Quantum no-deleting theorem
|
|
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page.
|
Quantum states are fragile in one sense and also robust in another sense. Quantum theory tells us that given a single quantum state it is impossible to determine it exactly. One needs an infinite number of identically prepared quantum states (copies) to know a state exactly. This has remarkable consequences in quantum information theory. One is the familiar no-cloning theorem for a single quantum [1]. Similar to the quantum no-cloning theorem, there is another no-go theorem in quantum information theory which is called as the no-deleting theorem [2]
Contents |
[edit] Quantum deleting
Suppose that there are two copies of an unknown quantum state. A pertinent question in this context is to ask if it is possible given two identical copies to delete one of them using quantum mechanical operations? It turns out that we cannot. The no-deleting theorem is a consequence of linearity of quantum mechanics. Like the no-cloning theorem this has important implications in quantum computing, quantum information theory and quantum mechanics in general.
The process of quantum deleting takes two copies of an arbitrary, unknown quantum state at the input port and outputs a blank state along with the original. Mathematically, this can be described by:
,
where
is the deleting operation which is not necessarily unitary (but a linear operator),
is the unknown quantum state,
is the blank state,
is the initial state of the deleting machine and
is the final state of the machine.
It may be noted that classical bits can be copied and deleted, as can qubits in orthogonal states. For example, if we have two identical qubits
and
then we can transform to
and
. In this case we have deleted the second copy. However, it follows from linearity of quantum theory that there is no
that can perform the deleting operation for any arbitrary state
.
Theorem
Let
be an unknown quantum state in some Hilbert space (and other states have their usual meaning). Then, there is no linear isometric transformation such that
, with the final state of the ancilla being independent of
.
[edit] Proof
The theorem holds for quantum states in any Hilbert space dimension. For simplicity, let us consider the deleting transformation for two identical qubits. If two qubits are in orthogonal states then we have
,
.
Let
be the state of an unknown qubit. If we have two copies of an unknown qubit, then by linearity of the deleting transformation we have
In the above expression, the following transformation has been used:
.
However, if we are able to delete a copy, then at the output port of the deleting machine the combined state should be
.
In general, these states are not identical and hence we can say that the machine fails to delete a copy. If we require that the final output states are same, then we will see that there is only one option:
, and
.
Since final state of the ancilla is normalized for all values of
it must be true that
and
are orthogonal. This means that the quantum information is simply in the final state of the ancilla. One can always obtain the unknown state from the final state of the ancilla using local operation on the ancilla Hilbert space. Thus, linearity of quantum theory does not allow an unknown quantum state to be deleted perfectly.
[edit] Consequence
- If it were possible to delete an unknown quantum state then using two pairs of EPR states we could send signals faster than light. Thus, the no-deleting theorem is inconsistent with the no-signalling condition.
- The no-cloning and the no-deleting theorems point to conservation of quantum information.
- A stronger version of the no-cloning theorem and the no-deleting theorem provide permanence to quantum information. To create a copy one must import the information from some part of the universe and to delete a state one needs to export it to another part of the universe where it will continue to exist.
[edit] See also
- No-broadcast theorem
- No-cloning theorem
- No-hiding theorem
- Quantum teleportation
- Quantum entanglement
- Quantum information
- Uncertainty principle
- Quantum cloning
[edit] References
- W.K. Wootters and W.H. Zurek, A Single Quantum Cannot be Cloned, Nature 299 (1982), 802.
- D. Dieks, Communication by EPR devices, Physics Letters A, vol. 92(6) (1982), 271.
- A. K. Pati and S. L. Braunstein, Impossibility of Deleting an Unknown Quantum State, Nature 404 (2000), 104.
,
,
.![|\psi\rangle_A |\psi\rangle_B |A\rangle_C = [\alpha^2 |0 \rangle_A |0\rangle_B + \beta^2
|1\rangle_A |1\rangle_B + \alpha \beta (|0\rangle_A |1\rangle_B + |1 \rangle_A |0\rangle_B ) ]
|A \rangle_C](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/math/1/3/3/133c5e071c8257c1adeaaf88ea496b8f.png)

.
, and
.