Our Culture, What's Left of It

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Our Culture, What's Left of It: The Mandarins and the Masses
Our Culture, What's Left of It.jpg
Author Theodore Dalrymple
Country United States
Language English
Subject Social criticism
Publisher Ivan R. Dee
Publication date
25 May 2005
ISBN 1-56663-643-4

Our Culture, What's Left of It: The Mandarins and the Masses is a 2005 non-fiction book by British physician and writer Theodore Dalrymple. It is composed of twenty-six separate pieces that cover a wide range of topics from drug legalisation to the influence of Shakespeare. A common theme is criticism of modern society in Great Britain and, in many articles, social attitudes towards literature. The book was published by the Ivan R. Dee group.[1] He generally describes British culture as a "moral swamp" and writes that the people must return to past traditions before it is too late.[2]

Contents[edit]

As a common theme, Dalrymple depicts what he sees as "the moral swamp that is contemporary Britain". He criticises the British national culture as "a banal, self-pitying, witless and shallow emotional incontinence". He advocates a restoration of what he calls traditional British virtues such as "prudence, thrift, industry, honesty, moderation, politeness, self-restraint".[2]

In the essay "Who Killed Childhood?", he writes that modern British children now grow up in a warped environment that gives them an "egotistical inability to feel, compensated for by an outward show." He states that on one end the social culture tends to treat children as small adults. While at the same time, he argues that an extended adolescence prevents young adults from maturing much further from that initial jump made as children. He blames a breakdown of the traditional family and widespread illegitimacy, and he states that for many people parenting is just one immature person blindly enforcing their will upon another immature person.[3]

In another essay, he discusses the immense power of music over humanity. He describes how various dictators from Vladimir Lenin to the Ayatollah Khomeini have opposed the public's right to play their music, and thus how music inherently challenges totalitarian thinking since it defies ideological characterisation. He writes about how the idea that what cannot be scientifically measured does not truly exist fails.[3]

He condemns the secularisation of British society, writing:

The loss of the religious understanding of the human condition— that man is a fallen creature for whom virtue is necessary but never fully attainable— is a loss, not a gain, in true sophistication. The secular substitute— the belief in the perfection of life on earth by the endless extension of a choice of pleasures— is not merely callow by comparison but much less realistic in its understanding of human nature.[2]

He describes his experience treating people who use illegal drugs. He defends the 'war on drugs' and attacks the arguments for legalisation. He writes, "If the war on drugs is lost, then so are the wars against theft, speeding, incest, fraud, rape, murder, arson... Few, if any such wars are winnable."[4]

Reviews[edit]

Writer and Greek Orthodox priest Johannes L. Jacobse wrote for Orthodoxy Today that the book gives "an illuminating journey through recent cultural history". He stated that "it's rare to find such a morally coherent, historically informed, and humane account of the costs that welfare socialists impose on society". He also remarked, "Sober-minded readers will benefit from Dalrymple's work".[5]

The Times Literary Supplement published a mostly positive review by author and editor Richard Davenport-Hines. Davenport-Hines argued that Dalrymple left out the negative influence of American culture on Britain— such as the instant gratification provided on trashy American television and the popularity of unhealthy American fast food. Richard Davenport-Hines also wrote more generally that:

Dalrymple has, it must be stressed, written an urgent, important, almost an essential book. Our Culture, What's Left of It needs to be read and acted on by policy-makers, by opinion-formers, and anyone who wants to grasp why Britain has become so much less pleasant a country in which to live. The book is elegantly written, conscientiously argued, provocative and fiercely committed... His measured polemics arouse disgust, shame and despair: they will shake many readers' views of their physical surroundings and cultural assumptions, and have an enriching power to improve the way that people think and act.[2]

A supportive review appeared in News Weekly, a publication by the Australian public policy group National Civic Council. The news magazine stated that "It is rare for a book on social issues to be so readable, but this is not a work of abstract social theory." The review also stated that "The vividness of Dalrymple's prose and the remorseless logic of his arguments make this a formidable work. Anyone concerned about the fate of Western civilisation should read this book."[4]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Our Culture, What's Left of It: The Mandarins and the Masses". Manhattan Institute. Retrieved 8 July 2011. 
  2. ^ a b c d Lost virtue November 13th, 2005.
  3. ^ a b Jamie Glazov (31 August 2005). "Our Culture, What's Left of It". Frontpage magazine. Retrieved 8 July 2011. 
  4. ^ a b "BOOKS: OUR CULTURE, WHAT'S LEFT OF IT, by Theodore Dalrymple (Peter Donald (reviewer))". Newsweekly.com.au. Retrieved 6 April 2012. 
  5. ^ Jacobse, Johannes L. (29 August 2005). "Book Review: Our Culture, What's Left of It". Orthodoxy Today. Retrieved 8 July 2011.