Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature
MirrorOfNature.gif
Author Richard Rorty
Country United States
Language English
Genre Philosophy of mind
Published 1979 (Princeton University Press)
Media type Print (Hardback & Paperback)
Pages 401
ISBN ISBN 0-691-02016-7
OCLC 7040341

Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (published in 1979) is a book by American philosopher Richard Rorty. It attempts to dissolve modern philosophical problems instead of solving them by presenting them as pseudo-problems that only exist in the language-game of epistemological projects culminating in Analytic philosophy. In a pragmatist gesture, Rorty suggests that philosophy must get past these pseudo-problems if it is to be productive.

The work was seen to be somewhat controversial upon its publication. It had the greatest success among students of analytic philosophy, who caused it to sell out within the first days of its publication; the students enjoyed it for being an alternative to the current analytic philosophy dogmas, in a period in which the analytic departments were tightening up on the dogmas even more.[1]

Contents[edit]

Rorty's central thesis is that philosophy has unduly relied on a representational theory of perception and a correspondence theory of truth, hoping our experience or language might mirror the way reality actually is. In this he continues a certain controversial Anglophone tradition, which builds upon the work of philosophers such as Willard Van Orman Quine, Wilfrid Sellars, and Donald Davidson. Rorty opts out of the traditional objective/subjective dialogue in favor of a communal version of truth. For him, "true" is simply an honorific knowers bestow on claims, asserting them as what "we" want to say about a particular matter.

Rorty spends much of the book explaining how philosophical paradigm shifts and their associated philosophical "problems" can be considered the result of the new metaphors, vocabularies, and mistaken linguistic associations which are necessarily a part of those new paradigms.

Notes and references[edit]

  1. ^ Jacques Derrida (1994) Of the Humanities and Philosophical Disciplines Surfaces Vol. VI.108 (v.1.0A - 16/08/1996) - ISSN: 1188-2492 Later republished in Ethics, Institutions, and the Right to Philosophy (2002).

External links[edit]