Out-group homogeneity bias

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate. (December 2008)

According to the outgroup homogeneity bias, individuals see members of their own group as being more varied than members of other groups.

This bias was found to be unrelated to the number of group and non-group members individuals knew. One might think that people thought members of their own groups were more varied and different simply because they knew them better, but this is actually not the case. The outgroup homogeneity bias was found between groups such as "men" and "women" who obviously interact frequently.

The implications of this effect to stereotyping is obvious, and it may be related to confirmation bias.

A similar bias on the individual level is the trait ascription bias. Compare to the group attribution error and the dilution effect.

[edit] In fiction

An example of this is that in science fiction universes, such as Star Trek, humans are almost always^{[citation needed]} the only species with multiple cultures; alien species are almost universally depicted as having a single, species-spanning culture.

In the television series "Babylon 5", additionally, the same idea is repeated, albeit deliberately. The first season episode Parliament of Dreams establishes that in-group heterogeneity is a specifically human trait, in deliberate contrast to the homogeneity of the alien races depicted.

[edit] See also

• Group-serving bias
• List of cognitive biases
• Outgroup (sociology)

[edit] References

• Quattrone, G. A., & Jones, E. E. (1980). The perception of variability within in-groups and out-groups: Implications for the law of small numbers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 141-152.
• Quattrone, G. A. (1986). On the perception of a group’s variability. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (eds.) Psychology of intergroup relations, 2nd ed. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
• Mullen, B. & Hu, L. (1989). Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability; A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 233-252.