Q.E.D.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Q.E.D)
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about the Latin phrase. For the physical theory, see quantum electrodynamics. For other uses, see QED (disambiguation).

Q.E.D. is an initialism of the Latin phrase quod erat demonstrandum, originating from the Ancient Greek analogous hóper édei deîxai (ὅπερ ἔδει δεῖξαι), meaning "which had to be proven". The phrase is traditionally placed in its abbreviated form at the end of a mathematical proof or philosophical argument when what was specified in the enunciation—and in the setting-out—has been exactly restated as the conclusion of the demonstration.[1] The abbreviation thus signals the completion of the proof.

Etymology and early use[edit]

The phrase quod erat demonstrandum is a translation into Latin from the Greek ὅπερ ἔδει δεῖξαι (hoper edei deixai; abbreviated as ΟΕΔ). Translating from the Latin into English yields, "what was to be demonstrated"; however, translating the Greek phrase ὅπερ ἔδει δεῖξαι produces a slightly different meaning. Since the verb "δείκνυμι" also means to show or to prove,[2] a better translation from the Greek would read, "The very thing it was required to have shown."[1] The phrase was used by many early Greek mathematicians, including Euclid[3] and Archimedes.

Modern philosophy[edit]

Philippe van Lansberge's 1604 Triangulorum Geometriæ used quod erat demonstrandum to conclude some proofs; others ended with phrases such as sigillatim deinceps demonstrabitur, magnitudo demonstranda est, and other variants.[4]

In the European Renaissance, scholars often wrote in Latin, and phrases such as Q.E.D. were often used to conclude proofs.

Spinoza's original text of Ethics, Part 1. Q.E.D. is used at the end of DEMONSTRATIO of PROPOSITIO III. in the right page.

Perhaps the most famous use of Q.E.D. in a philosophical argument is found in the Ethics of Baruch Spinoza, published posthumously in 1677. Written in Latin, it is considered by many to be Spinoza's magnum opus. The style and system of the book is, as Spinoza says, "demonstrated in geometrical order", with axioms and definitions followed by propositions. For Spinoza, this is a considerable improvement over René Descartes's writing style in the Meditations, which follows the form of a diary.[5]

QEF[edit]

There is another Latin phrase with a slightly different meaning, and less common in usage. Quod erat faciendum, originating from the Greek geometers' closing ὅπερ ἔδει ποιῆσαι (hoper edei poiēsai), meaning "which had to be done". Euclid used this phrase to close propositions which were not proofs of theorems, but constructions. For example, Euclid's first proposition shows how to construct an equilateral triangle given one side. It is usually shortened to QEF.

Equivalents in other languages[edit]

Q.E.D. has acquired many translations in various languages, including:

Language Abbreviations Stands for...
Arabic هـ.ط.ث وهو المطلوب إثباته
Armenian Ի.Պ.Ա.(rarely used as an abbreviation) ինչը և պահանջվում էր ապացուցել
Bengali অ. সি. অতঃ সিদ্ধ
Bosnian Š.T.D. što je trebalo dokazati
Bulgarian КТДД Което трябваше да докажем/Което трябваше да се докаже
Chinese 证毕/證畢/证讫/證訖 证明完毕/證明完畢 (证讫/證訖 are already the full form themselves)
Croatian Š.T.D. što je trebalo dokazati
Czech C.B.D. což bylo dokázati/což se mělo dokázat
Dutch w.m.b.w.
w.t.b.w
wat moest bewezen worden
wat te bewijzen was
Estonian M.O.T.T. mida oligi tarvis tõestada
Finnish M.O.T. mikä oli todistettava
French C.Q.F.D. ce qu'il fallait démontrer
Catalan C.V.D. com volíem demostrar
Georgian რ.დ.გ რისი დამტკიცებაც გვსურდა
German Q.E.D. was zu beweisen war
Greek Ο.Ε.Δ. όπερ έδει δείξαι
Hebrew .מ.ש.ל מה שהיה להוכיח
Hungarian E.K.B. (rarely used as an abbreviation) Ezt kellett bizonyítani
Icelandic Þ.S.S.Á. Það sem sanna átti
Italian C.V.D. come volevasi dimostrare
Japanese Q.E.D. かく示された。
これが証明すべきことだった。
Korean Q.E.D. 이렇게 밝혀진다.
이것이 증명될 것이었다.
Latvian k.b.j. kas bija jāpierāda
Norwegian Q.E.D. hvilket skulle demonstreres
hvilket skulle bevises
Persian Q.E.D اثبات شد آنچه باید
Polish c.b.d.u. co było do udowodnienia
Portuguese C.Q.D. como queríamos demonstrar
Romanian c.c.t.d. ceea ce trebuia demonstrat
Russian ч.т.д. что и требовалось доказать
Sanskrit इ.सि. इति सिद्धम्
Serbian ш.т.д. што је и требало да се докаже
Slovak č.b.t.d. čo bolo treba dokázať
Slovenian k.e.d. konec enega dokaza
Spanish Q.E.D.
C.Q.D.
lo que se quería demostrar
como queda demostrado
Swedish V.S.B.
V.S.V
vilket skulle bevisas
vilket skulle visas
Tamil நி.வே. நிரூபிக்கப்படவேண்டியது
Thai ซ.ต.พ. ซึ่งต้องพิสูจน์
Turkish G.İ.B. Gösterilmek istenen şey de buydu.
Bu da gosterimimizi bitirir.
Ukrainian щ.с.б.д.
щ.т.д.
що й слід було довести
що і треба було довести
Vietnamese đpcm. Điều phải chứng minh

There is no common formal English equivalent, though the end of a proof may be announced with a simple statement such as "this completes the proof", "as required", "hence proved", "ergo", or a similar locution. WWWWW or W5 - an abbreviation of "Which Was What Was Wanted" - has also been used. This is often considered to be more tongue-in-cheek than the usual Halmos symbol (see below) or Q.E.D.

Electronic forms[edit]

When typesetting was done by a compositor with letterpress printing, complex typography such as mathematics and foreign languages were called "penalty copy" (the author paid a "penalty" to have them typeset, as it was harder than plain text).[6] With the advent of systems such as LaTeX, mathematicians found their options more open, so there are several symbolic alternatives in use, either in the input, the output, or both. When creating TeX, Knuth provided the symbol (solid black square), also called by mathematicians tombstone or Halmos symbol (after Paul Halmos, who pioneered its use as an equivalent of Q.E.D.). The tombstone is sometimes open: (hollow black square). Unicode explicitly provides the "End of proof" character U+220E (), but also offers (U+25AE, black vertical rectangle) and (U+2023, triangular bullet) as alternatives. Some authors have adopted variants of this notation with other symbols, such as two forward slashes (//), or simply some vertical white space, implying no further statements need to be made in the proof.[citation needed]

Modern humorous usage[edit]

In Joseph Heller's book Catch-22, the Chaplain, having been told to examine a forged letter allegedly signed by him (which he knew he didn't sign), verified that his name was in fact there. His investigator replied, "Then you wrote it. Q.E.D." The chaplain said he didn't write it and that it wasn't his handwriting, but the investigator's faulty logic caused him to point out, "Then you signed your name in somebody else's handwriting again."[7]

In the mid eighties, BBC ran a series called Q.E.D. which showed how certain things were made or put together.

In the 1978 sci-fi radio comedy, and later in the TV and novel adaptations of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, "Q.E.D." is referred to in the Guide's entry for the babel fish, when it is claimed that the babel fish is used as evidence for the non-existence of God.[8]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Euclid's Elements translated from Greek by Thomas L. Heath. 2003 Green Lion Press pg. xxiv
  2. ^ Entry δείκνυμι at LSJ.
  3. ^ Elements 2.5 by Euclid (ed. J. L. Heiberg), retrieved 16 July 2005
  4. ^ Philippe van Lansberge (1604). Triangulorum Geometriæ. Apud Zachariam Roman. pp. 1–5. 
  5. ^ The Chief Works of Benedict De Spinoza, translated by R. H. M. Elwes, 1951. ISBN 0-486-20250-X.
  6. ^ Donald E. Knuth, "Mathematical Typography", lecture to the ACM, 1975
  7. ^ Heller, Joseph (1971). Catch-22. ISBN 9780573606854. Retrieved 15 July 2011. 
  8. ^ Adams, Douglas (2005). The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (Film tie-in edition ed.). Basingstoke and Oxford: Pan Macmillan. pp. 62–64. ISBN 0-330-43798-4. 

External links[edit]