Progress in artificial intelligence
Artificial intelligence applications have been used in a wide range of fields including medical diagnosis, stock trading, robot control, law, scientific discovery and toys. However, many AI applications are not perceived as AI: "A lot of cutting edge AI has filtered into general applications, often without being called AI because once something becomes useful enough and common enough it's not labeled AI anymore." "Many thousands of AI applications are deeply embedded in the infrastructure of every industry." In the late 90s and early 21st century, AI technology became widely used as elements of larger systems, but the field is rarely credited for these successes.
To allow comparison with human performance, artificial intelligence can be evaluated on constrained and well-defined problems. Such tests have been termed subject matter expert Turing tests. Also, smaller problems provide more achievable goals and there are an ever-increasing number of positive results.
The broad classes of outcome for an AI test are:
- optimal: it is not possible to perform better
- strong super-human: performs better than all humans
- super-human: performs better than most humans
- par-human: performs similarly to most humans
- sub-human: performs worse than most humans
- Connect Four
- Rubik's Cube
- Computer poker players, sub-human for full ring Texas hold 'em (approaching strong super-human in simpler versions of poker)
See also solved games.
- Backgammon: super-human
- Bridge: nearing strong super-human
- Chess: nearing strong super-human
- Crosswords: super-human
- Driving a car: super-human. Google driverless cars are safer and smoother when steering themselves than when a human takes the wheel.
- Jigsaw puzzles: strong super-human
- Reversi: strong super-human
- Scrabble: strong super-human
- Quiz show question answering: strong super-human
- Arimaa: super-human
- Optical character recognition for printed text (nearing par-human for Latin-script typewritten text)
- Handwriting recognition
- Object recognition
- Speech recognition
- Word-sense disambiguation
- Natural language processing
- Applications of artificial intelligence
- List of artificial intelligence projects
- List of emerging technologies
- AI set to exceed human brain power CNN.com (July 26, 2006)
- Kurtzweil 2005, p. 264
- NRC 1999[verification needed] under "Artificial Intelligence in the 90s"
- Schaeffer, J.; Burch, N.; Bjornsson, Y.; Kishimoto, A.; Muller, M.; Lake, R.; Lu, P.; Sutphen, S. (2007). "Checkers is solved". Science 317 (5844): 1518–1522. Bibcode:2007Sci...317.1518S. doi:10.1126/science.1144079. PMID 17641166. CiteSeerX: 10
.1 .1 .95 .5393.
- "God's Number is 20"
- Rubin, Jonathan; Watson, Ian (2011). "Computer poker: A review". Artificial Intelligence. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2010.12.005.
- Bowling, M.; Burch, N.; Johanson, M.; Tammelin, O. (2015). "Heads-up limit hold'em poker is solved". Science 347 (6218): 145. doi:10.1126/science.1259433.
- Tesauro, Gerald (March 1995). "Temporal difference learning and TD-Gammon". Communications of the ACM 38 (3): 58–68. doi:10.1145/203330.203343.
- Computer bridge#Computers versus humans
- Computer Chess#Computers versus humans
- Proverb: The probabilistic cruciverbalist. By Greg A. Keim, Noam Shazeer, Michael L. Littman, Sushant Agarwal, Catherine M. Cheves, Joseph Fitzgerald, Jason Grosland, Fan Jiang, Shannon Pollard, and Karl Weinmeister. 1999. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 710-717. Menlo Park, Calif.: AAAI Press.
- Reversi#Computer opponents
- Sheppard, B. (2002). "World-championship-caliber Scrabble". Artificial Intelligence 134: 241–275. doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(01)00166-7.
- Watson beats Jeopardy grand-champions. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/17/science/17jeopardy-watson.html
- Jackson, Joab. "IBM Watson Vanquishes Human Jeopardy Foes". PC World. IDG News. Retrieved 2011-02-17.
- According to http://arimaa.com/arimaa/challenge/, "The Arimaa Challenge was won on April 18, 2015 and is no longer available."
- There are several ways of evaluating machine translation systems. People competent in a second language frequently outperform machine translation systems but the average person is often less capable. Some machine translation systems are capable of a large number of languages, like google translate, and as a result have a broader competence than most humans. For example, very few humans can translate from Arabic to Polish and French to Swahili and Armenian to Vietnamese. When comparing over several languages machine translation systems will tend to outperform humans.