Portable Network Graphics
|Internet media type||
|Uniform Type Identifier||public.png|
|Magic number||89 50 4e 47 0d 0a 1a 0a|
|Developed by||PNG Development Group (donated to W3C)|
|Initial release||1 October 1996|
|Type of format||lossless bitmap image format|
|Extended to||APNG, JNG and MNG|
|Standard(s)||ISO/IEC 15948, IETF RFC 2083|
Portable Network Graphics (PNG // PING), or PNG's Not GIF, is a raster graphics file format that supports lossless data compression. PNG was created as an improved, non-patented replacement for Graphics Interchange Format (GIF), and is the most used lossless image compression format on the Internet.
PNG supports palette-based images (with palettes of 24-bit RGB or 32-bit RGBA colors), grayscale images (with or without alpha channel), and full-color non-palette-based RGB[A] images (with or without alpha channel). PNG was designed for transferring images on the Internet, not for professional-quality print graphics, and therefore does not support non-RGB color spaces such as CMYK.
PNG files nearly always use file extension
png and are assigned MIME media type
image/png. PNG was approved for this use by the Internet Engineering Steering Group on 14 October 1996, and was published as an ISO/IEC standard in 2004.
- 1 History and development
- 2 PNG Working Group
- 3 Technical details
- 4 Comparison to other file formats
- 5 Software support
- 6 File size and optimization software
- 7 See also
- 8 References
- 9 Further reading
- 10 External links
History and development
The motivation for creating the PNG format was in early 1995, after it became known that the Lempel–Ziv–Welch (LZW) data compression algorithm used in the Graphics Interchange Format (GIF) format was patented by Unisys. There were also other problems with the GIF format that made a replacement desirable, notably its limit of 256 colors at a time when computers able to display far more than 256 colors were growing common.
A January 1995 precursory discussion thread, on the usenet newsgroup "comp.graphics" with the subject Thoughts on a GIF-replacement file format, had many propositions, which would later be part of the PNG file format. In this thread, Oliver Fromme, author of the popular DOS JPEG viewer QPEG, proposed the PING name, meaning PING is not GIF, and also the PNG extension.
Although GIF allows for animation, it was decided that PNG should be a single-image format. In 2001, the developers of PNG published the Multiple-image Network Graphics (MNG) format, with support for animation. MNG achieved moderate application support, but not enough among mainstream web browsers and no usage among web site designers or publishers. In 2008, certain Mozilla developers published the Animated Portable Network Graphics (APNG) format with similar goals. APNG is natively supported by Gecko- and Presto-based web browsers, but as of 2013, usage of the format remains very minimal.
- 1 October 1996: Version 1.0 of the PNG specification was released, and later appeared as RFC 2083. It became a W3C Recommendation on 1 October 1996.
- 31 December 1998: Version 1.1, with some small changes and the addition of three new chunks, was released.
- 11 August 1999: Version 1.2, adding one extra chunk, was released.
- 10 November 2003: PNG became an International Standard (ISO/IEC 15948:2003). This version of PNG differs only slightly from version 1.2 and adds no new chunks.
- 3 March 2004: ISO/IEC 15948:2004.
PNG Working Group
The original PNG specification was authored by an ad-hoc group of computer graphics experts and enthusiasts. Discussions and decisions about the format were done exclusively via email. The original authors listed on RFC 2083 are:
- Editor: Thomas Boutell
- Contributing Editor: Tom Lane
- Authors (in alphabetical order): Mark Adler, Thomas Boutell, Christian Brunschen, Adam M. Costello, Lee Daniel Crocker, Andreas Dilger, Oliver Fromme, Jean-loup Gailly, Chris Herborth, Aleks Jakulin, Neal Kettler, Tom Lane, Alexander Lehmann, Chris Lilley, Dave Martindale, Owen Mortensen, Keith S. Pickens, Robert P. Poole, Glenn Randers-Pehrson, Greg Roelofs, Willem van Schaik, Guy Schalnat, Paul Schmidt, Tim Wegner, Jeremy Wohl
||Has the high bit set to detect transmission systems that do not support 8 bit data and to reduce the chance that a text file is mistakenly interpreted as a PNG, or vice versa.|
||In ASCII, the letters PNG, allowing a person to identify the format easily if it is viewed in a text editor.|
||A DOS-style line ending (CRLF) to detect DOS-Unix line ending conversion of the data.|
||A byte that stops display of the file under DOS when the command type has been used—the end-of-file character|
||A Unix-style line ending (LF) to detect Unix-DOS line ending conversion.|
"Chunks" within the file
After the header comes a series of chunks, each of which conveys certain information about the image. Chunks declare themselves as critical or ancillary, and a program encountering an ancillary chunk that it does not understand can safely ignore it. This chunk-based storage layer structure, similar in concept to a container format, is designed to allow the PNG format to be extended while maintaining compatibility with older versions—it provides forward compatibility, and this same file structure (with different signature and chunks) is used in the associated MNG, JNG, and APNG formats.
A chunk consists of four parts: length (4 bytes), chunk type/name (4 bytes), chunk data (length bytes) and CRC (cyclic redundancy code/checksum; 4 bytes). The CRC is a network-byte-order CRC-32 computed over the chunk type and chunk data, but not the length.
|Length||Chunk type||Chunk data||CRC|
|4 bytes||4 bytes||Length bytes||4 bytes|
Chunks are given a four-letter case sensitive ASCII type/name; compare FourCC. The case of the different letters in the name (bit 5 of the numeric value of the character) is a bit field that provides the decoder with some information on the nature of chunks it does not recognize.
The case of the first letter indicates whether the chunk is critical or not. If the first letter is uppercase, the chunk is critical; if not, the chunk is ancillary. Critical chunks contain information that is necessary to read the file. If a decoder encounters a critical chunk it does not recognize, it must abort reading the file or supply the user with an appropriate warning.
The case of the second letter indicates whether the chunk is "public" (either in the specification or the registry of special-purpose public chunks) or "private" (not standardised). Uppercase is public and lowercase is private. This ensures that public and private chunk names can never conflict with each other (although two private chunk names could conflict).
The third letter must be uppercase to conform to the PNG specification. It is reserved for future expansion. Decoders should treat a chunk with a lower case third letter the same as any other unrecognised chunk.
The case of the fourth letter indicates whether the chunk is safe to copy by editors that do not recognize it. If lowercase, the chunk may be safely copied regardless of the extent of modifications to the file. If uppercase, it may only be copied if the modifications have not touched any critical chunks.
A decoder must be able to interpret critical chunks to read and render a PNG file.
IHDRmust be the first chunk; it contains the image's width, height, and bit depth.
PLTEcontains the palette; list of colors.
IDATcontains the image, which may be split among multiple IDAT chunks. Such splitting increases filesize slightly, but makes it possible to generate a PNG in a streaming manner. The IDAT chunk contains the actual image data, which is the output stream of the compression algorithm.
IENDmarks the image end.
PLTE chunk is essential for color type 3 (indexed color). It is optional for color types 2 and 6 (truecolor and truecolor with alpha) and it must not appear for color types 0 and 4 (grayscale and grayscale with alpha).
Other image attributes that can be stored in PNG files include gamma values, background color, and textual metadata information. PNG also supports color management through the inclusion of ICC color space profiles.
- bKGD gives the default background color. It is intended for use when there is no better choice available, such as in standalone image viewers (but not web browsers; see below for more details).
- cHRM gives the chromaticity coordinates of the display primaries and white point.
- gAMA specifies gamma.
- hIST can store the histogram, or total amount of each color in the image.
- iCCP is an ICC color profile.
- iTXt contains UTF-8 text, compressed or not, with an optional language tag. iTXt chunk with the keyword 'XML:com.adobe.xmp' can contain Extensible Metadata Platform (XMP).
- pHYs holds the intended pixel size and/or aspect ratio of the image.
- sBIT (significant bits) indicates the color-accuracy of the source data.
- sPLT suggests a palette to use if the full range of colors is unavailable.
- sRGB indicates that the standard sRGB color space is used.
- sTER stereo-image indicator chunk for stereoscopic images.
- tEXt can store text that can be represented in ISO/IEC 8859-1, with one name=value pair for each chunk.
- tIME stores the time that the image was last changed.
- tRNS contains transparency information. For indexed images, it stores alpha channel values for one or more palette entries. For truecolor and grayscale images, it stores a single pixel value that is to be regarded as fully transparent.
- zTXt contains compressed text with the same limits as tEXt.
The lowercase first letter in these chunks indicates that they are not needed for the PNG specification. The lowercase last letter in some chunks indicates that they are safe to copy, even if the application concerned does not understand them.
|Bits per pixel|
|Color option||Channels||Bits per channel|
|Grayscale & alpha||2||16||32|
|Truecolor & alpha||4||32||64|
PNG images can either use palette-indexed color or be made up of one or more channels (numerical values directly representing quantities about the pixels). When there is more than one channel in an image all channels have the same number of bits allocated per pixel (known as the bit depth of the channel). Although the PNG specification always talks about the bit depth of channels, most software and users generally talk about the total number of bits per pixel (sometimes also referred to as bit depth or color depth). If there is more than one channel, the number of bits per pixel is higher than the number of bits per channel, as shown in the illustration at right.
The number of channels will depend on whether the image is grayscale or color and whether it has an alpha channel. PNG allows the following combinations of channels, called the color type.
The color type is specified in the color type field, which is a bit field, as explained in the table below at right. Not all combinations are valid, however: there is no indexed grayscale, which would be color types 1 and 5; transparency in palette images is indicated by the presence of a
tRNS chunk, not a separate channel, so there is no color type 7.
|4||Grayscale & alpha||0||1||0||0||alpha|
|5||(Indexed grayscale & alpha)||0||1||0||1||alpha, palette|
|6||Truecolor & alpha||0||1||1||0||alpha, color|
|7||(Indexed & alpha)||0||1||1||1||alpha, color, palette|
- 0: grayscale
- 2: red, green and blue: rgb/truecolor
- 3: indexed: channel containing indices into a palette of colors
- 4: grayscale and alpha: level of transparency for each pixel
- 6: red, green, blue and alpha
With indexed color images, the palette is always stored in RGB at a depth of 8 bits per channel (24 bits per palette entry). Additionally, an optional array of 8-bit alpha values of the palette entries may be included. The palette must not have more entries than the image bit depth allows for, but it may have fewer (for example, if an image only uses 90 colors then it does not need palette entries for all 256 colors).
Indexed color PNGs are allowed to have 1, 2, 4 or 8 bits per pixel by the standard; grayscale images with no alpha channel allow for 1, 2, 4, 8 or 16 bits per pixel. Everything else uses a bit depth per channel of either 8 or 16. The combinations this allows are given in the table above. The standard requires that decoders can read all supported color formats, but many image editors can only produce a small subset of them.
Transparency of image
PNG offers a variety of transparency options. With true-color and grayscale images either a single pixel value can be declared as transparent or an alpha channel can be added (enabling any percentage of partial transparency to be used). For paletted images, alpha values can be added to palette entries. The number of such values stored may be less than the total number of palette entries, in which case the remaining entries are considered fully opaque.
The scanning of pixel values for binary transparency is supposed to be performed before any color reduction to avoid pixels' becoming unintentionally transparent. This is most likely to pose an issue for systems that can decode 16-bits-per-channel images (as they must to be compliant with the specification) but only output at 8 bits per channel (the norm for all but the highest end systems).
Alpha storage can be "associated" ("premultiplied") or "unassociated", but PNG standardized on "unassociated" ("non-premultiplied") alpha so that images with separate transparency masks can be stored losslessly..
PNG uses a 2-stage compression process:
- pre-compression: filtering (prediction)
- compression: DEFLATE
Before DEFLATE is applied, the data is precompressed, via a prediction method: a single filter method is used for the entire image, while for each image line, a filter type is chosen that transforms the data so that it is hopefully more easily compressed.
There is only one filter method in the current PNG specification (denoted method 0), and thus in practice the only choice is which filter type to apply to each line. For this method, the filter predicts the value of each pixel based on the values of previous neighboring pixels, and subtracts the predicted color of the pixel from the actual value, as in DPCM. An image line filtered in this way is often more compressible than the raw image line would be, especially if it is similar to the line above, since the differences from prediction will generally be clustered around 0, rather than spread over all possible image values. This is particularly important in relating separate rows, since DEFLATE has no understanding that an image is a 2D entity, and instead just sees the image data as a stream of bytes.
There are five filter types for filter method 0; each type predicts the value of each byte (of the image data before filtering) based on the corresponding byte of the pixel to the left (A), the pixel above (B), and the pixel above and to the left (C) or some combination thereof, and encodes the difference between the predicted value and the actual value. Filters are applied to byte values, not pixels; pixel values may be one or two bytes, or several values per byte, but never cross byte boundaries. The filter types are:
|Type byte||Filter name||Predicted value|
|0||None||Zero (so that the raw byte value passes through unaltered)|
|1||Sub||Byte A (to the left)|
|2||Up||Byte B (above)|
|3||Average||Mean of bytes A and B, rounded down|
|4||Paeth||A, B, or C, whichever is closest to p = A + B − C|
The Paeth filter is based on an algorithm by Alan W. Paeth. Compare to the version of DPCM used in lossless JPEG, and to the discrete wavelet transform using 1×2, 2×1, or (for the Paeth predictor) 2×2 windows and Haar wavelets.
Compression is further improved by choosing filter types adaptively on a line-by-line basis. This improvement, and a heuristic method of implementing it commonly used by PNG-writing software, were created by Lee Daniel Crocker, who tested the methods on many images during the creation of the format; the choice of filter is a component of file size optimization, as discussed below.
If interlacing is used, each stage of the interlacing is filtered separately, meaning that the image can be progressively rendered as each stage is received; however, interlacing generally makes compression less effective.
PNG offers an optional 2-dimensional, 7-pass interlacing scheme—the Adam7 algorithm. This is more sophisticated than GIF's 1-dimensional, 4-pass scheme, and allows a clearer low-resolution image to be visible earlier in the transfer, particularly if interpolation algorithms such as bicubic interpolation are used.
However, the 7-pass scheme tends to reduce the data's compressibility more than simpler schemes.
PNG itself does not support animation at all. MNG is an extension to PNG that does; it was designed by members of the PNG Group. MNG shares PNG's basic structure and chunks, but it is significantly more complex and has a different file signature, which automatically renders it incompatible with standard PNG decoders.
The complexity of MNG led to the proposal of APNG by developers of the Mozilla Foundation. It is based on PNG, supports animation and is simpler than MNG. APNG offers fallback to single-image display for PNG decoders that do not support APNG. However, neither of these formats is currently widely supported. APNG is supported in Firefox 3.0 and Opera 9.5. The PNG Group decided in April 2007 not to embrace APNG. Several alternatives were under discussion, ANG, aNIM/mPNG, “PNG in GIF” and its subset “RGBA in GIF”.
Comparison to other file formats
Comparison to Graphics Interchange Format (GIF)
- On small images, GIF can achieve greater compression than PNG (see the section on filesize, below).
- On most images, except for the above case, a GIF will have a larger file-size than an indexed PNG.
- PNG gives a much wider range of transparency options than GIF, including alpha channel transparency.
- Whereas GIF is limited to 8-bit indexed color, PNG gives a much wider range of color depths, including 24-bit (8 bits per channel) and 48-bit (16 bits per channel) truecolor, allowing for greater color precision, smoother fades, etc. When an alpha channel is added, up to 64 bits per pixel (before compression) are possible.
- When converting an image from the PNG format to GIF, the image quality may suffer due to posterization if the PNG image has more than 256 colors.
- GIF intrinsically supports animated images. PNG supports animation only via unofficial extensions (see the section on animation, above).
PNG images are less widely supported by older browsers. In particular, IE6 has limited support for PNG. As users adopt newer browsers, this becomes less of an issue.
Comparison to JPEG
JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group) format can produce a smaller file than PNG for photographic (and photo-like) images, since JPEG uses a lossy encoding method specifically designed for photographic image data, which is typically dominated by soft, low-contrast transitions, and an amount of noise or similar irregular structures. Using PNG instead of a high-quality JPEG for such images would result in a large increase in filesize with negligible gain in quality. In contrast, when storing images that contain text, line art, or graphics – images with sharp transitions and large areas of solid color – the PNG format can compress image data more than JPEG can. Additionally, PNG is lossless, while JPEG produces noticeable visual artifacts around high-contrast areas. Where an image contains both sharp transitions and photographic parts, a choice must be made between the two effects. JPEG does not support transparency.
Because JPEG uses lossy compression, it also suffers from generation loss, where repeatedly encoding and decoding an image progressively loses information and degrades the image. Because PNG is lossless, it is suitable for storing images to be edited. While PNG is reasonably efficient when compressing photographic images, there are lossless compression formats designed specifically for photographic images, lossless JPEG 2000 and Adobe DNG (digital negative) for example. However these formats are either not widely supported, or are proprietary. An image can be stored losslessly and converted to JPEG format only for distribution, so that there is no generation loss.
The PNG specification does not include a standard for embedding Exif image data from sources such as digital cameras. Instead, PNG has various dedicated ancillary chunks for storing the metadata that other file formats (such as JPEG) would typically store in Exif format.
Early web browsers did not support PNG images; JPEG and GIF were the main image formats. JPEG was commonly used when exporting images containing gradients for web pages, because of GIF's limited color depth. However, JPEG compression causes a gradient to blur slightly. A PNG file will reproduce a gradient as accurately as possible for a given bit depth, while keeping the file size small. PNG became the optimal choice for small gradient images as web browser support for the format improved.
Comparison to JPEG-LS
JPEG-LS is a "near-lossless" image format by the Joint Photographic Experts Group, though far less widely known and supported than the other lossy JPEG format discussed above. It is directly comparable with PNG,[clarification needed] and has a standard set of test images. On the Waterloo Repertoire ColorSet, a standard set of test images (unrelated to the JPEG-LS conformance test set), JPEG-LS generally performs better than PNG, by 10–15%, but on some images PNG performs substantially better, on the order of 50–75%. Thus, if both of these formats are options and file size is an important criterion, they should both be considered, depending on the image.
Comparison to TIFF
Tagged Image File Format (TIFF) is a format that incorporates an extremely wide range of options. While this makes TIFF useful as a generic format for interchange between professional image editing applications, it makes adding support for it to applications a much bigger task and so it has little support in applications not concerned with image manipulation (such as web browsers). It also means that many applications can read only a subset of TIFF types, potentially creating more user confusion.
The most common general-purpose, lossless compression algorithm used with TIFF is Lempel–Ziv–Welch (LZW). This compression technique, also used in GIF, was covered by patents until 2003. There is a TIFF variant[which?] that uses the same compression algorithm as PNG, but it is not supported by many proprietary programs. TIFF also offers special-purpose lossless compression algorithms like CCITT Group IV, which can compress bilevel images (e.g., faxes or black-and-white text) better than PNG's compression algorithm.
PNG supports non-premultiplied alpha only whereas TIFF also supports "associated" (premultiplied) alpha.
Bitmap graphics editor support for PNG
The PNG format is widely supported by graphics programs, including Adobe Photoshop, Corel's Photo-Paint and Paint Shop Pro, the GIMP, GraphicConverter, Helicon Filter, ImageMagick, Inkscape, IrfanView, Pixel image editor, Paint.NET and Xara Photo & Graphic Designer and many others. Some programs bundled with popular operating systems which support PNG include Microsoft's Paint and Apple's iPhoto and Preview, with the GIMP also often being bundled with popular Linux distributions.
Adobe Fireworks (formerly by Macromedia) uses PNG as its native file format, allowing other image editors and preview utilities to view the flattened image. However, Fireworks by default also stores meta data for layers, animation, vector data, text and effects. Such files should not be distributed directly. Fireworks can instead export the image as an optimized PNG without the extra meta data for use on web pages, etc.
Web browser support for PNG
Despite calls by the Free Software Foundation and the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), tools such as gif2png, and campaigns such as Burn All GIFs, PNG adoption on websites has been fairly slow due to late and buggy support in Internet Explorer, particularly regarding transparency.
PNG compatible browsers include: Apple Safari, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Camino, Internet Explorer 7 (still numerous issues), Internet Explorer 8 (still some issues), Internet Explorer 9 and many others. For the complete comparison, see Comparison of web browsers (Image format support).
Especially versions of Internet Explorer (Windows) below 9.0 have numerous problems which prevent it from correctly rendering PNG images.
- 4.0 crashes on large PNG chunks.
- 4.0 does not include the functionality to view .png files, but there is a registry fix.
- 5.0 and 5.01 have broken OBJECT support.
- 5.01 prints palette images with black (or dark gray) backgrounds under Windows 98, sometimes with radically altered colors.
- 6.0 fails to display PNG images of 4097 or 4098 bytes in size.
- 6.0 cannot open a PNG file that contains one or more zero-length IDAT chunks. This issue was first fixed in security update 947864 (MS08-024). For more information, see this article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base: 947864 MS08-024: Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer 
- 6.0 sometimes completely loses ability to display PNGs, but there are various fixes.
- 6.0 and below have broken alpha-channel transparency support (will display the default background color instead). However there are various fixes:
- Degradable PNG Transparency for IE6
- webfx - PNG Behavior (IE behavior/.htc)
- The PNG problem in Windows Internet Explorer (IE behavior/.htc) (unmaintained)
- TwinHelix - Near-native PNG support with alpha opacity to IE 5.5 and 6 (IE behavior/.htc)
- A Better IE 5.5 and 6 PNG Fix (supports CSS background-position, background-repeat) (IE behavior/.htc)
- PNG-24 Alpha Transparency With Microsoft Internet Explorer or better (MSIE 5.5+) (PHP)
- Cross Browser PNG Transparency (CSS)
- CSS PNG fix (with background call none fix) (CSS)
- SitePoint - Use 8-bit PNGs with Fireworks
- Use 8-bit PNGs with Photoshop and pngquant
- Dean Edwards’s IE7.js and IE8.js fixes this issue (for specially-named .PNG files, for performance reasons), and other IE 5.5, 6, and 7 CSS incompatibilities as well.
- 7.0 and below cannot combine 8-bit alpha transparency AND element opacity (CSS - filter: Alpha(opacity=xx)) without filling partially transparent sections with black.
- 8.0 and below have inconsistent/broken gamma support.
- 8.0 and below don't have color-correction support.
Operating system support for PNG icons
PNG icons have been supported in most distributions of Linux since at least 1999, in desktop environments such as GNOME. In 2006, Microsoft Windows support for PNG icons was introduced in Windows Vista. PNG icons are supported in AROS, Mac OS X, iOS and MorphOS as well. In addition, Android makes a large use of PNGs.
File size and optimization software
PNG file size can vary significantly depending on how it is encoded and compressed; this is discussed and a number of tips are given in PNG: The Definitive Guide.
Compared to GIF
Compared to GIF files, a PNG file with the same information (256 colors, no ancillary chunks/metadata), compressed by an effective compressor will normally be smaller than GIF. Depending on the file and the compressor, PNG may range from somewhat smaller (10%) to significantly smaller (50%) to somewhat larger (5%), but is rarely significantly larger for large images. This is attributed to the performance of PNG's DEFLATE compared to GIF's LZW, and because the added precompression layer of PNG's predictive filters take account of the 2-dimensional image structure to further compress files; as filtered data encodes differences between pixels, they will tend to cluster closer to 0, rather than being spread across all possible values, and thus be more easily compressed by DEFLATE. However, some versions of Adobe Photoshop, CorelDRAW and MS Paint provide poor PNG compression, creating the impression that GIF is more efficient.
File size factors
PNG files vary in size due to a number of factors:
- color depth
- Color depth can range from 1 to 64 bits per pixel.
- ancillary chunks
- PNG supports metadata—this may be useful for editing, but unnecessary for viewing, as on websites.
- As each pass of the Adam7 algorithm is separately filtered, this can increase file size.
- As a precompression stage, each line is filtered by a predictive filter, which can change from line to line. As the ultimate DEFLATE step operates on the whole image's filtered data, one cannot optimize this row-by-row; the choice of filter for each row is thus potentially very variable, though heuristics exist.
- With additional computation, DEFLATE compressors can produce smaller files.
There is thus a filesize trade-off between high color depth, maximal metadata (including color space information, together with information that does not affect display), interlacing, and speed of compression, which all yield large files, with lower color depth, fewer or no ancillary chunks, no interlacing, and tuned but computationally intensive filtering and compression. For different purposes one will choose different trade-offs: a maximal file may be best for archiving and editing, while a stripped down file may be best for use on a website, and similarly fast but poor compression is preferred when repeatedly editing and saving a file, while slow but high compression is preferred when a file is stable: when archiving or posting. Interlacing is a trade-off: it dramatically speeds up early rendering of large files (improves latency), but may increase file size (decrease throughput) for little gain, particularly for small files.
Lossy PNG compression
Even though PNG has been designed as a lossless format, PNG encoders can pre-process image data in a lossy fashion (so as to reduce colors used) to improve PNG compression.
Image editing software
Some programs are more efficient than others when saving PNG files, this relates to implementation of the PNG compression used by the program.
Many graphics programs (such as Apple's Preview software) save PNGs with large amounts of metadata and color-correction data that are generally unnecessary for Web viewing. Unoptimized PNG files from Adobe Fireworks are also notorious for this since they contain options to make the image editable in supported editors. Also CorelDRAW (at least version 11) sometimes produces PNGs which cannot be opened by Internet Explorer (versions 6–8).
Adobe Photoshop's performance on PNG files has improved in the CS Suite when using the Save For Web feature (which also allows explicit PNG/8 use).
Adobe's Fireworks saves larger PNG files than many programs by default. This stems from the mechanics of its Save format, the images produced by Fireworks save function include large, private chunks, containing complete layer and vector information. This allows further lossless editing. When saved with the Export option, Fireworks' PNGs are competitive with those produced by other image editors, but are no longer editable as anything but flattened bitmaps. Fireworks is unable to save size-optimized vector-editable PNGs.
Other notable examples of poor PNG compressors include:
- Microsoft's Paint for Windows XP
- Microsoft Picture It! Photo Premium 9
Poor compression increases the PNG file size but does not affect the image quality or compatibility of the file with other programs.
Because GIF is de facto limited to 256 colors (GIF87a Standard), image editors must automatically reduce the color depth when saving an image in GIF format. Often, when people save the same truecolor image as PNG and GIF, they see that the GIF is smaller, and do not realize that this is due to the color depth reduction, and that it is possible to create a 256-color PNG that has identical quality to the GIF with a smaller file size. Further, some tools may automatically create PNG files as 24-bit, even if the source image is 8-bit, bloating the file. This leads to the misconception that PNG files are larger than equivalent GIF files.
Various tools are available for optimizing PNG files; they do this by:
- (optionally) removing ancillary chunks,
- reducing color depth, either:
- use a palette (instead of RGB) if the image has 256 or fewer colors,
- use a smaller palette, if the image has 2, 4, or 16 colors, or
- (optionally) lossily discard some of the data in the original image,
- optimizing line-by-line filter choice, and
- optimizing DEFLATE compression.
- pngcrush has been existing for the longest time among the popular PNG optimizers. It allows for multiple trials on filter selection and compression arguments, and finally choose the smallest one. This working model is used in almost every png optimizer.
- OptiPNG was based on pngcrush and effectively supersedes it, by iterating over a wider range of compression parameters and performing trials in memory for faster execution, as well as performing automatic bit depth, color type and color palette reduction where possible. (pngcrush has the ability to do color reduction in a later version).
- Advpng from package AdvanceCOMP was made to use 7-zip's deflater(which is slower but have smaller output than zlib), to optimize png files. However, since PNG is filtered before deflate compression, while advpng uses filter 0 globally (in other words it only uses unfiltered data), it's not a good consideration for png optimization(In most scenarios, filtering helps more than a good deflater.)
Advdef from the same package, however, is able to recompress the zlib stream, acting as a re-deflater.
- pngout was made with the author's own deflater(same to the author's zip utility, kzip), while keeps all facilities of color reduction / filtering. However, pngout doesn't allow for using several trials on filters in a single run, so it's suggested to use its commercial GUI version, pngoutwin, or used with a wrapper to automates the trials or to recompress using its own deflater while keep the filter line by line.
- zopflipng was also made with a self-own deflater, zopfli. It has all the optimizing features optipng/pngcrush have (including automating trials) while provide a good deflater.
A simple comparison of their features is listed below.
|Optimizer||Chunk Removal||Color Reduction||Filtering||Filter Reuse||Multiple trials on filters in a single run||Deflater|
|Advpng||Yes||No||0||No||N/A||zopfli or 7-zip|
|Advdef||No||No||Don't deal with||Always||N/A||zopfli or 7-zip|
|OptiPNG||Yes||Yes||0-4 or adaptive||No||Yes||zlib|
|pngcrush||Yes||Yes||0-4 or adaptive||No||Yes||zlib|
|pngout||Yes||Yes||0-4 or adaptive||Yes||No||kzip|
|zopflipng||Yes||Yes||0-4 or adaptive with 2 different algorithms, or with a brute way||Yes||Yes||zopfli|
Before zopflipng was available, a good way in practice to perform a png optimization is to use a combination of 2 tools in sequence for optimal compression: one which optimizes filters (and removes ancillary chunks), and one which optimizes DEFLATE. Although pngout offers both but only one type of filter can be specified in a single run, therefore it can be used with a wrapper tool or in combination with optipng or pngcrush, acting as a re-deflater, like advdef.
Ancillary chunk removal
For removing ancillary chunks, most PNG optimization tools have the ability to remove all color correction data from PNG files (gamma, white balance, ICC color profile, standard RGB color profile). This often results in much smaller file sizes. For example, The following command line options achieve this with pngcrush:
pngcrush -rem gAMA -rem cHRM -rem iCCP -rem sRGB InputFile.png OutputFile.png
Ancillary chunks can also be losslessly removed using the free Win32 program PNGExtra.
OptiPNG, pngcrush, pngout, and zopflipng all offer options applying filter 0-4 globally or with a presdo filter 5, which applies filters line by line using an adaptive algorithm. Zopflipng offers 3 different adaptive method, one of them is presdo-brute(Not really uses 5^line count tries because it's not always the best filter set).
OptiPNG, pngcrush and zopflipng provide options so that they can try with different filter strategies in a single run and choose the best. The freeware command line version of pngout doesn't offer this, however the commercial version, pngoutwin, does.
AdvanceCOMP advdef, advpng Ken Silverman's PNGOUT and zopflipng employ DEFLATE compression algorithms that are more exhaustive and produce smaller files than the reference implementation, zlib, that is used by the other compressors.
However, advpng doesn't have an option to apply filters and always use filter 0 globally (i.e., unfiltered), therefore it should not be used where the image benefits a lot from the filtering. advdef from the same package, on the opposite, doesn't deal with PNG structure and acts only as a re-deflater, virtually keeping the filter settings.
Wrapper tools that simplify this workflow include: ImageOptim, a GUI front-end for Mac OS X; Kashmir Web Optimizer- GUI front-end for Windows; pngoptim a cmd batch script for Windows; imgopt, a command-line shell script that also losslessly optimizes JPEG images, Smush.it, an image-optimizing web service; TinyPNG, which provides compression by reducing the number of colors in the image automatically, but preserving alpha transparency; and Compress PNG that allows users to pick the number of colors that should be used.
The littleutils is another open-source package, containing a wrapper script called opt-png that uses pngcrush and a variant of pngrewrite to reduce bit-depth when possible. Perl scripts might wish to employ Image-Pngslimmer which allows some dynamic optimization.
The current version of IrfanView can use PNGOUT as an external plug-in, obviating the need for a separate compressor.
All wrapper tools are designed to use the optimizers to do several tries, then select the best result. Most wrappers just run all optimizers, and select the smallest file, so the best filter may not be paired with best deflater. Such wrappers may take longer to run, but not always have a good output(although, likely to be good enough compress to the file before optimization).
pngoptim is a windows command-line wrapper that runs in a reasonable way so that best filter is paired with best deflater, thus may always produce the smallest image file with less effort compared to other wrappers' brute way.
Since icons intended for Windows Vista and later versions may contain PNG subimages, the optimizations can be applied to them as well. At least one icon editor, Pixelformer, is able to perform a special optimization pass while saving ICO files, thereby reducing their sizes.
Icons for Mac OS X may also contain PNG subimages, yet there isn't such tool available.
- Comparison of graphics file formats
- Computer graphics, including:
- Image editing
- Image file formats
- Related graphics file formats
- Similar file formats
- Scalable Vector Graphics
- "ISO/IEC 15948:2004 - Information technology -- Computer graphics and image processing -- Portable Network Graphics (PNG): Functional specification". Retrieved 2011-02-19.
- "History of PNG". Libpng.org. 29 May 2010. Retrieved 2010-10-20.
- "Richard Stallman - Software Patents (University of Calgary 2005)". YouTube. 2012-04-13. Retrieved 2014-02-01.
- Matthias Gelbmann (January 31, 2013). "The PNG image file format is now more popular than GIF". W3Techs. Q-Success. Retrieved March 22, 2013. "PNG is now used on 62.4% of all websites, just ahead of GIF with 62.3%."
- TBH View profile More options (6 January 1995). "Thoughts on a GIF-replacement file format". Groups.google.com. Retrieved 2010-10-20.
- "PNG standard, section 8.4". "PNG itself is strictly a single-image format. (...) In the future, a multiple-image format based on PNG may be defined. Such a format will be considered a separate file format"
- Thomas Boutell (1 March 1997). "PNG (Portable Network Graphics) Specification 1.0".
- "PNG (Portable Network Graphics) Specification, Version 1.1–12. Appendix: Rationale". Libpng.org. Retrieved 2010-10-20.
- Glenn Randers-Pehrson & Thomas Boutell (editors) (1999). "Chunk Specifications". PNG (Portable Network Graphics) Specification, Version 1.2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Retrieved 30 Jan 2011.
- "Portable Network Graphics (PNG) Specification (Second Edition)". W3.org. Retrieved 2013-05-01.
- "Portable Network Graphics (PNG) Specification (Second Edition) Information technology — Computer graphics and image processing — Portable Network Graphics (PNG): Functional specification. ISO/IEC 15948:2003 (E) W3C Recommendation 10 November 2003".
- "PNG News from 2006". Libpng.org.
- Portable Network Graphics (PNG) Specification (Second Edition): 11.2.2 IHDR Image header.
- PNG Specification: Rationale
- "Portable Network Graphics (PNG) Specification (Second Edition): 9 Filtering". W3.org. Retrieved 2010-10-20.
- "Filter Algorithms". PNG Specification.
- Paeth, A.W., "Image File Compression Made Easy", in Graphics Gems II, James Arvo, editor. Academic Press, San Diego, 1991. ISBN 0-12-064480-0.
- Crocker, Lee Daniel (July 1995). "PNG: The Portable Network Graphic Format". Dr. Dobb's Journal 20 (232): 36–44.
- "Introduction to PNG". nuwen.net. Retrieved 2010-10-20.
- "Opera Desktop Team: Post-Alpha Opera 9.5 Release". My.opera.com. Retrieved 2010-10-20.
- "Vote failed: APNG 20070405a". 20 April 2007.
- Comparison of animated PNG format proposals
- "A Basic Introduction to PNG Features". Libpng.org. Retrieved 2010-10-20.
- "GIF, PNG, JPG. Which One To Use?". Sitepoint.com. 3 August 2009. Retrieved 2010-10-20.
- "T.87 : Lossless and near-lossless compression of continuous-tone still images - Baseline". International Telecommunication Union. Retrieved 20 March 2011.
- Chapter 9. Compression and Filtering, in PNG: The Definitive Guide by Greg Roelofs.
- "Use of PNG Images to Display Data". Oregon Water Science Center. 16 February 2006.
- "Why There Are No GIF files on GNU Web Pages". GNU Operating System. 16 December 2008.
- "PNG Fact Sheet". World Wide Web Consortium. 7 October 1996.
- "PNG Transparency in Internet Explorer". PC Magazine. 5 October 2004.
- "Browsers with PNG Support". 14 March 2009.
- "Windows Explorer Crashes When I Click on a Fireworks PNG File to View It". Adobe Systems. 5 June 2007.
- "Unable to view .png images with Internet Explorer 4.0". Microsoft Knowledge Base.
- "PNG Graphics That Are Inside of an Object Tag Print as a Negative Image". Microsoft Knowledge Base.
- "PNG Images Are Printed Improperly in Internet Explorer 5.01". Microsoft Knowledge Base.
- "You cannot view some PNG images in Internet Explorer 6". Microsoft Knowledge Base.
- "You cannot use Internet Explorer 6 to open a PNG file that contains one or more zero-length IDAT chunks". Microsoft Knowledge Base.
- "PNG Frequently Asked Questions".
- "PhD: Portable Network Graphics Lose Transparency in Web Browser". Microsoft Knowledge Base.
- "PNG Files Do Not Show Transparency in Internet Explorer". Microsoft Knowledge Base.
- Lovitt, Michael (21 December 2002). "Cross-Browser Variable Opacity with PNG: A Real Solution". A List Apart.
- "IE7 alpha transparent PNG + opacity". Channel 9.
- Fulbright, Michael (1999). "GNOME 1.0 Library Roadmap".
- "Windows Vista - Icons". OOne. 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-12.
- The filtering is used to increase the similarity to the data, hence increasing the compression ratio. However, there is theoretically no formula for similarity, nor absolute relationship between the similarity and compressor, thus unless the compression is done, one can't tell one filter set is better than another.
- "PNG can be a lossy format". Pngmini.com. Retrieved 2014-02-01.
- Truţa, Cosmin. "A guide to PNG optimization".
- Use pngout -f6 to reuse previous filter set
- The tools offering such feature could act as a pure re-deflater to PNG files.
- The reference deflater implementation, zlib, is not good enough. See Page Zopfli, zip format in 7-zip and pngout
- Not only advpng doesn't support color reduction, it also fails with the images with a reduced colorspace
- Advpng can only apply filter 0 globally, thus it's neither yes or no, but N/A.
- Advdef only works to inflate the deflated data, and re-deflate it
- [optipng|pngcrush|pngout] -f OR zopflipng --filters
- zopflipng --filters=p
- In Pngoutwin's setting dialog when it's about to start an optimization, the user has checkboxes to select what filter strategies to be used.
- If not configured correctly, zopflipng and pngout, the optimizers with virtually best deflaters, may use a very poor filter therefore beaten by those optimizers who tries to apply all filter strategies and choose the smallest one but with a poor deflater, zlib.
- PNGOptim's workflow
- Roelofs, Greg (April 1997). "Linux Gazette: History of the Portable Network Graphics (PNG) Format". Linux Journal (Specialized Systems Consultants, Inc.) 1997 (36es). ISSN 1075-3583.
- Roelofs, Greg (2003). PNG: The Definitive Guide (2nd ed.). O'Reilly Media. ISBN 1-56592-542-4.
- An introduction to the PNG image format — Including test images, file editing tips, and reviews of PNG image tools for Windows.
- RFC 2083
- PNG transparency test
- "The Lonely Planet" — PNG-based animation for web browsers
- More information about PNG color correction
- The GD-library to generate dynamic PNG-files with PHP
- A guide to PNG optimization
- PNG Adam7 interlacing
- lodepng: by Lode Vandevenne. An open source PNG encoder and decoder for C and C++ with no external dependencies.
- PNGJ: A pure Java PNG encoder and decoder.
- OptiPNG PNG optimizer
- Encoding Web Shells in PNG files: Encoding human readable data inside an IDAT block.