Photocatalytic water splitting

Photocatalytic water splitting is the term for the production of hydrogen (H₂) and oxygen (O₂) from water by directly utilizing the energy from light. Hydrogen fuel production has gained increasing attention as oil and other nonrenewable fuels become increasingly depleted and expensive. Methods such as photocatalytic water splitting are being investigated to produce hydrogen fuel, which burns cleanly and can be used in a hydrogen fuel cell. Water splitting holds particular interest since it utilizes the inexpensive natural resource water. Photocatalytic water splitting has the simplicity of using a powder in solution and sunlight to produce H₂ and O₂ from water and can provide a clean, renewable energy source, without producing greenhouse gases or having many adverse effects on the atmosphere. Theoretically, only solar energy (photons), water and a catalyst are needed.

Concepts

$2 \text{ } H_2 O \text{ } \stackrel {Heat} {\rightleftharpoons} \text{ } 2 \text{ } H_2 + \text{ } O_2$

H₂O is split into O₂ and H₂, the stoichiometric ratio of its byproducts are 2:1. When Hydrogen gas is burned a pale-blue flame is observed. The reaction is endothermic (ΔH > 0) because most photon energies absorb and favorably complete oxidation reaction; it applies to the degradation of toxic organic compound in air and water, for example, TiO2 (mineral.) In contrast, the exothermic process (ΔH < 0) when photosynthesis has happened; the photon energy absorbed is converted into the chemical energy that provide for plants- this process usually happens in biological pathway of water splitting (KE involves). The production of hydrogen from water requires large amounts of energy, this makes it difficult to compete with existing energy generation using coal or natural gas since such energy is not eco-friendly.

Photocatalysts used in water splitting have several strict requirements. The redox potential needed to drive the reduction of hydrogen from water is 0.0ev Vs. Normal Hydrogen Electrode (NHE) at pH=0, and oxidation of oxygen from water is 1.23 ev vs. NHE (oxidation reaction) at pH=0. Therefore the minimum potential difference (voltage) needed to split water 1.23ev at pH=0. Since the minimum band gap for successful water splitting at pH=0 is 1.23 eV, corresponding to light of 1008 nm, the electrochemical requirements can theoretically reach down into infrared light, albeit with negligible catalytic activity. These values are true only for a completely reversible reaction at standard temperature and pressure (thermodynamics) (1 bar and 25 degrees celsius ).

Theoretically, infrared light has enough energy to split water into hydrogen and oxygen; however, this reaction is kinetically very slow because the wavelength is greater 380 nm. The potential is less than 3.0eV to make the efficient use of solar. Water splitting can transfer charges, but not be able to corrosion for long term stability. Defects within crystalline photocatlysts can act as recombination sites ultimately lowering efficiency.

Materials used in photocatalytic water splitting fulfill the band requirements outlined previously and typically have dopants and/or co-catalysts added to optimize their performance. A sample semiconductor with the proper band structure is TiO₂. However, due to the relatively positive conduction band of TiO₂, there is little driving force for H₂ production, so TiO₂ is typically used with a co-catalyst such as Pt to increase the rate of H₂ production. It is routine to add co-catalysts to spur H₂ evolution in most photocatalysts due to the conduction band placement. Most semiconductors with suitable band structures to split water absorb mostly UV light; in order to absorb visible light, it is necessary to narrow the band gap. Since the conduction band is fairly close to the reference potential for H₂ formation, it is preferable to alter the valence band to move it closer to the potential for O₂ formation, since there is a greater natural overpotential.

Photocatalysts can suffer from catalyst decay and recombination under operating conditions. Catalyst decay becomes a problem when using a sulfide-based photocatalyst such as CdS, since the sulfide in the catalyst is oxidized to elemental sulfur at the same potentials used to split water. Thus, sulfide-based photocatalysts are not viable without sacrificial reagents such as sodium sulfide to replenish any sulfur lost, which effectively changes the main reaction to one of hydrogen evolution as opposed to water splitting. Recombination of the electron-hole pairs needed for photocatalysis can happen with any catalyst and is dependent on the defects and surface area of the catalyst; thus, a high degree of crystallinity is required to avoid recombination at the defects.

The conversion of solar energy to hydrogen by means of water splitting process is one of the most interesting ways to achieve clean and renewable energy systems. However if this process is assisted by photocatalysts suspended directly in water instead of using photovoltaic and an electrolytic system the reaction is in just one step, therefore it can be more efficient.

Method of evaluation

Photocatalysts must conform to several key principles in order to be considered effective at water splitting. A key principle is that H₂ and O₂ evolution should occur in a stoichiometric 2:1 ratio; significant deviation could be due to a flaw in the experimental setup and/or a side reaction, both of which do not indicate a reliable photocatalyst for water splitting. The prime measure of photocatalyst effectiveness is quantum yield (QY), which is:

QY (%) = (Number of reacted electrons) / (Number of incident photons) × 100%

This quantity is a reliable determination of how effective a photocatalyst is; however, it can be misleading due to varying experimental conditions. To assist in comparison, the rate of gas evolution can also be used; this method is more problematic on its own because it is not normalized, but it can be useful for a rough comparison and is consistently reported in the literature. Overall, the best photocatalyst has a high quantum yield and gives a high rate of gas evolution.

The other important factor for a photocatalyst is the range of light absorbed; although UV-based photocatalysts will perform better per photon than visible light-based photocatalysts due to the higher photon energy, far more visible light reaches the Earth's surface than UV light. Thus, a less efficient photocatalyst that absorbs visible light may ultimately be more useful than a more efficient photocatalyst absorbing solely UV light and above.

Photocatalyst systems

NaTaO₃:La

NaTaO₃:La yields the highest water splitting rate of photocatalysts demonstrated as of October 2008 without using sacrificial reagents. This UV-based photocatalyst was shown to be highly effective with water splitting rates of 9.7 mmol/h and a quantum yield of 56%. The nanostep structure of the material promotes water splitting as edges functioned as H₂ production sites and the grooves functioned as O₂ production sites. Addition of NiO particles as cocatalysts assisted in H₂ production; this step was done by using an impregnation method with an aqueous solution of Ni(NO₃)₂•6H₂O and evaporating the solution in the presence of the photocatalyst. NaTaO₃ has a conduction band higher than that of NiO, so photogenerated electrons are more easily transferred to the conduction band of NiO for H₂ evolution.

K₃Ta₃B₂O₁₂

K₃Ta₃B₂O₁₂, another catalyst activated by solely UV light and above, does not have the performance or quantum yield of NaTaO₃:La. However, it does have the ability to split water without the assistance of cocatalysts and gives a quantum yield of 6.5% along with a water splitting rate of 1.21 mmol/h. This ability is due to the pillared structure of the photocatalyst, which involves TaO₆ pillars connected by BO₃ triangle units. Loading with NiO did not assist the photocatalyst due to the highly active H₂ evolution sites.

(Ga_.82Zn_.18)(N_.82O_.18)

(Ga_.82Zn_.18)(N_.82O_.18) has the highest quantum yield in visible light for visible light-based photocatalysts that do not utilize sacrificial reagents as of October 2008. The photocatalyst gives a quantum yield of 5.9% along with a water splitting rate of 0.4 mmol/h. Tuning the catalyst was done by increasing calcination temperatures for the final step in synthesizing the catalyst. Temperatures up to 600 °C helped to reduce the number of defects, although temperatures above 700 °C destroyed the local structure around zinc atoms and was thus undesirable. The treatment ultimately reduced the amount of surface Zn and O defects, which normally function as recombination sites, thus limiting photocatalytic activity. The catalyst was then loaded with Rh_2-yCr_yO₃ at a rate of 2.5 wt % Rh and 2 wt% Cr to yield the best performance.

Pt/TiO₂

TiO₂ is the best photocatalyst because it yields high quantum number as well as giving high rates of H₂ gas evolution. For example, Pt/TiO2 (anatase phase) is an example catalyst to use in water splitting. These photocatalysts combine with thin NaOH aqueous layer to make a solution that can split water into H₂ and O₂. TiO₂ only absorbs in the UV due to its large band gap(>3.0ev), it will perform better than most visible light photocatalyts because it does not photocorrode as easily. Most ceramic materials have large band gaps; this means they have stronger covalent bonds than other semiconductors with lower bandgaps- It will perform a little light in the UV than visible light-based photocatalysts because of higher photon energy (photo irradiation)

Cobalt based systems

Photocatalysts based on cobalt have been reported. Members are tris(bipyridine) cobalt(II), compounds of cobalt ligated to certain cyclic polyamines and certain cobaloximes.

GaN-Sb alloy

A theoretical photocatalyst based on gallium nitride has been reported.

See also

• Artificial photosynthesis
• Photocatalysis
• Photoelectrochemical cell