Particle-size distribution

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The particle-size distribution (PSD) of a powder, or granular material, or particles dispersed in fluid, is a list of values or a mathematical function that defines the relative amount, typically by mass, of particles present according to size.[1] PSD is also known as grain size distribution.[2]

Particle size distribution of coal-fired fly ash.
A log-normal distribution of coal-fired fly ash.

Significance[edit]

The PSD of a material can be important in understanding its physical and chemical properties. It affects the strength and load-bearing properties of rocks and soils. It affects the reactivity of solids participating in chemical reactions, and needs to be tightly controlled in many industrial products such as the manufacture of printer toner, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical products.

Significance in the collection of particulate matter[edit]

Particle size distribution can greatly affect the efficiency of any collection device.

Settling chambers will normally only collect very large particles, those that can be separated using sieve trays.

Centrifugal collectors will normally collect particles down to about 20 μm. Higher efficiency models can collect particles down to 10 μm.

Fabric filters are one of the most efficient and cost effective types of dust collectors available and can achieve a collection efficiency of more than 99% for very fine particules.

Wet scrubbers that use liquid are commonly known as wet scrubbers. In these systems, the scrubbing liquid (usually water) comes into contact with a gas stream containing dust particles. The greater the contact of the gas and liquid streams, the higher the dust removal efficiency.

Electrostatic precipitators use electrostatic forces to separate dust particles from exhaust gases. They can be very efficient at the collection of very fine particles.

Filter Press used for filtering liquids by cake filtration mechanism. The PSD plays an important part in the cake formation, cake resistance, and cake characteristics. The filterability of the liquid is determined largely by the size of the particles.

Nomenclature[edit]

ρp: Actual particle density (g/cm3)

ρg: Gas or sample matrix density (g/cm3)

r2: Least-squares coefficient of determination. The closer this value is to 1.0, the better the data fit to a straight-line.

λ: Gas mean free path (cm)

D50: Mass-median-diameter (MMD). The log-normal distribution mass median diameter. The MMD is considered to be the average particle diameter by mass.

σg: Geometric standard deviation. This value is determined mathematically by the equation:

σg = D84.13/D50 = D50/D15.87

The value of σg determines the slope of the least-squares regression curve.

α: Relative standard deviation or degree of polydispersity. This value is also determined mathematically. For values less than 0.1, the particulate sample can be considered to be monodisperse.

α = σg/D50

Re(P) : Particle Reynolds Number. In contrast to the large numerical values noted for flow Reynolds number, particle Reynolds number for fine particles in gaseous mediums is typically less than 0.1.

Ref : Flow Reynolds number.

Kn: Particle Knudsen number.

Types[edit]

The way PSD is usually defined by the method by which it is determined. The most easily understood method of determination is sieve analysis, where powder is separated on sieves of different sizes. Thus, the PSD is defined in terms of discrete size ranges: e.g. "% of sample between 45 μm and 53 μm", when sieves of these sizes are used. The PSD is usually determined over a list of size ranges that covers nearly all the sizes present in the sample. Some methods of determination allow much narrower size ranges to be defined than can be obtained by use of sieves, and are applicable to particle sizes outside the range available in sieves. However, the idea of the notional "sieve", that "retains" particles above a certain size, and "passes" particles below that size, is universally used in presenting PSD data of all kinds.

The PSD may be expressed as a "range" analysis, in which the amount in each size range is listed in order. It may also be presented in "cumulative" form, in which the total of all sizes "retained" or "passed" by a single notional "sieve" is given for a range of sizes. Range analysis is suitable when a particular ideal mid-range particle size is being sought, while cumulative analysis is used where the amount of "under-size" or "over-size" must be controlled.

The way in which "size" is expressed is open to a wide range of interpretations. A simple treatment assumes the particles are spheres that will just pass through a square hole in a "sieve". In practice, particles are irregular – often extremely so, for example in the case of fibrous materials – and the way in which such particles are characterized during analysis is very dependent on the method of measurement used.

Sampling[edit]

Before a PSD can be determined, it is vital that a representative sample is obtained. In the case where the material to be analysed is flowing, the sample must be withdrawn from the stream in such a way that the sample has the same proportions of particle sizes as the stream. The best way to do this is to take many samples of the whole stream over a period, instead of taking a portion of the stream for the whole time.[3]p. 6 In the case where the material is in a heap, scoop or thief sampling needs to be done, which is inaccurate: the sample should ideally have been taken while the powder was flowing towards the heap.[3]p. 10 After sampling, the sample volume typically needs to be reduced. The material to be analysed must be carefully blended, and the sample withdrawn using techniques that avoid size segregation, for example using a rotary divider[3]p. 5. Particular attention must be paid to avoidance of loss of fines during manipulation of the sample.

Measurement techniques[edit]

Sieve analysis[edit]

This continues to be used for many measurements because of its simplicity, cheapness, and ease of interpretation. Methods may be simple shaking of the sample in sieves until the amount retained becomes more or less constant. Alternatively, the sample may be washed through with a non-reacting liquid (usually water) or blown through with an air current.

Advantages: this technique is well-adapted for bulk materials. A large amount of materials can be readily loaded into 8-inch-diameter (200 mm) sieve trays. Two common uses in the power industry are wet-sieving of milled limestone and dry-sieving of milled coal.

Disadvantages: many PSDs are concerned with particles too small for separation by sieving to be practical. A very fine sieve, such as 37 μm sieve, is exceedingly fragile, and it is very difficult to get material to pass through it. Another disadvantage is that the amount of energy used to sieve the sample is arbitrarily determined. Over-energetic sieving causes attrition of the particles and thus changes the PSD, while insufficient energy fails to break down loose agglomerates. Although manual sieving procedures can be ineffective, automated sieving technologies using image fragmentation analysis software are available. These technologies can sieve material by capturing and analyzing a photo of material.

Air elutriation analysis[edit]

Material may be separated by means of an elutriator, which consists of a vertical tube up which fluid is passed at a controlled velocity. When the particles are introduced, often through a side tube, the smaller particles are carried over in the fluid stream while the large particles settle against the upward current. If we start with low flow rates small less dense particle attain terminal velocites, and flow with the stream, the particle from the stream is collected in overflow and hence will be separated from the feed. Flow rates can be increased to separate higher size ranges. Further size fractions may be collected if the overflow from the first tube is passed vertically upwards through a second tube of greater cross-section, and any number of such tubes can be arranged in series.

Advantages: a bulk sample is analyzed using centrifugal classification and the technique is non-destructive. Each cut-point can be recovered for future size-respective chemical analyses. This technique has been used for decades in the air pollution control industry (data used for design of control devices). This technique determines particle size as a function of settling velocity in an air stream (as opposed to water, or some other liquid).

Disadvantages: a bulk sample (about ten grams) must be obtained. It is a fairly time-consuming analytical technique. The actual test method [4] has been withdrawn by ASME due to obsolescence. Instrument calibration materials are therefore no longer available.

Photoanalysis[edit]

Main article: Optical granulometry

Materials can now be analysed through photoanalysis procedures. Unlike sieve analyses which can be time-consuming and inaccurate, taking a photo of a sample of the materials to be measured and using software to analyze the photo can result in rapid, accurate measurements. Another advantage is that the material can be analyzed without being handled. This is beneficial in the agricultural industry, as handling of food products can lead to contamination. Photoanalysis equipment and software is currently being used in mining, forestry and agricultural industries worldwide.

Optical counting methods[edit]

PSDs can be measured microscopically by sizing against a graticule and counting, but for a statistically valid analysis, millions of particles must be measured. This is impossibly arduous when done manually, but automated analysis of electron micrographs is now commercially available.

Electroresistance counting methods[edit]

An example of this is the Coulter counter, which measures the momentary changes in the conductivity of a liquid passing through an orifice that take place when individual non-conducting particles pass through. The particle count is obtained by counting pulses. This pulse is proportional to the volume of the sensed particle.

Advantages: very small sample aliquots can be examined.

Disadvantages: sample must be dispersed in a liquid medium... some particles may (partially or fully) dissolve in the medium altering the size distribution. The results are only related to the projected cross-sectional area that a particle displaces as it passes through an orifice. This is a physical diameter, not really related to mathematical descriptions of particles (e.g. terminal settling velocity).

Sedimentation techniques[edit]

These are based upon study of the terminal velocity acquired by particles suspended in a viscous liquid. Sedimentation time is longest for the finest particles, so this technique is useful for sizes below 10 μm, but sub-micrometer particles cannot be reliably measured due to the effects of Brownian motion. Typical apparatus disperses the sample in liquid, then measures the density of the column at timed intervals. Other techniques determine the optical density of successive layers using visible light or x-rays.

Advantages: this technique determines particle size as a function of settling velocity.

Disadvantages: Sample must be dispersed in a liquid medium... some particles may (partially or fully) dissolve in the medium altering the size distribution, requiring careful selection of the dispersion media. Density is highly dependent upon fluid temperature remaining constant. X-Rays will not count carbon (organic) particles. Many of these instruments can require a bulk sample (e.g. two to five grams).

Laser diffraction methods[edit]

These depend upon analysis of the "halo" of diffracted light produced when a laser beam passes through a dispersion of particles in air or in a liquid. The angle of diffraction increases as particle size decreases, so that this method is particularly good for measuring sizes between 0.1 and 3,000 μm. Advances in sophisticated data processing and automation have allowed this to become the dominant method used in industrial PSD determination. This technique is relatively fast and can be performed on very small samples. A particular advantage is that the technique can generate a continuous measurement for analyzing process streams.

Acoustic spectroscopy or ultrasound attenuation spectroscopy[edit]

Instead of light, this method employs ultrasound for collecting information on the particles that are dispersed in fluid. Dispersed particles absorb and scatter ultrasound similarly to light. This has been known since Lord Rayleigh developed the first theory of ultrasound scattering and published a book "The Theory of Sound" in 1878.[5] There have been hundreds of papers studying ultrasound propagation through fluid particulates in the 20th century.[6] It turns out that instead of measuring scattered energy versus angle, as with light, in the case of ultrasound, measuring the transmitted energy versus frequency is a better choice. The resulting ultrasound attenuation frequency spectra are the raw data for calculating particle size distribution. It can be measured for any fluid system with no dilution or other sample preparation. This is a big advantage of this method. Calculation of particle size distribution is based on theoretical models that are well verified for up to 50% by volume of dispersed particles.

Air pollution emissions measurements[edit]

Cascade impactors – particulate matter is withdrawn isokinetically from a source and segregated by size in a cascade impactor at the sampling point exhaust conditions of temperature, pressure, etc. Cascade impactors use the principle of inertial separation to size segregate particle samples from a particle laden gas stream. The mass of each size fraction is determined gravimetrically. The California Air Resources Board Method 501[7] is currently the most widely accepted test method for particle size distribution emissions measurements.

Mathematical models[edit]

Probability distributions[edit]

  • The log-normal distribution is often used to approximate the particle size distribution of aerosols, aquatic particles and pulverized material.
  • The Weibull distribution or Rosin Rammler distribution is a useful distribution for representing particle size distributions generated by grinding, milling and crushing operations.
  • The log-hyperbolic distribution was proposed by Bagnold and Barndorff-Nielsen[8] to model the particle-size distribution of naturally occurring sediments. This model suffers from having non-unique solutions for a range of probability coefficients.
  • The skew log-Laplace model was proposed by Fieller, Gilbertson and Olbricht [9] as a simpler alternative to the log-hyperbolic distribution.

Rosin-Rammler distribution[edit]

The Weibull distribution, now named for Waloddi Weibull was first identified by Fréchet (1927) and first applied by Rosin & Rammler (1933) to describe particle size distributions. It is still widely used in mineral processing to describe particle size distributions in comminution processes.

f(x;P_{\rm{80}},m) =  \begin{cases}
1-e^{ln\left(0.2\right)\left(\frac{x}{P_{\rm{80}}}\right)^m} & x\geq0 ,\\
0 & x<0 ,\end{cases}

where

x: Particle size
P_{\rm{80}}: 80th percentile of the particle size distribution
m: Parameter describing the spread of the distribution

The inverse distribution is given by:

f(F;P_{\rm{80}},m) =  \begin{cases}
P_{\rm{80}} \sqrt[m] {\frac{ln(1-F)}{ln(0.2)}} & F>0 ,\\
0 & F\leq0 ,\end{cases}

where

F: Mass fraction
Parameter estimation[edit]

The parameters of the Rosin-Rammler distribution can be determined by refactoring the distribution function to the form[10]

\ln\left(-\ln\left(1-F)\right)\right) = 
m\ln(x)+ \ln\left(\frac{-\ln(0.2)}{(P_{\rm{80}})^m}\right)

Hence the slope of the line in a plot of

\ln\left(-\ln\left(1-F)\right)\right) versus \ln(x)

yields the parameter m and P_{\rm{80}} is determined by substitution into

P_{\rm{80}} = \left(\frac{-\ln(0.2)}{e^{intercept}}\right)^\frac{1}{m}

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Jillavenkatesa A, Dapkunas S J, Lin-Sien Lum, Particle Size Characterization, NIST Special Publication 960-1, 2001
  2. ^ Sivakugan N, Soil Classification, James Cook University Geoengineering lecture handout, 2000
  3. ^ a b c Terence Allen, ed. (2003). Powder sampling and particle size determination (1st ed. ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-444-51564-3. Retrieved 22 August 2011. 
  4. ^ ASME Shop – Standards, Courses, Journals, Books and Proceedings – ASME. Catalog.asme.org. Retrieved on 2011-11-18.
  5. ^ Lord Rayleigh, "The Theory of Sound", vol.2, Macmillan and Co, NY, second edition, 1896, first edition, 1878.
  6. ^ Dukhin, A.S. and Goetz P.J. "Ultrasound for characterizing colloids", Elsevier, 2002
  7. ^ State of California Air Resources Board: Method 501 – Determination of Size Distribution of Particulate Matter from Stationary Sources. (PDF) . Retrieved on 2011-11-18.
  8. ^ Bagnold, R.A.; Barndorff-Nielsen, O (1980). "The pattern of natural size distributions". Sedimentology 27 (2): 199–207. Bibcode:1980Sedim..27..199B. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3091.1980.tb01170.x. 
  9. ^ Fieller, N.R.J; Gilbertson, D.D. and Olbricht, W (1984). "A new method for environmental analysis of particle size distribution data from shoreline sediments". Nature 311 (5987): 648–651. Bibcode:1984Natur.311..648F. doi:10.1038/311648a0. 
  10. ^ Wills, B.A. and Napier-Munn, T.J, Wills' Mineral Processing Technology: an introduction to the practical aspects of ore treatment and mineral recovery, ISBN 978-0-7506-4450-1, Seventh Edition (2006), Elsevier, Great Britain
  • O. Ahmad, J. Debayle, and J. C. Pinoli. "A geometric-based method for recognizing overlapping polygonalshaped and semi-transparent particles in gray tone images", Pattern Recognition Letters 32(15), 2068–2079,2011.
  • O. Ahmad, J. Debayle, N. Gherras, B. Presles, G. Févotte, and J. C. Pinoli. "Recognizing overlapped particles during a crystallization process from in situ video images for measuring their size distributions.",In 10th SPIE International Conference on Quality Control by Artificial Vision (QCAV), Saint-Etienne, France,June 2011.
  • O. Ahmad, J. Debayle, N. Gherras, B. Presles, G. Févotte, and J. C. Pinoli. "Quantification of overlapping polygonal-shaped particles based on a new segmentation method of in situ images during crystallization.",Journal of Electronic Imaging, 21(2), 021115, 2012.
  • Fréchet, Maurice (1927), "Sur la loi de probabilité de l'écart maximum", Annales de la Société Polonaise de Mathematique, Cracovie 6: 93–116 .
  • Rosin, P.; Rammler, E. (1933), "The Laws Governing the Fineness of Powdered Coal", Journal of the Institute of Fuel 7: 29–36 .

External links[edit]