Figures.MoveMsg THEN Move(r, msg(Figures.MoveMsg).dx, msg(Figures.MoveMsg).dy) ELSE (* ignore *) END END Handle; PROCEDURE New* (VAR r : Rectangle); BEGIN NEW(r); Figures.Init(r, Handle); END New; END Rectangles.
In the Oberon operating system both of these techniques are used for dynamic dispatch. The first one is used for a known set of methods; the second is used for any new methods declared in the extension module. For example, if the extension module Rectangles were to implement a new Rotate() procedure, within the Figures module it could only be called via a message handler.
Implementations and variants
No-cost implementations of Oberon (the language) and Oberon (the operating system) can be found on the Internet (several are from ETHZ itself).
A few changes were made to the first released specification (object-oriented programming features were added, the 'FOR' loop was reinstated, for instance); the result was Oberon-2, currently the most common implementation. There is a release called Native Oberon which includes an operating system, and can directly boot on PC class hardware. A .NET implementation of Oberon with the addition of some minor .NET-related extensions has also been developed at ETHZ.
Oberon-07, defined by Niklaus Wirth in 2007 and revised in 2011, 2013, and 2014 is based on the original version of Oberon rather than Oberon-2. The main changes are: explicit numeric conversion functions (e.g. FLOOR and FLT) must be used, the LOOP and EXIT statements have been eliminated, WHILE statements have been extended, RETURN statements can only be connected to the end of a function, imported variables and structured value parameters are read-only and arrays can be assigned without using COPY. For full details, see The Programming Language Oberon-07.
Active Oberon is yet another variant of Oberon, which adds objects (with object-centered access protection and local activity control), system-guarded assertions, preemptive priority scheduling and a slightly changed syntax for methods (aka type-bound procedures in the Oberon world). Objects may be active, which means that they may be threads or processes. The operating system A2 aka Bluebottle, especially the kernel, synchronizes and coordinates different active objects.
Development has continued on languages in this family. A further extension of Oberon-2 produced Component Pascal which was developed for Windows and Mac OS by Oberon microsystems, a commercial company spin-off from ETHZ, and for .NET by Queensland University of Technology. In addition, the Lagoona and Obliq languages carry the Oberon spirit into specialized areas.
ETHZ has released Active Oberon which supports active objects, and the Bluebottle operating system and environment (JDK, HTTP, FTP, etc.) for the language. As with many prior designs from ETHZ, versions of both are available for download on the Internet. As this is written, both single and dual x86 CPUs and the StrongARM family are supported.
Recent .NET development efforts at ETHZ have been focused on a new language called Zonnon. This includes the features of Oberon and restores some from Pascal (enumerated types, built-in IO) but has some syntactic differences. Additional features include support for active objects, operator overloading and exception handling. Zonnon is available as a plug-in language for the Microsoft Visual Studio for .NET development environment.
Oberon-V (originally called Seneca, after Seneca the Younger) is a descendant of Oberon designed for numerical applications on supercomputers, especially vector or pipelined architectures. It includes array constructors and an ALL statement. (See "Seneca - A Language for Numerical Applications on Vectorcomputers", Proc CONPAR 90 - VAPP IV Conf. R. Griesemer, Diss Nr. 10277, ETH Zurich.)
- D. Pountain, Modula's Children, Part II: Oberon - BYTE 16(3), 135-142, Mar. 1991.
- Mössenböck, Hanspeter. "Compiler Construction: The Art of Niklaus Wirth" (PDF). Ftp.ssw.uni-linz.ac.at.
- Niklaus Wirth's Oberon Page at ETH-Zürich
- Oberon Page at ETH-Zürich
- Oberon Page at SSW, Linz
- Project Oberon, The Design of an Operating System and a Compiler, book in PDF by Niklaus Wirth and Jürg Gutknecht, 2005 Edition
- Oberon Language Genealogy
- Astrobe ARM Oberon-07 Development System
- Oberon System V4 for HP OpenVMS Alpha with source code upward-compatible 64 bit addressing
- 64 bit Oberon-2 compiler for HP OpenVMS Alpha
Evolution of Oberon
- Modula-2 and Oberon Wirth (2005)
- The Programming Language Oberon Wirth, (1988/90)
- The Programming Language Oberon (Oberon-7, Revised Oberon) Wirth, (2014, most current language report)
- Differences between Oberon-07 and Oberon Wirth (2011)
- The Programming Language Oberon-2 H. Mössenböck, N. Wirth, Institut für Computersysteme, ETH Zürich, January 1992
- Differences between Oberon and Oberon-2 Mössenböck and Wirth (1991)
- What's New in Component Pascal (Changes from Oberon-2 to CP), Pfister (2001)