Prevalence of female genital mutilation by country
||This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: Stats are way, way off, e.g. under Eritrea:"About 50% of the women in rural areas undergo Type III"; see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Female_genital_mutilation#Prevalence_stats_way_off. We could say "About 50% of the women in rural areas have undergoing Type III," but should also note that in 2014, only about 1-4% of girls are undergoing FGM at all.. (October 2014)|
||This article does not follow Wikipedia's guidelines on the use of different tenses. (October 2014)|
Female genital mutilation (FGM) is practised in 30 countries in western, eastern, and north-eastern Africa, in parts of the Middle East and Asia, and within some immigrant communities in Europe, North America and Australia. The WHO defines the practice as "all procedures that involve partial or total removal of the external female genitalia, or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons."
According to a 2013 UNICEF report, Egypt has the world's highest total number with 27.2 million women having undergone FGM, while Somalia has the highest incidence rate of FGM at 98%. Estimates about the prevalence of FGM vary by source.
Classifications of FGM
The WHO identifies four types of FGM:
- Type I: removal of the clitoral hood, the skin around the clitoris (Ia), with partial or complete removal of the clitoris (Ib);
- Type II: removal of the labia minora (IIa), with partial or complete removal of the clitoris (IIb) and the labia majora (IIc);
- Type III: removal of all or part of the labia minora (IIIa) and labia majora (IIIb), and the stitching of a seal across the vagina, leaving a small opening for the passage of urine and menstrual blood (infibulation);
- Type IV: other miscellaneous acts, including cauterization of the clitoris, cutting of the vagina (gishiri cutting), and introducing corrosive substances into the vagina to tighten it.
FGM is practiced in Africa, the Middle East, Indonesia and Malaysia, as well as some migrants in Europe, United States and Australia. It is also seen in some populations of South Asia. The highest known prevalence rates are in 30 African countries, in a band that stretches from Senegal in West Africa to Ethiopia on the east coast, as well as from Egypt in the north to Tanzania in the south.
According to a 2013 UNICEF report based on surveys completed by select countries, FGM is known to be prevalent in 27 African countries, Yemen and Iraqi Kurdistan, where 125 million women and girls have undergone FGM. The UNICEF report notes FGM is found in countries beyond the 29 countries it covered, and the total worldwide number is unknown. Other reports claim the prevalence of FGM in countries not discussed by the 2013 UNICEF report. The practice occurs in Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Iraq, Syria, Oman, United Arab Emirates and Qatar. Earlier reports claimed the prevalence of FGM in Israel among the Negev Bedouin, which by 2009 has virtually disappeared.
As a result of immigration, FGM has also spread to Europe, Australia, and the United States, with some families having their daughters undergo the procedure while on vacation overseas. As Western governments become more aware of FGM, legislation has come into effect in many countries to make the practice a criminal offense. In 2006, Khalid Adem became the first man in the United States to be prosecuted for mutilating his daughter.
Much of the FGM prevalence data currently available is based on verbal surveys and self-reporting. Clinical examinations are uncommon. The assumption is that women respond truthfully when asked about their FGM status and that they know the type and extent of FGM that was performed on their genitalia. However, many FGM procedures are performed at a very young age, many cultures feel a taboo about such discussions, and a number of such factors raise the possibility that the validity of survey responses might be incorrect, potentially underreported. In Oman, for example, some do not wish to discuss FGM from the fear that such discussion is showing their culture's dirty laundry to the world, causing criticism of a practice that they believe is purely religious.
In countries where FGM has been outlawed, fear of prosecution of family members or self, and social disapproval from elders may cause women to deny that they underwent or were subjected to FGM. For example, the self-reported circumcision status of women aged 15–49 was verbally surveyed in 1995 in northern Ghana. The same women were interviewed again in 2000 after the enactment of a law that criminalized FGM and Ghana-wide public campaigns against the practice. This study discovered that 13% of women who reported in 1995 that they had undergone FGM denied it in the 2000 interview, with youngest age group girls denying at rates as high as 50%.
UNICEF has revised its data on the FGM prevalence rates in the Kurdistan region of the Middle East:
Where is FGM/C practiced? There are reports, but no clear evidence, of a limited incidence in (..) certain Kurdish communities in Iraq.—UNICEF (2005), 
Female Genital Mutilation or Cutting (FGM/C): 1 in 2 young girls (15-24) has experienced FGM/C when they were younger in Erbil and Sulaymaniyah governorates (Kurdistan Region).—UNICEF (2011), 
In July 2003, at its second summit, the African Union adopted the Maputo Protocol promoting women's rights and calling for an end to FGM. The agreement came into force in November 2005, and by December 2008, 25 member countries had ratified it.
As of 2013, according to a UNICEF report, 24 African countries have legislations or decrees against FGM/C practice; these countries are: Benin, Burkina Faso, Central African Republic, Chad, Côte d'Ivoire, Djibouti, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria (some states), Senegal, Somalia, Sudan (some states), Tanzania, Togo and Uganda (see page 9 of the report) and Zambia and South Africa (see page 8).
In 2014 The Girl Generation, an Africa-led campaign to oppose FGM worldwide, was launched. 
- Female genital mutilation is present in South Algeria among Sub-Saharan African migrants.
- Benin (13% prevalence, Type II)
- Female genital mutilation is prevalent in Benin. According to a 2006 survey, 13% of Benin women have been subjected to FGM. This is a decline over the 2001 survey, which reported 17%. The prevalence varies with religion in Benin; FGM is prevalent in 49% of Muslim women, 15% of Protestants, 12% of traditional religions and 7% of Roman Catholic women. A 2003 law banns all forms of FGM.
- Burkina Faso (77% prevalence, Type II)
- According to a 2003 survey, FGM is prevalent in 77% of women in Burkina Faso. The 1998 survey, reported a rate of only 72%. However, this is not considered as evidence of an increase in the practice, but reflects the worldwide fact that better and more information is increasingly available on FGM. The prevalence varies with religion in Burkina Faso; FGM is prevalent in 82% of Muslim women, 73% of traditional religions, 69% of Roman Catholics and 65% of Protestants. In a 2011 study on a wide range of variables, FGM prevalence characteristics in Burkina Faso was found to be strongly associated with religion, and age being the other important variable. A law prohibiting FGM was enacted in 1996 and went into effect in February 1997. Even before this law, however, a presidential decree had set up the National Committee against excision and imposed fines on people guilty of excising girls and women. The new law includes stricter punishment. Several women excising girls have been handed prison sentences. Burkina Faso ratified the Maputo Protocol in 2006.
- Cameroon (1.4% prevalence, Type I and II)
- Female genital mutilation is prevalent in Cameroon. According to a survey on FGM in 2004, FGM prevalence rate was 1.4%. Even though national rate is low, there are regions with high prevalence rate. In extreme north Cameroon, the prevalence rate is 13% for the Fulbe people and people of Arab descent. The prevalence varies with religion; FGM is prevalent in 6% of Muslim women, less than 1% of Christians, and 0% for Animist women. Cameroon's national penal code does not classify genital mutilation as a criminal offence. However, article 277 criminalizes aggravated assault, including aggravated assault to organs. A draft law has been pending for over 10 years.
- Central African Republic (25.7% prevalence, Type I and II)
- WHO gives the prevalence of FGM in Central African Republic at 25.7% in 2008. A survey from 2000 found FGM was prevalent in 36% of Central African Republic women. This is a decline over the 1994 survey, which reported 43%. The prevalence in the 2000 survey varied with religion in Central African Republic; FGM was prevalent in 46% of Animist women, 39% of Muslim, 36% of Protestants, and 35% of Catholic women. In 1996, the President issued an Ordinance prohibiting FGM throughout the country. It has the force of national law. Any violation of the Ordinance is punishable by imprisonment of from one month and one day to two years and a fine of 5,100 to 100,000 francs (approximately US$8–160). No arrests are known to have been made under the law.
- Chad (45% prevalence, Type II and III)
- According to Chad's first survey on FGM in 2004, FGM prevalence rate was 45%. The prevalence varies with religion in Chad; FGM is prevalent in 61% of Muslim women, 31% of Catholics, 16% of Protestants, and 12% of traditional religions. The prevalence also varies with ethnic groups; the Arabs (95%), Hadjarai (94%), Ouadai (91%) and Fitri-batha (86%), and less than 2.5% among the Gorane, Tandjile and Mayo-Kebbi. Law no 6/PR/2002 on the promotion of reproductive health has provisions prohibiting FGM, but does not provide for sanctions. FGM may be punished under existing laws against assault, wounding, and mutilation of the body. 
- Côte d'Ivoire (36.4% prevalence, Type II)
- According to the WHO, in 2006, the prevalence of FGM was 36.4% among women aged 15-49 in Côte d’Ivoire. A 2005 survey  found that 42% of all women aged between 15 and 49 had been subjected to FGM. This is similar to the FGM reported rate of 46% in 1998 and 43% in 1994. The prevalence varies with religion in Côte d'Ivoire; FGM is prevalent in 76% of Muslim women, 45% of Animist, 14% of Catholic and 13% of Protestant women. A December 18, 1998 law provides that harm to the integrity of the genital organ of a woman by complete or partial removal, excision, desensitization or by any other procedure will, if harmful to a women's health, be punishable by imprisonment of one to five years and a fine of 360,000 to two million CFA Francs (approximately US$576–3,200). The penalty is five to twenty years incarceration if a death occurs during the procedure and up to five years' prohibition of medical practice, if this procedure is carried out by a doctor.
- Democratic Republic of the Congo (5% prevalence, Type II)
- Female genital mutilation is practiced in the Congo.  FGM is illegal: the law imposes a penalty of two to five years of prison and a fine of 200,000 Congolese francs on any person who violates the "physical or functional integrity" of the genital organs. 
- Djibouti (90–98% prevalence, Type I, II and III)
- Estimates for FGM prevalence rate of FGM in Djibouti range from 93% to 98%. According to a UNICEF 2010 report, Djibouti has the world's second highest rate of Type III FGM, with about two thirds of all Djibouti women undergoing the procedure; Type I is the next most common form of female circumcision practiced in the country. Like its neighboring countries, a large percentage of women in Djibouti also undergo re-infibulation after birth or a divorce. Two thirds of the women claimed tradition and religion as the primary motivation for undergoing FGM. A predominantly Muslim country, Islamic clerics in Djibouti have been divided on the FGM issue, with some actively supporting the practice and others opposing it. FGM was outlawed in the country's revised Penal Code that went into effect in April 1995. Article 333 of the Penal Code provides that persons found guilty of this practice will face a five year prison term and a fine of one million Djibouti francs (approximately US$5,600). Djibouti ratified the Maputo Protocol in 2005.
- Egypt (78–97% prevalence, Type I, II and III)
- Egypt's Ministry of Health and Population has banned all forms of female genital mutilation since 2007. The ministry's order declared it is 'prohibited for any doctors, nurses, or any other person to carry out any cut of, flattening or modification of any natural part of the female reproductive system'. Islamic authorities in the nation also stressed that Islam opposes female genital mutilation. The Grand Mufti of Egypt, Ali Gomaa, said that it is "Prohibited, prohibited, prohibited." Egypt passed a law banning FGM. The June 2007 Ministry ban eliminated a loophole that allowed girls to undergo the procedure for health reasons. There had previously been provisions under the Penal Code involving "wounding" and "intentional infliction of harm leading to death", as well as a ministerial decree prohibiting FGM. In December 1997, the Court of Cassation (Egypt's highest appeals court) upheld a government banning of the practice providing that those who did not comply would be subjected to criminal and administrative punishments. According to a survey in the year 2000, a study found that 97% of the country's population still practiced FGM; a 2005 study found that over 95% of Egyptian women have undergone some form of FGM.
- Eritrea (89% prevalence, Type I, II, and III)
- The government of Eritrea surveyed and published an official FGM prevalence rate of 89% in 2003. About 50% of the women in rural areas undergo Type III with stitching to close vulva, while Type I and II are more common in urban areas. Overall, about a third of all women in Eritrea undergo Type III FGM with stitching. Most FGM (68%) are performed on baby girls less than 1 year old, another 20% before they turn 5 year old. About 60% of Eritrean women believe FGM is a religious requirement. The prevalence varies with woman's religion, as well as by their ethnic group; FGM is prevalent in 99% of Muslim women, 89% of Catholics and 85% of Protestants. Eritrea outlawed all forms of female genital mutilation with Proclamation 158/2007 in March 2007. The law envisions a fine and imprisonment for anyone conducting or commissioning FGM.
- Ethiopia (74.3% prevalence, Type I, II, III, and IV)
- The WHO gives a prevalence of 74.3% for FGM in 2005. According to a 2005 UNICEF report, Ethiopia's Regional statistics of the prevalence from the survey are: Afar Region – 94.5%; Harare Region – 81.2%; Amhara Region – 81.1%; Oromia Region – 79.6%; Addis Ababa City – 70.2%; Somali Region – 69.7%; Beneshangul Gumuz Region – 52.9%; Tigray Region – 48.1%; Southern Region – 46.3%. The prevalence also varies with religion in Ethiopia; FGM is prevalent in 92% of Muslim women, 72% of Protestants, 67% of Catholics and 67% of Traditional Religions. FGM has been made illegal by the 2004 Penal Code. 
- Gambia (76% prevalence, Type I, II, III and IV)
- Female genital mutilation is prevalent in Gambia. A 2006 UNICEF survey found a 78.3% prevalence rate in Gambia. According to another 2013 report, an estimated 76.3% of girls and women have been subjected to FGM/C. The age when FGM is done on Gambian girls ranges from 7 days after birth up to pre-adolescence. Gambia's predominant religion is Islam (90%), and it has many ethnic groups. Prevalence rates of FGM/C vary significantly between the ethnic groups: Sarahule (FGM rate of 98%), Mandinka (97%), Djola (87%), Serer (43%), and Wolof (12%). Urban areas report FGM/C rates of about 56%, whereas in rural areas, rates exceed 90%. A majority of Gambian women who underwent FGM/C claimed they did it primarily because religion mandates it. A 2011 clinical study reports 66% FGMs in Gambia were Type I, 26% were Type II and 8% Type III. About a third of all women in Gambia with FGM/C, including Type I, suffered health complications because of the procedure. Gambia has no law that prohibits FGM, and it does not prosecute it on the basis of any other criminal laws. The Gambian parliament and activists have been deliberating a law to address FGM.
- Ghana (3.8% - 40% prevalence, Type I, II and III)
- Female genital mutilation is prevalent in Ghana. In 1989, the head of the government of Ghana, President Rawlings, issued a formal declaration against FGM. Article 39 of Ghana's Constitution also provides in part that traditional practices that are injurious to a person's health and well being are abolished. The Criminal Code was amended in 1994 to outlaw FGM, and the law was strengthened in 2007.  Ghana ratified the Maputo Protocol in 2007.
- Guinea (96% prevalence, Type I, II and III)
- Guinea has the second highest FGM prevalence rate in the world. According to a 2005 survey, 96% of all Guinea women aged between 15 and 49 have been cut. That is a slight decline in the practice from the 1999 recorded FGM rate of 98.6%. Among the 15 to 19 year olds the prevalence was 89%, among 20 to 24 year olds 95%. About 50% of the women in Guinea believe FGM is a religious requirement. Guinea is predominantly a Muslim country, with 90% of the population practicing Islam. However, the high FGM rates are observed across all religions in Guinea; FGM is prevalent in 99% of Muslim women, 94% of Catholics and Protestants, and 93% of Animist women. FGM is illegal in Guinea under Article 265 of the Penal Code. The law sentences death to the perpetrator if the girl dies within 40 days after the FGM. Article 6 of the Guinean Constitution, which outlaws cruel and inhumane treatment, could be interpreted to include these practices, should a case be brought to the Supreme Court. Guinea signed the Maputo Protocol in 2003 but has not ratified it. Article 305 of Guinea’s penal code also bans FGM, but nobody has yet been sentenced under any of Guinea's FGM-related laws. In Guinea, instead of stopping FGM, the trend is towards medicalisation of FGM, where the mutilation is advertised under hygienic conditions by medically trained staff, who see FGM practice an additional source of income. Per the above 2005 survey, 27% of girls were cut by medically trained staff.
- Guinea-Bissau (50% prevalence)
- Female genital mutilation is present in Guinea-Bissau. A law banning the practice nationwide was made in 2011.
- Kenya (27% prevalence, Type I, II and III)
- Female genital mutilation is prevalent in Kenya. The 2009 FGM survey in Kenya indicates that 27% of women aged between 15 and 49 have undergone FGM. By contrast, the 2003 survey reported a 32% rate, while 1998 rate was 38%. The statistical analysis of age group data confirms FGM practice is falling in Kenya. Of those women who have undergone FGM, the vast majority (83%) undergo Type II excision. In the Northeastern Province the prevalence is 98%, Eastern Province is 36% and Western Province 1%. FGM is common among the Kisii people (96%) and the Massai (73%), according to 2009 survey. Many other ethnic groups of Kenya practice FGM. The prevalence varies with religion in Kenya; FGM is prevalent in 50% of Muslim women, 33% of Catholics, 30% of Protestant women. In 2001 Kenya enacted the Children’s Act, under the provisions of which FGM was criminalized when practiced on girls younger than 18. The practice was made illegal nationwide in September 2011.
- Liberia (58% prevalence, Type II)
- Female genital mutilation is prevalent in Liberia. Genital mutilation is a taboo subject in Liberia. It is difficult to get accurate data on FGM prevalence rate. However, it is known that FGM procedure is mandatory for initiation of women into the secret Liberia and Sierra Leone society called the Sande society, sometimes called Bondo. A 2007 demographic survey asked women if they belonged to Sande society. It was assumed that those who were part of Sande society had undergone FGM. Based on this estimation method, the prevalence of FGM in Liberia has been estimated as 58%. Liberia has consented to international charters such as CEDAW as well as Africa's Maputo Protocol. Nevertheless, national legislation explicitly making FGM punishable by law has yet to be passed.
- Mali (85.2% - 92% prevalence, Type I, II and III)
- Female genital mutilation is prevalent in Mali. The WHO gives a prevalence of 85.2% for women aged 15-49 in 2006 in Mali. According to a 2007 report, 92% of all Mali women between the ages of 15 and 49 have been subjected to FGM. The rates of FGM are lower only among the Sonrai (28%), the Tamachek (32%) and the Bozo people (76%). Nearly half are Type I, another half Type II. The prevalence varies with religion in Mali; FGM is prevalent in 92% of Muslim women, 76% of Christians. About 64% of the women of Mali believe FGM is a religious requirement. In 2002, Mali created a government program aimed at discouraging FGM (Ordinance No. 02-053 portant creation du programme national de lutte contre la pratique de l’excision [Ordinance creating a National Program to Fight the Practice of Female Genital Mutilation]). There is however no specific legislation criminalizing FGM.
- Mauritania (71% prevalence, Type I and II)
- Female genital mutilation is prevalent in Mauritania. According to 2001 survey, 71% of all women aged between 15 and 49 had undergone FGM. A 2007 demographic cluster study found no change in FGM prevalence rate in Mauritania. Type II FGM is most frequent. About 57% of Mauritania women believe FGM is a religious requirement. Mauritania is 99% Muslim. The FGM prevalence rate varies by ethnic groups: 92% of Soninke women are cut, about 70% of Fulbe and Moorish women, but only 28% of Wolof women have undergone FGM. Mauritania has consented to international charters such as CEDAW as well as Africa's Maputo Protocol. Ordonnance n°2005-015 on child protection restricts FGM.
- Niger (2%-20% prevalence, Type II)
- Female genital mutilation is prevalent in Niger. According to 2006 survey, about 2% of Niger women have undergone FGM/C. In 1998, Niger reported a 4.5% prevalence rate. This survey data is potentially incorrect because, adjusted for age group, the women who claimed to have experienced FGM at the previous survey still are, albeit in a different age group. However, the 2006 survey implies more women had never experienced FGM than previously reported. The DHS surveyors claim the adoption of criminal legislation and fear of prosecution may explain why Niger women did not want to report having ever been circumcised. A WHO report estimates the prevalence rate of FGM in Niger to be 20%. Other sources, including a UNICEF 2009 report, claim FGM rates are high in Niger. A law banning FGM was passed in 2003 by the Niger government.
- Nigeria (30% prevalence, Type I, II, III and IV)
- A 2008 demographic survey found 30% of all Nigerian women have been subjected to FGM. This contrasts with 25% reported by a 1999 survey, and 19% by 2003 survey. This suggests no trend, unreliable past or most recent survey data in some regions, as well as the possibility that a number of women are increasingly willing to acknowledge having undergone FGM. Another possible explanation for higher 2008 prevalence rate is the definition of FGM used, which included Type IV FGMs. In some parts of Nigeria, the vagina walls are cut in new born girls or other traditional practices performed - such as the angurya and gishiri cuts - which fall under Type IV FGM classification of the World Health Organization. Over 80% of all FGMs are performed on girls under one year of age. The prevalence varies with religion in Nigeria; FGM is prevalent in 31% of Catholics, 27% of Protestant and 7% of Muslim women. There is no federal law banning the practice of FGM in Nigeria. Opponents of these practices rely on Section 34(1)(a) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria that states "no person shall be subjected to torture or inhuman or degrading treatment" as the basis for banning the practice nationwide. A member of the House of Representatives has drafted a bill, not yet in committee, to outlaw this practice. Nigeria ratified the Maputo Protocol in 2005. A few states of Nigeria, including Abia, Bayelsa, Cross River, Delta, Ogun, Osun and Rivers State have passed laws to address FGMs. These laws are being mocked by excisers who conduct FGMs, and they dare any law enforcement agent to arrest them.
- Republic of the Congo (5% prevalence, Type II)
- Female genital mutilation is practiced in the Republic of the Congo.
- Senegal (28% prevalence, Type II and III)
- Female genital mutilation is prevalent in Senegal. According to 2005 survey, FGM prevalence rate is 28% of all women aged between 15 and 49. There are significant differences in regional prevalence. FGM is most widespread in the Southern Senegal (94% in Kolda Region) and in Northeastern Senegal (93% in Matam Region). FGM rates are lower in other regions: Tambacounda (86%), Ziguinchor (69%), and less than 5% in Diourbel and Louga Regions. Senegal is 94% Muslim. The FGM prevalence rate varies by religion: 29% of Muslim women have undergone FGM, 16% of Animists, and 11% of Christian women. A law that was passed in January 1999 makes FGM illegal in Senegal. President Diouf had appealed for an end to this practice and for legislation outlawing it. The law modifies the Penal Code to make this practice a criminal act, punishable by a sentence of one to five years in prison. A spokesperson for the human rights group RADDHO (The African Assembly for the Defense of Human Rights) noted in the local press that "Adopting the law is not the end, as it will still need to be effectively enforced for women to benefit from it. Senegal ratified the Maputo Protocol in 2005.
- Sierra Leone (91% prevalence, Type I and II)
- Female genital mutilation is prevalent in Sierra Leone. According to a 2008 survey, 91% of women in Sierra Leone between the ages of 15 and 49 have undergone FGM. The highest rate of prevalence is in the Northern Sieraa Leone (97%). Type II is most common, but Type I is known as well as Type III. In a 2013 report, researchers first conducted verbal surveys followed by clinical examination. They found that the verbal disclosure were not completely reliable, and clinical examination showed greater extent of FGM. These researchers report 68% Type II and 32% Type I in Sierra Leone women. Like Liberia, Sierra Leone has the traditional secret society of women, called Bondo or Sande society, which uses FGM as part of the initiation rite. 70% of the population is Muslim, 20% Christian, and 10% as traditional religions. Only Creole Christians of Sierra Leone are known to not practice FGM. There is no federal law against FGM in Sierra Leone; and the Soweis - those who do FGM excision - wield considerable political power during elections.
- Somalia (98% prevalence, Type I, II and III)
- According to a 2005 WHO estimate, about 97.9% of Somalia's women and girls underwent FGM. This was at the time the world's highest prevalence rate of the procedure. A UNICEF 2010 report also noted that Somalia had the world's highest rate of Type III FGM, with 79% of all Somali women having undergone the procedure; another 15% underwent Type II FGM. However, the prevalence rate varies considerably by region and is on the decline in the northern part of the country. In 2013, UNICEF in conjunction with the Somali authorities reported that the FGM prevalence rate among 1 to 14 year old girls in the autonomous northern Puntland and Somaliland regions had dropped to 25% following a social and religious awareness campaign. Article 15 of the Federal Constitution adopted in August 2012 also prohibits female circumcision.
- Sudan (91% prevalence, Type I, II and III)
- Only some states of Sudan have laws against FGM; currently there is no national law forbidding FGM, although Sudan was the first country to outlaw it in 1946, under the British. Type III was prohibited under the 1925 Penal Code, with less severe forms allowed. Outreach groups have been trying to eradicate the practice for 50 years, working with NGOs, religious groups, the government, the media and medical practitioners. Arrests have been made but no further action seems to have taken place. Sudan signed the Maputo Protocol in June, 2008 but no ratification has yet been deposited with the African Union.
- Tanzania (14.6% prevalence, Type II and III)
- According to 2005 survey in Tanzania, FGM prevalence rate is 14.6% of all women aged between 15 and 49. In contrast, the 1996 survey reported 17.6, suggesting a drop of 3% over 10 years or unwillingness to disclose. Type II FGM was found to be most common. There are significant differences in regional prevalence; FGM is most widespread in Manyara (81%), Dodoma (68%), Arusha (55%), Singida (43%) and Mara (38%) regions. The practice varies with religion, with reported prevalence rates of 20% for Christian and 15% of Muslim women. Section 169A of the Sexual Offences Special Provisions Act of 1998 prohibits FGM in Tanzania. Punishment is imprisonment of from five to fifteen years or a fine not exceeding 300,000 shillings (approximately US$250) or both. Tanzania ratified the Maputo Protocol in 2007. As with Kenya, Tanzania 1998 Act protects only girls up to the age of 18 years. The FGM law is being occasionally implemented, with 52 violations have been reported, filed and prosecuted. At least 10 cases were convicted in Tanzania.
- Togo (5.8% - 50% prevalence, Type II)
- Female genital mutilation is practiced in Togo. On October 30, 1998, the National Assembly unanimously voted to outlaw the practice of FGM. Penalties under the law can include a prison term of two months to ten years and a fine of 100,000 francs to one million francs (approximately US$160 to 1,600). A person who had knowledge that the procedure was going to take place and failed to inform public authorities can be punished with one month to one year imprisonment or a fine of from 20,000 to 500,000 francs (approximately US$32 to 800). Togo ratified the Maputo Protocol in 2005.
- Uganda (<5% prevalence, Type I and II)
- Anyone convicted of carrying out FGM is subject to 10 years in prison. If the life of the patient is lost during the operation a life sentence is recommended. In 1996, a court intervened to prevent the performance of FGM under Section 8 of the Children Statute, which makes it unlawful to subject a child to social or customary practices harmful to the child's health. Uganda signed the Maputo Protocol in 2003 but has not ratified it. In early July 2009, President Yoweri Museveni stated that a law would soon be passed prohibiting the practice, with alternative livelihoods found for its practitioners.
- Female genital mutilation has been reported in Iranian Kurdistan. It is estimated that in Iranian Kurdistan the rate of the mutilated girls and women is about 60%. A 2012 study in Kermanshah province of Iran suggests FGM is a common practice in Ravansars’ women, with over 55% of girls have been circumcised less than 7 years age.
- Iraq, Iraqi Kurdistan (72.7% prevalence (excluding Dohuk), Type I and II
- Female genital mutilation is prevalent in Kurdish region of Iraq, with FGM rates exceeding 80% in Garmyan and New Kirkuk. In Arbil Governorate and Suleymaniya Type I FGM is common; while in Garmyan and New Kirkuk, Type II and III FGM are common. There was no law against FGM in Iraqi Kurdistan, but in 2007 a draft legislation condemning the practice was submitted to the Regional Parliament, but was not passed. A 2011 Kurdish law criminalized FGM practice in Iraqi Kurdistan, however this law is not being enforced. A field report by Iraqi group PANA Center, published in 2012, shows 38% of females in Kirkuk and its surrounding districts areas had undergone female circumcision. Of those females circumcised, 65% were Kurds, 26% Arabs and rest Turkmen. On the level of religious and sectarian affiliation, 41% were Sunnis, 23% Shiites, rest Kaka’is, and none Christians or Chaldeans. A 2013 report finds FGM prevalence rate of 59% based on clinical examination of about 2000 Iraqi Kurdish women; FGM found were Type I, and 60% of the mutilation were performed to girls in 4–7 year age group.
- Female genital mutilation is prevalent in some parts of Jordan. Southern Jordan residents of Wadi Araba near Aqaba are known to practice FGM. The practice is found in Muslim descendants of Bani Sinai tribes, and others living in Gaza and Beer Sheba.
- Female genital mutilation is prevalent in Kuwait in the Maliki madhab of Sunni Muslims. A 2011 study finds 38% of women having undergone FGM, with Type II and III common.
- The practice is prevalent in Oman. A 2013 article describes FGM practice in Oman, and claims the practice is very common in Dhofar. Type I is claimed to be common in southern Oman and typically performed within a few weeks of a girl's birth, while Type IV is observed in most parts of northern Oman.
- Female genital mutilation is prevalent in Saudi Arabia. FGM is most prevalent in Saudi regions following Shafi'i school within the Sunni sect of Islam, such as Hejaz, Tihamah and Asir. In a clinical study, Alsibiani and Rouzi provide evidence of the practice in Saudi Arabia. Another 2010 report claims post-FGM medical complications are an indicator of widespread prevalence of the practice in Saudi women. A 2012 study finds, that of the Saudi women who had FGM, Type III was more common than Type I or II.
- Circumstantial evidence suggests FGM exists in Syria. A 2012 conference confirmed that FGM is observed in Syria, particularly in its Kurdish, Shafi'i and minority Muslim groups.
- Circumstantial evidence suggests FGM exists in regions inhabited by Kurdish populations.
- United Arab Emirates
- The WHO mentions a study that documents FGM in the United Arab Emirates, but does not provide data. The practice is reportedly prevalent in rural and urban UAE.) In a 2011 survey, 34% of Emirati female respondents said they were circumcised, and explained the practice to customs and tradition. FGM is a controversial topic in UAE, and people argue about whether it is an Islamic requirement or a tribal tradition. A significant number of UAE nationals follow in the footsteps of their parents and grandparents without questioning the practice. A 2012 report published by UAE government scores UAE at 31% on prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation.
- According to a 1997 demographic survey, 23% prevalence in women 15 to 49; in addition to the adult prevalence, UNICEF reports that 20% of women aged 15–49 have a daughter who had the procedure. In 4 of Yemen's 21 governorates, according to a 2008 report, the FGM prevalence rates exceed 80%: al-Hudaydah (97%), Hadhramaut (97%), al-Mahrah (97%) and Adan (82%); Sana'a Governorate, which includes the capital of Yemen, has a prevalence rate of 46%. Type II FGM was most common, accounting for 83% of all FGMs. Type I FGMs accounted for 13%. Yemeni tradition is to carry out the FGM on a new born, with 97% of FGM being done within the first month of a baby girl. In 2001, Yemen banned FGM in all private and public medical facilities by a government decree, but not homes. Yemeni government, however, did not enforce this decree. In 2009, conservative Yemeni parliamentarians opposed the adoption of a nationwide criminal law against FGM. In 2010, the Ministry of Human Rights of Yemen launched a new study to ascertain over 4 years if FGM is being practiced in Yemen, then propose a new law against FGM. A 2013 UNICEF report claims Yemen's FGM prevalence rate have not changed in last 30 years.
South, Southeast and Central Asia
- Female genital mutilation is practiced in Maldives. Maldives' Attorney General Husnu Suood claims FGM was eradicated from Maldives by the 1990s, but the practice of female circumcision in Maldives is reviving because of Islamic fatwas from religious scholars in Maldives who preach that it as compulsory. Religious leaders have renewed their calls for FGM in 2014.
- FGM is practiced among some Pakistani communities. Gibeau reports, for example, FGM is widespread in Bohra Muslims of Pakistan The Sheedi Muslim community of Pakistan, considered to be of Arab-African origins, practice FGM. The practice is also found in Muslim communities near Pakistan's Iran-Balochistan border.
- Estimates suggest 90% of females in the Ismaili Shia Muslim Bohra community in India undergo the trauma.
- Malaysia (Type I and IV)
- FGM is prevalent in Malaysia. It is widely considered as a female sunnah tradition (sunat perempuan), typically done by midwife (mak bidan). It is either a prick (Type IV) or cutting off a small piece of the highest part of clitoral hood and foreskin (Type I). FGM Prevalence rates have been estimated between 62% to 90% in Muslim Malay communities. Malaysian women claim religious obligation (82%) as the primary reason for female circumcision, with hygiene (41%) and cultural practice (32%) as other major motivators for FGM prevalence. Malaysia is a multicultural society, FGM is prevalent in Muslim community, and not observed in its minority Buddhist and Hindu communities. Malaysia has no laws in reference to FGM. The Malaysian government sponsored 86th conference of Malaysia’s Fatwa Committee National Council of Islamic Religious Affairs held in April 2009 decided that female circumcision is part of Islamic teachings and it should be observed by Muslims, with the majority of the jurists in the Committee concluding that female circumcision is obligatory (wajib). However, the fatwa noted harmful circumcision methods are to be avoided. In 2012, Malaysian government health ministry proposed guidelines to reclassify and allow female circumcision as a medical practice.
- Indonesia (Type I and IV)
- FGM is prevalent in Indonesia. In certain communities of Indonesia, mass female circumcision (khitanan massal) ceremony are organized by local Islamic foundations around Prophet Muhammad’s birthday. Some FGM are Type IV done with a pen knife, others are Type I done with scissors. Two Indonesian nationwide studies in 2003 and 2010 found over 80% of Muslim girls are subjected to cutting, typically newborns through the age of 9. More than 90% of adults claimed they wanted the practice to continue. Historical records suggest female circumcision in Indonesia started and became prevalent with the arrival of Islam in the 13th century as part of its drive to convert people to Islam. In islands of Indonesia, where partial populations converted to Islam in the 17th century, FGM has been prevalent in Muslim females only. In 2006, FGM was banned by the government; however, FGM/C remained commonplace for women in Indonesia - the world’s largest Muslim nation. In 2010, the Indonesian Health Ministry issued a decree outlining the proper procedure for FGM, which activists claim contradicted the 2006 ruling prohibiting clinics from performing any FGM. In 2013, the Indonesian Ulema Council ruled that it favors FGM, stating that although it is not mandatory, it is still “morally recommended”. The Ulema has been pushing Indonesian government to circumcise girls, claiming it is part of Islamic teachings. Some Indonesian officials, in March 2013, claimed cutting and pricking type circumcision is not FGM.
- FGM is prevalent in parts of Philippines. The communities that practice FGM call it Pag-Sunnat, sometimes Pag-Islam, and include Tausugs of Mindanao, Yakan of Basilan and other Muslim communities of Philippines. FGM is typically performed to girls between few days old and age 8. Type IV FGM with complications have been reported.
In recent years the increase in immigration for individuals from countries which practice FGM, has led to the introduction of FGM in European and North American societies. However, FGM prevalence rate has been difficult to quantify among immigrants to European countries. A case study which investigated FGM in groups of migrant women from Northern Africa to European countries like Scandinavia, noted that a majority of these women had been circumcised before their migration to Europe. It also has been established that African communities in European countries continue the practice of FGM on their daughters after migrating to Europe. For instance in Sweden, a study by Karolinska Institutet concluded that about a third of families migrated from countries with a FGM culture wanted to continue mutilating in their new countries. The Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence defines and criminalizes FGM, as well as other forms of violence against women.  The Convention came into force on 1 August 2014.
Sweden was the first country in the world to ban genital mutilation in 1982. It is punishable by up to ten years in prison, and in 1999 the Government extended the law to include procedures performed abroad. There have been 46 cases of suspected genital mutilation since the law was introduced in 1982, and two convictions, according to a report published by the National Centre for Knowledge on Men's Violence against Women in 2011.
In June 2014, Norrköpings Tidningar published a story on genital mutilation, which was picked up by the foreign press, including The Independent and The Daily News. It was claimed that every single girl in one class had been victims of genital mutilation. However, the newspapers never said where and when the genital mutilation took place. It was later revealed by Sweden's national publicly radio that none of the girls had been subjected to the procedure, or had any procedure preformed on them abroad, while living in Sweden.
Legal status in other regions
- In 1994 there were several anecdotal reports of FGM being practised amongst migrant communities in Australia. By 1997, all Australian states and territories had made FGM a criminal offence. It is also a criminal offence to take, or propose to take, a child outside Australia to have a FGM procedure performed. The incidence of FGM in Australia is unknown as it is unreported to authorities and is often only uncovered when women and girls are taken to hospital due to complications with the procedure.
- There is some evidence to indicate that FGM is practised in Ontario and across Canada among immigrant and refugee communities. FGM is considered child assault and prohibited under sections 267 (assault causing bodily harm) or 268 (aggravated assault, including wounding, maiming, disfiguring) of the Criminal Code.
- Between 1979 and 2004, a total of 29 FGM court cases were brought before criminal courts, mostly from the
mid-1990s onwards and with aggravated sentences. By 2013, more than 100 people had been convicted of FGM. FGM is a criminal offense punishable by 10 years or up to 20 years in jail if the victim is under 15 years of age. The law requires anyone to report any case of mutilation or planned mutilation. In 2014 it was reported that about 100 people in France had been jailed. Not only the person carrying out the mutilation is sentenced, parents organising the crime face legal proceedings as well.
- After a few cases of infibulation practiced by complaisant medical practitioners within the African immigrants community came to public knowledge through media coverage, the Law n°7/2006 was passed on 1/9/2006, becoming effective on 1/28/2006, concerning "Measures of prevention and prohibition of any female genital mutilation practice"; the Act is also known as the Legge Consolo ("Consolo Act") named after its primary promoter, Senator Giuseppe Consolo. Article 6 of the law integrates the Italian Penal Code with Articles 583-Bis and 583-Ter, punishing any practice of female genital mutilation "not justifiable under therapeutical or medical needs" with imprisonment ranging from 4 to 12 years (3 to 7 years for any mutilation other than, or less severe than, clitoridectomy, excision or infibulation). Penalty can be reduced up to 2⁄3 if the harm caused is of modest entity (i.e. if partially or completely unsuccessful), but may also be elevated up to 1⁄3 if the victim is a minor or if the offense has been committed for profit. An Italian citizen or a foreign citizen legally resident in Italy can be punished under this law even if the offense is committed abroad; the law will as well afflict any individual of any citizenship in Italy, even illegally or provisionally. The law also mandates any medical practitioner found guilty under those provisions to have his/her medical license revoked for a minimum of six up to a maximum of ten years.
- FGM is punishable as a criminal offense under Norwegian law even if the offence is committed abroad.
- FGM is considered mutilation and is punishable as a criminal offense under Dutch law. There is no specific law against FGM: the act is subsumed under the general offense of inflicting harm ("mishandling", art. 300–304 Dutch Criminal Code). The maximum penalty is a prison sentence of 12 years. However, the sentence can be higher if the offender is a family member of the victim. It is also illegal to assist or encourage another person to perform FGM. A Dutch citizen or a foreign citizen legally resident in the Netherlands can be punished even if the offense is committed abroad. Doctors have the obligation to report suspected cases of FGM and may break patient confidentiality rules if necessary.
- New Zealand
- Under a 1995 amendment to the Crimes Act, it is illegal to perform "any medical or surgical procedure or mutilation of the vagina or clitoris of any person" for reasons of "culture, religion, custom or practice". It is also illegal to send or make any arrangement for a child to be sent out of New Zealand for FGM to be performed, assist or encourage any person in New Zealand to perform FGM on a New Zealand citizen or resident outside New Zealand convince or encourage any other New Zealand citizen or resident to go outside New Zealand to have FGM performed.
- The Criminal Code does state that sexual mutilation, such as FGM, is a criminal offense punishable by up to 12 years in jail.
- FGM is punishable according to Act (1982:316) Prohibiting Female Genital Mutilation. Sweden was the first Western country to prohibit FGM, legislation against 'female circumcision' passed in 1982. In 1998 the law was revised with a change in terminology and more severe penalties for breaking the law were imposed. The law was further reformulated in 1999, to allow for prosecution in a Swedish court of someone performing FGM even if the act has been performed in a country where it is not considered criminal (removal of the principle of double incrimination).
- United Kingdom
- (See also Female genital mutilation in the UK.) FGM was made a criminal offence by the Prohibition of Female Circumcision Act 1985. This was superseded by the Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003, and (in Scotland) by the Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation (Scotland) Act 2005. Taking a UK citizen or permanent resident abroad for the purpose of FGM is a criminal offence whether or not it is lawful in the country the girl is taken to. Since April 2014, all NHS hospitals will be able to record if a patient has undergone FGM or if there is a family history of this, and by September 2014, all acute hospitals will have to report this data to the Department of Health, on a monthly basis.
- United States
- The Centers for Disease Control estimated in 1997 that 168,000 girls living in the United States had undergone FGM or were at risk. Fauziya Kasinga, a 19-year-old member of the Tchamba-Kunsuntu tribe of Togo, was granted asylum in 1996 after leaving an arranged marriage to escape FGM; this set a precedent in US immigration law because it was the first time FGM was accepted as a form of persecution. Performing the procedure on anyone under the age of 18 became illegal in the U.S. the following year with the Federal Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation Act. Seventeen states enacted similar laws between 1994 and 2006. The Transport for Female Genital Mutilation Act was passed in January 2013 and prohibits knowingly transporting a girl out of the U.S. for the purpose of undergoing FGM. By 2011, it was reported that 20 states had specific laws against FGM. States that do not have such laws may use other general statutes, such as assault, battery or child abuse.
- For the legal situation in the US as of 2008, see Ross, Susan Deller (ed.). Women's Human Rights: The international and Comparative Law Casebook. Vantage Press, 2008, p. 509ff. Khalid Adem, who had moved from Ethiopia to Atlanta, Georgia, became the first person to be convicted in the US in an FGM case; he was sentenced to ten years in 2006 for having severed his two-year-old daughter's clitoris with a pair of scissors.
FGM is addressed by various international instruments. The Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence addresses this issue. Article 38 reads:
Article 38 – Female genital mutilation
Parties shall take the necessary legislative or other measures to ensure that the following intentional conducts are criminalised:
a excising, infibulating or performing any other mutilation to the whole or any part of a woman’s labia majora, labia minora or clitoris;
b coercing or procuring a woman to undergo any of the acts listed in point a;
c inciting, coercing or procuring a girl to undergo any of the acts listed in point a.
- "Prevalence of FGM/C". UNICEF. Retrieved 18 August 2014.
- Rouzi, A. A. (2013). Facts and controversies on female genital mutilation and Islam. The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 18(1), 10-14
- Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting UNICEF, (July 2013)
- Socialstyrelsen (2002), Kvinnlig könsstympning, Sweden; ISBN 91-7201-719-8; page 8-9; In Swedish, use a translator
- Female Genital Mutilation: Studies on primary and repeat female genital cutting Vanja Berggren, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (2005); see page 2-4
- FGM - Where is it practiced? European Campaign on FGM & Amnesty International (2012)
- Tackling Female Genital Mutilation in the Kurdistan Region Sofia Barbarani, The Kurdistan Tribune (March 4, 2013)
- World Health Organization, Female genital mutilation: an overview. 1998, Geneva: World Health Organization
- William G. Clarence-Smith (2012) ‘Female Circumcision in Southeast Asia since the Coming of Islam’, in Chitra Raghavan and James P. Levine (eds.), Self-Determination and Women’s Rights in Muslim Societies, Brandeis University Press; ISBN 978-1611682809; see pages 124-146
- Care of women with female genital mutilation/ cutting - A Review Jasmine Abdulcadira, Christiane Margairazb, Michel Boulvaina, Olivier Irion; Swiss Medical Weekly (Geneva), 2011; 140:w13137; doi: 10.4414/smw.2011.13137
- "Female genital mutilation", World Health Organization, February 2010.
- Momoh, Comfort (ed). "Female Genital Mutilation", Radcliffe Publishing, 2005, pp. 6–7.
- Gibeau, A. M. (1998), Female genital mutilation: when a cultural practice generates clinical and ethical dilemmas, Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 27(1), 85-91
- "Bohra women go online to fight circumcision trauma". Hindustan Times. December 9, 2011.
- Female circumcision fear as fundamentalists roll back women's rights Ben Doherty, The Sydney Morning Herald (January 25, 2012)
- Razor's Edge – The Controversy of Female Genital Mutilation
- UNICEF 2013, pp. 3–26. *For Iraqi Kurdistan, also see Yasin, Berivan A. et al. "Female genital mutilation among Iraqi Kurdish women: a cross-sectional study from Erbil city", BMC Public Health, 13, September 2013. *For more information on UNICEF's data collection, see "Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS)", UNICEF, 25 May 2012.
- UNICEF 2013, pp. 114, 22
- Female Circumcision World Health Organization, United Nations
- FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION: STRATEGIES FOR ERADICATION Fran P. Hosken (1989), The First International Symposium on Circumcision, Anaheim, California
- Stop FGM in Kurdistan
- Strobel S, von der Osten-Sacken T (2006-03-27). "Female genital mutilation in Iraqi Kurdistan. Presented at the 1ère Journée Humanitaire sur la Santé des Femmes dans le Monde, Paris, France". Gynécologie sans Frontières.
- Birch, Nicholas. "Female circumcision surfaces in Iraq", Christian Science Monitor, 10 August 2005.
- The issue of female genital mutilation in Oman Susan Mubarak, Muscat Daily (January 01, 2013)
- Fatal traditions: Female circumcision in the UAE Wafa Al Marzouqi (Jul 23, 2011), The National, United Arab Emirates
- Female genital mutilation: a brutal violation of rights Asma Malik, Gulf News (June 15, 2012)
- "Bedouins shunning FGM/C – new research", IRIN, March 4, 2009.
- "Georgia: Man Convicted in Daughter’s Mutilation", Associated Press, 2 November 2010.
- Bjälkander et al. (2013), Female Genital Mutilation in Sierra Leone: Forms, Reliability of Reported Status, and Accuracy of Related Demographic and Health Survey Questions, Obstetrics and Gynecology International, Volume 2013, doi: 10.1155/2013/680926
- A. Rahman and N. Toubia, Female Genital Mutilation: A Guide to Worldwide Laws and Policies, Zed Press, London, UK, 2000
- B. Karmaker, N.-B. Kandala, D. Chung, and A. Clarke (2011), “Factors associated with female genital mutilation in Burkina Faso and its policy implications,” International Journal for Equity in Health, vol. 10, article 20; doi:10.1186/1475-9276-10-20
- E. F. Jackson et al. (2003), “Inconsistent reporting of female genital cutting status in northern Ghana: explanatory factors and analytical consequences,” Studies in Family Planning, vol. 34, no. 3, pages 200–210
- CHANGING A HARMFUL SOCIAL CONVENTION: FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION/CUTTING; see page 3, column 1
- The Situation of Children and Women in Iraq; see 2nd last page
- "Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) or Female Genital Cutting (FGC): Individual Country Reports", U.S. State Department, 1 June 2001.
- Raya, Patricia Diane. "Female Genital Mutilation and the Perpetuation of Multigenerational Trauma", The Journal of Psychohistory, Spring 2010.
- FGM Education and Networking Project, Fgmnetwork.org, accessed 5 February 2011.
- Female Genital Mutilation in Burkina Faso Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany (September 2011)
- FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION/CUTTING: A Statistical Exploration UNICEF (2010); see Table 1C, page 34
- Bue Karmaker et al. (2011), Factors associated with female genital mutilation in Burkina Faso and its policy implications, International Journal for Equity in Health; 10: 20
- Stolz, Joëllepr (September 1998). "Le Burkina Faso fait reculer l'excision". Le Monde diplomatique (in French). p. 18.
- "FGC Prevalence Rates Diagram", African Women's Health Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, accessed 7 September 2011.
- Female Genital Mutilation in Cameroon Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany (September 2011)
- LEGISLATION TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION (FGM) Berhane Ras-Work, United Nations (May 21, 2009)
- Female Genital Mutilation in Chad Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany (September 2011)
- "Female Genital Mutilation", UK Border Agency, 20 June 2008.
- Female Genital Mutilation in Côte d'Ivoire Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany (September 2011)
- The law on sexual violence, DRC 2006 (Les lois sur les violences sexuelles) reads (in French): "Article 3, Paragraphe 7: De la mutilation sexuelle; Article 174g; Sera puni d’une peine de servitude pénale de deux à cinq ans et d’une amende de deux cent mille francs congolais constants, quiconque aura posé un acte qui porte atteinte à l’intégrité physique ou fonctionnelle des organes génitaux d’une personne. Lorsque la mutilation a entraîné la mort, la peine est de servitude pénale à perpétuité."
- Female genital mutilation in Djibouti Martinelli and Ollé-Goig, African Health Sciences, 2012 December; 12(4): 412–415
- Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Data and Trends: UPDATE 2010 UNICEF, Page 7
- The issue of reinfibulation Gamal I. Serour, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Volume 109, Issue 2, May 2010, Pages 93–96
- Female Circumcision: Rite of Passage Or Violation of Rights? Frances Althaus, International Family Planning Perspectives, Volume 23, Number 3, September 1997
- DJIBOUTI: FGM still a major challenge IRIN, UN news service (2004)
- Michael, Maggie. "Egypt Officials Ban Female Circumcision", The Associated Press, 29 June 2007.
- "Egypt forbids female circumcision", BBC News, 28 June 2007.
- "Egypt strengthens ban on female genital cutting", Reuters, 28 June 2007.
- "Egypt death sparks debate on female circumcision", Reuters, 20 June 2007.
- Diana Kuring(2008) Female Genital Mutilation in Eritrea: Regional Variations“ (Chapter 4, pp. 57 – 120) in: Weibliche Genitalverstümmelung in Eritrea. Regionale Er- klärungen, nationale Ansätze und internationale Standards, Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, 2008; see summary here: starting page 105
- Female Genital Mutilation/ Cutting: Data and Trends: UPDATE 2010 UNICEF, Page 7
- "Eritrea bans female circumcision", BBC News, 4 April 2007.
- Female Genital Mutilation and Legislation Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany (January 2011)
- Article 565 - Female Circumcision; Article 566 - Infibulation of the Female Genitalia 
- The Gambia MICS 2005-2006 Report UNICEF and Gambia Bureau of Statistics (2007)
- Kaplan et al., Knowledge, attitudes and practices of female genital mutilation/cutting among health care professionals in The Gambia: a multiethnic study, BMC Public Health 2013, 13:851
- Hernlund Y: Cutting without ritual and ritual without cutting: female circumcision and the Re-ritualization of initiation in The Gambia. In Female “circumcision” in Africa: culture, controversy and change. Edited by Shell-Duncan B, Hernlund Y. London: Rienner publishers; 2000
- Kaplan et al. (2011), Health consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting in the Gambia, evidence into action Reproductive Health, 8:26
- More Kombo community leaders resolve FGM is harmful The Point, Gambia (July 12, 2013)
- Female Genital Mutilation in Guinea Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany (September 2011)
- Female Genital Mutilation in Kenya Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany (September 2011)
- "FGM: Kenya acts against unkindest cut", The Guardian, 8 September 2011.
- Female Genital Mutilation in Liberia Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany (September 2011)
- Female Genital Mutilation in Mali Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany (November 2007)
- Female Genital Mutilation in Mauritania Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany (September 2011)
- FGM/C - 2005 Statistics UNICEF, see page 32
- Enquête Démographique et de Santé et à Indicateurs Multiples 2006 RÉPUBLIQUE DU NIGER; page 281 (in French, use an internet translator if you are not fluent in French)
- Female Genital Mutilation: An overview WHO, Geneva
- Ten villages unite to say ‘no’ to female genital mutilation/cutting in Niger UNICEF (2009)
- NIGER Nathalie Maulet, UNFPA (2007)
- NIGER: Legal ban on female circumcision widely ignored IRIN, UN News Service (2004)
- PRIORITIES IN CHILD SURVIVAL, EDUCATION AND PROTECTION - Niger UNICEF (2007)
- Female Genital Mutilation in Nigeria Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany (September 2011)
- Female Genital Mutilation in Senegal Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany (September 2011)
- "Senegal: Report on Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) or Female Genital Cutting (FGC)", Released by the Office of the Senior Coordinator for International Women's Issues, US Department of State.
- Female Genital Mutilation in Sierra Leone Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany (September 2011)
- "Prevalence of FGM". Who.int. 2010-12-09. Retrieved 2010-12-30.
- "Somalia: Female genital mutilation down". Associated Press via The Jakarta Post. 16 April 2013. Retrieved 17 May 2013.
- "The Federal Republic of Somalia - Provisional Constitution". Retrieved 13 March 2013.
- Female Genital Mutilation in Tanzania Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany (September 2011)
- "Uganda Bans Female Genital Mutilation", BBC News, |10 December 2009.
- Uganda Government News: Uganda asked to ratify Women’s rights protocol, UGPulse, November 27, 2008
- "Museveni condemns genital cutting", The New Vision, Kampala, 2 July 2007.
- YEMEN: Government body moves to stem female genital mutilation IRIN, A news service of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (2008)
- Gilbert, D. (1993). For the sake of purity (and control). Female genital mutilation. Links (New York, NY), 9(5), 6
- Golnaz Esfandiari (2009-03-10). "Female Genital Mutilation Said To Be Widespread In Iraq's, Iran's Kurdistan". Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty.
- Saleem, R. A., Othman, N., Fattah, F. H., Hazim, L., & Adnan, B. (2013). Female Genital Mutilation in Iraqi Kurdistan: description and associated factors. Women & health, 53(6), 537-551
- Pashaei et al. (2012), Related Factors of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) in Ravansar (Iran), Journal of Women’s Health Care, 1:108; doi:10.4172/2167-0420.1000108
- "Female Genital Mutilation in Iraqi Kurdistan – A Study", WADI, accessed 15 February 2010.
- Burki, T. (2010), Reports focus on female genital mutilation in Iraqi Kurdistan. The Lancet, 375(9717), 794
- "Draft for a Law Prohibiting Female Genital Mutilation is submitted to the Kurdish Regional Parliament", Stop FGM in Kurdistan, accessed 21 November 2010.
- Iraqi Kurdistan: Law Banning FGM Not Being Enforced Human Rights Watch, August 29, 2012
- Memorandum to prevent female genital mutilation in Iraq PUK, Kurdistan (May 2, 2013)
- Yasin et al. (September 2013) Female genital mutilation among Iraqi Kurdish women: a cross-sectional study from Erbil city, BMC Public Health, 13:809, doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-809
- The Jordanian town that still circumcises women Rana Sabbagh-Gargour, The Star (Lebanon)
- Female circumcision/genital cutting BBC Guide, United Kingdom (2008)
- Chibber, R., El-Saleh, E., & El Harmi, J. (2011), Female circumcision: obstetrical and psychological sequelae continues unabated in the 21st century, Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 24(6), pages 833-836
- "Is Female Genital Mutilation an Islamic Problem?", Middle East Quarterly, accessed 5 February 2011.
- FOCUS ON FGM Victoria Cuthbert, The Week (Oman), (April 25, 2012)
- Mutilation/Cutting: Promoting Gender Equality, UNFPA, accessed 5 February 2011.
- Gender Equality in West Bank and Gaza|Social Institutions and Gender Index (SIGI), Genderindex.org, 16 February 2007.
- Berg, R. C., Denison, E., & Fretheim, A. (2010). Psychological, social and sexual consequences of female genital. Report from Kunnskapssenteret, (13), Norway
- FGM Prevalence US Department of State (2001)
- Al-Sharabasi, Ahmad (1980), Yas'alunak fi al-din wal-hayat, 4th Edition, II, pp 31; also see I:253-255
- Alsibiani, S. A., & Rouzi, A. A. (2010). Sexual function in women with female genital mutilation. Fertility and sterility, 93(3), 722-724
- Rouzi, A. A. (2010). Epidermal clitoral inclusion cysts: not a rare complication of female genital mutilation. Human reproduction, 25(7), 1672-1674
- Berg, R. C., & Denison, E. (2012). Does female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) affect women’s sexual functioning? A systematic review of the sexual consequences of FGM/C. Sexuality research and social policy, 9(1), 41-56
- FEATURE-Fighting female genital mutilation, one Kurdish village at a time Patrick Markey, Reuters (October 17, 2012)
- The Practice of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) in the Kurdish Regions Acharya (2009), Kurdish Human Rights Project
- "Eliminating Female Genital Mutilation: An interagency statement", World Health Organization, 2008, p. 30.
- Kvello, Ane; Sayed L; Sundby J (2003-09-06). "Concerning female circumcision in the United Arab Emirates: Is clitoridectomy in a traditional context an assault against women?". "FOKO 2003 – ABSTRACTS". University of Oslo.
- UAE Women Index Report 2012 Shamsa Saleh, UAE (2012)
- At a glance: Yemen – Statistics, UNICEF, accessed 5 February 2011.
- Female Genital Mutilation in Yemen Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany (September 2011)
- YEMEN: New FGM/C law possible "within four years" - minister IRIN, A news service of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (2010)
- Overwhelming opposition to female genital mutilation/cutting, yet millions of girls still at risk UNICEF (July 2013)
- Encyclopedia of Women & Islamic Cultures: Family, Body, Sexuality and Health , Volume 3 (Encyclopaedia of Women and Islamic Cultures). Brill Academic Publishers. 2005. p. 588.
- "Female circumcision is cultural practice", The Brunei Times, 16 June 2012.
- Islamism and radicalism in the Maldives Hasan Amir, Calhoun (CA, United States); see page 59-62
- Attorney General: Practice of female circumcision gaining momentum in Addu Haveeru, Maldives (December 12, 2009)
- Magoha & Magoha (2000), Current global status of female genital mutilation: a review. East African medical journal, 77(5)
- Practice Of Female Circumcision Among Bohra Muslims
- PAKISTAN: Low awareness of hidden FGM/C practices IRIN, Karachi, 2011
- Female Genital Mutilation: Many Pakistani women’s painful secret Farahnaz Zahidi, February 6, 2013
- The Yin, Wounded - A primitive rite for Bohra women sees its first murmurs of protest DEBARSHI DASGUPTA, Outlook India (December 2011)
- The Practice of Female Circumcision in Malaysia Maznah Dahlui, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia (May 10, 2012)
- Knowledge and acceptance of Female Circumcision Khalid et al., Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (2013)
- Rahman Isa A, Shuib R, Shukri Othman M (May 1999). "The practice of female circumcision among Muslims in Kelantan, Malaysia". Reproductive Health Matters 7 (13): 137–144. doi:10.1016/S0968-8080(99)90125-8.
- “A Tiny Cut”: Female Circumcision in South East Asia The Islamic Monthly (March 12 20313)
- Dahlui, Wong and Choo (2012), Female circumcision (FC) in Malaysia: Medicalization of a religious practice. Int. J. Behav. Med., 19 (Suppl 1):S7
- "Legislation and other national provisions", Inter-Parliamentary Union, accessed 21 November 2010.
- Hukum Pemotongan Genitalia Wanita (Female Genital Mutilation) Jabatan Kemajuan Islam Malaysia, Rasmi Fatwa, Government of Malaysia (2009)
- Malaysia storm over female circumcision ABC News Australia (December 7, 2012)
- A Cutting Tradition Sara Corbett, New York Times (January 20, 2008)
- The day I saw 248 girls suffering genital mutilation Abigail Haworth, The Guardian United Kingdom, (November 17, 2012)
- Male and Female Genital Cutting among Yagyakartans and Madurans Muhadjir Darwin et al. (2004), Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia
- "Female Circumcision in Indonesia". TaskForce FGM. US Aid. Retrieved 7 October 2014.
- Female Circumcision in Indonesia Population Council and USAID, September 2003; see pages 24-27 and full report
- William Clarence-Smith, Self-determination and Women's Rights in Muslim Societies (edited by Raghavan and Levine); pp 127-134, Brandeis University Press (2012), ISBN 978-1-61168-280-9.
- A. Feillard and L. Morcoes (1998), Female Circumcision in Indonesia: To Islamize in Ceremony or Secrecy Persee, Vol. 56, Issue 56, pages 337-367
- "INDONESIA: Female genital mutilation persists despite ban", IRIN Global, 2 September 2010.
- [ Female circumcision decree must be revoked: NGOs] Dessy Sagita, The Jakarta Globe (June 23, 2011)
- Mathias Hariyadi, Indonesian Ulema in favour of female circumcision: a “human right”’, Asia News, Jakarta (24 Jan 2013)
- MUI pushes government to circumcise girls The Jakarta Post, Indonesia (January 22, 2013)
- Female circumcision not mutilation: Jakarta Agence France Presse, The Japan Times (March 25, 2013)
- FEMALE CIRCUMCISION AMONG YAKAN IN BASILAN, PHILIPPINES Sittinurussamsi A. Calsalin, ATENEO DE ZAMBOANGA UNIVERSITY (APRIL 2008)
- Gilbert, D. (1993). "For the sake of purity (and control). Female genital mutilation". Links 9 (5): 6–8, 30. PMID 12159278.
- Maria Kontoyannis and Christos Katsetos, Female genital mutilation, Health Sciences Journal, Vol 4, Issue 1 (2010)
- Muslim Women and Circumcision: “A Study of Intergenerational Practice and Its Continuity In Southern Philippines” Olga Czarina Velayo Belisario, WMSU Research Journal, Vol 28, No 1 (2009)
- Leye, Els; Richard Powell; Gerda Nienhuis; Patricia Claeys; Marleen Temmerman (2006). "Health Care in Europe for Women with Genital Mutilation.". Health Care for Women International (27.4): 362–378.
- Elgaali, Mahoud; Helena Strevens, and Per-Anders Mårdh (2005). "Female Genital Mutilation – an Exported Medical Hazard". The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care 10.2: 93–97.
- "En av tre familjer vill fortsätta omskära". Dagens Nyheter. 2014-06-24. Retrieved 25 June 2014.
- Réthy, Laura (06.02.14). "Wo beschnittene Frauen ihre Würde zurückerlangen". Die Welt (Axel Springer AG). Retrieved 25 June 2014. Check date values in:
- Richard Orange; Alexandra Topping (27 June 2014). "FGM specialist calls for gynaecological checks for all girls in Sweden". The Guardian. Retrieved 17 October 2014. "The pilot in Norrköping, which grabbed headlines when it was wrongly reported that an entire school class of girls had been subjected to FGM, 28 in the most severe fashion [...] Sweden was the first country in the world to ban FGM in 1982, and in 1999 the ban was extended to include circumcision carried out in other countries."
- "Lag (1982:316) med förbud mot könsstympning av kvinnor" (in Swedish). The Riksdag. Retrieved 17 October 2014.
- "Ny rapport om kvinnlig omskärelse/könsstympning" (in Swedish). National Centre for Knowledge on Men's Violence against Women. Retrieved 17 October 2014.
- "Alla 30 flickor i klassen var könsstympade" (in Swedish). Norrköpings Tidningar. 20 June 2014. Retrieved 17 October 2014.
- "FGM in Sweden: School where every single girl in one class underwent procedure exposed". The Independent. Retrieved 17 October 2014.
- "Swedish health authorities discover every girl in one class had undergone genital mutilation: report". The Daily News. Retrieved 17 October 2014.
- "Nyheten som var en nyhet" (in Swedish). Norrköpings Tidningar. Retrieved 17 October 2014. "Vi skrev inte om var och när könsstympningen genomförts."
- "Stympad rapportering om könsstympning och nya medievanor" (in Swedish). Sveriges Radio. 28 June 2014. Retrieved 17 October 2014.
- "Female genital mutilation: London hospitals treat 4,000 patients". News (BBC). 19 March 2014. Retrieved 25 June 2014.
- "The Criminalisation Of Female Genital Mutilation In Queensland". Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law. September 2002.
- Royal Australian College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (1997), Female Genital Mutilation: Information for Australian Health Professionals, Royal Australian College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
- "Girls mutilated for 'tradition'", The Sunday Telegraph, 5 November 2006.
- "FGM in Canada". Ontario Human Right Commission. Ontario Human Right Commission. Retrieved 7 October 2014.
- Federal Interdepartmental Working Group on Female Genital Mutilation (1999), Female genital mutilation and health care – an exploration of the needs and roles of affected communities and health care providers in Canada, Health Canada
- "Current situation of female genital Mutilation in France". European Institute for Gender Equality. European Institute for Gender Equality. Retrieved 7 October 2014.
- Smith, Joan. "Convictions for female genital mutilation. France-100 UK-Nil". The Independent Newspaper. Retrieved 7 October 2014.
- Wilsher, Kim (10 February 2014). "France's tough stance on female genital mutilation is working, say campaigners". The Guardian. Retrieved 26 June 2014.
- Italian Law n°7 1/9/2006, Disposizioni concernenti la prevenzione e il divieto delle pratiche di mutilazione genitale femminile, accessed 23 March 2009.
- LAWS OF THE WORLD ON FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION Harvard University (February 2010)
- "Female Genital Mutilation: Information for health and child protection professionals, New Zealand Ministry of Health, accessed 7 September 2011.
- Johnsdotter, Sara (2004). "FGM in Sweden: Swedish Legislation Regarding 'Female Genital Mutilation' and Implementation of the Law. Research Report in Sociology 2004:1". Lund University.
- Kerbaj, Richard. "Thousands of girls mutilated in Britain", The Times, 16 March 2009.
- Notes on some overseas countries' laws, The FGM Education and Networking Project
- Cullen-DuPont, Kathryn. "Female genital mutilation,"Encyclopedia of Women's History in America. Da Capo Press, 1998, p. 85.
- Dugger, Celia W. "June 9-15; Asylum From Mutilation",The New York Times, 16 June 1996.
- "In re Fauziya KASINGA, file A73 476 695, U.S. Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review, decided 13 June 1996.
- Dugger, Celia W. "Woman's Plea for Asylum Puts Tribal Ritual on Trial", The New York Times, 15 April 1996.
- Zabus 2004, p. 110.
- Susan Deller Ross (2008). Women's Human Rights: The International and Comparative Law Casebook. Vantage Press, Inc. p. 509.
- Hassan, Yasmeen. "As Global Consensus Accelerates, Obama Strengthens Federal Law Protecting Girls in the Fight Against Female Genital Mutilation",The Huffington Post, 3 January 2013.
- "Man gets 10-year sentence for circumcision of 2-year-old daughter", Associated Press, 1 November 2006.
- Laws on FGM in Africa (according to a 2013 document compiled by the African Child Policy Forum (ACPF) - an independent, non-profit, pan-African organization focusing on African children)