Jump to content

PSMC1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Neils51 (talk | contribs) at 03:19, 21 October 2022 (Function: replaced: eastablishs → establishes). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

PSMC1
Identifiers
AliasesPSMC1, P26S4, S4, p56, proteasome 26S subunit, ATPase 1, RPT2
External IDsOMIM: 602706; MGI: 106054; HomoloGene: 2095; GeneCards: PSMC1; OMA:PSMC1 - orthologs
Orthologs
SpeciesHumanMouse
Entrez
Ensembl
UniProt
RefSeq (mRNA)

NM_002802
NM_001330212

NM_008947

RefSeq (protein)

NP_001317141
NP_002793

NP_032973

Location (UCSC)Chr 14: 90.26 – 90.28 MbChr 12: 100.08 – 100.09 Mb
PubMed search[3][4]
Wikidata
View/Edit HumanView/Edit Mouse

26S protease regulatory subunit 4, also known as 26S proteasome AAA-ATPase subunit Rpt2, is an enzyme that in humans is encoded by the PSMC1 gene.[5][6] This protein is one of the 19 essential subunits of a complete assembled 19S proteasome complex.[7] Six 26S proteasome AAA-ATPase subunits (Rpt1, Rpt2 (this protein), Rpt3, Rpt4, Rpt5, and Rpt6) together with four non-ATPase subunits (Rpn1, Rpn2, Rpn10, and Rpn13) form the base sub complex of 19S regulatory particle for proteasome complex.[7]

Gene

The gene PSMC1 encodes one of the ATPase subunits, a member of the triple-A family of ATPases which have a chaperone-like activity. The human PSMC1 gene has 11 exons and locates at chromosome band 14q32.11.

Protein

The human protein 26S protease regulatory subunit 4 is 49kDa in size and composed of 440 amino acids. The calculated theoretical pI of this protein is 526S protease regulatory subunit 5.68. One expression isoform is generated by alternative splicing, in which 1-73 of the amino acid sequence is missing.[8]

Complex assembly

26S proteasome complex is usually consisted of a 20S core particle (CP, or 20S proteasome) and one or two 19S regulatory particles (RP, or 19S proteasome) on either one side or both side of the barrel-shaped 20S. The CP and RPs pertain distinct structural characteristics and biological functions. In brief, 20S sub complex presents three types proteolytic activities, including caspase-like, trypsin-like, and chymotrypsin-like activities. These proteolytic active sites located in the inner side of a chamber formed by 4 stacked rings of 20S subunits, preventing random protein-enzyme encounter and uncontrolled protein degradation. The 19S regulatory particles can recognize ubiquitin-labeled protein as degradation substrate, unfold the protein to linear, open the gate of 20S core particle, and guide the substate into the proteolytic chamber. To meet such functional complexity, 19S regulatory particle contains at least 18 constitutive subunits. These subunits can be categorized into two classes based on the ATP dependence of subunits, ATP-dependent subunits and ATP-independent subunits. According to the protein interaction and topological characteristics of this multisubunit complex, the 19S regulatory particle is composed of a base and a lid subcomplex. The base consists of a ring of six AAA ATPases (Subunit Rpt1-6, systematic nomenclature) and four non-ATPase subunits (Rpn1, Rpn2, Rpn10, and Rpn13). Thus, 26S protease regulatory subunit 4 (Rpt2) is an essential component of forming the base subcomplex of 19S regulatory particle. For the assembly of 19S base sub complex, four sets of pivotal assembly chaperons (Hsm3/S5b, Nas2/P27, Nas6/P28, and Rpn14/PAAF1, nomenclature in yeast/mammals) were identified by four groups independently.[9][10][11][12][13][14] These 19S regulatory particle base-dedicated chaperons all binds to individual ATPase subunits through the C-terminal regions. For example, Hsm3/S5b binds to the subunit Rpt1 and Rpt2 (this protein), Nas2/p27 to Rpt5, Nas6/p28 to Rpt3, and Rpn14/PAAAF1 to Rpt6, respectively. Subsequently, three intermediate assembly modules are formed as following, the Nas6/p28-Rpt3-Rpt6-Rpn14/PAAF1 module, the Nas2/p27-Rpt4-Rpt5 module, and the Hsm3/S5b-Rpt1-Rpt2-Rpn2 module. Eventually, these three modules assemble together to form the heterohexameric ring of 6 Atlases with Rpn1. The final addition of Rpn13 indicates the completion of 19S base sub complex assembly.[7]

Function

As the degradation machinery that is responsible for ~70% of intracellular proteolysis,[15] proteasome complex (26S proteasome) plays a critical roles in maintaining the homeostasis of cellular proteome. Accordingly, misfolded proteins and damaged protein need to be continuously removed to recycle amino acids for new synthesis; in parallel, some key regulatory proteins fulfill their biological functions via selective degradation; furthermore, proteins are digested into peptides for MHC class I antigen presentation. To meet such complicated demands in biological process via spatial and temporal proteolysis, protein substrates have to be recognized, recruited, and eventually hydrolyzed in a well controlled fashion. Thus, 19S regulatory particle pertains a series of important capabilities to address these functional challenges. To recognize protein as designated substrate, 19S complex has subunits that are capable to recognize proteins with a special degradative tag, the ubiquitinylation. It also have subunits that can bind with nucleotides (e.g., ATPs) in order to facilitate the association between 19S and 20S particles, as well as to cause confirmation changes of alpha subunit C-terminals that form the substate entrance of 20S complex.

The ATPases subunits assemble into a six-membered ring with a sequence of Rpt1–Rpt5–Rpt4–Rpt3–Rpt6–Rpt2, which interacts with the seven-membered alpha ring of 20S core particle and establishes an asymmetric interface between the 19S RP and the 20S CP.[16][17] Three C-terminal tails with HbYX motifs of distinct Rpt ATPases insert into pockets between two defined alpha subunits of the CP and regulate the gate opening of the central channels in the CP alpha ring.[18][19]

Clinical significance

The proteasome and its subunits are of clinical significance for at least two reasons: (1) a compromised complex assembly or a dysfunctional proteasome can be associated with the underlying pathophysiology of specific diseases, and (2) they can be exploited as drug targets for therapeutic interventions. More recently, more effort has been made to consider the proteasome for the development of novel diagnostic markers and strategies. An improved and comprehensive understanding of the pathophysiology of the proteasome should lead to clinical applications in the future.

The proteasomes form a pivotal component for the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) [20] and corresponding cellular Protein Quality Control (PQC). Protein ubiquitination and subsequent proteolysis and degradation by the proteasome are important mechanisms in the regulation of the cell cycle, cell growth and differentiation, gene transcription, signal transduction and apoptosis.[21] Subsequently, a compromised proteasome complex assembly and function lead to reduced proteolytic activities and the accumulation of damaged or misfolded protein species. Such protein accumulation may contribute to the pathogenesis and phenotypic characteristics in neurodegenerative diseases,[22][23] cardiovascular diseases,[24][25][26] inflammatory responses and autoimmune diseases,[27] and systemic DNA damage responses leading to malignancies.[28]

Several experimental and clinical studies have indicated that aberrations and deregulations of the UPS contribute to the pathogenesis of several neurodegenerative and myodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease,[29] Parkinson's disease[30] and Pick's disease,[31] Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS),[31] Huntington's disease,[30] Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease,[32] and motor neuron diseases, polyglutamine (PolyQ) diseases, Muscular dystrophies[33] and several rare forms of neurodegenerative diseases associated with dementia.[34] As part of the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS), the proteasome maintains cardiac protein homeostasis and thus plays a significant role in cardiac ischemic injury,[35] ventricular hypertrophy[36] and heart failure.[37] Additionally, evidence is accumulating that the UPS plays an essential role in malignant transformation. UPS proteolysis plays a major role in responses of cancer cells to stimulatory signals that are critical for the development of cancer. Accordingly, gene expression by degradation of transcription factors, such as p53, c-jun, c-Fos, NF-κB, c-Myc, HIF-1α, MATα2, STAT3, sterol-regulated element-binding proteins and androgen receptors are all controlled by the UPS and thus involved in the development of various malignancies.[38] Moreover, the UPS regulates the degradation of tumor suppressor gene products such as adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) in colorectal cancer, retinoblastoma (Rb). and von Hippel–Lindau tumor suppressor (VHL), as well as a number of proto-oncogenes (Raf, Myc, Myb, Rel, Src, Mos, ABL). The UPS is also involved in the regulation of inflammatory responses. This activity is usually attributed to the role of proteasomes in the activation of NF-κB which further regulates the expression of pro inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-β, IL-8, adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, VCAM-1, P-selectin) and prostaglandins and nitric oxide (NO).[27] Additionally, the UPS also plays a role in inflammatory responses as regulators of leukocyte proliferation, mainly through proteolysis of cyclines and the degradation of CDK inhibitors.[39] Lastly, autoimmune disease patients with SLE, Sjögren syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) predominantly exhibit circulating proteasomes which can be applied as clinical biomarkers.[40]

In humans the 26S protease regulatory subunit 4', also known as 26S proteasome AAA-ATPase subunit Rpt2, is an enzyme that is encoded by the PSMC1 gene.[5][6] This protein and is one of the 19 essential subunits of a complete assembled 19S proteasome complex.[7] Megakaryocytes that were isolated from mice deficient for PSMC1 failed to produce pro platelets. The failure to produce proplatelets in proteasome-inhibited megakaryocytes was due to upregulation and hyperactivation of the small GTPase, RhoA. It appears that proteasome function, through an underlying mechanisms involving PSMC1, is critical for thrombopoiesis. Furthermore, inhibition of RhoA signaling in this process may be a potential strategy to treat thrombocytopenia in bortezomib-treated multiple myeloma patients.[41]

Interactions

PSMC1 has been shown to interact with PSMD2[42][43] and PSMC2.[43][44]

References

  1. ^ a b c GRCh38: Ensembl release 89: ENSG00000100764Ensembl, May 2017
  2. ^ a b c GRCm38: Ensembl release 89: ENSMUSG00000021178Ensembl, May 2017
  3. ^ "Human PubMed Reference:". National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  4. ^ "Mouse PubMed Reference:". National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  5. ^ a b Tanahashi N, Suzuki M, Fujiwara T, Takahashi E, Shimbara N, Chung CH, Tanaka K (March 1998). "Chromosomal localization and immunological analysis of a family of human 26S proteasomal ATPases". Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 243 (1): 229–32. doi:10.1006/bbrc.1997.7892. PMID 9473509.
  6. ^ a b "Entrez Gene: PSMC1 proteasome (prosome, macropain) 26S subunit, ATPase, 1".
  7. ^ a b c d Gu ZC, Enenkel C (Dec 2014). "Proteasome assembly". Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 71 (24): 4729–45. doi:10.1007/s00018-014-1699-8. PMID 25107634. S2CID 15661805.
  8. ^ "P62191 - PRS4_HUMAN". Uniprot.
  9. ^ Le Tallec B, Barrault MB, Guérois R, Carré T, Peyroche A (Feb 2009). "Hsm3/S5b participates in the assembly pathway of the 19S regulatory particle of the proteasome". Molecular Cell. 33 (3): 389–99. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2009.01.010. PMID 19217412.
  10. ^ Funakoshi M, Tomko RJ, Kobayashi H, Hochstrasser M (May 2009). "Multiple assembly chaperones govern biogenesis of the proteasome regulatory particle base". Cell. 137 (5): 887–99. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.061. PMC 2718848. PMID 19446322.
  11. ^ Park S, Roelofs J, Kim W, Robert J, Schmidt M, Gygi SP, Finley D (Jun 2009). "Hexameric assembly of the proteasomal ATPases is templated through their C termini". Nature. 459 (7248): 866–70. Bibcode:2009Natur.459..866P. doi:10.1038/nature08065. PMC 2722381. PMID 19412160.
  12. ^ Roelofs J, Park S, Haas W, Tian G, McAllister FE, Huo Y, Lee BH, Zhang F, Shi Y, Gygi SP, Finley D (Jun 2009). "Chaperone-mediated pathway of proteasome regulatory particle assembly". Nature. 459 (7248): 861–5. Bibcode:2009Natur.459..861R. doi:10.1038/nature08063. PMC 2727592. PMID 19412159.
  13. ^ Saeki Y, Toh-E A, Kudo T, Kawamura H, Tanaka K (May 2009). "Multiple proteasome-interacting proteins assist the assembly of the yeast 19S regulatory particle". Cell. 137 (5): 900–13. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.005. PMID 19446323.
  14. ^ Kaneko T, Hamazaki J, Iemura S, Sasaki K, Furuyama K, Natsume T, Tanaka K, Murata S (May 2009). "Assembly pathway of the Mammalian proteasome base subcomplex is mediated by multiple specific chaperones". Cell. 137 (5): 914–25. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.008. PMID 19490896.
  15. ^ Rock KL, Gramm C, Rothstein L, Clark K, Stein R, Dick L, Hwang D, Goldberg AL (Sep 1994). "Inhibitors of the proteasome block the degradation of most cell proteins and the generation of peptides presented on MHC class I molecules". Cell. 78 (5): 761–71. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(94)90462-6. PMID 8087844. S2CID 22262916.
  16. ^ Tian G, Park S, Lee MJ, Huck B, McAllister F, Hill CP, Gygi SP, Finley D (Nov 2011). "An asymmetric interface between the regulatory and core particles of the proteasome". Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 18 (11): 1259–67. doi:10.1038/nsmb.2147. PMC 3210322. PMID 22037170.
  17. ^ Lander GC, Estrin E, Matyskiela ME, Bashore C, Nogales E, Martin A (Feb 2012). "Complete subunit architecture of the proteasome regulatory particle". Nature. 482 (7384): 186–91. Bibcode:2012Natur.482..186L. doi:10.1038/nature10774. PMC 3285539. PMID 22237024.
  18. ^ Gillette TG, Kumar B, Thompson D, Slaughter CA, DeMartino GN (Nov 2008). "Differential roles of the COOH termini of AAA subunits of PA700 (19 S regulator) in asymmetric assembly and activation of the 26 S proteasome". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 283 (46): 31813–31822. doi:10.1074/jbc.M805935200. PMC 2581596. PMID 18796432.
  19. ^ Smith DM, Chang SC, Park S, Finley D, Cheng Y, Goldberg AL (Sep 2007). "Docking of the proteasomal ATPases' carboxyl termini in the 20S proteasome's alpha ring opens the gate for substrate entry". Molecular Cell. 27 (5): 731–744. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.033. PMC 2083707. PMID 17803938.
  20. ^ Kleiger G, Mayor T (Jun 2014). "Perilous journey: a tour of the ubiquitin–proteasome system". Trends in Cell Biology. 24 (6): 352–9. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2013.12.003. PMC 4037451. PMID 24457024.
  21. ^ Goldberg AL, Stein R, Adams J (Aug 1995). "New insights into proteasome function: from archaebacteria to drug development". Chemistry & Biology. 2 (8): 503–8. doi:10.1016/1074-5521(95)90182-5. PMID 9383453.
  22. ^ Sulistio YA, Heese K (Jan 2015). "The Ubiquitin–Proteasome System and Molecular Chaperone Deregulation in Alzheimer's Disease". Molecular Neurobiology. 53 (2): 905–31. doi:10.1007/s12035-014-9063-4. PMID 25561438. S2CID 14103185.
  23. ^ Ortega Z, Lucas JJ (2014). "Ubiquitin–proteasome system involvement in Huntington's disease". Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience. 7: 77. doi:10.3389/fnmol.2014.00077. PMC 4179678. PMID 25324717.
  24. ^ Sandri M, Robbins J (Jun 2014). "Proteotoxicity: an underappreciated pathology in cardiac disease". Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology. 71: 3–10. doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.12.015. PMC 4011959. PMID 24380730.
  25. ^ Drews O, Taegtmeyer H (Dec 2014). "Targeting the ubiquitin–proteasome system in heart disease: the basis for new therapeutic strategies". Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 21 (17): 2322–43. doi:10.1089/ars.2013.5823. PMC 4241867. PMID 25133688.
  26. ^ Wang ZV, Hill JA (Feb 2015). "Protein quality control and metabolism: bidirectional control in the heart". Cell Metabolism. 21 (2): 215–26. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2015.01.016. PMC 4317573. PMID 25651176.
  27. ^ a b Karin M, Delhase M (Feb 2000). "The I kappa B kinase (IKK) and NF-kappa B: key elements of proinflammatory signalling". Seminars in Immunology. 12 (1): 85–98. doi:10.1006/smim.2000.0210. PMID 10723801.
  28. ^ Ermolaeva MA, Dakhovnik A, Schumacher B (Jan 2015). "Quality control mechanisms in cellular and systemic DNA damage responses". Ageing Research Reviews. 23 (Pt A): 3–11. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2014.12.009. PMC 4886828. PMID 25560147.
  29. ^ Checler F, da Costa CA, Ancolio K, Chevallier N, Lopez-Perez E, Marambaud P (Jul 2000). "Role of the proteasome in Alzheimer's disease". Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease. 1502 (1): 133–8. doi:10.1016/s0925-4439(00)00039-9. PMID 10899438.
  30. ^ a b Chung KK, Dawson VL, Dawson TM (Nov 2001). "The role of the ubiquitin-proteasomal pathway in Parkinson's disease and other neurodegenerative disorders". Trends in Neurosciences. 24 (11 Suppl): S7–14. doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01998-6. PMID 11881748. S2CID 2211658.
  31. ^ a b Ikeda K, Akiyama H, Arai T, Ueno H, Tsuchiya K, Kosaka K (Jul 2002). "Morphometrical reappraisal of motor neuron system of Pick's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with dementia". Acta Neuropathologica. 104 (1): 21–8. doi:10.1007/s00401-001-0513-5. PMID 12070660. S2CID 22396490.
  32. ^ Manaka H, Kato T, Kurita K, Katagiri T, Shikama Y, Kujirai K, Kawanami T, Suzuki Y, Nihei K, Sasaki H (May 1992). "Marked increase in cerebrospinal fluid ubiquitin in Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease". Neuroscience Letters. 139 (1): 47–9. doi:10.1016/0304-3940(92)90854-z. PMID 1328965. S2CID 28190967.
  33. ^ Mathews KD, Moore SA (Jan 2003). "Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy". Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports. 3 (1): 78–85. doi:10.1007/s11910-003-0042-9. PMID 12507416. S2CID 5780576.
  34. ^ Mayer RJ (Mar 2003). "From neurodegeneration to neurohomeostasis: the role of ubiquitin". Drug News & Perspectives. 16 (2): 103–8. doi:10.1358/dnp.2003.16.2.829327. PMID 12792671.
  35. ^ Calise J, Powell SR (Feb 2013). "The ubiquitin proteasome system and myocardial ischemia". American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 304 (3): H337–49. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00604.2012. PMC 3774499. PMID 23220331.
  36. ^ Predmore JM, Wang P, Davis F, Bartolone S, Westfall MV, Dyke DB, Pagani F, Powell SR, Day SM (Mar 2010). "Ubiquitin proteasome dysfunction in human hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathies". Circulation. 121 (8): 997–1004. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.904557. PMC 2857348. PMID 20159828.
  37. ^ Powell SR (Jul 2006). "The ubiquitin–proteasome system in cardiac physiology and pathology" (PDF). American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 291 (1): H1–H19. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00062.2006. PMID 16501026. S2CID 7073263. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-02-27.
  38. ^ Adams J (Apr 2003). "Potential for proteasome inhibition in the treatment of cancer". Drug Discovery Today. 8 (7): 307–15. doi:10.1016/s1359-6446(03)02647-3. PMID 12654543.
  39. ^ Ben-Neriah Y (Jan 2002). "Regulatory functions of ubiquitination in the immune system". Nature Immunology. 3 (1): 20–6. doi:10.1038/ni0102-20. PMID 11753406. S2CID 26973319.
  40. ^ Egerer K, Kuckelkorn U, Rudolph PE, Rückert JC, Dörner T, Burmester GR, Kloetzel PM, Feist E (Oct 2002). "Circulating proteasomes are markers of cell damage and immunologic activity in autoimmune diseases". The Journal of Rheumatology. 29 (10): 2045–52. PMID 12375310.
  41. ^ Shi DS, Smith MC, Campbell RA, Zimmerman PW, Franks ZB, Kraemer BF, Machlus KR, Ling J, Kamba P, Schwertz H, Rowley JW, Miles RR, Liu ZJ, Sola-Visner M, Italiano JE, Christensen H, Kahr WH, Li DY, Weyrich AS (Sep 2014). "Proteasome function is required for platelet production". The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 124 (9): 3757–66. doi:10.1172/JCI75247. PMC 4151230. PMID 25061876.
  42. ^ Rual JF, Venkatesan K, Hao T, Hirozane-Kishikawa T, Dricot A, Li N, Berriz GF, Gibbons FD, Dreze M, Ayivi-Guedehoussou N, Klitgord N, Simon C, Boxem M, Milstein S, Rosenberg J, Goldberg DS, Zhang LV, Wong SL, Franklin G, Li S, Albala JS, Lim J, Fraughton C, Llamosas E, Cevik S, Bex C, Lamesch P, Sikorski RS, Vandenhaute J, Zoghbi HY, Smolyar A, Bosak S, Sequerra R, Doucette-Stamm L, Cusick ME, Hill DE, Roth FP, Vidal M (October 2005). "Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network". Nature. 437 (7062): 1173–8. Bibcode:2005Natur.437.1173R. doi:10.1038/nature04209. PMID 16189514. S2CID 4427026.
  43. ^ a b Gorbea C, Taillandier D, Rechsteiner M (January 2000). "Mapping subunit contacts in the regulatory complex of the 26 S proteasome. S2 and S5b form a tetramer with ATPase subunits S4 and S7". J. Biol. Chem. 275 (2): 875–82. doi:10.1074/jbc.275.2.875. PMID 10625621.
  44. ^ Hartmann-Petersen R, Tanaka K, Hendil KB (February 2001). "Quaternary structure of the ATPase complex of human 26S proteasomes determined by chemical cross-linking". Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 386 (1): 89–94. doi:10.1006/abbi.2000.2178. PMID 11361004.

Further reading