An online pass is a digital rights management system for restricting access to supplemental functionality in a product by using a single-use serial number. Online passes are primarily intended to hinder or discourage the second-hand sale of a product, and to allow the producer of a product to still return profits from second-hand copies of the product.
A similar tactic has surfaced in the academic textbook industry, regulating use of supplemental material and other online content, with intent to prevent students from obtaining a second-hand or borrowed copy of a needed textbook. This requires them to purchase a new copy in order to use its functionality.
Online passes are traditionally used to restrict access to a game's multiplayer modes and other online content; they ship as single-use codes printed on inserts packaged with retail copies of video games, and must be redeemed by the user in order to access the multiplayer and online modes of a particular game. If a player does not have an unused online pass (such as when buying a used game), the player can either purchase access via their console or can access a limited trial of the game's online content. The use of online passes in video games are intended to counter the popularity of stores such as Gamestop, which buy and sell second-hand copies of video games. Alongside downloadable content, they add an additional revenue stream which can be used to make up for profits lost through second-hand sales, and encourage players to buy games new at retail so they do not have to pay extra to access the game's full content.
Supporters of online passes and publishers using them argue that requiring buyers of used games to pay extra for access to online content and services is a more fair system for paying the costs required to maintain online resources. Opponents contend that adoption of online pass systems may lead to removing more essential functionality from used games and possibly even preventing the resale of video games. 38 Studios founder Curt Schilling defended the use of an online pass to unlock the seven-part bonus quest "House of Valor" on the single-player RPG Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning (which was published by EA), by arguing that it was actually "day one DLC" intended to "reward" early adopters. However, the decision still provoked discussion on the appropriateness of the model.
Among the first video games to require an online pass was SOCOM: U.S. Navy SEALs Fireteam Bravo 3 for the PlayStation Portable, which required the use of a one-time voucher included in retail copies of the game to access multiplayer modes, charging $20 for replacements. However, in this case, Sony Computer Entertainment stated that this requirement was intended to combat piracy. In late-2009, EA began implementing online passes in its games as part of an initiative known as "Project Ten Dollar"; Mass Effect 2 used an online pass to allow access to bonus content through its "Cerberus Network" system, while Dragon Age Origins came with a code that could be redeemed to download its first major DLC release, The Stone Prisoner, for free. In May 2010, EA announced that beginning with Tiger Woods PGA Tour 10, all future EA Sports titles would require the use of online passes to access multiplayer.
In mid-2013, many publishers began to phase out online passes; in May 2013, Electronic Arts announced it would, due to customer feedback, discontinue its future use of online passes in upcoming titles, and retroactively remove the online pass requirements from existing titles. On November 1, 2013, Ubisoft followed suit by discontinuing its Uplay Passport system for future titles, and making the pass for its recently-released Assassin’s Creed IV: Black Flag available at no charge. An Ubisoft spokesperson stated that the system was "no longer the best approach for ensuring that all our customers have the best possible experience with all facets of our games", noting that Black Flag's single-player campaign contained passive online features that would be otherwise unavailable without activating the pass. Sony specifically forbids the use of online passes by developers on PlayStation 4 titles; as users now must have a PlayStation Plus subscription to access online multiplayer, Sony did not want publishers to add additional DRM designed to charge users further.
A similar system has been recently used by textbook publishers, by requiring the use of an online pass to offer supplemental content; including an online message board, an assignment system where homework may be assigned or handed in, or even an e-book version of the title. It is similarly intended to discourage the second-hand re-sale or sharing of these textbooks by only allowing their online functionality to be utilized by a single student; requiring others to buy their own copy of the book or obtain an access code individually.
- Snider, Mike (2010-08-10). "Video game publishers try to open up more lines of income". USA Today. Retrieved 24 June 2012.
- R. Young, Jeffery. "With 'Access Codes,' Textbook Pricing Gets More Complicated Than Ever". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved 4 September 2012.
- Orland, Kyle (2012-01-26). "Kingdoms of Amalur's "Online Pass" continues a slippery slope for used games". Ars Technica. Retrieved 24 June 2012.
- "The Used Games Debate: Kingdoms of Amalur Locks Up Content". Time. Retrieved 7 December 2013.
- "'Project Ten Dollar' will alienate consumers, warns retail". GamesIndustry.biz. Retrieved 4 December 2013.
- "How Mass Effect 2's "Cerberus Network" Works". 1up.com. Retrieved 4 December 2013.
- "EA Sports to Used Game Buyers: Pay Up". PC World. Retrieved 4 December 2013.
- "Ubisoft Kills Online Pass System, Effective Immediately". IGN. Retrieved 4 December 2013.
- "EA's Online Pass not coming back". Gamespot. Retrieved 4 December 2013.
- "Further clarification on Sony's DRM policies: No more online pass". Gamasutra. Retrieved 4 December 2013.