Voting in the Council of the European Union
This article is part of a series on the
The procedures for voting in the Council of the European Union are described in the treaties of the European Union. The Council of the European Union (or simply Council) has had its voting procedure amended by subsequent treaties and currently operates on a system brought forth by the Treaty of Nice. The Treaty of Lisbon is set to replace this system from 2014.
- 1 Qualified majority voting
- 1.1 Treaty of Rome (1958–1973)
- 1.2 Accession Treaty (1973–1979)
- 1.3 Accession Treaty (1979–1985)
- 1.4 Accession Treaty (1985–1995)
- 1.5 Accession Treaty (1995–2003)
- 1.6 Treaty of Nice (2003–2014/2017)
- 1.7 Square root method (rejected)
- 1.8 Treaty of Lisbon (2014 onwards)
- 1.9 Voting practice
- 1.10 Policy areas
- 2 Unanimity
- 3 External links
- 4 References
Qualified majority voting
This section presents the former, current, and proposed qualified majority voting systems employed in the Council of the European Union, and its predecessor institutions. While some policy areas require unanimity among all Council members, for selected policy areas qualified majority voting has existed right from the start. All major treaties have shifted some policy areas from unanimity to qualified majority voting.
Whenever the community was enlarged, voting weights for new members were defined and thresholds re-adjusted by accession treaties. After its inception in 1958, the most notable changes to the voting system occurred:
- with the 1973 enlargement, when the number of votes for the largest member states was increased from 4 to 10,
- with the Treaty of Nice, when the maximum number of votes was increased to 29, thresholds became defined in terms of percentages, and a direct population-dependent condition was introduced,
- with the Treaty of Lisbon, when the concept of votes was abandoned in favor of a "double majority" depending only on the number of states and the population represented.
All systems prescribed higher thresholds for passing acts that were not proposed by the Commission. Member states have to cast their votes en bloc (i.e., a member state may not split its votes). Hence, the number of votes rather describes the weight of a member's single vote.
The analysis of the distribution of voting power under different voting rules in the EU Council often requires the use of complex computational methods that go beyond a mere calculation of vote share, such as the Shapley-Shubik index or the Banzhaf measure.
Treaty of Rome (1958–1973)
According to Article 148 of the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (EEC Treaty), acts of the Council required for their adoption:
- 12 votes (if the act was proposed by the Commission), or
- 12 votes by at least 4 member states (if the act was not proposed by the Commission).
The values above are related to the EU-6, the founding member states. The treaty allocated the votes as follows:
- 4 votes: France, Germany, Italy,
- 2 votes: Belgium, Netherlands,
- 1 vote: Luxembourg.
Accession Treaty (1973–1979)
Article 148 of the EEC Treaty, specifying the qualified majority voting system of the Council, was amended by Article 8 of the Accession Treaty regulating the enlargement of the community by Denmark, Ireland, and the United Kingdom. Acts of the Council now required for their adoption:
- 41 votes (if the act was proposed by the Commission), or
- 41 votes by at least 6 member states (if the act was not proposed by the Commission).
These values were now related to the EU-9. The treaty allocated the votes as follows:
- 10 votes: France, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom,
- 5 votes: Belgium, Netherlands,
- 3 votes: Denmark, Ireland,
- 2 votes: Luxembourg.
Accession Treaty (1979–1985)
Article 148 of the EEC Treaty, specifying the qualified majority voting system of the Council, was amended by Article 14 of the Accession Treaty regulating the enlargement of the community by Greece. Acts of the Council now required for their adoption:
- 45 votes (if the act was proposed by the Commission), or
- 45 votes by at least 6 member states (if the act was not proposed by the Commission).
The votes allocated previously to the EU-9 did not change. Greece was allocated 5 votes.
Accession Treaty (1985–1995)
Article 148 of the EEC Treaty, specifying the qualified majority voting system of the Council, was amended by Article 14 of the Accession Treaty regulating the enlargement of the community by Portugal and Spain. Acts of the Council now required for their adoption:
- 54 votes (if the act was proposed by the Commission), or
- 54 votes by at least 8 member states (if the act was not proposed by the Commission).
The votes allocated previously to the EU-10 did not change. To the new members, the following votes were allocated:
- 8 votes: Spain,
- 5 votes: Portugal.
The Treaty of Maastricht established the European Community Treaty (EC Treaty) where the qualified majority voting system was detailed in Article 148. While this treaty transferred some policy areas subject to unanimity to qualified majority, it neither changed the voting weights nor the thresholds.
Accession Treaty (1995–2003)
Article 148 of the EC Treaty, specifying the qualified majority voting system of the Council, was amended by Article 8 of the Accession Treaty regulating the enlargement of the community by Austria, Finland, and Sweden. Acts of the Council now required for their adoption:
- 62 votes (if the act was proposed by the Commission), or
- 62 votes by at least 10 member states (if the act was not proposed by the Commission).
The votes allocated previously to the EU-12 did not change. To the new members, the following votes were allocated:
- 4 votes: Austria, Sweden,
- 3 votes: Finland.
Treaty of Nice (2003–2014/2017)
The currently applicable voting system of the Council is defined in the Treaty of Nice since its entry into force on 1 February 2003. The voting weights of the member states according to this treaty are shown in the table on the right.
The following conditions apply to taking decisions:
- Majority of countries: 50% + one; if proposal made by the Commission, or else at least two-thirds (66,67%),  and
- Majority of voting weights: 74%, and
- Majority of population: 62%.
The last condition is only checked upon request by a member state.
In the absence of consensus, qualified majority voting is the Council's key way of decision-making. In terms of the statistics before Croatia became a member of the EU (1 July 2013), the pass condition translated into:
- At least 14 (or 18, if proposal was not made by the Commission) countries,
- At least 255 of the total 345 voting weights,
- At least 311 mil. people represented by the states that vote in favour.
The last requirement is almost always already implied by the condition on the number of voting weights. The rare exceptions to this may occur in certain cases when a proposal is backed by exactly three of the six most populous member states but not including Germany, that is, three of France, UK, Italy, Spain and Poland, and by all or nearly all of the 21 other members.
Note that mechanisms by which the Commission makes a proposal may not require weighted votes. For example, the Anti-Dumping Advisory Committee (ADAC) can approve a proposal to impose tariffs based on a simple, unweighted majority. Since this simple majority vote leads to a Commission proposal to the Council, the simple majority effectively requires a qualified majority to overturn it (because overturning the recommendation of the ADAC means voting against a Commission proposal). This greatly increases the power of small member states in such circumstances.
The declarations of the conference which adopted the Treaty of Nice contained contradictory statements concerning qualified majority voting after the enlargement of the European Union to 25 and 27 members: one declaration specified that the qualifying majority of votes would increase to a maximum of 73.4%, contradicting another declaration which specified a qualifying majority of 258 votes (74.78%) after enlargement to 27 countries. But the treaties of accession following the Treaty of Nice clarified the actual required majority.
From 1 July 2013, at least 260 votes out of a total of 352 by at least 15 member states are required for legislation to be adopted by qualified majority. Croatia has 7 votes (the same as Denmark, Ireland, Lithuania, Slovakia and Finland).
In terms of the current statistics, the pass condition translates into:
- At least 15 (or 18, if proposal was not made by the Commission) countries,
- At least 260 of the total 352 voting weights,
- At least 313.6 mil. people represented by the states that vote in favour.
Square root method (rejected)
Poland proposed the Penrose method (also known as the "square root method"), which would narrow the weighting of votes between the largest and smallest countries in terms of population. The Czech Republic supported this method to some extent, but has warned it would not back a Polish veto on this matter. All the other states remained opposed. After previously refusing to discuss the issue, the German government agreed to include it for discussion at the June council. The given percentage is the game theoretical optimal threshold, and is known as the "Jagiellonian Compromise". The Penrose method voting weights allocated to the states are shown in the table to the right.
According to the proposal, the requirement for an act to pass in the Council was:
- Majority of voting weights: 61.4%.
Treaty of Lisbon (2014 onwards)
Article 16 of the "Treaty on European Union", as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon, stipulates that the Council voting arrangements of the Nice Treaty will apply until 31 October 2014. Moreover, until 31 March 2017, any member state can request that the Nice rules are used for a particular vote. Article 16 also states the conditions for a qualified majority, effective from 1 November 2014 (Lisbon rules):
- Majority of countries: 55%, comprising at least 15 of them, if acting on a proposal from the Commission or from the High Representative, or else 72%, and
- Majority of population: 65%.
A blocking minority requires—in addition to not meeting one of the two conditions above—that at least 4 countries (or, if not all countries participate in the vote, the minimum number of countries representing more than 35% of the population of the participating countries, plus one country) vote against the proposal. Thus, there may be cases where an act is passed, even though the population condition is not met. This precludes scenarios where 3 populous countries could block a decision against the other 24 countries.
Note that the Lisbon rules eradicated the use of "artificial" voting weights. This move, first proposed in the Constitution, is based on the size of populations and, at the same time, acknowledges the smaller member states' fears of being overruled by the larger countries.
In practice, the Council targeted unanimous decisions, and qualified majority voting was often simply used as a means to pressure compromises for consensus. For example in 2008, 128 out of 147 Council decisions were unanimous. Within the remaining decisions, there was a total of 32 abstentions and 8 votes against the respective decision. These opposing votes were cast twice by Luxembourg and once by each of Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Spain, Netherlands, and Portugal.
The EU has competence to make decisions only in those areas specified in the Treaties. Competence can be exclusive, joint with national governments, or supporting, with national governments having lead competence. The Lisbon Treaty added some policies to the responsibility of the European Union. Moreover, qualified majority voting (QMV) was extended to policy areas that required unanimity according to the Nice Treaty.
The new areas of QMV are:
|Initiatives of the High Representative for Foreign Affairs||Unanimity||QMV following unanimous request||15b TEU|
|Rules concerning the Armaments Agency||Unanimity||QMV||28D§2 TEU|
|Freedom to establish a business||Unanimity||QMV||47§2 TFEU|
|Self-employment access rights||Unanimity||QMV||47§2 TFEU|
|Freedom, security and justice – cooperation and evaluation||Unanimity||QMV||70 TFEU|
|Border controls||Unanimity||QMV||77 TFEU|
|Crime prevention incentives||Unanimity||QMV||69c TFEU|
|Police cooperation||Unanimity||QMV||69f TFEU|
|European Central Bank||Unanimity||QMV||107§3, 245b TFEU|
|Structural and Cohension Funds||Unanimity||QMV||161 TFEU|
|Organisation of the Council of the European Union||Unanimity||QMV||201b TFEU|
|European Court of Justice||Unanimity||QMV||245, 224a, 225a TFEU|
|Freedom of movement for workers||Unanimity||QMV||42 TFEU|
|Social security||Unanimity||QMV||42 TFEU|
|Criminal judicial cooperation||Unanimity||QMV||69a TFEU|
|Criminal law||Unanimity||QMV||69b TFEU|
|President of the European Council election||(New item)||QMV||9b§5 TEU|
|Foreign Affairs High Representative election||(New item)||QMV||9e§1 TEU|
|Funding the Common Foreign and Security Policy||Unanimity||QMV||28 TEU|
|Common defense policy||Unanimity||QMV||28e TEU|
|Withdrawal of a member state||(new item)||QMV||49a TEU|
|General economic interest services||Unanimity||QMV||16 TFEU|
|Diplomatic and consular protection||Unanimity||QMV||20 TFEU|
|Citizens initiative regulations||Unanimity||QMV||21 TFEU|
|Intellectual property||Unanimity||QMV||97a TFEU|
|Eurozone external representation||Unanimity||QMV||115c TFEU|
|Civil protection||Unanimity||QMV||176c TFEU|
|Administrative cooperation||Unanimity||QMV||176d TFEU|
|Emergency international aid||Unanimity||QMV||188i TFEU|
|Humanitarian aid||Unanimity||QMV||188j TFEU|
|Response to natural disasters or terrorism||(new item)||QMV||188R§3 TFEU|
|Economic and Social Committee||QMV||QMV||256a TFEU|
|Committee of the Regions||Unanimity||QMV||256a TFEU|
|Economic and Social Committee||Unanimity||QMV||256a TFEU|
|The EU budget||Unanimity||QMV||269 TFEU|
|This section needs additional citations for verification. (June 2010)|
Certain policy fields remain subject to unanimity in whole or in part, such as:
- membership of the Union (opening of accession negotiations, association, serious violations of the Union's values, etc.);
- the finances of the Union (own resources, the multiannual financial framework);
- harmonisation in the field of social security and social protection;
- certain provisions in the field of justice and home affairs (the European prosecutor, family law, operational police cooperation, etc.);
- the flexibility clause (352 TFEU) allowing the Union to act to achieve one of its objectives in the absence of a specific legal basis in the treaties;
- the common foreign and security policy, with the exception of certain clearly defined cases;
- the common security and defence policy, with the exception of the establishment of permanent structured cooperation;
- citizenship (the granting of new rights to European citizens, anti-discrimination measures);
- certain institutional issues (the electoral system and composition of the Parliament, certain appointments, the composition of the Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee, the seats of the institutions, the language regime, the revision of the treaties, including the bridging clauses, etc.).
- Majority Calculator for Council decisions
- A detailed summary of qualified majority voting
- BBC: Background on the voting weights discussion
- Analysis and history of voting weights in the Council
- New winners and old losers. A priori voting power in the EU25
- Article at EUABC
- europa.eu.int: Full text of the Constitution – Title IV article I-25
- Completion of the 5-th enlargement and institutional changes (votes in Council and European Parliament including Bulgaria's and Romania's from 1 Jan 2007)
- Enlargement and institutional changes. The European Commission Representation in Ireland. 16 March 2004. Archived from the original on 24 December 2005. Retrieved 29 June 2009.
For context, subsections of this document are entitled "The European Commission", "The Council of the European Union" and "European Parliament".
- eg Diego Varela and Javier Prado-Dominguez (2012) 'Negotiating the Lisbon treaty: Redistribution, efficiency and power indices', AUCO Czech Economic Review 6(2): 107-124.
- "Treaty of Rome" (TIF). Treaty establishing the European Economic Community. Official Journal of the European Communities at EUR-Lex. 1957. Retrieved 3 May 2011.
- "Accession of Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom (Adaptation decision 1973)" (TIF). Council decision of the European Communities adjusting the instruments concerning the accession of new Member States to the European Communities. Official Journal of the European Communities at EUR-Lex, L2. 1 January 1973. Retrieved 4 May 2011.
- L291 "Accession of Greece (1979)" (TIF). Documents concerning the accession of the Hellenic Republic to the European Communities. Official Journal of the European Communities at EUR-Lex. 19 November 1979. Retrieved 4 May 2011.
- "Accession of Spain and Portugal (1985)" (PDF). Documents concerning the accession of the Kingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Republic to the European Communities. Official Journal of the European Communities at EUR-Lex, L302. 15 November 1985. Retrieved 5 May 2011.
- "Treaty of Maastricht" (PDF). Treaty on European Union, together with the complete text of the Treaty establishing the European Community. Official Journal of the European Communities at EUR-Lex, vol. 35, C224. 31 August 1992. Retrieved 30 April 2011.
- "Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden (Adaptation decision 1995)" (TIF). Decision of the Council of the European Union adjusting the instruments concerning the accession of new Member States to the European Union. Official Journal of the European Communities at EUR-Lex, L1. 1 January 1995. Retrieved 5 May 2011.
- Calculated, when available, from the latest national censuses or most recent official estimates (many of which are cited in their respective column), using the exponential formula shown on the List of countries by past and future population article. This is done to normalize the different populations to a unique date, so that they are really comparable. (url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_European_Union_member_states_by_population)
- W. Slomczynski, K. Zyczkowski (2006). "Penrose Voting System and Optimal Quota" (pdf). Acta Physica Polonica B 37 (11): 3133–3143.
- "Treaty of Nice" (PDF). Amending the Treaty on the European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain Related Acts. Official Journal of the European Communities. 10 March 2001. Retrieved 2 May 2010.
- "Cowen welcomes ratification of Treaty of Nice by Ireland". Under its terms, the Treaty of Nice will enter into force on 1 February 2003. Department of foreign affairs, Republic of Ireland. 18 December 2002. Retrieved 27 August 2011.
- Article 205 of the EC Treaty and Articles 23 and 34 of the EU Treaty.
- Article 3 of the Treaty of Nice, passim.
- Declaration 21 in http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/treaties/dat/12001C/pdf/12001C_EN.pdf
- Declaration 20, ibid.
- "EU welcomes 28th member state - Croatia". European Council. 28 June 2013. Retrieved 2013-10-19.
- James G. Neuger (18 June 2007). "Merkel Sees Snags Over EU Treaty as Poland Holds Firm (Update1)". Bloomberg. Retrieved 2007-06-26.
- Renata Goldirova (20 June 2007). "Germany gives ear to Poland in 'Treaty of Lisbon' talks". EU Observer. Retrieved 2007-06-26.
- Physics World 2006; 19(3):35-37.
- "Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union". Council of the European Union document number: 6655/08. 15 April 2008. Retrieved 28 April 2011.
- Summary of Council Acts; Council of the European Union; retrieved on 16 June 2010.
- Areas of EU competence, Government of Ireland Referendum Commission, accessed on 2008-06-16
- New cases of qualified majority voting (Council and European Council), European Commission, accessed on 2008-06-17
- The provision reads:
Article 311 shall be repealed. A new Article 311a shall be inserted, with the wording of Article 299(2), first subparagraph, and Article 299(3) to (6); the text shall be amended as follows:
(e) the following new paragraph shall be added at the end of the Article:
"6. The European Council may, on the initiative of the Member State concerned, adopt a decision amending the status, with regard to the Union, of a Danish, French or Netherlands country or territory referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2. The European Council shall act unanimously after consulting the Commission."