Orders of magnitude (radiation)
|Parts of this article (those related to article) are outdated. (July 2011)|
Recognized effects of higher acute radiation doses are described in more detail in the article on radiation poisoning. Although the International System of Units (SI) defines the sievert (Sv) as the unit of radiation dose equivalent, chronic radiation levels and standards are still often given in unts of millirems (mrem), where 1 mrem equals 1/1000 of a rem and 1 mrem equals 0.01 mSv. Light radiation sickness begins at about 50–100 rad (0.5–1 gray (Gy), 0.5–1 Sv, 50–100 rem, 50,000–100,000 mrem).
The following table includes some dosages for comparison purposes, using millisieverts (mSv) (one thousandth of a sievert). The concept of radiation hormesis is relevant to this table – radiation hormesis is a hypothesis stating that the effects of a given acute dose may differ from the effects of an equal fractionated dose. Thus 100 mSv is considered twice in the table below – once as received over a 5-year period, and once as an acute dose, received over a short period of time, with differing predicted effects. The table describes doses and their official limits, rather than effects.
|Level (mSv)||Duration||Hourly equivalent (μSv/hour)||Description|
|0.001||Hourly||1||Cosmic ray dose rate on commercial flights varies from 1 to 10 μSv/hour, depending on altitude, position and solar sunspot phase.|
|0.01||Daily||0.4||Natural background radiation, including radon|
|0.06||Acute||-||Chest X-ray (AP+Lat)|
|0.07||Acute||-||Transatlantic airplane flight.|
|0.09||Acute||-||Dental X-ray (Panoramic)|
|0.1||Annual||0.011||Average USA dose from consumer products|
|0.15||Annual||0.017||USA EPA cleanup standard|
|0.25||Annual||0.028||USA NRC cleanup standard for individual sites/sources|
|0.27||Annual||0.031||Yearly dose from natural cosmic radiation at sea level (0.5 in Denver due to altitude)|
|0.28||Annual||0.032||USA yearly dose from natural terrestrial radiation (0.16-0.63 depending on soil composition)|
|0.46||Acute||-||Estimated largest off-site dose possible from March 28, 1979 Three Mile Island accident|
|0.48||Day||20||USA NRC public area exposure limit|
|0.66||Annual||0.075||Average USA dose from human-made sources|
|1||Annual||0.11||Limit of dose from man-made sources to a member of the public who is not a radiation worker in the USA and Canada|
|1.1||Annual||0.13||1980 average USA radiation worker occupational dose|
|2||Annual||0.23||USA average medical and natural background 
Human internal radiation due to radon, varies with radon levels
|3||Annual||0.34||USA average dose from all natural sources|
|3.66||Annual||0.42||USA average from all sources, including medical diagnostic radiation doses|
|4||duration of the pregnancy||0.6||Canada CNSC maximum occupational dose to a pregnant woman who is a designated Nuclear Energy Worker.|
|5||Annual||0.57||USA NRC occupational limit for minors (10% of adult limit)
USA NRC limit for visitors
|5||Pregnancy||0.77||USA NRC occupational limit for pregnant women|
|6.4||Annual||0.73||High Background Radiation Area (HBRA) of Yangjiang, China|
|7.6||Annual||0.87||Fountainhead Rock Place, Santa Fe, NM natural|
|10||Acute||-||lower dose level for public calculated from the 1 to 5 rem range for which USA EPA guidelines mandate emergency action when resulting from a nuclear accident
|50||Annual||5.7||USA NRC/ Canada CNSC occupational limit for designated Nuclear Energy Workers(10 CFR 20)|
|100||5 years||2.3||Canada CNSC occupational limit over a 5-year dosimetry period for designated Nuclear Energy Workers|
|100||Acute||-||USA EPA acute dose level estimated to increase cancer risk 0.8%|
|120||30 years||0.46||Exposure, long duration, Ural mountains, lower limit, lower cancer mortality rate|
|150||Annual||17||USA NRC occupational eye lens exposure limit[clarification needed]|
|175||Annual||20||Guarapari, Brazil natural radiation sources|
|250||2 hours||125000 (125 mSv/hour)||Whole body dose exclusion zone criteria for US nuclear reactor siting (converted from 25 rem)|
|250||Acute||-||USA EPA voluntary maximum dose for emergency non-life-saving work|
|260||Annual||30||calculated from 260 mGy per year peak natural background dose in Ramsar|
|500||Annual||57||USA NRC occupational whole skin, limb skin, or single organ exposure limit
|500||Acute||-||Canada CNSC occupational limit for designated Nuclear Energy Workers carrying out urgent and necessary work during an emergency.
Low-level radiation sickness due to short-term exposure
|750||Acute||-||USA EPA voluntary maximum dose for emergency life-saving work|
|1000||Hourly||1000000 (1000 mSv/hour)||level reported during Fukushima I nuclear accidents, in immediate vicinity of reactor|
|3000||Acute||-||Thyroid dose (due to iodine absorption) exclusion zone criteria for US nuclear reactor siting (converted from 300 rem)|
|4800||Acute||-||LD50 (actually LD50/60) in humans from radiation poisoning with medical treatment estimated from 480 to 540 rem.|
|5000||Acute||-||Calculated from the estimated 510 rem dose fatally received by Harry Daghlian on 1945 August 21 at Los Alamos and lower estimate for fatality of Russian specialist on 1968 April 5 at Chelyabinsk-70.|
|5000||5 000 - 10 000 mSv. Most commercial electronics can survive this radiation level.|
|21 000||Acute||-||calculated from the estimated 2100 rem dose fatally received by Louis Slotin on 1946 May 21 at Los Alamos and lower estimate for fatality of Russian specialist on 1968 April 5 Chelyabinsk-70.|
|48 500||Acute||-||roughly calculated from the estimated 4500 + 350 rad dose for fatality of Russian experimenter on 1997 June 17 at Sarov.|
|60 000||Acute||-||roughly calculated from the estimated 6000 rem doses for several Russian fatalities from 1958 onwards, such as on 1971 May 26 at the Kurchatov Institute. Lower estimate for a Los Alamos fatality in 1958 December 30.|
|100 000||Acute||-||roughly calculated from the estimated 10000 rad dose for fatality at the United Nuclear Fuels Recovery Plant on 1964 July 24.|
|200 000||Hourly||170000 for over 1100 hours (170 mSv)||Some Chernobyl emergency workers' doses|
|1 000 000 000||The most radiation-hardened electronics can survive this radiation level.|
- "Annex B: Exposures from natural radiation sources". UNSCEAR 2000 Report: Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. 1 Sources. p. 88, Figure 3.
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (http://www.ornl.gov/sci/env_rpt/aser95/tb-a-2.pdf)
- Health Physics Society (http://www.hps.org/documents/meddiagimaging.pdf)
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (http://www.ornl.gov/sci/env_rpt/aser95/appa.htm)
- Radiation Protection Regulations, Canada
- "Annex B: Exposures from natural radiation sources". UNSCEAR 2000 Report: Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. 1 Sources.
Orvieto town, Italy
- Tao Z, Cha Y, Sun Q (July 1999). "[Cancer mortality in high background radiation area of Yangjiang, China, 1979–1995]". Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (in Chinese) 79 (7): 487–92. PMID 11715418.
- 10 CFR Part 100.11 Section 1
- Dissanayake C (May 2005). "Of Stones and Health: Medical Geology in Sri Lanka". Science 309 (5736): 883–5. doi:10.1126/science.1115174. PMID 16081722.
high as 260 mGy/year
- "Japan's Chernobyl". Spiegel. 2011-03-14. Retrieved 16 March 2011.
- Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
- "A Review of Criticality Accidents". Los Alamos National Laboratory. May 2000. pp. 16, 33, 74, 75, 87, 88, 89. Retrieved 16 March 2011.
- ieee.org - Radiation Hardening 101: How To Protect Nuclear Reactor Electronics
- Introduction to Radiation-Resistant Semiconductor Devices and Circuits
- Kerr, Richard (31 May 2013). "Radiation Will Make Astronauts' Trip to Mars Even Riskier". Science 340 (6136): 1031. doi:10.1126/science.340.6136.1031. Retrieved 31 May 2013.
- Zeitlin, C. et al. (31 May 2013). "Measurements of Energetic Particle Radiation in Transit to Mars on the Mars Science Laboratory". Science 340 (6136): 1080–1084. Bibcode:2013Sci...340.1080Z. doi:10.1126/science.1235989. Retrieved 31 May 2013.
- Chang, Kenneth (30 May 2013). "Data Point to Radiation Risk for Travelers to Mars". New York Times. Retrieved 31 May 2013.
- Gelling, Cristy (June 29, 2013). "Mars trip would deliver big radiation dose; Curiosity instrument confirms expectation of major exposures". Science News 183 (13): 8. Retrieved July 8, 2013.