Physicomimetics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Physicomimetics is derived from physisφύσις (Greek for "nature" or "the science of physics") and mimesis - μίμησις (Greek for "imitation").

In response to growing concerns that single monolithic robotic vehicles are expensive, brittle, and vulnerable, there has been a trend towards the development of distributed networks of small, inexpensive vehicles. The capability of these networks to dynamically monitor and sense environmental conditions while maintaining cost-effectiveness, robustness, and flexibility, is considered to be among their greatest assets.

Dynamic sensor networks are critically needed for various tasks such as search and rescue, surveillance, perimeter defense, locating and mapping of chemical and biological hazards, virtual space telescopes, automated assembly of micro-electromechanical systems, and medical surgery (e.g., with nanobots).

The core technology used to achieve these goals is a novel approach referred to as "artificial physics" or "physicomimetics". With physicomimetics, robotic agents perceive and react to artificial physics forces. By synthesizing the appropriate virtual forces, various important task-driven behaviors can be effectively achieved, such as lattice-shaped distributed antennas, perimeter defense, and dynamic surveillance. Furthermore the systems self-organize, can self-repair, and are fault-tolerant.[1][2][3] Recently the paradigm has been adapted to function optimization.[4][5][6][7]

The motivation for this approach is that any system designed using the laws of physics is amenable to the full gamut of empirical, analytical, and theoretical analysis tools used by physicists. This approach was first introduced by Professors William Spear and Diana Spears at the Naval Research Laboratory and the University of Wyoming. The first paper on this approach was published by them in 1999 at the IEEE International Conference on Information, Intelligence, and Systems. and the title was "Using Artificial Physics to Control Agents".[8]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Spears, W., Spears, D., Hamann, J., Heil, R. "Distributed, physics-based control of swarms of vehicles". Autonomous Robots 17, 137–162 (2004)
  2. ^ Ellis, C., Wiegand, R.P. "Actuation constraints and artificial physics control". Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, 389–398 (2008)
  3. ^ Kazadi, S., Lee, J.R., Lee, J. "Artificial physics, swarm engineering, and the hamiltonian method". Proceedings from the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, 623–632 (2007)
  4. ^ Xie, L.P., Zeng, J.C., Cui, Z.H. "Using artificial physics to solve global optimization problems". The 8th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics, 502–508 (2009)
  5. ^ Xie, L.P., Zeng, J.C. "A global optimization based on physicomimetics framework". The World Summit on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, 609–616 (2009)
  6. ^ Mo, S.M., Zeng, J.C. "Performance analysis of the artificial physics optimization algorithm with simple neighborhood topologies". International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security, 155–160 (2009)
  7. ^ Wang, Y., Zeng, J.C. "A multi-objective optimization algorithm based on artificial physics optimization". Control and Decision 25(7), 1040–1044 (2010)
  8. ^ Spears, W.M., Gordon, D.F. "Using artificial physics to control agents". IEEE International Conference on Information, Intelligence, and Systems, 281–288 (1999)

External links[edit]