Ok Tedi environmental disaster

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The Ok Tedi environmental disaster caused grave harm to the environment along 1,000 kilometres (620 mi) of the Ok Tedi River and the Fly River in the Western Province of Papua New Guinea between about 1984 and 2013. The lives of 50,000 people have been disrupted. One of the worst environmental disasters caused by humans, it is a consequence of the discharge of about two billion tons of untreated mining waste into the Ok Tedi from the Ok Tedi Mine, an open pit mine in the Western Province of Papua New Guinea.

This mining pollution, due to the collapse of the Ok Tedi tailings dam system in 1984 and the lack of a proper waste retention facility, was the subject of class action litigation, naming Ok Tedi Mining Limited and BHP Billiton and brought by local landowners. Villagers downstream from Ok Tedi in the Fly River system in the Middle Fly District and the southern and central areas of the North Fly District, in particular, believe that the effect on their livelihood from this disaster far outweighs the benefits they have received from the mine's presence in their area.

Environmental impact[edit]

In 1999, BHP reported that 90 million tons of mine waste was annually discharged into the river for more than ten years and destroyed downstream villages, agriculture and fisheries. Mine wastes were deposited along 1,000 kilometres (620 mi) of the Ok Tedi and the Fly River below its confluence with the Ok Tedi, and over an area of 100 square kilometres (39 sq mi). BHP's CEO, Paul Anderson, said that the Ok Tedi Mine was "not compatible with our environmental values and the company should never have become involved."[1] As of 2006, mine operators continued to discharge 80 million tons of tailings, overburden and mine-induced erosion into the river system each year. About 1,588 square kilometres (613 sq mi) of forest has died or is under stress. As many as 3,000 square kilometres (1,200 sq mi) may eventually be harmed, an area equal to the U.S. state of Rhode Island or the Danish island of Funen.[2]

Following heavy rainfall, mine tailings are swept into the surrounding rain forest, swamps and creeks, and have left behind 30 square kilometers of dead forest. Thick gray sludge from the mine is visible throughout the Fly River system, although its effects downriver are not as severe.[3] Chemicals from the tailings killed or contaminated fish, although they are still eaten by the people of the surrounding villages. However, fish counts decrease closer to the mine. The massive amount of mine-derived waste dumped into the river exceeded its carrying capacity. This dumping resulted in the river bed being raised 10 m, causing a relatively deep and slow river to become shallower and develop rapids, thereby disrupting indigenous transportation routes.[4] Flooding, caused by the raised riverbed, left a thick layer of contaminated mud on the flood plain among plantations of taro, bananas and sago palm that are the staples of the local diet. About 1300 square kilometers were damaged in this way. The concentration of copper in the water is about 30 times above the standard level, but it is below the World Health Organisation (WHO) standards.[5]

The original plans included an Environmental Impact Statement that required a tailings dam be built. This would allow heavy metals and solid particles to settle, before releasing the clean ‘high-water’ into the river system where remaining contaminants would be diluted. In 1984 an earthquake caused the half built dam to collapse. The company continued operations without the dam, initially because BHP argued that it would be too expensive to rebuild it. Subsequently, the PNG government decided a dam wasn’t necessary, in the wake of the closure of the Panguna mine.[citation needed]

Most of Papua New Guinea's land is held under a system of native title, with ownership divided amongst many small clans, while the central government retains control over how resources that lie under the ground are used. The 2000 members of the clan that held ownership of the land on which the mine would be built were included in the formal negotiations. They received money, jobs, vocational training, and infrastructure improvements.[citation needed]

Also, as a consequence of geotechnical problems, there are no waste retention facilities on the premises. This allowed all ore processing residues, waste rock and overburden to be discharged into the Ok Tedi River.[6]

Aftermath[edit]

In the 1990s the communities of the lower Fly Region, including the Yonggom people,[7] sued BHP and received US$28.6 million in an out-of-court settlement, which was the culmination of an enormous public-relations campaign against the company by environmental groups. As part of the settlement a (limited) dredging operation was put in place and efforts were made to rehabilitate the site around the mine. However the mine is still in operation and waste continues to flow into the river system. BHP was granted legal indemnity from future mine related damages.

In January 2007 PNG lawyer Camillus Narokobi lodged a lawsuit on behalf of 3,000 villagers known as the Ninggerum people who live near the Birim River, a tributary of the Ok Tedi River. He is seeking US$4 billion in damages.[8]

The Ok Tedi Mine was scheduled to close in 2013.[9] However, the PNG Government has taken over control of the mine and with support of local community, the mine life was extended.[10][11] Until that time two thirds of the profits go into a long-term fund to enable the mine to continue to contribute to the PNG economy for up to half a century after it closes. The balance is allocated to current development programs in the local area (Western Province) and PNG more generally. Experts have predicted that it will take 300 years to clean up the toxic contamination.[8]

According to the owners of the Ok Tedi Mine, there have also been many positive social effects that have come from the mine. Because of all the new money pouring into the economy, the quality of the health care, schools and roads has greatly improved. This has also caused the average life expectancy for the indigenous people to increase.[2]

Mine Life Extension and Community Support[edit]

In 2013, the PNG Government seized 100% ownership of Ok Tedi Mine[12] and repealed laws that would allow people to sue mining giant BHP Billiton over environmental damage. Ok Tedi Mining Limited launched the OT2025 project that was focused on transitioning the business to a smaller operation in preparation for Mine Life Extension.

Community consent for the mine’s life to be extended to 2025 was endorsed by the Mine Associated Communities, which is made up of 156 villages, through the signing of the respective Community Mine Continuation Extension Agreements by the Community representatives and OTML at the end of 2012 and beginning of 2013. The signing of the Agreements facilitated the Company to commence planning for the MLE project throughout 2013. [13]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Burton, Bob (2006-09-17). "BHP admits Ok Tedi mine is environmental disaster". Asia Times Online. 
  2. ^ a b "Key Statistics". Ok Tedi Mining. Archived from the original on 2006-08-20. Retrieved 2006-09-17. 
  3. ^ Kirsch, Stuart (Fall 1996). "Cleaning up Ok Tedi: Settlement Favors Yonggom People". Journal of the International Institute. Scholarly Publishing Office of the University of Michigan Library. Retrieved 2008-03-02. 
  4. ^ Hettler, J.; Irion, G.; Lehmann, B. (1997). "Environmental impact of mining waste disposal on a tropical lowland river system: a case study on the Ok Tedi Mine, Papua New Guinea". Mineralium Deposita. 
  5. ^ Marychurch, Judith; Natalie Stoianoff (4–7 July 2006). "Blurring the Lines of Environmental Responsibility: How Corporate and Public Governance was Circumvented in the Ok Tedi Mining Limited Disaster" (pdf). Australasian Law Teachers Association – Refereed Conference Papers. Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 
  6. ^ Hettler, J.; Irion, G.; Lehmann, B. (1997). "Environmental impact of mining waste disposal on a tropical lowland river system: a case study on the Ok Tedi Mine, Papua New Guinea". Mineralium Deposita. 
  7. ^ Kirsch, Stuart (July 2006). Reverse Anthropology: Indigenous Analysis of Social and Environmental Relations in New Guinea. Stanford University Press;. pp. pp272. ISBN 0-8047-5342-3. 
  8. ^ a b Australian Associated Press (January 20, 2007). "Villagers sue BHP Billiton for $5bn". The Age (Fairfax). Retrieved 2007-02-04. 
  9. ^ "Mine Closure Planning". OK Tedi Mining Limited. Retrieved 16 February 2012. 
  10. ^ "PNG to take over Ok Tedi". MiningNews.Net. Aspermont Ltd. Retrieved 22 March 2013. 
  11. ^ "Ok Tedi’s interested parties". PNG Industry News. Aspermot Ltd. Retrieved 12 February 2014. 
  12. ^ "BREAKING NEWS: PNG Govt seizes Ok Tedi". PNG Industry News. Retrieved 19 September 2013. 
  13. ^ Garrett, Jemima. "Community control of Ok Tedi mine assets welcomed in Papua New Guinea's Western Province". Australia Network News. Retrieved 11 Feb 2014. 

External links[edit]