Ovid among the Scythians

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Ovid among the Scythians
Ovid among the Scythians.jpg
Artist Eugène Delacroix
Year 1859
Type Oil on canvas
Dimensions 87.6 cm × 130.2 cm (34.5 in × 51.3 in)
Location National Gallery, London
Ovid among the Scythians
001 Ovid among the Scythians (oil on paper laid down on wood).jpg
Artist Eugène Delacroix
Year 1862
Type Oil on wood
Dimensions 32.1 cm × 50.2 cm (12.6 in × 19.8 in)
Location Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City

Ovid among the Scythians (1859 and 1862) is the title of two oil paintings by French artist Eugène Delacroix. The little famous second version was painted to integrate the figures and landscape and rectified the problems of scale of the first version, which unusual composition and strange scale of the characters provoked negative criticism, even among Delacroix's admirers such as Baudelaire and Gautier, although artists like Edgar Degas were deeply impressed.[1] Delacroix painted this subject first in 1844 as part of the decorations for the ceiling of the Library of the Palais Bourbon in Paris.[2] They depict the life of the Ancient Roman poet Ovid when exiled by the Emperor Augustus to the Black Sea port of Tomis in south east Romania, in Scythia, where he spent his last eight years and wrote poems such as Tristia and Epistulae ex Ponto.[3] Scythians were an Ancient Iranian people whose way of life was described by Herodotus in his Histories as "nomadic"[4] and Ovid himself called them a "wild tribe".[5]

However, with its cultured man standing before barbarous people, the 1859 picture show the Scythians treating the poet with sympathy and curiosity, and is a fine treatment of the theme of civilisation confronted with barbarity.[6] Henri Loyrette wrote:

Low but sometimes steep mountains covered with scrubby vegetation surround a still, shallow lake, boggy at its edges; scattered huts built precariously of wood and thatch suggest a pastoral and nomadic culture. In the foreground a man milks a large mare; behind him, various figures are casually placed, squatting, walking or standing still – a child, an old man, a nursling in its mother's arms, soldiers, resting shepherds. And, dolefully stretched out on a gentle incline, swathed in drapery, lies the figure identified by the painting's title as Ovid. He appears like a fallen meteorite on whom converge the friendly but startled inhabitants of this savage country. Delacroix has given him the pose of a Madonna in a Nativity [...].[7]

The first version was exhibited in the Paris Salon of 1859, the last in which Delacroix participated.[7] The composition reinterprets ideas that Delacroix had previously used in decorative compositions such as The Massacre at Chios, Death of Sardanapalus and Entry of the Crusaders in Constantinople.[6] At the time of its exhibition, the landscape with its mountains was "universally" praised, while the mare in the foreground was thought strange by some.[8] Théophile Gautier, for example, admired the painting, but ironically called the mare la femelle du cheval de Troie ("the female of the trojan horse").[9] Maxime Du Camp was the author of the harshest criticism, calling the painting "a spectacle of irremissible decadence" and advising the painter "to return to the literary works that he loves and to the music for which he was certainly born".[10] Baudelaire, in his last Salon criticism, called the painting "one of these amazing works" and saying "Delacroix knows the design and painting",[11] and also wrote a long essay on the life of an exiled poet and also quoting Chateaubriand's epic Les Martyrs to evoke "the landscape, its solitude, its calm charm".[12] Zacharie Astruc, in his first Salon criticism, praised all the details in the picture: Ovid ("what noble elegance!"); the mare ("what color and air around it!"); the dog, which made him think about classical sculpture; the water ("a strange beauty"); and, above all, the landscape.[13] In the catalog, by Delacroix himself, was written: "Some examine him [Ovid] with interest, others go home and offer wild fruit and mare's milk, etc., etc."[14]

The wildness and the misunderstood genius were key concepts in Romanticism and are very well portrayed in these two paintings by Delacroix.[15] The second version, contrary to what one might think, is not an oil sketch but a completed version which develops many elements of the London work. Delacroix painted it with more vivid colors, replaced the barbarian with a shield on the back by a woman bringing food, and also closely integrated the figures and landscape in a manner that is more in keeping with a historical landscape.[16] It was painted a year before his death, in 1862, most probably for a private collector. It was given to Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, in honour of Philippe de Montebello, in 2008. According to Gary Tinterow, the Metropolitan’s curator of 19th-century, Modern and contemporary art: "this is his late, final statement on a theme that interested him his whole life."[17]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Recent Acquisitions, A Selection: 2007–2008," in The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, v. 66, no. 2 (Fall, 2008).
  2. ^ http://www.nationalgalleryimages.co.uk/search.aspx?q=DELACROIX,+Eug%C3%A8ne&mode=artist&frm=1
  3. ^ Richard A. Bauman, Women and politics in ancient Rome (Routledge, 1992), p.119. ISBN 0-415-05777-9, ISBN 978-0-415-05777-6
  4. ^ Her. Hist. 4.46.3, .127.2.
  5. ^ Ov. Tris. III, X, 5. The poet regrets the place of his exile in the whole poem. After all, no one understood his language (III. 11. 9-10, III. 14. 37-40, V. 10. 35-36), and when they heard Latin words they laugh (10. 37-38). Ovid also complains about constant wars (III. 10. 53-70, V. 10. 21-26; Ep. I. 2. 13-14) and the harsh climate, with cold, snow and ice (III. 8. 27-32, V. 2. 63-66; Ep. I. 2. 23-26, I. 3. 45-50).
  6. ^ a b Gilles Néret, Eugène Delacroix, 1798-1863: the prince of romanticism (Taschen, 2000), p.81-82. ISBN 3-8228-5988-5, ISBN 978-3-8228-5988-9
  7. ^ a b Henri Loyrette, "Delacroix's 'Ovid in exile'" In: The Burlington Magazine (The Burlington Magazine Publications, Ltd.), Vol. 137, No. 1111 (Oct., 1995), pp. 682-683.
  8. ^ L. Jourdan: Les Peintres français, Salon de 1859, Paris [1859], p.35.
  9. ^ T. Gautier: Exposition de 1859, ed. W. Drost and U. Henninges, Heidelberg [1992], p.35. (See the review in p.607 of this issue.)
  10. ^ M. Du Camp: Le Salon de 1859, Paris [1859], p.34.
  11. ^ Charles Baudelaire, Curiosités esthétiques: Salon 1845-1859 (M. Lévy, 1868), Original from Oxford University, p.288.
  12. ^ Timothy Bell Raser, The simplest of signs: Victor Hugo and the language of images in France, 1850-1950 (University of Delaware Press, 2004), p.127. ISBN 0-87413-867-1, ISBN 978-0-87413-867-2
  13. ^ Z. Astrug: Les 14 statins de Salon - 1859, Paris [1859], pp.260-61.
  14. ^ Paris, 1859 Salon, no. 822. Also quoted by Alexander Sturgis, Rebels and martyrs: the image of the artist in the nineteenth century (Yale University Press, 2006), p.18. ISBN 1-85709-346-1, ISBN 978-1-85709-346-9
  15. ^ Matt Cartmill, A View to a Death in the Morning: Hunting and Nature Through History, Harvard University Press, 1996, p.118-19. ISBN 0-674-93736-8
  16. ^ Barthélémy Jobert, Delacroix, Paris, 1997, p.268.
  17. ^ "Drawing Center Won’t Move to Seaport" (March 14, 2008), by Carol Vogel. In New York Times. Consulted on January 19, 2010.

External links[edit]