Onychectomy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Onychectomy, popularly known as declawing, is an operation to surgically remove an animal's claws by means of amputating of all or part of the distal phalanx, or end bones, of the animal's toes. It is performed most often on household cats, though occasionally on other animals such as circus lions or dancing bears. Because the claw develops from germinal tissue deep within the third phalanx, amputation of the bone is necessary to remove the claw. The terms "onychectomy" (origin: Greek onycho, nail + ektome, excision) and "declawing" imply mere claw removal, but a more appropriate description would be phalangectomy^[1], excision of toe bone.

Although common in North America^[2], and Asian countries such as Japan, Korea, and China, declawing is increasingly becoming unpopular and considered an act of animal cruelty in certain other regions (see "Declawing practices" below).

Contents 1 Medically indicated onychectomy 2 Elective onychectomy 3 Methods 4 Recovery, health and behavioral effects 5 Declawing practices 5.1 Australia 5.2 Brazil 5.3 Europe 5.4 United States 5.4.1 Ethical viewpoints on declawing in the US 6 Alternatives to declawing 6.1 Surgical 6.2 Non-surgical 7 See also 8 References 9 External links

[edit] Medically indicated onychectomy

The amputation of the distal phalanx is indicated in case of chronic inflammatory processes, tumours, persistent and severe infections and gangrene that are limited to the distal phalanx. The procedure is usually limited to the affected claw, leaving the healthy claws (if any) intact.

[edit] Elective onychectomy

In North America, declawing is commonly performed on housecats to prevent damage to household possessions by scratching and to prevent scratching of people.^[2] To achieve this result, all distal phalanges of the front paws, and sometimes the rear paws, are amputated. Although no precise figures are available, peer-reviewed veterinary journal articles estimate that approximately 25% of domestic cats in North America have been declawed.^[2] Some privately owned apartment buildings in the U.S. ban cats unless they have been declawed, but in 2007 Congress enacted legislation that forbids public housing authorities from having such rules for publicly subsidized housing ^[3].

Some North American veterinarians hold the position that people with compromised immune systems, due to conditions such as AIDS, should have their cats declawed to prevent health risks to themselves.^[4] However, there is no agreement within the North American medical community that this course of action is necessary or desirable to protect the health of such people. Many sources suggest that because declawing increases biting behavior in cats, that declawing is contraindicated.^[5]

[edit] Methods

Despite the prevalence of elective onychectomy in North America, no standard practices exist regarding the surgical techniques or cutting tools used, the administration of post-operative analgesics or other follow-up care, or the optimal age or other attributes of cats undergoing the procedure.^[2]

[edit] Recovery, health and behavioral effects

Please help improve this article by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page. (March 2008)

In a survey of 276 cat owners, 34% reported post-surgical discomfort in their cats while 78% reported primarily tenderness.^[6] Recovery time took from three days to two weeks. One cat (0.4%) had difficulty walking even after four months and another developed a house-soiling issue. Increased biting strength or frequency was reported in 10 cats (4%) but overall, 96% of owners were satisfied with the surgery.

At one veterinary teaching hospital, between 50 and 80% of cats had one or more medical complications post-surgery. 19.8% developed complications after release. Lameness was noted for 1-42 days (1 cat was still painful 96 months—8 years—later).^[7]

Even among private practitioners, medical complications are common; in one survey, 34.8% of 320 veterinarian surveyed reported long-term complications. ^[8]

A study of two different surgical techniques found that 16% of those who underwent joint amputation developed lameness while only 5% who underwent bone amputation did.^[9] 22% of the first group and 16% of the second experienced reopened wound.

The American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) policy statement on declawing states: "There is no scientific evidence that declawing leads to behavioral abnormalities when the behavior of declawed cats is compared with that of cats in control groups."^[10] However, by qualifying and limiting the "scientific evidence" to only studies using "control groups," the AVMA is able to ignore the studies that do clearly demonstrate that declawing causes behavior problems, notably biting and litter box avoidance. ^[11][12]

The most recent and most long-term study found that 33% of declawed cats developed behavior problems after surgery. 18% of cats had an increase in biting habits or intensity of biting after being declawed. ^[13]

In another study, 16% of declawed cats developed behavior problems, and more declawed (55%) than intact (45%) cats were referred to a vet teaching hospital for behavior problems. ^[14]

Eleven cats (4%) developed or had worse behavior problems post-operatively. Despite positive attitude toward declawing, 5 clients reported that their cats had developed litterbox and biting problems.^[15]

Behavior problems are a primary cause of cats being relinquished to shelters. In one study, when all factors were accounted for, overall odds of being relinquished to a shelter was almost double for declawed cats as intact cats (1.89 compared to 1.00). Inappropriate elimination was twice as common in declawed (52.4%) as intact cats (29.1%). ^[16]

[edit] Declawing practices

Declawing is uncommon outside North America, and laws governing its practice vary. Many European countries prohibit or significantly restrict the practice, as do Australia, New Zealand, and Turkey. The list below gives an overview of the situation in different parts of the world.

[edit] Australia

In Australia, declawing has never been common, and for all practical purpose, does not exist. Nationwide legislation was recently enacted that essentially prohibits the declawing of cats except for medical need of the cat.[2] The Australian Veterinary Association's policy states: "Surgical alteration to the natural state of an animal is acceptable only if it is necessary for the health and welfare of the animal concerned. Performance of any surgical procedure for other than legitimate medical reasons is unacceptable."[3]

[edit] Brazil

In Brazil, declawing is not allowed by the Federal Council of Veterinary Medicine. It applies nationwide.^[17]

[edit] Europe

In many European countries the practice is forbidden either under the terms of the European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals^[18] or under Local Animal Abuse Laws, unless there it is for "veterinary medical reasons or for the benefit of any particular animal." Some European countries go further, such as Finland, Estonia[4], the Netherlands, Germany and Switzerland^[19], where declawing cats for non-medical reasons is always illegal under their laws against cruelty to animals.

Austria
In Austria, the Federal Act on the Protection of Animals, in Section 7, states, surgical procedures "carried out for other than therapeutic or diagnostic purposes...are prohibited, in particular...declawing."^[20]

United Kingdom
In the United Kingdom, declawing was outlawed by the Animal Welfare Act 2006, which explicitly prohibited "interference with the sensitive tissues or bone structure of the animal, otherwise than for the purposes of its medical treatment".^[21] Even before the 2006 Act, however, declawing was extremely uncommon, to the extent that most people had never seen a declawed cat. The procedure was considered cruel by almost all British vets, who refused to perform it except on medical grounds. The Guide to Professional Conduct of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons stated that declawing was "only acceptable where, in the opinion of the veterinary surgeon, injury to the animal is likely to occur during normal activity. It is not acceptable if carried out for the convenience of the owner ... the removal of claws, particularly those which are weight bearing, to preclude damage to furnishings is not acceptable."^[22]

[edit] United States

Declawing is legal in most US jurisdictions. It is estimated that 25% of owned cats in the United States are declawed (Patronek 2001).

Declawing was outlawed in West Hollywood, California, in 2003, the first such ban in the US.^[23]. The California Veterinary Medical Association challenged the law in court^[24]. The CVMA maintained that West Hollywood had overstepped its municipal authority by enacting an ordinance that infringed on licensed professionals’ state-granted rights. It did not directly address declawing as an animal welfare issue. The CVMA initially prevailed in Superior Court, but in June 2007, the California Court of Appeal overturned the lower court ruling, thus reinstating the law banning declawing in West Hollywood.^[25].

In 2004, California became the first state in the USA to enact a statewide ban on the declawing of wild and exotic cats.

In 2006, the United States Department of Agriculture enacted a ban on declawing of all wild and exotic animals held by USDA-licensed owners.^[26]

In April 2007, the city of Norfolk, Virginia outlawed declawing by persons other than veterinarians (Municipal Code Sec. 6.1-78.1).^[27]

In 2009, the California state legislature approved a measure, sponsored by the California Veterinary Medical Association (CVMA), intended to stop other cities from passing bans similar to West Hollywood. By including in the bill all professions licensed by the state Department of Consumer Affairs, the CVMA got the bill pushed through, and it was signed by the Governor in July, 2009. However, the bill's effective date, January 1, 2010, provided a window of opportunity for grandfathering any other declaw bans passed locally in the state before that date.[5]

In 2009, seven other California cities, San Francisco, Santa Monica, Los Angeles, Beverly Hills, Berkeley, Burbank, and Culver City, passed ordinances banning declawing on the basis of animal cruelty.[6] [7]

[edit] Ethical viewpoints on declawing in the US

Although widely practiced, declawing is ethically controversial within the American veterinary community.^[2] Many American veterinarians are critical of the procedure and some refuse to perform it^[28]. The two leading national animal protection organizations in the US, the Humane Society of the United States and the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, strongly discourage or condemn the procedure.^[29] The Humane Society of the United States and other animal advocacy groups have supported legislation banning or restricting declawing.^[30] Major opposition to attempts to ban or restrict declawing has come from veterinary trade organizations, such as the California Veterinary Medical Association. The AVMA considers declawing acceptable under certain circumstances but states that it "should be considered only after attempts have been made to prevent the cat from using its claws destructively or when its clawing presents a zoonotic risk for its owner(s)."^[10] Despite the clear ethical guidelines given by the AVMA, surveys suggest that 95% of declaw surgeries are done to protect furniture, and 76% of cats are declawed before 8 months of age, which precludes any serious effort at training or use of other humane alternatives. ^[31]

[edit] Alternatives to declawing

[edit] Surgical

Tendonectomy involves cutting the deep digital flexor tendon of each claw, resulting in the cat being unable to move its distal phalanges. Without the ability to expose its claws, the cat is unable to wear down or groom its claws. For this reason, the cat subsequently requires a lifetime of regular nail clippings to prevent its claws from growing into its paw pads. A 1998 study published in the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association comparing cats undergoing onychectomy to cats undergoing tendonectomy found that, although the cats undergoing tendonectomy appeared to suffer less pain immediately post-operatively, there was no significant difference in postoperative lameness, bleeding, or infection between the two groups.^[32] The American Veterinary Medical Association and the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association explicitly do not recommend this surgery as an alternative to declawing^[10][33].

[edit] Non-surgical

One popular, non-surgical alternative to declawing available through veterinarians is the application of vinyl nail caps (marketed in the US under brand names such as Soft Paws and Soft Claws) that are affixed to the claws with nontoxic glue, requiring periodic replacement when the cat sheds its claw sheaths (usually every four to six weeks, depending on the cat's scratching habits).

Other alternatives include regular nail trimming; directing scratching behavior to inexpensive cardboard scratchers or scratching posts, or emery scratching pads that dull the claws; rotary sanding devices (Dremel, Pedi-Paws); covering furniture or using double-sided sticky tape or sheets such as Sticky Paws; remote aversive devices such as Scat Mats; or acceptance of cats' scratching behavior.

[edit] See also

• Veterinary medicine

[edit] References

[edit] External links

• Studies Pertaining to Feline Onychectomy A summary of various studies and surveys
• Declawing and Its Alternatives from The Pet Health Library
• "Indoor Cats, Scratching, and the Debate over Declawing: When Normal Pet Behavior Becomes a Problem." from The State of the Animals III: 2005 Humane Society Press.
• The Paw Project Non-profit anti-declawing lobby group
• Declawing: What you need to know anti-declawing site
• Ask the Cat Doctor: Declawing Cats Includes an anatomical chart for better understanding of the declaw procedure.

v • d • e Cat Felinology Cats in ancient Egypt · Anatomy · Cat genetics Health Anesthesia · Cat skin disorders · Declawing · Diet · Feline acne · Feline asthma · Feline calicivirus · Feline hepatic lipidosis · Feline hypertrophic cardiomyopathy · Feline immunodeficiency virus · Feline infectious peritonitis · Feline leukemia virus · Feline lower urinary tract disease · Feline panleukopenia · Feline viral rhinotracheitis · Flea · Heartworm · Neutering · Rabies · Ringworm · Roundworm · Tick · Toxoplasmosis · Vaccination Behavior Body language · Catfight · Catnip · Communication · Kneading · Intelligence · Play and toys · Purr · Righting reflex · Senses Human-cat interaction Animal hoarding · Black cat · Cat allergy · Cat meat · Cat show · Cultural depictions of cats · Feral cat · High-rise syndrome · Ship's cat Registries American Cat Fanciers Association · Cat Aficionado Association · Cat Fanciers' Association · Fédération Internationale Féline · Governing Council of the Cat Fancy · The International Cat Association Breeds Domestic Abyssinian · American Curl · American Shorthair · Balinese · British Shorthair · Birman · Bombay · Burmese · California Spangled · Chartreux · Cornish Rex · Cymric · Devon Rex · Donskoy · Egyptian Mau · Exotic Shorthair · German Rex · Himalayan · Japanese Bobtail · Javanese · Khao Manee  · Korat · Maine Coon · Manx · Munchkin · Norwegian Forest Cat · Ocicat · Oriental Shorthair · Persian · Peterbald · Ragdoll · Ragamuffin · Russian Blue · Scottish Fold · Selkirk Rex · Siamese · Siberian · Singapura · Sokoke · Snowshoe · Somali · Sphynx · Thai · Tonkinese · Turkish Angora · Turkish Van · (Full list) Hybrid Bengal · Chausie · Cheetoh · Savannah · Serengeti cat Category · Portal · Book