Political status of Crimea

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Emblem of Crimea.svg
This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of Crimea
See also
Political status of Crimea
Politics of Ukraine
Politics of Russia

The political status of the Crimea is the subject of a political and territorial dispute between Ukraine and Russia. Ukraine and the majority of the international community consider both Crimea and Sevastopol as administrative divisions of Ukraine, while Russia and some other countries considers both to be under a Russian federal district. The dispute came into being after the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol merged as a single united nation under the name of Republic of Crimea and then unilaterally declared their independence from Ukraine. This nation then acceded to Russia, where it became the aforementioned federal district, while the Autonomous Republic became the "Republic of Crimea" as a Russian republic and Sevastopol became a Russian federal city. However, Ukraine and the majority of the international community do not consider the merge, the independence, nor the accession as legitimate and still consider both entities as divisions of Ukraine.

Background[edit]

Evolution of status of Crimea and Sevastopol within independent Ukraine[edit]

Autonomous Republic of Crimea[edit]

After Crimean referendum of 1991, which asked whether Crimea should be elevated into a signatory of the New Union Treaty (that is, became a union republic on its own), Ukraine restored Crimea's autonomous status, but confirmed that autonomy restored as a part of the Ukrainian SSR. Crimean Oblast council became Supreme Council of Crimea and, on 4 September 1991, passed Declaration of state sovereignty of Crimea[1] Following dissolution of the Soviet Union, the autonomy renamed itself as the Republic of Crimea.[2] The Ukrainian government initially accepted its name, but not its claims to be a state. According to Ukrainian law "On status of the autonomous Republic of Crimea", passed on 29 April 1992, "Republic of Crimea is an autonomous part of the Ukraine and independently decides on matters, which are delegated to it by the Constitution and laws of the Ukraine" (art. 1).[3] The Regional Supreme Council, on the contrary, insisted that "Republic of Crimea is a legal democratic state", which "has supremacy in respect to natural, material, cultural and spiritual heritage" and "exercises its sovereign rights and full power" on its territory (art. 1 of the May 1992 Constitution), but also a "part of the Ukraine and establishes relations in it on a basis of the treaty and agreements" (art. 9).[4] Both Ukrainian law on autonomy status[5] and the 1992 Constitution of the Crimea[6] were amended later that year, putting Republic's status in between what proposed in initial revision of the 1992 Constitution and what was proposed in April 1992 Ukrainian law on the status of the Republic.

On 21 May 1992 Supreme Soviet of Russia declared 1954 transfer of Crimea as having "no legal force", because it was adopted "in violation of the Constitution (Fundamental Law) of the Russian SFSR and legislative process", but because subsequent legislation and 1990 Russo-Ukrainian treaty constituted that fact, parliament considered it necessary to resolve Crimean question in a negotiations between Ukraine and Russia and on basis of popular will of inhabitants of Crimea,[7] similar resolution was adopted for Sevastopol year later. Both moves were condemned by Ukraine[8][9][10] and resulted in no changes to the Russian Constitution (neither 1978 nor 1993 documents enumerated Crimea and Sevastopol as federal subjects).

In 1994, after parliamentary and presidential elections in the Republic, Supreme Council and the executive became dominated by the Russian Bloc (which had won 57 seats in the Supreme Council of Crimea and Presidency for its member, Yuri Meshkov), until 2014 it was highest achievement of pro-Russian movement at the peninsula.[11] Following referendum, held in same year, Supreme Council of Crimea reversed 1992 Constitution to its original revision,[12] but a year later this constitution, along with presidency and regional citizenship, was declared null and void by the Ukrainian Parliament, which by that time, had renamed the autonomy from "Republic of Crimea" to Autonomous Republic of Crimea.[13] Another Constitution was passed by Crimean parliament in 1995,[14] but many parts of it were rejected by the Ukrainian parliament, among them were Republic's name (which was to remain "Republic of Crimea") and citizenship.[15] Meanwhile, during drafting of the new Ukrainain Constiution question of autonomy was much debated: some legislators proposed abolishing it altogether (downgrading back to oblast status or to autonomy but not autonomous republic),[16][17] while other legislators proposed legalising 1992 Constitution of Crimea provisions (original May revision) in the new Ukrainian Constitution.[16] Ultimately, new Constitution of Ukraine distanced from these extremes and reiterated the autonomous status of the republic, while downgrading some of its powers (such as regional Supreme Council's powers to enact legislation in form of laws ("zakoni")). The Republic was declared to be the "Autonomous Republic of Crimea", but also an "inseparable constituent part of Ukraine".[18] A new Crimean constitution, complying with provisions of the Ukrainian one, was adopted in 1998.

Status of Sevastopol[edit]

Before the 1954 transfer of Crimea, Sevastopol was elevated into a "city of republican subordination" of the Russian SFSR (a predecessor[19] of modern status of "city of federal importance"). Nevertheless, in practice it was still governed as a part of Crimean Oblast (for example, inhabitants of Sevastopol elected deputies into Crimean Oblast Council,[20][21] all its structures, such as local militsiya departments, etc., were subordinated to oblast structures[22]) and therefore was practically transferred too. The Ukrainian Constitution of 1978 listed Sevastopol as one of its "cities of republican subordination" (along with Kyiv),[23] whilst the Russian constitution of the same year didn't list Sevastopol as such.[24] In 1993, the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Federation issued a resolution, which "confirms Russian federal status of Sevastopol" and requested a parliamentary commission to prepare and present to Congress of People's Deputies of Russia corresponding constitutional amendments, but 1993 Russian constitutional crisis prevented that from happening and initial revisions of the Constitution of Russia, adopted on 12 December 1993, did not list Sevastopol as a federal subject. Three years later, the State Duma declared that Russia has a right to exercise sovereignty over Sevastopol,[25] but this resolution went without any actual effect. An agreement was concluded in 1997 by the Russian and Ukrainian governments, allowing the Black Sea Fleet to stay in Sevastopol until 2017 (later extended by another 25 years until 2042, with possible option to extend this period until 2047).

Crimean crisis and subsequent developments[edit]

Amidst rising tension in the region as part of the Crimean crisis, the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol hosted a referendum to find out whether its people wanted to accede to the Russian Federation. The referendum took place on 16 March 2014 with 97% of voters choosing to leave Ukraine and join Russia. For this purpose, the Autonomous Republic and Sevastopol joined together as a single united nation under the name of Republic of Crimea. This nation then acceded to Russia where it was converted into a federal district under the name of Crimean Federal District. However, the accession divided the Autonomous Republic and the city of Sevastopol once again into two separate entities: the Autonomous Republic became the "Republic of Crimea" as a Russian republic while Sevastopol became a Russian federal city.

Regardless of all this, Ukraine and the vast majority of the international community has not recognized the validity of the referendum, and has not recognized the accession of this country into Russia.

Only Russia and four other nations have recognized all these events—namely Afghanistan, Nicaragua, Syria, and Venezuela.[26][27][28]

The lack of recognition from Ukraine and the international community is based primarily on the fact that the referendum included an option to join Russia while the region was under military occupation by Russia itself. The European Union, United States, Canada and several other nations condemned the decision to hold a referendum. In addition, the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People—the unofficial political association of the Crimean Tatars—called for a boycott of the referendum.[29][30]

The UN General Assembly eventually adopted a non-binding resolution considering the referendum as invalid and reaffirming Ukraine’s territorial integrity by a vote of 100 to 11 with 58 abstentions and 24 absent.[31][32]

Stances[edit]

Results of the United Nations General Assembly vote about the territorial integrity of Ukraine.
  In favor   Against   Abstentions   Absent

Ukraine[edit]

The recently installed government of Ukraine, along with most sovereign states in the world, did not recognize the Republic of Crimea's claim to sovereignty, nor the unification of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea with Sevastopol, nor the referendum that paved the way for Crimean secession.

Russia[edit]

Russia recognized the short-lived Republic of Crimea as a country shortly before concluding the aforementioned treaty of accession, which was approved by the Constitutional Court of Russia.

Russia claims the Republic of Crimea (country) as a federal district, the Crimean Federal District, on the grounds of historical control of the area and the local population's right to self-determination.[33]

Others[edit]

  Countries recognizing results of 2014 Crimean referendum
  Crimea

The following members of the United Nations have made statements about their recognition of the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol as federal subjects of Russia:

Position of  Belarus is vague: it includes comments by Belarusian president Alexander Lukashenko who said "Ukraine should remain an integral, indivisible, non-aligned state" and "As for Crimea, I do not like it when the integrity and independence of a country are broken", on the one hand, and "Today Crimea is part of the Russian Federation. No matter whether you recognize it or not, the fact remains." and "Whether Crimea will be recognized as a region of the Russian Federation de-jure does not really matter", on the other hand.[35]

The following non-members of the United Nations have made statements about their recognition of the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol as federal subjects of Russia:

The following states have recognized the 2014 Crimean referendum.[not in citation given]

State UN member Date References
 Russia Yes 17 March 2014 [37]
 Venezuela Yes 17 March 2014 [38][39]
 South Ossetia No 17 March 2014 [40]
 Abkhazia No 17 March 2014 [40]
 Kazakhstan Yes 18 March 2014 [38][41]
 Armenia Yes 19 March 2014 [38][39][42]
 Nagorno-Karabakh No 19 March 2014 [43]
 Kyrgyzstan Yes 20 March 2014 [38][44]
 Uganda Yes 21 March 2014 [45][46]
 Afghanistan Yes 22 March 2014 [38][47]
 North Korea Yes 22 March 2014 [38][39]
 Syria Yes 22 March 2014 [38][39]
 Belarus Yes 23 March 2014 [39][48][49]
 Cuba Yes 27 March 2014 [39]
 Bolivia Yes 27 March 2014 [39]
 Nicaragua Yes 27 March 2014 [39]
 Sudan Yes 27 March 2014 [39]
 Zimbabwe Yes 27 March 2014 [39]

The majority of the international community, however, has not recognized the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol as part of Russia. Most nations located in North America, Europe, Oceania, and Central America, as well as some[which?] in Southeast Asia[citation needed] and Africa, have openly rejected the referendum and the accession, and instead consider Crimea and Sevastopol to be administrative divisions of Ukraine. However, a number of nations from have recognized the referendum. The remainder have largely remained neutral. The vote on United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262 (supporting the position that Crimea and Sevastopol remain part of Ukraine) was 100 to 11 in favor, with 58 states abstaining and a further 24 of the 193 member states not voting through being absent when the vote took place. The 100 states voting in favor represented about 34% of the world's population, the 11 against represented about 4.5%, the 58 abstentions represented about 58%, and the 24 absents represented about 3.5%.

Neutral positions[edit]

 Argentina had abstained from the United Nations General Assembly vote about the territorial integrity of Ukraine referring to some governments lack of coherence on similar questions.[50] President Cristina Fernández criticized what she called a double standard allowing the Falklands/Malvinas residents to hold a vote on their future, while condemning the Crimean referendum on union with Russia.[51][52]

 Israel, on April 13, 2014, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz suggests in an unconfirmed report that unnamed officials in Washington are not entirely satisfied with Israel's "neutrality" regarding Crimea's reunification with Russia. A senior Israeli official said that Israel's absence from the United Nations General Assembly vote about the territorial integrity of Ukraine was viewed around the world as an extremely irregular measure, a departure from a long-standing Israeli policy of voting with the United States in the UN.[53]

 South Africa abstained from the United Nations General Assembly vote about the territorial integrity of Ukraine because it believes the crisis did not start with the Crimean referendum. Spokesperson Clayson Monyela told SABC News that the initiative fails to encourage dialogue and therefore viewed the vote as counterproductive.[54][55]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Parliament of Ukraine (17 Nov 1994). "Декларация о государственном суверенитете Крыма". Government of Ukraine. Retrieved 24 Apr 2014.  (Russian)
  2. ^ Parliament of Ukraine (20 Oct 1999). "О Республике Крым как официальном названии демократического государства Крым". Government of Ukraine. Retrieved 24 Apr 2014.  (Russian)
  3. ^ Про статус автономної Республіки Крим. Закон від 29.04.1992 № 2299-XII (Ukrainian)
  4. ^ Конституция Республики Крым (Russian)
  5. ^ Про внесення змін і доповнень до Закону України "Про статус автономної Республіки Крим" Верховна Рада України; Закон від 30.06.1992 № 2523-XII (Ukrainian)
  6. ^ О внесении изменений и дополнений в Конституцию Республики Крым. Верховная Рада АРК; Закон от 25.09.1992 № 155-1 (Russian)
  7. ^ "Постановление ВС России "О правовой оценке решений высших органов государственной власти РСФСР по изменению статуса Крыма, принятых в 1954 году"" (in Russian). May 1992. 
  8. ^ "Letter dated 25 May 1992 from the Permanent Representative of Ukraine to the United Nations, addressed to the Secretary-General". un.org. 25 May 1992. 
  9. ^ "Letter dated 13 July 1993 from the Permanent Representative of Ukraine to the United Nations, addressed to the President of the Security Council". 
  10. ^ "Letter dated 16 July 1993 from the Permanent Representative of Ukraine to the United Nations addressed to the Security Council". 
  11. ^ Полунов, Александр Юрьевич. Общественные организации русского Крыма: политическая деятельность, стратегии взаимоотношений с властью. Государственное управление. Выпуск № 21. Декабрь 2009 года. (Russian)
  12. ^ О восстановлении конституционных основ государственности Республики Крым. Верховная Рада АРК; Закон от 20.05.1994 № 32-1 (Russian)
  13. ^ Про внесення змін і доповнень до Конституції (Основного Закону) України. Верховна Рада України; Закон від 21.09.1994 № 171/94-ВР (Ukrainian)
  14. ^ Конституция Автономной Республики Крым. Верховная Рада АРК; Закон, Конституция от 01.11.1995 № 611k-1 (Russian)
  15. ^ Про Конституцію Автономної Республіки Крим. Верховна Рада України; Закон від 04.04.1996 № 117/96-ВР (Ukrainian)
  16. ^ a b Table of amendments to the 11 March 1996 draft Ukrainian Constitution (Ukrainian)
  17. ^ Table of amendments to the second-reading draft Ukrainian constitution (Ukrainian)
  18. ^ "Constitution of Ukraine, 1996". Retrieved March 12, 2014. 
  19. ^ Закон РФ от 9 декабря 1992 г. N 4061-I "Об изменениях и дополнениях Конституции (Основного Закона) Российской Федерации - России" (принят седьмым Съездом народных депутатов РФ): "В статье 71<...>в части второй слова "республиканского подчинения" заменить словами "федерального значения"" (Russian)
  20. ^ "Анализ документов: Севастополь — украинский город". Sd.net.ua. Retrieved 2014-04-10. 
  21. ^ Город республиканского подчинения - Власть - gazeta.zn.ua
  22. ^ ""Сверхнаглость" сработает ? Севастополь: псевдоюридические аргументы Ю. М. Лужкова" (in Russian). Day.kiev.ua. 2011-10-07. Retrieved 2014-04-10. 
  23. ^ Constitution (Fundamental Law) of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic (Ukrainian)
  24. ^ Constitution (Fundamental Law) of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (Russian)
  25. ^ "Постановление Государственной Думы Федерального Собрания РФ от 24 октября 1996 г. N 747-II ГД "Об обращении Государственной Думы Федерального Собрания Российской Федерации "К …". Bazazakonov.ru. Retrieved 2014-04-10. 
  26. ^ a b Russian Federation Council ratifies treaty on Crimea’s entry to Russia. itar-tass.com. 21 March 2014
  27. ^ a b c d Rosenberg, Matthew (23 March 2014) Breaking With the West, Afghan Leader Supports Russia’s Annexation of Crimea. New York Times
  28. ^ a b "Nicaragua recognizes Crimea as part of Russia". Kyiv Post. 27 March 2014. 
  29. ^ "Mejlis to boycott Crimean referendum&". Ukrinform.ua. 6 March 2014. Retrieved 15 March 2014. 
  30. ^ "Tatar leader: referendum's results 'predetermined'". DW.DE. 16 March 2014. Retrieved 17 March 2014. 
  31. ^ United Nations News Centre - Backing Ukraine’s territorial integrity, UN Assembly declares Crimea referendum invalid. Un.org (1 March 2014). Retrieved on 28 March 2014.
  32. ^ U.N. General Assembly declares Crimea secession vote invalid. Reuters. 27 March 2014.
  33. ^ Juan Valdes; Rosemary Wardley (5 March 2014). "300 Years of Embattled Crimea History in 6 Maps". National Geographic. Retrieved 30 March 2014. 
  34. ^ Visiting Russia, Fidel Castro's Son Scoffs at U.S. Sanctions Over Crimea
  35. ^ President of the Republic of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko answers questions of mass media representatives on 23 March 2014. president.gov.by. 23 March 2014.
  36. ^ "Abkhazian president hails Russia-Crimea reunion Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/news/2014_04_15/Abkhazian-president-hails-Russia-Crimea-reunion-8588/". Voice of Russia. 15 April 2014. Retrieved 20 May 2014. 
  37. ^ Президент РФ подписал указ о признании независимости Крыма. Russian.rt.com. 17 March 2014.
  38. ^ a b c d e f g Afghanistan respects Crimea's right to self-determination – Karzai. rt.com. 22 March 2014
  39. ^ a b c d e f g h i j UN General Assembly approves referendum calling Russia annexation of Crimea illegal. Associated Press via Fox News. 27 March 2014
  40. ^ a b "Sokhumi, Tskhinvali Recognize Crimea Vote". civil.ge. 17 March 2014. 
  41. ^ Kazakhstan supported Russia on the ‘Crimean question’. qha.com.ua. 19 March 2014
  42. ^ Sarkisian Backs Crimean Referendum in Phone Call with Putin. asbarez.com. 19 March 2014
  43. ^ Karabakh Foreign Ministry Issues Statement on Crimea. Asbarez.com. Retrieved on 23 March 2014.
  44. ^ Kyrgyzstan Recognizes Crimea Referendum Results. ria.ru. 20 March 2014.
  45. ^ Маргелов: лидеры африканских стран поддерживают позицию РФ по Крыму. ria.ru. 20 March 2014
  46. ^ Африка признаёт референдум // Метро.- № 35 (47/2965). 21 March 2014. p. 4
  47. ^ Karzai: Afghanistan Endorses Crimean Right to Decide Their Future. tolonews.com. 23 March 2014
  48. ^ Belarusian president: Crimea is de-facto part of Russia. rt.com. 23 March 2014
  49. ^ Lukashenko: Crimea is part of Russia now. itar-tass.com. 23 March 2014
  50. ^ https://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2014/ga11493.doc.htm
  51. ^ http://en.mercopress.com/2014/03/18/malvinas-crimea-cristina-fernandez-blasts-uk-on-double-standard
  52. ^ http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/19/crimea-referendum-falklands-argentina-cristina-fernandez
  53. ^ http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.585333
  54. ^ http://www.sabc.co.za/news/a/fcb60c80436d360480699e6c62b42e10/SA-abstains-in-UN-vote-of-Crimea
  55. ^ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMN4IW8k0PQ