Portal talk:Star

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former featured portal candidate This portal is a former featured portal candidate. Please see the links under Portal milestones below for its original nomination page and why the nomination failed.
          This page is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Astronomy / Astronomical objects  (Rated Portal-class)
WikiProject icon Portal:Star is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.
 Portal  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
 
WikiProject Mythology (Rated Portal-class)
WikiProject icon This page is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.
 Portal  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

Interested for a userbox, or recognition of you edits to this portal, here it is:

STEREO-A first images.jpg This user is one of the maintainers of Portal:Star.


Suggestions[edit]

Good enough for featured portal. Please give suggestions. --Extra999 (Contact me + contribs) 11:09, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

The DYK section should be documented on the talk page, otherwise, it should be deleted, since it is highly questionable that what is said there is even true. 76.66.198.79 (talk) 05:17, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Well, the sources are :
1. (First fact) First source, Second source and the Third Source
2. (Second fact) First and only source (and its first fact)
3. (Third fact) First Source and the Second Source (and its second fact)
4. (Fourth fact) First and only source (and its seventh section)
I have also listed them in the DYK talk page. --Extra999 (Contact me + contribs) 06:27, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Ok i have had this problem before and we solved by adding the links --see here......Buzzzsherman (talk) 18:20, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
The first "fact" is wrong, the supporting sources for it even says it is wrong. 76.66.194.32 (talk) 04:56, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
You did the right thing...if source is not good..the statement should be removed,,as you did GJ...Moxy (talk) 17:38, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia[edit]

I feel like saying that wikipedia (for all its contents, not only articles, but portals and every other special page that conforms it) is a very very incredible internet site, the best one ever made which (and I quote) aims for archiving the sum af all human knowledge. I wish I could donate if I weren't poor. - 189.217.170.15 (talk) 03:39, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

And I don´t feel like those previous words express how much I apreciate wikipedia; not close to the real thing. - 189.217.170.15 (talk) 03:40, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
You are a real champion of Wikipedia. Well, if you could not donate, please continue editing. --Extra999 (Contact me + contribs) 12:18, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

I think wiki is missing γ-process for supernovae[edit]

Scaling relations for the supernova γ-process and the 176Lu nuclear cosmochronometer, thanks, Marasama (talk) 15:26, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Hmm..please add, your contribution would be really appreciated. --Extra 999 (Contact me + contribs) 03:32, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
I'm not an expert in that area. The best of my knowledge is that I know it exists and are from Supernovae. Thanks, Marasama (talk) 22:17, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Me too, needs some experts from here. --Extra 999 (Contact me + contribs) 16:47, 18 May 2010 (UTC)