Platine War

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Not to be confused with Cisplatine War.
Platine War
Part of Argentine Civil War and the Uruguayan Civil War
Scenes from various battles and naval engagements during the Platine War
From top to bottom: Brazilian 1st Division in the Caseros; Uruguayan infantry aiding Entre Rios cavalry in Caseros; Beginning of the Passage of the Tonelero; Charge of Urquiza's cavalry in Caseros; Passage of the Tonelero.
Date 18 August 1851 – 3 February 1852
Location Uruguay
  • Argentina northeast
  • Río de la Plata
Result
Belligerents
 Empire of Brazil


 Uruguay


Bandera argentina unitaria marina mercante.png Unitarians
 Entre Ríos
 Corrientes

 Argentine Confederation


Flag of Artigas.svg Federalists


Blancos

Commanders and leaders
Strength
  • 20,200+ Brazilians [3] [4]
  • 20,000+ Argentines
  • 2,000+ Uruguayans
  • 26,000+ Argentines [5]
  • 8,500 Uruguayans
Casualties and losses
600+ dead and wounded
  • 1,500+ dead and wounded
  • 7,000 captured

The Platine War (18 August 1851 – 3 February 1852) was fought between the Argentine Confederation and an alliance consisting of the Empire of Brazil, Uruguay and the Argentine provinces of Entre Ríos and Corrientes. The war was part of a long-running contest between Argentina and Brazil for influence over Uruguay and Paraguay, and hegemony over the Platine region (areas bordering the Río de la Plata). The conflict took place in Uruguay, on the Río de la Plata, and northeastern Argentina.

In 1850, the Platine region was politically unstable. Although the Governor of Buenos Aires, Juan Manuel de Rosas, used his position to gain dictatorial control over other Argentine provinces, his rule was plagued by a series of regional rebellions. Meanwhile, Uruguay struggled with a long-running civil war which started after acquiring independence from Brazil in 1828. Rosas backed the Uruguayan Blanco party in this conflict, and further desired to extend Argentine borders to areas formerly occupied by the Spanish Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata. This meant asserting control over Uruguay, Paraguay, and Bolivia. Rosas' objective also threatened Brazilian interests and sovereignty since the old Spanish Viceroyalty had also included territories which had since been assimilated into Brazil's province of Rio Grande do Sul.

Brazil actively pursued ways to eliminate the Rosist threat. In 1851, it allied with the Argentine breakaway provinces of Corrientes and Entre Rios (led by Justo José de Urquiza), and the anti-Rosas faction in Uruguay. Brazil next secured the south-western flank by signing defensive alliances with Paraguay and Bolivia. Faced with an offensive alliance against his regime, Rosas declared war on Brazil. Allied forces then advanced into Uruguayan territory, defeating the Rosas-aligned faction led by Manuel Oribe. Afterwards, the allied army was split, with the main arm advancing by land to engage Rosas's main defenses and the other launching a seaborne assault directed at Buenos Aires.

The Platine War ended in 1852 with the allied victory at the Battle of Caseros, establishing Brazilian hegemony over much of South America. The war's result further ushered in a period of economic and political stability in the Empire of Brazil. With Rosas gone, Argentina began a process which would result in a more unified state. However, the end of the war did not completely resolve other issues within the Platine region. Turmoil continued in subsequent years, with internal disputes among political factions in Uruguay, a long civil war in Argentina, and an emergent Paraguay asserting its claims. Two more major international wars followed during the next two decades, sparked by territorial ambitions and conflicts over influence.

Background[edit]

Civil wars in Argentina[edit]

Main article: Argentine Civil War
map of South America with the Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata indicated in blue, the area of which incorporated portions of present-day Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil, Paraguay, Bolivia and Chile
Spain's Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata in blue, and Portuguese-America in green. Viceroyalty lands split among Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay after independence.

Don Juan Manuel de Rosas became governor of Buenos Aires after the brief period of anarchy following the end of the Cisplatine War in 1828. In theory, Rosas only held as much power as governors of the other Argentine provinces, but in reality he ruled over the entire Argentine Confederation, as the country was then known. Although he was one of the Federalists, a faction which demanded greater provincial autonomy, in practice Rosas exercised control over the other provinces and become the virtual ruler of Argentina.[b][c][6] During his 20-year government, the country witnessed the resurgence of armed conflicts between the Unitarians (his rival political faction) and the Federalists.[6][7][8]

Rosas desired to recreate the former Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata. He aimed to build a powerful, republican state with Argentina placed at the its center.[d][e][f][g][9][10] The defunct Viceroyalty had shattered into several separate nations following the gaining of independence at the beginning of the 19th century. To achieve reunification, the Argentine government needed to annex the three neighbouring nations of Bolivia, Uruguay and Paraguay, as well as to incorporate a portion of the southern region of Brazil.[11] Rosas first had to gather allies across the region who shared his vision. In some instances, this meant that he had to become involved in the internal politics of neighboring countries, backing those sympathetic to union with Argentina, and occasionally even financing rebellions and wars.[h][11]

Paraguay had considered itself a sovereign nation since 1811, but it was not recognized as such by any other nation. Argentina viewed it as a rebellious province. The Paraguayan dictator José Gaspar Rodríguez de Francia decided that the best way to maintain his own rule and the independence of Paraguay from Argentina was to isolate the country from contacts with the outside world. It was for this reason that, up until 1840, Paraguay had avoided establishing diplomatic relations with other nations.[12] With the death of Francia, this policy began to shift, and his successor Don Carlos Antonio López signed two treaties in July 1841. These were the "Friendship, Commerce and Navigation" and "Limits" agreements made with the Argentine province of Corrientes, which itself had broken away from Argentina under Rosas.[13] Meanwhile, Rosas increasingly put pressure on Paraguay. He continued to refuse to recognize Paraguayan independence and placed a blockade on international traffic to and from Paraguay on the Paraná river.[13]

La Guerra Grande[edit]

Main article: Uruguayan Civil War
An old photograph showing buildings lining the river banks of the Rio de la Plata at Buenos Aires.
View of the Río de la Plata (River Plate) from Buenos Aires, 1852. The Argentine capital was the center of Rosas' power.

Uruguay's internal troubles, including the long civil war, "La Guerra Grande" (The Great War), were heavily influential factors leading up to the Platine War. The old Brazilian province of Cisplatina had become the Oriental Republic of Uruguay after the Cisplatine War of the 1820s.[7] The country soon engulfed in a long civil war between its two political parties: the Blancos, led by Don Juan Antonio Lavalleja, and the Colorados, led by Don Fructuoso Rivera.[7]

Lavalleja soon discovered that Rosas in neighbouring Buenos Aires was interested in aiding him financially and militarily.[7] In 1832, Lavalleja began to receive aid[14] from Bento Gonçalves, a soldier and farmer from the Brazilian province of Rio Grande do Sul. Gonçalves had been encouraged by Rosas to rebel against the Brazilian government in 1835, with the ultimate aim of enabling Argentina to annex the province of Rio Grande do Sul.[15][16] Together, Lavalleja and Gonçalves initiated a military campaign in Uruguay which was characterised by extensive violence and pillage.[17] Gonçalves betrayed Rosas and Lavalleja by becoming an ally of Rivera.[9][18] Both then invaded Uruguay and overran most of the country outside the environs of the capital, Montevideo. Defeated, the then-Uruguayan president Manuel Oribe, like the betrayed Lavalleja a member of the Blanco party,[17][19] resigned his position as president and decamped to Argentina.[20]

Rosas was determined to restore Argentine suzerainty over Uruguay and take revenge on Gonçalves. A series of interventions resulted. In 1839 an army led by Lavalleja, Oribe and Justo José de Urquiza, (Governor of Entre Rios) was quickly defeated by Rivera. At this point, Lavalleja turned his back on the conflict and played no further part in the civil war.[21] Rosas sent another army of Argentines and Uruguayans in 1845, led by Oribe[19] and Urquiza,[9] and this time defeated Rivera's forces, slaughtering the survivors. Rivera was one of the few who managed to escape,[22] and went into exile in Rio de Janeiro.[23][24] What remained of Rivera's Colorados held power only in the country's capital Montevideo as Oribe's forces began subjecting it to a siege.[21] The violence in Uruguay escalated, with Oribe's men killing more than 17,000 Uruguayans and 15,000 Argentinians during the conflict.[25]

Oribe's control of nearly all of Uruguay had been secured, enabling him to launch an invasion of southern Brazil, his forces stealing cattle, looting ranches, and liquidating political enemies as they went.[24] More than 188 Brazilian farms were attacked, with 814,000 cattle and 16,950 horses stolen.[26] Local Brazilians independently decided to retaliate, making raids into Uruguay which became known as "Califórnias",[27][28][29] in reference to the violence in western North America during California's revolt against Mexico, its brief independence and subsequent annexation by the U.S.[30][31] As conflict further escalated with the persistent support of Rosas for the Blancos, anarchy spread over wide areas in the region; with a growing threat to trade, the era's two greatest powers, France and Great Britain, were induced to declare war on Argentina.[9] Buenos Aires suffered repeated attacks from Anglo-French fleets and endured several blockades. The Argentine government was able to mount effective resistance, however, leading to a peace accord in 1849.[27][32]

Empire of Brazil reacts[edit]

Half-length portrait from a photograph showing the young, bearded Emperor Pedro the Second in full uniform with sash of office and various medals
Emperor Dom Pedro II around the time of the Platine War

By the middle of the 19th century, the Empire of Brazil was the richest[33] and most powerful nation in Latin America.[34] It thrived under democratic institutions and a constitutional monarchy, and prided itself on the absence of the caudillos, dictators and coups d'état which were common across the rest of the continent.[i] During the minority of emperor Dom Pedro II in the 1830s, however, there had been internal rebellions driven by local disputes for power within a few provinces.[35] One of these, the Ragamuffin War, had been led by Gonçalves, as noted above.

For the Brazilian Empire, expansionist plans on the part of powerful, republican Argentina represented an existential menace. It also signified a threat to Brazilian hegemony across its southern borders. A successful Argentine bid to incorporate Paraguay and Uruguay into a reconstituted Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata (and control of the Platine river network consequently passing into entirely hostile hands[36][37]) would have threatened to cut communication between the Brazilian province of Mato Grosso and Rio de Janeiro.[36][37] With river transportation denied, the alternative land routes would require months of travel instead of days. Nor was Brazil keen to share a direct border with Argentina, fearing an increased vulnerability to an invasion by Rosas.[36][38]

The members of the Brazilian Cabinet could not reach agreement as to how to address the danger posed by Rosas. Some ministers advocated seeking a peaceful resolution at any cost. These feared Brazil was unprepared for war and that a defeat would lead to a situation similar to the chaos following the loss of Cisplatine in the 1820s, which ended in abdication by Dom Pedro I, the Emperor's father. Other ministers took the position that only a military response would eliminate the threat. In 1849, however, Paulino José Soares de Sousa, a member of the pro-war faction and later Viscount of Uruguai, was chosen as the new minister of Foreign Affairs.[39] Soares made clear his intent to deal with Argentina without foreign assistance, announcing that the "Imperial Government does not desire or judge convenient an alliance with France or any other European nation related to the matters in the Platine region. It understands that they must be resolved by the nations which [we] are closely connected with... It will not admit European influence over America." The Empire of Brazil was determined to extend its zone of influence over South America.[40]

The cabinet settled upon a risky alternative to resolve the complicated situation in the Platine region. Instead of undertaking a period of conscription to build up the Brazilian Army, which would have been costly, the Council decided to rely on the standing army. It sent a contingent south to secure the region. Brazil held an advantage in possessing a powerful and modern navy, along with an experienced professional army hardened by years of internal and external warfare.[41] Up until this point, no other nation in South America possessed true navies or regular armies. Rosas' and Oribe's forces were largely made up of irregular troops on loan from those caudillos who supported them.[42] Even a decade later, Argentina could only field an army of 6,000 men.[43] Brazil also decided to adopt Rosas' own tactics by financing his opponents to weaken him both internally and externally.[10][44][45]

War begins[edit]

Alliance against Rosas[edit]

The Brazilian government set about creating a regional alliance against Rosas, sending a delegation to the region led by Honório Hermeto Carneiro Leão (later the Marquis of Paraná), who held plenipotentiary authority. He was assisted by José Maria da Silva Paranhos (later the Viscount of Rio Branco). Brazil signed a treaty with Bolívia in which Bolivia agreed to strengthen its border defenses to deter any attack by Rosas, though it declined to contribute troops to a war with Argentina.[46] Isolationist Paraguay was more difficult to win over. Brazil made the initial overtures, becoming the first country to formally recognise Paraguayan independence in 1844.[9] This soon led to the establishment of excellent diplomatic relations. The Brazilian ambassador in Paraguay, Pimenta Bueno, became a private councilor to Carlos López.[13] A defensive alliance[47] was signed on 25 December 1850[27][48] between Brazil and Paraguay, in which López agreed to supply the Empire with horses for its army.[38] But Paraguay also refused to contribute troops to fight Rosas, believing that Justo José Urquiza (who had invaded Uruguay in 1839 and in 1845), the ruler of the Argentine Entre Rios province, secretly wished to annex Paraguay.[2]

Brazil's involvement in the Uruguayan civil war also began to deepen. Luis Alves de Lima e Silva, the Count of Caxias, assumed the presidency (governorship) of Rio Grande do Sul and the command of the four Brazilian Army divisions headquartered in the province.[31] Beginning in 1849, the Imperial government directly assisted the besieged Colorado Uruguayan government in Montevideo, and on 6 September 1850 the Uruguayan representative Andres Lamas signed an agreement with Irineu Evangelista de Sousa[j] to transfer money to the Montevideo government through his bank.[38][49][50] On 16 March 1851, the Empire of Brazil openly declared its support of Colorado Uruguay against Oribe, something it had been covertly doing for more than two years. This did not please the Argentine government, and they began mobilizing for war.[47][51]

Brazil had also been searching for support against Rosas inside Argentina, with some success. On 1 May 1851, the province of Entre Rios, still governed by Urquiza, declared to Rosas that "it is the will of its people to reassume the entire exercise of its own sovereignty and power which had been delegated to the governor of Buenos Aires." It was followed by the province of Corrientes, governed by Benjamín Virasoro, which sent the same message.[52] Brazil encouraged and financially supported both uprisings. One of the reasons for Urquiza's betrayal of Rosas was a long-running rivalry. Rosas had tried to remove him from power several times since 1845, suspecting that the caudillo was nurturing designs for his overthrow.[27] This was the trigger for military intervention, and Brazil sent a naval force to the Platine region, basing it near the port of Montevideo. The British Rear admiral John Pascoe Grenfell, a veteran of the Brazilian War of Independence and of the Cisplatine War, was appointed to lead the fleet,[46] which reached Montevideo on 4 May 1851. His command included 1 frigate, 7 corvettes, 3 brigs and 6 steamships.[51][53] The Brazilian Armada had a total of 59 vessels of various types in 1851, including 36 armed sailing ships, 10 armed steamships, 7 unarmed sailing ships and 6 sailing transports.[54]

Uruguay, Brazil and the Argentine provinces of Entre Rios and Corrientes joined in an offensive alliance against Rosas on 29 May 1851. The text of the treaty declared that the objective was to protect Uruguayan independence, pacify its territory, and expel Oribe's forces.[28] Urquiza would command the Argentine forces and Eugenio Garzón would lead the Colorado Uruguayans, with both receiving financial and military aid from the Empire of Brazil.[51] This was followed on 2 August 1851 by landings of the first Brazilian detachments in Uruguay, consisting of approximately 300 soldiers of the 6th Battalion of Skirmishers sent to protect Fuerte del Cerro (Cerro Fort).[55] In response, Rosas declared war against Brazil on 18 August 1851.[56]

Allied invasion of Uruguay[edit]

map of Uruguay showing the routes taken by the armies within the country
map of the Platine region showing routes of attack by armies going from Uruguay into northern Argentina and then south towards Buenos Aires
Movement of the Allied forces into Uruguayan (left) and Argentine (right) territory

The Count of Caxias led a Brazilian army of 16,200 professional soldiers across the border between Rio Grande do Sul and Uruguay on 4 September 1851. His force consisted of four divisions, with 6,500 infantrymen, 8,900 cavalrymen, 800 artillerymen and 26 cannons,[57] a little under half the total Brazilian army (37,000 men);[58] while another 4,000 of his men remained in Brazil to protect its border.[57]

The Brazilian Army entered Uruguay in three groups: the main force, consisting of the 1st and 2nd divisions left from Santana do Livramento—around 12,000 men under Caxias's personal command. The second force, under the command of Colonel David Canabarro departed from Quaraim, comprising the 4th division, protecting Caxias' right flank. The third force, the 3rd Division under Brigadier General José Fernandes, left from Jaguarão, protecting Caxias' left. Canabarro's 4th Division joined Caxias's troops shortly after arriving at the Uruguayan town of Frutuoso, the combined force then joining up with Fernandes just before reaching Montevideo.[59]

Defeat of Oribe[edit]

Meanwhile, the troops of Urquiza and Eugenio Garzón had surrounded the army of Oribe near Montevideo. Their forces numbered roughly 15,000 men, almost double Oribe's 8,500. Realising that the Brazilians were approaching and knowing that there was no hope of victory, Oribe orderered his troops to surrender without a fight[46] on 19 October,[52] and retreated into seclusion on his farm in Paso del Molino. The Brazilian fleet, with their ships scattered throughout the River Plate and tributaries, prevented the defeated army of Oribe from escaping into Argentina.[51][60] Urquiza suggested to Grenfell that they should simply kill the resulting prisoners of war, but Grenfell refused to harm any of them.[61] Instead, Oribe's Argentine soldiers were incorporated into the army of Urquiza, and the Uruguayans into Garzon's.[62]

The Brazilian army easily took the remaining Blanco Uruguayan territory, fending off remnants of Oribe's troops who attacked its flanks in several skirmishes.[60] On 21 November the representatives of Brazil, Uruguay, Entre Rios and Corrientes then formed another alliance[63] in Montevideo with the objective of "freeing the Argentine people from the oppression it suffers under the tyrant rule of Governor Rosas”.[64]

Allied invasion of Argentina[edit]

Allied army advance[edit]

Shortly after the surrender of Oribe, the allied forces split into two groups, the plan being for one force to manoeuver upriver and sweep down on Buenos Aires from Santa Fe, while the other would make a landing at the port of Buenos Aires itself. The first of these groups, was composed of Uruguayan and Argentine troops, along with the 1st Division of the Brazilian Army under Brigadier General Manuel Marques de Sousa (later the Count of Porto Alegre). It was initially based in the town of Colonia del Sacramento in the south of Uruguay across the Río de la Plata estuary from the city of Buenos Aires.[65]

A line of masted Brazilian warships, led by a sidewheel steamship, passing upriver while bombarding positions flying Argentine colors atop cliffs at the water's edge.
Brazilian warships passing the Tonelero.

On 17 December 1851, a squadron of Brazilian ships, consisting of four steamships, three corvettes and one brig under the command of Grenfell, forced a passage of the Paraná River in the battle which became known as the Passage of the Tonelero. The Argentines had formed a powerful defensive line at Tonelero, near the cliffs of Acevedo, protected by 16 pieces of artillery and 2,000 riflemen under the command of general Lucio Norberto Mansilla.[64] The Argentine troops exchanged fire with the Brazilian warships but were unable to prevent from them from progressing upriver.[66] The following day, the Brazilian ships returned and broke their way through Tonelero's defenses, carrying the remaining troops of Marques de Sousa's Brazilian division upstream towards Gualeguaichu. This second influx of ships caused Mansilla and his soldiers to withdraw in chaos, abandoning their artillery, believing that the allies were intending to land and attack their positions from the rear.[67]

The allied army continued to make its way to the assembly point at Gualeguaichu. Urquiza and his cavalry traveled overland from Montevideo, while the infantry and artillery were carried by Brazilian warships up the Uruguay River. After meeting up, they marched west until they reached the city of Diamante on the east side of the Paraná River in the middle of December 1851.[68] Eugenio Garzón and his the Uruguayan troops were taken from Montevideo up to Potrero Perez by Brazilian warships and continued on foot until arriving at Diamante on 30 December 1851, when all the allied forces were finally reunited.[68] From Diamante contingents were ferried to the other side of the Paraná River, landing at Santa Fé.[68] The Confederate Argentine troops in the region ran away without offering any resistance.[68] The Allied Army, or the “Grand Army of South America” as it was officially called by Urquiza, marched on towards Buenos Aires.[68]

Meanwhile, the second force, comprising the majority of the Brazilian troops (about 12,000 men) under the command of Caxias, had remained in Colonia del Sacramento. The Brazilian commander took the steamship Dom Afonso (named in honor of the late Prince Afonso) and entered the port at Buenos Aires to select the best place to disembark his troops. He expected to have to defeat the Argentine flotilla anchored there, but the force did nothing to stop him and he safely returned to Sacramento to plan his assault.[69] The attack was prematurely aborted, however, when news arrived of the allied victory at Caseros.[67][70]

Rosas defeated[edit]

Painting of the Battle of Caseros.

The Allied army had been advancing on the Argentinian capital of Buenos Aires by land, while the Brazilian Army commanded by Caxias planned a supporting attack by sea. On 29 January at the Battle of Alvarez Field the Allied vanguard defeated a force of 4,000 Argentines led by two colonels which General Ángel Pacheco had sent to slow down the advance.[71] Pacheco retreated. Two days later, troops under his personal command were defeated at the Battle of Marques Bridge by two allied divisions.[71][72] On 1 February 1852, the Allied troops encamped approximately nine kilometers from Buenos Aires. The next day a brief skirmish between the vanguards of both armies ended with a retreat by the Argentines.[73][74]

Three quarters length tintype portrait showing a mustachioed man in military dress uniform and cap with one foot resting on a rock and holding a sheathed sword.
Domingo Faustino Sarmiento, future President of Argentina. He is wearing the Brazilian Order of the Southern Cross given to him by Pedro II during his exile in Petrópolis in 1852.[75]

On 3 February the Allied army encountered the main Argentine force commanded by Rosas himself. On paper, the two sides were well-matched. The Allies included 20,000 Argentines, 2,000 Uruguayans, 4,000[3] Brazilian elite[4] troops totalling 26,000 men and 45 cannon (16,000 cavalrymen, 9,000 infantrymen and 1,000 artillerymen).[5] On the Argentine side, Rosas had 15,000 cavalrymen, 10,000 infantrymen and 1,000 artillerymen, totalling 26,000 men and 60 cannon.[76] Rosas had been able to select the best positions for his army, choosing the high ground on the slopes of a hill at Caseros, which lay on the other side of the Morón creek. His headquarters were based in a mansion at the top of Caseros.[5]

The Allied commanders were de Sousa, Manuel Luis Osório (later the Marquis of Erval), Jose Maria Pirán, Jose Miguel Galán (who replaced Garzón after his unexpected death in December 1851), Urquiza, and the future Argentine presidents Bartolomé Mitre and Domingo Sarmiento—the latter both leading the Argentine Unitarians. These men formed a War Council, and gave orders to commence the attack.[3] Almost immediately the forward units of the two armies began to engage in battle.[5]

The Battle of Caseros, as the clash between the Allied and Argentine armies became known, resulted in a huge victory for the opponents of Rosas. Although they started with the inferior position on the battlefield, the Allied soldiers managed to annihilate Rosas's troops in a fight that lasted for most of the day. A few minutes before the Allied forces reached Rosas' headquarters, the Argentine dictator escaped the battlefield. Disguised as a sailor,[70] he sought out Robert Gore, British ambassador in Buenos Aires, and requested asylum. The ambassador agreed to have de Rosas and his daughter Manuelita taken to the United Kingdom, where he would spend the last twenty years of his life.[46][3] The official report stated that 600 men on the Allied side had been wounded or died, while the Argentine losses were 1,400 killed or wounded and 7,000 captured. Given the duration and scale of the battle, however, this may be an underestimate.[77][78]

To mark their victory, the Allied troops marched in triumph through the streets of Buenos Aires. The parades included the Brazilian Army, which insisted that their triumphal procession take place on 20 February, to mark payback for the defeat it had suffered at the Battle of Ituzaingó twenty five years before on that date. The population of Buenos Aires was said to have looked on silently with a combination of shame and hostility as the Brazilians passed.[3]

Aftermath[edit]

In Brazil[edit]

The triumph in Caseros was a pivotal military victory for Brazil. The independence of Paraguay and Uruguay was secured, and the planned Argentine invasion of Rio Grande do Sul was blocked.[79] In a period of three years, the Empire of Brazil had destroyed any possibility of reconstituting a state encompassing the territories of old Viceroyalty of the Rio de la Plata, a goal cherished by many in Argentina since independence.[52] Brazil's army and fleet had accomplished what Great Britain and France, the great powers of that time, had not achieved through interventions by their powerful navies.[80] This represented a watershed for the history of the region as it not only ushered in Imperial hegemony over the Platine region,[2][3] but, according to Brazilian historian J. F. Maya Pedrosa, also in the rest of South America.[34] The victory over Paraguay eighteen years later would only be a confirmation of Brazilian dominance.[k]

Daguerrotype portrait of a man seated next to a table and wearing black suit, vest and tie.
Bartolomé Mitre (photo of 1854) led Buenos Aires against the Argentine Confederation until he reunified Argentina after his victory in the Battle of Pavón in 1861.

Hispanic American nations from Mexico to Argentina suffered from coups d'état, revolts, dictatorships, political upheavals, economic instability, civil wars and secessions. Brazil, on the other hand, came out of the conflict with its system of constitutional monarchy strengthened and the cessation of internal revolts. The problematic province of Rio Grande do Sul had actively participated in the war effort. As a consequence, there was increased identification with Brazil among its populace, quelling of separatist feeling, and an easier and effective integration with the rest of the nation.[76] Internal stability also allowed Brazil to begin assuming a respected place on the international scene, coinciding with the parallel emergence of the United States which was only now establishing its own borders. The European powers perceived in the Empire of Brazil a rare exception in a continent afflicted by civil wars and dictatorships.[81] Brazil entered into a period of great economic, scientific and cultural prosperity, lasting from 1850 until the end of its monarchy.[82][83]

In Argentina[edit]

Soon after Caseros, the San Nicolás Agreement was signed. It was meant to comply with the constitutional mandate of the Federal pact that presided over the Argentine Confederation, convening a Constitutional Assembly to meet in Santa Fe. This agreement was not accepted by the province of Buenos Aires, since it reduced its influence and power over the other provinces. Buenos Aires thereupon seceded from the confederation, thus Argentina got divided into two rival, independent states which fought to establish dominance.[2][84] On the one side were the Federalists of the Argentine Confederation, led by Justo José de Urquiza. On the other, the Autonomists of Buenos Aires. The civil war was only brought to an end with the decisive victory of Buenos Aires over the Federation at the 1861 Battle of Pavón. The bonaerense liberal leader Bartolomé Mitre was elected the first President of a united Argentine Republic in 1862.[85][86]

In Paraguay and Uruguay[edit]

With the opening of the Platine rivers, Paraguay now found it possible to contract with European technicians and Brazilian specialists to aid in its development. Unhindered access to the outside world also enabled it to import more advanced military technology.[38] During the greater part of the 1850s, the dictator Carlos López harassed Brazilian vessels attempting to freely navigate the Paraguay River. López feared that the province of Mato Grosso might become a base from which an invasion from Brazil could be launched. This dispute was also leverage with the Imperial government for acceptance of his territorial demands in the region.[87] The nation also experienced difficulties in delimiting its borders with Argentina. Argentina wanted the Gran Chaco placed completely under its flag: a demand which Paraguay could not accept, as this would entail surrendering more than half of its national territory.[87]

The end of the Platine War did not bring a halt to conflict in the region. Peace remained out of reach in Uruguay, which remained unstable and in a state of constant crisis due to continuing internecine strife between the Blancos and Colorados. Border disputes, power struggles among diverse regional factions, and attempts to establish regional and internal influence would eventually spark the Uruguayan War as well as the later Paraguayan War.[88][89]

See also[edit]

Endnotes[edit]

  1. ^ "Brasil possuía uma reputação na comunidade internacional que, com a única exceção dos Estados Unidos da América, nenhum outro país americano tinha". See Lyra 1977, Vol 2, p. 9.
  2. ^ "He became governor of Buenos Aires in 1929. The city of Buenos Aires remained at the center of Argentine politics, but now as a provincial capital. In reaction to the chaos that the political wars of the 1820s had created, he instituted an authoritarian regime. [...] Rosas grew notorious for his repression of political opponents." —Daniel K. Lewis in Lewis 2001, p. 45.
  3. ^ "In the first half of the 19th century Juan Manuel de Rosas came to prominence as a caudillo in Buenos Aires province, representing the interests of rural elites and landowners. He became governor of the province in 1829 and, while he championed the Federalist cause, he also helped centralize political power in Buenos Aires and required all international trade to be funneled through the capital. His reign lasted more than 20 years (from 1829 to 1852), and he set ominous precedents in Argentine political life, creating the infamous mazorca (his ruthless political police force) and institutionalizing torture." —Danny Palmerlee in Palmerlee 2008, pp. 32–33.
  4. ^ "Rosas had never recognized Paraguay as an independent nation. He still called it the província del Paraguay and sought its 'recovery', aiming to extend its frontiers of the confederation to those of the old Spanish viceroyalty." —John Lynch in Lynch 2001, p. 140.
  5. ^ "A tentativa do ditador da Confederação Argentina, Juan Manuel de Rosas, na década de 1830, de se impor às antigas províncias do vice-reinado do Rio da Prata, abrigando–as em um Estado nacional sob sua chefia". —Francisco Doratioto in Doratioto 2002, p. 25.
  6. ^ "O ditador de Buenos Aires, Juan Manuel de Rosas, sonhou reconstituir o antigo vice-reinado do Prata, criado na segunda metade do século XVIII e que abrangia, além da Argentina, as atuais repúblicas do Uruguai, Paraguai e Bolívia (alto Peru)." —Manuel de Oliveira Lima (pt) in Lima 1989, p. 158.
  7. ^ "Cresceu, então, o velho receio do Paraguai, por que o objetivo de Rosas sempre foi reconstituir o Vice-Reinado." —J. F. Maya Pedrosa in Pedrosa 2004, p. 50.
  8. ^ "Deliberate manipulation of Uruguayan politics for external advantage began in the year 1835, when Juan Manuel de Rosas became president of the Argentine Confederation [...]. In 1836 the Colorados revolted against the Blanco-controlled government, which they overthrew two years later. The Blancos turned to President Rosas for support, which he willingly supplied. In 1839 the new Colorado-controlled government declared war on Argentina, starting a twelve-year conflict. Rosas not only enabled the Blancos to dominate the Uruguayan countryside but also encouraged them to give aid and asylum to the Farrapos rebels, across the frontier in Rio Grande do Sul." —Roderick J. Barman in Barman 1999, p. 125.
  9. ^ "quando o Brasil firmou-se como um país de governo sólido e situação interna estabilizada, a partir da vitória sobre a Farroupilha, em 1845, e contra a revolta pernambucana, consolidando, definitivamente, sua superioridade no continente. Compete admitir que, nesta mesma época, as novas repúblicas debatiam-se em lutas internas intermináveis iniciadas em 1810 e sofriam de visível complexo de insegurança em relação ao Brasil" —J. F. Maya Pedrosa in Pedrosa 2004, p. 35.
  10. ^ Later Viscount of Mauá.
  11. ^ "The end of the Paraguayan War marked the apogee of the Imperial regime in Brazil. It is the 'Golden Age' of the monarchy." and "...Brazil had a reputation in the international community that, with the sole exception of the United States of America, no other country in the Americas held." —Heitor Lyra in Lyra 1977, Vol 2, p. 9.

Footnotes[edit]

  1. ^ Halperín Donghi 2007, p. 91.
  2. ^ a b c d Furtado 2000, p. 10.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g Golin 2004, p. 42.
  4. ^ a b Calmon 2002, p. 196.
  5. ^ a b c d Costa 2003, p. 156.
  6. ^ a b Vainfas 2002, p. 447.
  7. ^ a b c d Holanda 1976, p. 113.
  8. ^ Vianna 1994, p. 528.
  9. ^ a b c d e Estado-maior do Exército 1972, p. 546.
  10. ^ a b Maia 1975, p. 255.
  11. ^ a b Lyra 1977, Vol 1, p. 160.
  12. ^ Doratioto 2002, p. 24.
  13. ^ a b c Doratioto 2002, p. 26.
  14. ^ Holanda 1976, pp. 113, 114.
  15. ^ Holanda 1976, p. 116.
  16. ^ Vainfas 2002, p. 448.
  17. ^ a b Holanda 1976, p. 114.
  18. ^ Holanda 1976, p. 117.
  19. ^ a b Furtado 2000, p. 7.
  20. ^ Holanda 1976, p. 119.
  21. ^ a b Holanda 1976, p. 120.
  22. ^ Holanda 1976, p. 121.
  23. ^ Vainfas 2002, p. 303.
  24. ^ a b Vianna 1994, p. 526.
  25. ^ Costa 2003, p. 145.
  26. ^ Costa 2003, p. 146.
  27. ^ a b c d Estado-maior do Exército 1972, p. 547.
  28. ^ a b Vianna 1994, p. 527.
  29. ^ Pedrosa 2004, p. 110.
  30. ^ Calmon 1975, p. 371.
  31. ^ a b Bueno 2003, p. 207.
  32. ^ Lima 1989, p. 158.
  33. ^ Pedrosa 2004, p. 232.
  34. ^ a b Pedrosa 2004, p. 35.
  35. ^ Dolhnikoff 2005, p. 206.
  36. ^ a b c Doratioto 2002, p. 28.
  37. ^ a b Furtado 2000, p. 6.
  38. ^ a b c d Furtado 2000, p. 8.
  39. ^ Lyra 1977, Vol 1, pp. 158–162.
  40. ^ Calmon 1975, p. 391.
  41. ^ Costa 2003, p. 148.
  42. ^ Barroso 2000, p. 119.
  43. ^ Furtado 2000, p. 21.
  44. ^ Calmon 1975, p. 390.
  45. ^ Holanda 1976, pp. 114, 115.
  46. ^ a b c d Lima 1989, p. 159.
  47. ^ a b Lyra 1977, Vol 1, p. 163.
  48. ^ Golin 2004, p. 41.
  49. ^ Calmon 1975, p. 387.
  50. ^ Golin 2004, p. 35.
  51. ^ a b c d Maia 1975, p. 256.
  52. ^ a b c Lyra 1977, Vol 1, p. 164.
  53. ^ Estado-maior do Exército 1972, p. 548.
  54. ^ Carvalho 1976, p. 181.
  55. ^ Maia 1975, pp. 256, 257.
  56. ^ Furtado 2000, p. 9.
  57. ^ a b Golin 2004, p. 22.
  58. ^ Pedrosa 2004, p. 229.
  59. ^ Carvalho 1976, pp. 185, 186.
  60. ^ a b Costa 2003, p. 150.
  61. ^ Barroso 2000, p. 101.
  62. ^ Golin 2004, p. 23.
  63. ^ Golin 2004, p. 38.
  64. ^ a b Maia 1975, p. 257.
  65. ^ Estado-maior do Exército 1972, p. 551.
  66. ^ Barroso 2000, p. 112.
  67. ^ a b Maia 1975, p. 258.
  68. ^ a b c d e Estado-maior do Exército 1972, p. 553.
  69. ^ Costa 2003, pp. 155, 156.
  70. ^ a b Costa 2003, p. 158.
  71. ^ a b Títara 1852, p. 161.
  72. ^ Estado-maior do Exército 1972, p. 554.
  73. ^ Magalhães 1978, p. 64.
  74. ^ Títara 1852, p. 162.
  75. ^ Calmon 1975, p. 407.
  76. ^ a b Golin 2004, p. 43.
  77. ^ Doratioto 2009, p. 80.
  78. ^ Scheina 2003, p. 123.
  79. ^ Golin 2004, pp. 42, 43.
  80. ^ Calmon 2002, p. 195.
  81. ^ Lyra 1977, Vol 1, p. 200.
  82. ^ Bueno 2003, p. 196.
  83. ^ Lyra 1977, Vol 1, p. 199.
  84. ^ Doratioto 2002, p. 29.
  85. ^ Furtado 2000, p. 17.
  86. ^ Pedrosa 2004, p. 168.
  87. ^ a b Furtado 2000, p. 14.
  88. ^ Doratioto 2002, pp. 95, 96.
  89. ^ Furtado 2000, p. 13.

References[edit]

  • Barman, Roderick J. (1999). Citizen Emperor: Pedro II and the Making of Brazil, 1825–1891. Stanford: Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-3510-0. 
  • Barroso, Gustavo (2000). Guerra do Rosas: 1851–1852 (in Portuguese). Fortaleza: SECULT. 
  • Bueno, Eduardo (2003). Brasil: Uma História (in Portuguese). São Paulo: Ática. ISBN 978-85-08-08213-1. 
  • Calmon, Pedro (1975). História de D. Pedro II. 5 v (in Portuguese). Rio de Janeiro: J. Olympio. 
  • Calmon, Pedro (2002). História da Civilização Brasileira (in Portuguese). Brasília: Senado Federal. 
  • Carvalho, Affonso (1976). Caxias (in Portuguese). Brasília: Biblioteca do Exército. 
  • Costa, Virgílio Pereira da Silva (2003). Duque de Caxias (in Portuguese). São Paulo: Editora Três. 
  • Dolhnikoff, Miriam (2005). Pacto imperial: origens do federalismo no Brasil do século XIX (in Portuguese). São Paulo: Globo. ISBN 978-85-250-4039-8. 
  • Doratioto, Francisco (2002). Maldita Guerra: Nova história da Guerra do Paraguai (in Portuguese). São Paulo: Companhia das Letras. ISBN 978-85-359-0224-2. 
  • Doratioto, Francisco (2009). Revista de História da Biblioteca Nacional (in Portuguese) (Rio de Janeiro: SABIN) 4 (41). 
  • Estado-maior do Exército (1972). História do Exército Brasileiro: Perfil militar de um povo (in Portuguese) 2. Brasília: Instituto Nacional do Livro. 
  • Furtado, Joaci Pereira (2000). A Guerra do Paraguai (1864–1870) (in Portuguese). São Paulo: Saraiva. ISBN 978-85-02-03102-9. 
  • Golin, Tau (2004). A Fronteira (in Portuguese) 2. Porto Alegre: L&PM Editores. ISBN 978-85-254-1438-0. 
  • Halperín Donghi, Tulio (2007). The Contemporary History of Latin America. Durham: Duke University Press. ISBN 978-08-2231-374-8. 
  • Holanda, Sérgio Buarque de (1976). História Geral da Civilização Brasileira (II) (in Portuguese) 3. DIFEL/Difusão Editorial S.A. 
  • Lewis, Daniel K. (2001). The history of Argentina. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-4039-6254-6. 
  • Lima, Manuel de Oliveira (1989). O Império brasileiro (in Portuguese). Belo Horizonte: Itatiaia. ISBN 978-85-319-0517-9. 
  • Lynch, John (2001). Argentine caudillo: Juan Manuel de Rosas. Lanham: SR Books. ISBN 978-0-8420-2898-1. 
  • Lyra, Heitor (1977). História de Dom Pedro II (1825–1891): Ascenção (1825–1870) (in Portuguese) 1. Belo Horizonte: Itatiaia. 
  • Lyra, Heitor (1977). História de Dom Pedro II (1825–1891): Fastígio (1870–1880) (in Portuguese) 2. Belo Horizonte: Itatiaia. 
  • Magalhães, João Batista (1978). Osório : síntese de seu perfil histórico (in Portuguese). Rio de Janeiro: Biblioteca do Exército. 
  • Maia, João do Prado (1975). A Marinha de Guerra do Brasil na Colônia e no Império (in Portuguese) (2nd ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Livraria Editora Cátedra. 
  • Palmerlee, Danny (2008). Argentina (6th ed.). Lonely Planet. ISBN 978-1-74104-702-8. 
  • Pedrosa, J. F. Maya (2004). A Catástrofe dos Erros (in Portuguese). Rio de Janeiro: Biblioteca do Exército. ISBN 978-85-7011-352-8. 
  • Scheina, Robert L. (2003). Latin America's Wars: The age of the caudillo, 1791–1899. Dulles: Brassey's. ISBN 978-1-57488-450-0. 
  • Títara, Ladislau dos Santos (1852). Memórias do grande exército alliado libertador do Sul da América (in Portuguese). Rio Grande do Sul: Tipografia de B. Berlink. 
  • Vainfas, Ronaldo (2002). Dicionário do Brasil Imperial (in Portuguese). Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva. ISBN 978-85-7302-441-8. 
  • Vianna, Hélio (1994). História do Brasil: período colonial, monarquia e república (in Portuguese) (15th ed.). São Paulo: Melhoramentos.