Preliminary ruling

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

A preliminary ruling is a decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on the interpretation of European Union law, made at the request of a court of a European Union Member State. They are called preliminary rulings because the referring national court, which remains responsible for resolving the specific dispute before it, will stay its own proceedings until its question(s) about the interpretation or validity of EU law have been answered. Preliminary rulings can also be made, in certain circumstances, by the European General Court, although most are made by the ECJ.

A request (or reference) for a preliminary ruling is made by submitting questions to the CJEU for resolution. However, questions are not answered in abstraction, but rather are submitted together with the circumstances leading up to their being asked. Thus, whilst the CJEU is limited to deciding the law in question, the ECJ's ruling frequently leaves little room to rule other than in a certain way. The CJEU may also decline to give judgement in the absence of a genuine dispute.[1]

Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union states the following:

"The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings concerning:
(a) the interpretation of the Treaties;
(b) the validity and interpretation of acts of the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union;
Where such a question is raised before any court or tribunal of a Member State, that court or tribunal may, if it considers that a decision on the question is necessary to enable it to give judgment, request the Court to give a ruling thereon.
Where any such question is raised in a case pending before a court or tribunal of a Member State against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law, that court or tribunal shall bring the matter before the Court.
If such a question is raised in a case pending before a court or tribunal of a Member State with regard to a person in custody, the Court of Justice of the European Union shall act with the minimum of delay."

What constitutes a "court or tribunal" is a matter of Union law and it is not to be determined by reference to national law.[2] In determining whether or not a body is a "court or tribunal of Member State" the European Courts will take a number of issues into account, namely whether—

  1. it is established by law,
  2. it is permanent,
  3. its jurisdiction is compulsory,
  4. it has an inter partes procedure,
  5. it applies rules of law, and
  6. it is independent.[3]

However, these criteria are not absolute. In Broekmeulen v Huisarts Registratie Commissie[4] the ECJ ruled that a body established under the auspices of the Royal Medical Society for the Promotion of Medicine was a "court or tribunal" within the meaning of the treaty, even though that society was a private association. Also the Benelux Court of Justice was considered a court within this context, as a court common to several (Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg) Member States.

Footnotes[edit]

  1. ^ Case 244/80, Pasquale Foglia v. Mariella Novello paragraph 18.
  2. ^ Case C-24/92, Corbiau v Administration des Contributions at paragraph 15.
  3. ^ Case C-54/96 Dorsch Consult Ingenieurgesellschaft v Bundesbaugesellschaft Berlin at paragraph 23.
  4. ^ Case 246/80, C. Broekmeulen v Huisarts Registratie Commissie