For other uses, see
Phyla.
In biology, a phylum (English pronunciation: /ˈfaɪləm/; plural: phyla)[note 1] is a taxonomic rank below kingdom and above class. "Phylum" is equivalent to the botanical term division.[1] The kingdom Animalia contains approximately 35 phyla; the kingdom Plantae contains 12 divisions. Current research in phylogenetics is uncovering the relationships between phyla, which are contained in larger clades, like Ecdysozoa and Embryophyta.
[edit] General description and familiar examples
Informally, phyla can be thought of as grouping organisms based on general specialization of body plan,[2] At the most basic level, a phylum can be defined in two ways: as a group of organisms with a certain degree of morphological or developmental similarity (the phenetic definition), or a group of organisms with a certain degree of evolutionary relatedness (the phylogenetic definition).[3] Attempting to define a level of the Linnean hierarchy without referring to (evolutionary) relatedness is an unsatisfactory approach, but the phenetic definition is more useful when addressing questions of a morphological nature—such as how successful different body plans were.
[edit] Definition based on genetic relation
The largest objective measure in the above definitions is the "certain degree"—how unrelated do organisms need to be to be members of different phyla? The minimal requirement is that all organisms in a phylum should be related closely enough for them to be clearly more closely related to one another than to any other group.[3] However, even this is problematic, as the requirement depends on our current knowledge about organisms' relationships: As more data becomes available, particularly from molecular studies, we are better able to judge the relationships between groups. So phyla can be merged or split if it becomes apparent that they are related to one another or not. For example, the bearded worms were described as a new phylum (the Pogonophora) when described in 1914, but molecular work almost a century later found them closely related to annelids and merged the phyla, so that the bearded worms are now an annelid family.[4] Likewise, the highly parasitic phylum Mesozoa was divided into two phyla Orthonectida and Rhombozoa, when it was discovered the Orthonectida are deuterostomes and the Rhombozoa protostomes.[5]
This changeability of phyla has led some biologists to call for the concept of a phylum to be abandoned in favour of cladistics, a method in which plan" based definition of a phylum has been proposed by paleontologists Graham Budd and Sören Jensen. The definition was posited by paleontologists off-shoots that diverged from a phylum's history before the characters that define the modern phylum were all acquired.
[edit] Definition based on body plan
By Budd and Jensen's definition, phyla are defined by a set of characters shared by all their living representatives. This has a couple of small problems—for instance, characters common to most members of a phylum may be secondarily lost by some members. It is also defined based on an arbitrary point of time (the present). However, as it is character based, it is easy to apply to the fossil record. A more major problem is that it relies on an objective decision of which group of organisms should be considered a phylum.
Its utility is that it makes it easy to classify extinct organisms as "stem groups" to the phyla with which they bear the most resemblance, based only on the taxonomically important similarities.[3] However, proving that a fossil belongs to the crown group of a phylum is difficult, as it must display a character unique to a sub-set of the crown group.[3] aspects of the "body plan" of the phylum without all the characters necessary to fall within it. This weakens the idea that each of the phyla represents a distinct body plan.[6]
Based upon this definition, which some say is unreasonably affected by the chance survival of rare groups, which vastly increase the size of phyla, representatives of many modern phyla did not appear until long after the Cambrian.[7]
[edit] Animal phyla
| Phylum |
Meaning |
Common name |
Distinguishing characteristic |
Species described |
| !a |
!a |
!a |
!a |
-9e99 |
| Acanthocephala |
Thorny headed worms |
Thorny-headed worms |
Reversible spiny proboscis |
756 approx. |
| Acoelomorpha |
Without gut |
Acoels |
No mouth or alimentary canal (alimentary canal = digestive tract in digestive system) |
|
| Annelida |
Little ring |
Segmented worms |
Multiple circular segment |
17,000+ extant |
| Arthropoda |
Jointed foot |
Arthropods |
Chitin exoskeleton |
1,134,000+ |
| Brachiopoda |
Arm foot |
Lamp shells |
Lophophore and pedicle |
300-500 extant |
| Bryozoa |
Moss animals |
Moss animals, sea mats |
Lophophore, no pedicle, ciliated tentacles |
5,000 extant |
| Chaetognatha |
Longhair jaw |
Arrow worms |
Chitinous spines either side of head, fins |
100 extant approx. |
| Chordata |
Cord |
Chordates |
Hollow dorsal nerve cord, notochord, pharyngeal slits, endostyle, post-anal tail |
100,000+ approx. |
| Cnidaria |
Stinging nettle |
Coelenterates |
Nematocysts (stinging cells) |
11,000 approx. |
| Ctenophora |
Comb bearer |
Comb jellies |
Eight "comb rows" of fused cilia |
100 extant approx. |
| Cycliophora |
Wheel carrying |
Symbion |
Circular mouth surrounded by small cilia |
3+ |
| Echinodermata |
Spiny skin |
Echinoderms |
Fivefold radial symmetry in living forms, mesodermal calcified spines |
7,000 extant approx.; 13,000 extinct approx. |
| Entoprocta |
Inside anus |
Goblet worm |
Anus inside ring of cilia |
150 approx. |
| Gastrotricha |
Hair stomach |
Meiofauna |
Two terminal adhesive tubes |
690 approx. |
| Gnathostomulida |
Jaw orifice |
Jaw worms |
|
100 approx. |
| Hemichordata |
Half cord |
Acorn worms, pterobranchs |
Stomochord in collar, pharyngeal slits |
100 extant approx. |
| Kinorhyncha |
Motion snout |
Mud dragons |
Eleven segments, each with a dorsal plate |
150 approx. |
| Loricifera |
Corset bearer |
Brush heads |
Umbrella-like scales at each end |
122 approx. |
| Micrognathozoa |
Tiny jaw animals |
— |
Accordion like extensible thorax |
1 |
| Mollusca |
Soft |
Mollusks / molluscs |
Muscular foot and mantle round shell |
112,000[8] |
| Nematoda |
Thread like |
Round worms |
Round cross section, keratin cuticle |
80,000–1,000,000 |
| Nematomorpha |
Thread form |
Horsehair worms |
|
320 approx. |
| Nemertea |
A sea nymph |
Ribbon worms |
|
1,200 approx. |
| Onychophora |
Claw bearer |
Velvet worms |
Legs tipped by chitinous claws |
200 extant approx. |
| Orthonectida |
Straight swim |
|
Single layer of ciliated cells surrounding a mass of sex cells |
20 approx. |
| Phoronida |
Zeus's mistress |
Horseshoe worms |
U-shaped gut |
20 |
| Placozoa |
Plate animals |
|
|
1 |
| Platyhelminthes |
Flat worms |
Flat worms |
|
25,000 approx.[9] |
| Porifera* |
Pore bearer |
Sponges |
Perforated interior wall |
5,000+ extant |
| Priapulida |
Little Priapus |
|
|
16 |
| Rhombozoa |
Lozenge animal |
— |
Single axial cell surrounded by ciliated cells |
75 |
| Rotifera |
Wheel bearer |
Rotifers |
Anterior crown of cilia |
2,000 approx. |
| Sipuncula |
Small tube |
Peanut worms |
Mouth surrounded by invertible tentacles |
144–320 |
| Tardigrada |
Slow step |
Water bears |
Four segmented body and head |
1,000+ |
| Xenoturbellida |
Strange flatworm |
— |
Ciliated deuterostome |
2 |
| ~z |
~z |
~z |
~z |
9e99 |
| Total: 35 |
|
|
|
2,000,000- |
|
Protostome |
Bilateria |
|
Deuterostome |
|
Basal/disputed |
|
Other |
[edit] Groups formerly ranked as phyla
[edit] Plant divisions
| Division |
Meaning |
Common name |
Distinguishing characteristics |
| Anthocerotophyta |
Flower-horn plants |
Hornworts |
Horn-shaped sporophytes, no vascular system |
| Bryophyta |
Moss plants |
Mosses |
Persistent unbranched sporophytes, no vascular system |
| Marchantiophyta |
Marchantia plants |
Liverworts |
Ephemeral unbranched sporophytes, no vascular system |
| Lycopodiophyta |
Wolf foot plants |
Clubmosses & Spikemosses |
Microphyll leaves, vascular system |
| Pteridophyta |
Fern plants |
Ferns & Horsetails |
Prothallus gametophytes, vascular system |
| Pteridospermatophyta |
Fern with seeds plant |
Seed ferns |
Only known from fossils, mostly Devonian, ranking in dispute[10] |
| Coniferophyta |
Sap/pitch plants |
Conifers |
Cones containing seeds and wood composed of tracheids |
| Cycadophyta |
Palm plants |
Cycads |
Seeds, crown of compound leaves |
| Ginkgophyta |
Ginkgo plants |
Ginkgo, Maidenhair |
Seeds not protected by fruit (single species) |
| Gnetophyta |
|
Gnetophytes |
Seeds and woody vascular system with vessels |
| Anthophyta (or Magnoliophyta) |
Flower plant |
Flowering plants |
Flowers and fruit, vascular system with vessels |
[edit] Fungal divisions
[edit] Bacterial Phyla/Divisions
Currently there are 29 phyla accepted by LPSN[11]
- Acidobacteria, phenotipically diverse and mostly uncultured
- Actinobacteria, High-G+C Gram positive species
- Aquificae, only 14 thermophilic genera, deep branching
- Bacteroidetes
- Caldiserica, formerly candidate division OP5, Caldisericum exile is the sole representative
- Chlamydiae, only 6 genera
- Chlorobi, only 7 genera
- Chloroflexi,
- Chrysiogenetes, only 3 genera (Chrysiogenes arsenatis, Desulfurispira natronophila, Desulfurispirillum alkaliphilum)
- Cyanobacteria, also known as the blue-green algae
- Deferribacteres
- Deinococcus-Thermus, Deinococcus radiodurans and Thermus aquaticus are "commonly known" species of this phyla
- Dictyoglomi
- Elusimicrobia, formerly candidate division Thermite Group 1
- Fibrobacteres
- Firmicutes, Low-G+C Gram positive species, such as the spore-formers Bacilli (aerobic) and Clostridia (anaerobic)
- Fusobacteria
- Gemmatimonadetes
- Lentisphaerae, formerly clade VadinBE97
- Nitrospira
- Planctomycetes ANo ito?
- Proteobacteria, the most known phyla, containing species such as Escherichia coli or Pseudomonas aeruginosa
- Spirochaetes, species include Borrelia burgdorferi, which causes Lyme disease
- Synergistetes
- Tenericutes, alternatively class Mollicutes in phylum Firmicutes (notable genus: Mycoplasma)
- Thermodesulfobacteria
- Thermomicrobia
- Thermotogae, deep branching
- Verrucomicrobia
[edit] Archaeal Phyla/Division
- Crenarchaeota, Second most common archaeal phylum
- Euryarchaeota, most common archaeal phylum
- Korarchaeota
- Nanoarchaeota, ultra-small symbiotes
- Thaumarchaeota
[edit] See also
- ^ The term was coined by Georges Cuvier from Greek φῦλον phylon, "race, stock," related to φυλή phyle, "tribe, clan."
[edit] References
- ^ "Life sciences". The American Heritage New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy (third ed.). Houghton Mifflin Company. 2005. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/phylum. Retrieved 2008-10-04. "Phyla in the plant kingdom are frequently called divisions."
- ^ Valentine, James W. (2004). On the Origin of Phyla. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press. pp. 7. ISBN 0226845486. "Classifications of organisms in hierarchical systems were in use by the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Usually organisms were grouped according to their what? morphological similarities as perceived by those early workers, and those groups were then grouped according to their similarities, and so on, to form a hierarchy."
- ^ a b c d Budd, G.E.; Jensen, S. (2000). "A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla". Biological Reviews 75 (2): 253–295. doi:10.1017/S000632310000548X. PMID 10881389. http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S000632310000548X. Retrieved 2007-05-26.
- ^ Rouse G.W. (2001). "A cladistic analysis of Siboglinidae Caullery, 1914 (Polychaeta, Annelida): formerly the phyla Pogonophora and Vestimentifera". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 132 (1): 55–80. doi:10.1006/zjls.2000.0263.
- ^ Pawlowski J, Montoya-Burgos JI, Fahrni JF, Wüest J, Zaninetti L (October 1996). "Origin of the Mesozoa inferred from 18S rRNA gene sequences". Mol. Biol. Evol. 13 (8): 1128–32. PMID 8865666. http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=8865666.
- ^ Budd, G.E. (1998). "Arthropod body-plan evolution in the Cambrian with an example from anomalocaridid muscle". Lethaia (Blackwell Synergy) 31 (3): 197–210. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1998.tb00508.x. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1502-3931.1998.tb00508.x.
- ^ Briggs, D. E. G; Fortey, R. A (2005). "Wonderful strife: systematics, stem groups, and the phylogenetic signal of the Cambrian radiation". Paleobiology 31 (2 (Suppl)): 94–112. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2005)031[0094:WSSSGA]2.0.CO;2.
- ^ Feldkamp, S. (2002) Modern Biology. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, USA. (pp. 725)
- ^ Species Register. "Flatworms — Phylum Platyhelminthes". Marine Discovery Centres. http://www.woodbridge.tased.edu.au/mdc/Species%20Register/phylum_platyhelminthes.htm. Retrieved 2007-04-09.
- ^ ""Kingdom Plantae Tree of Life"". http://www.fossilmuseum.net/Tree_of_Life/KingdomPlantae.htm.
- ^ J.P. Euzéby. "List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature: Phyla". http://www.bacterio.cict.fr/classifphyla.html. Retrieved 30 December 2010.
[edit] External links