Probatio diabolica
| This article is an orphan, as few or no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; suggestions may be available. (December 2010) |
| This article does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (December 2009) |
Probatio diabolica (Latin: "devil's proof") is a legal requirement to achieve an impossible proof. Where a legal system would appear to require an impossible proof, the remedies are reversing the burden of proof, or giving additional rights to the individual facing the probatio diabolica.
In essence the lack of proof that contradicts the given statement makes the statement true in some sense. This connects with the idea that there is no evidence to prove that the devil exists. But there is also no evidence that says "the devil does not exist" so therefore one cannot rule that the devil doesn't exist.
For example, one party might patent a process for manufacturing an item. Another party might then make the item. The patent holder would normally have to show that the patented process had been improperly used; this is a probatio diabolica since on the face of it the patent holder has no information on what process was actually used, and this could render the patent useless. Two possible solutions exist:
- the burden of proof is reversed by presuming that the second manufacturer has improperly used the patented process, unless or until he demonstrates that he has used some other process; or
- the patent holder is given discovery rights, enabling him to get information from the second manufacturer on the process actually used.
| IUS | This legal article about a Latin phrase is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |