Pliska

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Pliska infobox.png
The Great Basilica in Pliska

Pliska (Bulgarian: Плиска, Old Church Slavonic: Пльсковъ, romanized: Plĭskovŭ) is the name of both the first capital of the First Bulgarian Empire and a small town (formerly village known as Aboba) situated 20 km Northeast of the provincial capital Shumen.

History[edit]

Prior to 681[edit]

In 680 CE, Bulgars crossed the Danube and invaded lands now part of modern day Bulgaria, which was at that time largely inhabited by Slavic farmers.[1] The Bulgar army was led by Asparukh, who according to Byzantine chroniclers was one of the five sons of Kubrat, the Onogur chief who revolted against his Avar rulers and succeeded in uniting the various Bulgar groups living north of the Black Sea.[2] When Asparukh and his warriors entered the region south of the Danube, the Byzantine Emperor Constantine IV was upset and led an army to prevent the Bulgars from remaining there. The Byzantine expedition against the Bulgars ended disastrously and after defeating the imperial forces, Asparukh forced the nearby Slavic tribes to pay tribute to him, while leaving their tribal organization intact. As a result of this defeat, the empire was forced to sign a treaty recognizing the Bulgar state in 681. Despite the area having been for some time under the de facto control of various Slavic tribes, the emperors of Byzantium had kept up the fiction that the area was still imperial, as up to 681 no true state had replaced imperial rule. This was the first time that the Byzantine empire officially acknowledged another state in the Balkans.[3]

681-893[edit]

Ruins of the early medieval city of Pliska, the first Bulgarian capital

Pliska was the capital of the First Bulgarian Empire between 681 and 893 AD. According to a Bulgarian chronicle, it was founded by Khan Asparukh. At its greatest extent, it had an area of 21.8 km² and was surrounded by earthen ramparts.[4] A smaller stone fortification was built inside these ramparts and this contained a palace and buildings belonging to the aristocracy.

While Pliska experienced nearly a century of growth following its selection as the capital of the new Bulgarian state, this was not a peaceful era. The Bulgars and Byzantine Empire were in an almost constant state of war during the eighth century and into the early ninth.[5] Emperor Constantine V oversaw nine campaigns against the Bulgars between 741 and 775, and Emperor Nikephoros I's campaign in 811 resulted in the burning of the royal residence in Pliska.[6] In this last instance the emperor led a massive army to Pliska in retaliation for the Bulgarian capture of Sardika and massacre of its garrison that occurred in an earlier set of hostilities.[7] The Bulgarian leader Krum was not prepared to face the emperor's army and thus abandoned Pliska and the Byzantines plundered the palace and town there and burned it to the ground as it was largely at this time made of wood. Soon after, the invaders were driven out by Khan Krum (see Battle of Pliska).[8]

Later in the ninth century, during the reign of Boris I, the pagan temples in Pliska likely began to be converted to Christian churches.[9] In 886, Boris founded the Pliska Literary School which was moved to Preslav when Boris later relocated the capital. When Boris fell seriously ill and retired to a monastery, his son Vladimir succeeded him and attempted to reestablish paganism. During this period (889-93) the large stone basilica at Pliska built under Boris was heavily damaged. Boris left his monastery to overthrow his son, and after succeeding, relocated the capital to the nearby town of Preslav which seems to have been a centre of Christianity in the state.[10] Following this Pliska's relevance in Bulgar governance steadily declined until the Bulgarian state was destroyed by the Byzantine general turned emperor (when he murdered the previous emperor Nikephorus Phokas) John Tzimiskes defeated the Bulgar armies (as well as the Russian forces that were contesting the weakened Bulgarian territories) and annexed the Bulgarian lands all the way to the Danube, ending the first Bulgarian state.[11] During this Russian and Byzantine war over Bulgaria, Pliska was destroyed between 969 and 972 and was not rebuilt.

Archaeology of Pliska[edit]

The construction of an earthen rampart was started shortly after the Bulgars settled in the Pliska plain (it has been suggested that these embankments may not have been built all at once[12]), and the territory inside of this is known as the Outer Town, which consisted of multiple groupings of modest cottages with space in between for flocks of livestock and horses.[13] This seemingly unusual layout may have been chosen as the Bulgars had been nomadic prior to building their capital at Pliska, and when they began to cooperate with the local Slavs (which formed a strong majority of the new state's population) a mixed pastoral and agricultural economy developed. The Inner Town, which was likely built later in the settlement's existence, consisted of a palace, basilica and aristocratic buildings inside a stone fortification.[14] The Inner Town was surrounded by the Outer Town which was in turn surrounded by the earthen rampart.

Overall, far less is known about the layout and contents of Pliska prior to the conversion to Christianity than afterwards. No stone buildings have been dated with certainty from before the Bulgars converted to Christianity in 864/5,[15] and many wooden buildings (which were initially presumed to have come from the pagan era) also appear to have been built later on. It's not clear which buildings were built in the decades immediately after 681. When the earthen rampart was built, Pliska had a very low population. Dimitrov's map based on the 1989 to 1991 dredging works in the Outer Town suggests that there were no more than six to twelve hamlet sized settlements there, while there might have been thirty or so by the tenth century.[16]

There is however still no plausible explanation for why the earthen rampart and ditch built around Pliska encircled such a large area.[17] A few areas appear to have been inhabited by people who provided services or took part in craft production for the palace centre, and agriculture clearly took place within the earthen rampart around the Outer Town. There was clearly a fair amount of open ground inside the earthen rampart. Henning concludes that the settlement was initially built for military and strategic reasons, and could not really be considered a typical city (with all of the associated trade, production, and population) until the period after Bulgaria converted to Christianity in 864/5.[18] Most of the stone architecture in Pliska was built between this conversion and eventual Byzantine conquest of the city in 971. The buildings from this era show a clear Byzantine influence in their design and function. For example, a 4 kilometre-long canal fed a large brick cistern that moved water from the Kriva river to the Inner Town via ceramic pipes. This cistern had attached rooms containing private baths.[19]

Only certain parts of the archaeological site of the city have been properly investigated. One of the most thoroughly researched is the Asar-dere area just to the west of the stone fortification surrounding the Inner Town. Four clay-made furnaces have been discovered in this area, suggesting that Pliska possessed a specialized pottery making capabilities and an urban economy at some point during its development.[20]

Initially, such finds were interpreted to show that early on the settlement relied upon pastoral and agricultural activities, and later developed sophisticated craft techniques. This interpretation was further supported by the relatively late dating of the first occurrences of glazed ceramic ware found in Pliska. At the very earliest these came from the late ninth century, though some certainly dated from the tenth and eleventh centuries as well.

However, more recent investigation of the Asar-dere area has shown that the area contained a large waste disposal site alongside multiple hearths and kilns all dating from the earliest occupation phase. The content of the waste shows that ceramics were produced early in the settlement's history. Other finds from this first phase of occupation (from the eighth until the beginning of the ninth century) include those connected with iron processing, such as slag, charcoal, ash, and pig iron. Fragments and solid droplets of glass suggest glassmaking are also found from this same period.[21] These types of finds are not extant in this area in the tenth and eleventh centuries, when it was instead occupied by numerous small and primitive grubenhaus dwellings. According to Henning;

“It was not the case that a predominantly agricultural style of living opened the way to a stepwise growth in craft activities, but rather a situation of fully developed and highly specialized artisan production was followed later by a process of broad ruralization”.[22]

Scholarly Disputes[edit]

Some scholars, such as Georgiev and Kirilov, have proposed that that Pliska was not in fact the capital of Bulgaria in this period at all. Georgiev suggests that Pliska was only a seasonal residence with small timber buildings at least until the middle of the eighth century. Kirilov offers the explanation that like the Ottonian kings, the Bulgar rulers were itinerant, and travelled between multiple different residences.[23] Additionally, prior to some more recent finds at the in the Asar-dere area of the archaeological site, it was believed that the craft activities attested by Milčev showed that site did not become a true large town until the later ninth or early tenth century, however Henning shows that this may have occurred in reverse order.[24] Ceramic fragments on the floors of many of the pit-houses suggested (based on their depth in the soil) at first suggested that the pottery was made and those houses were occupied in the later occupation period of the settlement. Excavation of the pit-house designated grubenhaus No. 8 however precipitated a sharp conceptual turn amongst many researchers towards the belief that the pit-houses may largely have been built much earlier, and this suggests that the famous Great Basilica may have been built after rather than before the majority of the pit-houses, meaning it may not have been built in AD 864 as long supposed, but instead as late as the later tenth century[25]

Modern Pliska[edit]

Karta Pliska.png

The ruins of the city of Pliska lie 3 km north of the modern village of Pliska. The site of the city is currently a National Archaeological Reserve. Ruins of the Great and the Small Palace, the strong stone fortifications and the Great Basilica (c. 875), used both as a royal church and as a national patriarchal cathedral, can be seen in the reserve.

Under Ottoman rule, the village known as Pliska since 1947, was instead called Aboba, a name which it kept until 1925, when the name was changed to Pliskov, a variant of its current name. The settlement has a population of 1124 and is located 146 m above sea level in Shumen Province at the south end of the Ludogorie plateau. It is approximately 400 km northeast of Sofia, at 43°22′N 27°7′E / 43.367°N 27.117°E / 43.367; 27.117.

Gallery[edit]

References[edit]

Dončeva-Petkova, Ljudmila. "Eighth- and ninth-century pottery from the industrial quarter of Pliska, capital of the early medieval Bulgarian kingdom." In Post-Roman Towns, Trade and Settlement in Europe and Byzantium, edited by Joachim Henning, 293-314. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2007.

Fiedler, Uwe. "Bulgars in the Lower Danube region. A survey of the archaeological evidence and the state of current research." In The Other Europe in the Middle Ages, edited by Florin Curta and Roman Kovalev, 151-236. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2008.

Fine, John. The early medieval Balkans: a critical survey from the sixth to the late twelfth century. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991. Crampton, R. A Concise History of Bulgaria. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Henning, Joachim. "The Metropolis of Pliska or, how large does an early medieval settlement have to be in order to be called a city?" In Post-Roman Towns, Trade and Settlement in Europe and Byzantium, edited by Joachim Henning, 209-40. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2007.

Prinzing, Günter. "Pliska in the view of Protobulgarian inscriptions and Byzantine written sources." In Post-Roman Towns, Trade and Settlement in Europe and Byzantium, edited by Joachim Henning, 241-51. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2007.

Literature[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Crampton, R. (2005). A Concise History of Bulgaria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 8. 
  2. ^ Fine, John (1991). The early medieval Balkans: a critical survey from the sixth to the late twelfth century. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. p. 69. 
  3. ^ Fine, John (1991). The early medieval Balkans: a critical survey from the sixth to the late twelfth century. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. p. 69. 
  4. ^ Henning, Joachim (2007). The Metropolis of Pliska or, how large does an early medieval settlement have to be in order to be called a city?. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. p. 210. 
  5. ^ Fiedler, Uwe (2008). Bulgars in the Lower Danube region. A survey of the archaelogical evidence and the state of current research. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. p. 166. 
  6. ^ Prinzing, Günter (2007). Pliska in the view of Protobulgarian inscriptions and Byzantine written sources. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. p. 242. 
  7. ^ Fine, John (1991). The early medieval Balkans: a critical survey from the sixth to the late twelfth century. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. p. 95. 
  8. ^ Fine, John (1991). The early medieval Balkans: a critical survey from the sixth to the late twelfth century. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. p. 96. 
  9. ^ Fine, John (1991). The early medieval Balkans: a critical survey from the sixth to the late twelfth century. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. p. 130. 
  10. ^ Fine, John (1991). The early medieval Balkans: a critical survey from the sixth to the late twelfth century. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. p. 130. 
  11. ^ Fine, John (1991). The early medieval Balkans: a critical survey from the sixth to the late twelfth century. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. p. 187. 
  12. ^ Fiedler, Uwe (2008). Bulgars in the Lower Danube region. A survey of the archaelogical evidence and the state of current research. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. p. 169. 
  13. ^ Henning, Joachim (2007). The Metropolis of Pliska or, how large does an early medieval settlement have to be in order to be called a city?. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. p. 213. 
  14. ^ Henning, Joachim (2007). The Metropolis of Pliska or, how large does an early medieval settlement have to be in order to be called a city?. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. p. 215. 
  15. ^ Fiedler, Uwe (2008). Bulgars in the Lower Danube region. A survey of the archaelogical evidence and the state of current research. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. p. 187. 
  16. ^ Fiedler, Uwe (2008). Bulgars in the Lower Danube region. A survey of the archaelogical evidence and the state of current research. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. p. 187. 
  17. ^ Henning, Joachim (2007). The Metropolis of Pliska or, how large does an early medieval settlement have to be in order to be called a city?. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. p. 231. 
  18. ^ Henning, Joachim (2007). The Metropolis of Pliska or, how large does an early medieval settlement have to be in order to be called a city?. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. p. 235. 
  19. ^ Fiedler, Uwe (2008). Bulgars in the Lower Danube region. A survey of the archaelogical evidence and the state of current research. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. p. 184. 
  20. ^ Henning, Joachim (2007). The Metropolis of Pliska or, how large does an early medieval settlement have to be in order to be called a city?. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. p. 215. 
  21. ^ Dončeva-Petkova, Ljudmila (2007). Eighth- and ninth-century pottery from the industrial quarter of Pliska, capital of the early medieval Bulgarian kingdom. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. p. 294. 
  22. ^ Henning, Joachim (2007). The Metropolis of Pliska or, how large does an early medieval settlement have to be in order to be called a city?. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. p. 216. 
  23. ^ Fiedler, Uwe (2008). Bulgars in the Lower Danube region. A survey of the archaelogical evidence and the state of current research. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. p. 188. 
  24. ^ Henning, Joachim (2007). The Metropolis of Pliska or, how large does an early medieval settlement have to be in order to be called a city?. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. p. 216. 
  25. ^ Henning, Joachim (2007). The Metropolis of Pliska or, how large does an early medieval settlement have to be in order to be called a city?. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. pp. 224–226. 

Coordinates: 43°23′13″N 27°07′55″E / 43.387°N 27.132°E / 43.387; 27.132