Proof by example
||It has been suggested that this article be merged into Hasty generalization. (Discuss) Proposed since November 2010.|
|This article needs additional citations for verification. (November 2006)|
This fallacy has the following structure, and argument form:
- I know that X is such.
- Therefore, anything related to X is also such.
- I know that x, which is a member of group X, has the property P.
- Therefore, all other elements of X have the property P.
The following example demonstrates why this is a logical fallacy:
- I've seen a person shoot someone dead.
- Therefore, all people are murderers.
The flaw in this argument is very evident, but arguments of the same form can sometimes seem somewhat convincing, as in the following example:
- I've seen Gypsies steal. So, Gypsies must be thieves.
However, argument by example is valid when it leads from a singular premise to an existential conclusion. For example:
- Socrates is wise.
- Therefore, someone is wise.
- I've seen a person steal.
- Therefore, people can steal.
This is an informal version of the logical rule known as existential introduction (also known as particularisation or existential generalization).
- Existential Introduction
- Modus ponens
- Affirming the consequent
- Inductive reasoning
- Bayesian probability
- Proof by construction
- Anecdotal evidence