Open learning

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Open learning is an innovative movement in education that emerged in the 1970s and evolved into fields of practice and study. The term refers generally to activities that either enhance learning opportunities within formal education systems or broaden learning opportunities beyond formal education systems.[1] Open learning involves but is not limited to: classroom teaching methods, approaches to interactive learning,[2] formats in work-related education and training,[3][4] the cultures and ecologies of learning communities,[5][6] and the development and use of open educational resources. While there is no agreed-upon, comprehensive definition of open learning, central focus is commonly placed on the "needs of the learner as perceived by the learner."[7] Case studies[7][8] illustrate open learning as an innovation both within and across academic disciplines, professions, social sectors and national boundaries, and in business and industry, higher education institutions, collaborative initiatives between institutions, and schooling for young learners.

Inception[edit]

Open learning as a teaching method is founded on the work of Célestin Freinet in France and Maria Montessori in Italy, among others. Open learning is supposed to allow pupils self-determined, independent and interest-guided learning. A prominent example is the language experience approach to teaching initial literacy (cf. Brügelmann/ Brinkmann 2011). More recent work on open learning has been conducted by the German pedagogues Hans Brügelmann (1975; 1999), Falko Peschel (2002), Jörg Ramseger (1977) and Wulf Wallrabenstein (1991). The approach is supposed to face up to three challenges (cf. in more detail Brügelmann/ Brinkmann 2008, chap. 1):

  • the vast differences in experiences, interests, and comptencies between children of the same age;
  • the constructivist nature of learning demanding active problem-solving by the learner him- and herself;
  • the legal requirement of student participation in decisions stipulated by the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). of 1989.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ D'Antoni, Susan (2009). "Open Educational Resources: reviewing initiatives and issues". Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning 24 (1 (Special Issue)): 4. doi:10.1080/02680510802625443. 
  2. ^ Mason, Robin (February 1991). "Conference Report. Open learning in the 1990s, 12-14 September 1990, University of Lancaster, UK". Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning 6 (1): 49–50. doi:10.1080/0268051910060109. Retrieved 20 September 2013. 
  3. ^ Bowen, Peter (1987). "Open learning formats in high performance training". Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning 2 (2): 29–31. doi:10.1080/0268051870020206. Retrieved 20 September 2013. 
  4. ^ Wilson, Valerie; Ursula Schlapp, Julia Davidson (2003). "Prescription for learning? Meeting the development needs of the pharmacy profession". International Journal of Lifelong Education 22 (4): 380–95. doi:10.1080/02601370304833. Retrieved 20 September 2013. 
  5. ^ Chang, Bo (2010). "Culture as a tool: facilitating knowledge construction in the context of a learning community". International Journal of Lifelong Education 29 (6): 705–22. doi:10.1080/02601370.2010.523947. Retrieved 20 September 2013. 
  6. ^ Ehlers, Ulf-Daniel (2013). Open Learning Cultures: A Guide to Quality, Evaluation, and Assessment for Future Learning. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. pp. vii–viii, 43. ISBN 978-3-642-38173-7. Retrieved 21 September 2013. 
  7. ^ a b Coffey, John (1988). "Guest Editorial: The Opening Learning Movement". Innovations in Education & Training International 25 (3): 195–96. doi:10.1080/1355800880250301. 
  8. ^ Dodds, Tony (2001). "Creating open and lifelong learning institutions in higher education: a Namibian case-study". International Journal of Lifelong Education 20 (6): 502–10. doi:10.1080/02601370110088472. Retrieved 20 September 2013. 

Further reading[edit]

  • Brügelmann, H. (1975): Open curricula—A paradox? In: Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 1, No. 5, Lent Term 1975, 12-20.
  • Brügelmann, H. (1999): From invention to convention. Children's different routes to literacy. How to teach reading and writing by construction vs. instruction. In: Nunes, T. (ed.) (1999): Learning to read: An integrated view from research and practice. Kluwer: Dordrecht et al., pp. 315–342.
  • Brügelmann, H./ Brinkmann, E.(2008): Öffnung des Anfangsunterrichts. Theoretische Prinzipien, unterrichtspraktische Ideen und empirische Befunde. Arbeitsgruppe Primarstufe/ Universität: Siegen (2nd ed.. 2009).
  • Brügelmann, H./ Brinkmann, E. (2011): Combining openness and structure in the initial literacy curriculum. A language experience approach for beginning teachers. http://www2.agprim.uni-siegen.de/printbrue/brue.bri.language_experience.engl.111124.pdf
  • Giaconia, R.M./ Hedges, L.V. (1982): Identifying features of effective open education. In: Review of Educational Research, Vol. 52, 579-602.
  • Peschel, F. (2002a+b): Offener Unterricht – Idee – Realität - Perspektive und ein praxiserprobtes Konzept zur Diskussion. Teil I: Allgemeindidaktische Überlegungen. Teil II: Fachdidaktische Überlegungen. Schneider Verlag Hohengehren: Baltmannsweiler.
  • Peschel, F. (2003): Offener Unterricht - Idee, Realität, Perspektive und ein praxiserprobtes Konzept in der Evaluation. Dissertation. FB 2 der Universität: Siegen/ Schneider Hohengehren: Baltmannsweiler.
  • Ramseger, J. (1977): Offener Unterricht in der Erprobung. Erfahrungen mit einem didaktischen Modell. Juventa: München (3rd ed. 1992).
  • Rothenberg, J. (1989): The open classroom reconsidered. In: The Elementary School Journal, Vol. 90, No. 1, 69-86.
  • Silberman, C.E. (Ed.) (1973): The open classroom Reader. Vintage Books: New York.
  • Wallrabenstein, W. (1991): Offene Schule – offener Unterricht. Ratgeber für Eltern und Lehrer. Rororo-Sachbuch 8752: Reinbek.