|This article needs additional citations for verification. (December 2012)|
|Paradigm(s)||multiparadigm: procedural, structured|
|Designed by||Mike Cowlishaw|
|Developer||Mike Cowlishaw, IBM|
|Stable release||ANSI X3.274 / 1996|
|Major implementations||VM/SP, TSO/E V2, SAAREXX, ARexx, BREXX, KEXX Regina|
|Dialects||NetRexx, Object REXX, now ooREXX|
|Influenced by||PL/I, Algol, EXEC 2|
|Influenced||NetRexx, Object REXX|
|Filename extension(s)||.exec .rexx .rex|
Rexx (Restructured Extended Executor) is an interpreted programming language developed at IBM by Mike Cowlishaw. It is a structured, high-level programming language designed for ease of learning and reading. Proprietary and open source REXX interpreters exist for a wide range of computing platforms; compilers exist for IBM mainframe computers.
Rexx is widely used as a scripting and macro language, and is often used for processing data and text and generating reports; these similarities with Perl mean that Rexx works well in Common Gateway Interface (CGI) programming and it is indeed used for this purpose. Rexx is the primary scripting language in some operating systems, e.g. OS/2, MVS, VM, AmigaOS, and is also used as an internal macro language in some other software, such as KEDIT, THE and the ZOC terminal emulator. Additionally, the Rexx language can be used for scripting and macros in any program that uses Windows Scripting Host ActiveX scripting engines languages (e.g. VBScript and JScript) if one of the Rexx engines is installed.
Rexx is supplied with VM/SP on up, TSO/E Version 2 on up, OS/2 (1.3 and later, where it is officially named Procedures Language/2), AmigaOS Version 2 on up, PC DOS (7.0 or 2000), and Windows NT 4.0 (Resource Kit: Regina). REXX scripts for OS/2 share the filename extension .cmd with other scripting languages, and the first line of the script specifies the interpreter to be used.
- 1 Features
- 2 History
- 3 Syntax
- 3.1 Looping
- 3.2 Conditionals
- 3.3 Testing for multiple conditions
- 3.4 Simple variables
- 3.5 Compound variables
- 3.6 Keyword instructions
- 3.7 Error handling and exceptions
- 4 See also
- 5 References
- 6 Further reading
- 7 External links
Rexx has the following characteristics and features:
- Simple syntax
- Small instruction set containing just two dozen instructions
- Freeform syntax
- Case-insensitive tokens, including variable names
- Character string basis
- Dynamic data typing, no declarations
- No reserved keywords, except in local context
- No include file facilities
- Arbitrary numerical precision
- Decimal arithmetic, floating-point
- A rich selection of built-in functions, especially string and word processing
- Automatic storage management
- Crash protection
- Content addressable data structures
- Associative arrays
- Straightforward access to system commands and facilities
- Simple error-handling, and built-in tracing and debugger
- Few artificial limitations
- Simplified I/O facilities
- Unconventional operators
- Only partly supports Unix style command line parameters, except specific implementations
- Provides no basic terminal control as part of the language, except specific implementations
- Provides no generic way to include functions and subroutines from external libraries, except specific implementations
Rexx has just twenty-three, largely self-evident, instructions (such as
select) with minimal punctuation and formatting requirements. It is essentially an almost free-form language with only one data-type, the character string; this philosophy means that all data are visible (symbolic) and debugging and tracing are simplified.
Rexx's syntax looks similar to PL/I, but has fewer notations; this makes it harder to parse (by program) but easier to use, except for cases where PL/I habits may lead to surprises. One of the REXX design goals was the principle of least astonishment.
Rexx was designed and first implemented, in assembly language, as an 'own-time' project between 20 March 1979 and mid-1982 by Mike Cowlishaw of IBM, originally as a scripting programming language to replace the languages EXEC and EXEC 2. It was designed to be a macro or scripting language for any system. As such, Rexx is considered a precursor to Tcl and Python. Rexx was also intended by its creator to be a simplified and easier to learn version of the PL/I programming language. However, some differences from PL/I may trip up the unwary.
It was first described in public at the SHARE 56 conference in Houston, Texas, in 1981, where customer reaction, championed by Ted Johnston of SLAC, led to it being shipped as an IBM product in 1982.
Over the years IBM included Rexx in almost all of its operating systems (VM/CMS, VM/GCS, MVS TSO/E, AS/400, VSE/ESA, AIX, CICS/ESA, PC DOS, and OS/2), and has made versions available for Novell NetWare, Windows, Java, and Linux.
The first non-IBM version was written for PC DOS by Charles Daney in 1984/5. The first compiler version appeared in 1987, written for CMS by Lundin and Woodruff. Other versions have also been developed for Atari, AmigaOS, Unix (many variants), Solaris, DEC, Windows, Windows CE, Pocket PC, DOS, Palm OS, QNX, OS/2, Linux, BeOS, EPOC32, AtheOS, OpenVMS, OpenEdition, Apple Macintosh, and Mac OS X.
The Amiga version of Rexx, called ARexx, was included with AmigaOS 2 onwards and was popular for scripting as well as application control. Many Amiga applications have an "ARexx port" built into them which allows control of the application from Rexx. One single Rexx script could even switch between different Rexx ports in order to control several running applications.
Several freeware versions of Rexx are available. In 1992, the two most widely used open-source ports appeared: Ian Collier's REXX/imc for Unix and Anders Christensen's Regina (later adopted by Mark Hessling) for Windows and Unix. BREXX is well known for WinCE and Pocket PC platforms, and has been "back-ported" to VM/370 and MVS.
OS/2 had a visual development system from Watcom VX-REXX another dialect was VisPro REXX from Hockware.
In 1996 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) published a standard for Rexx: ANSI X3.274–1996 "Information Technology – Programming Language REXX". More than two dozen books on Rexx have been published since 1985.
Since the mid-1990s, two newer variants of Rexx have appeared:
- NetRexx: compiles to Java byte-code via Java source code; this has no reserved keywords at all, and uses the Java object model, and is therefore not generally upwards-compatible with 'classic' Rexx.
- Object REXX: an object-oriented generally upwards-compatible version of Rexx.
In 1990, Cathy Dager of SLAC organized the first independent Rexx symposium, which led to the forming of the REXX Language Association. Symposia are held annually.
Rexx marked its 25th anniversary on 20 March 2004, which was celebrated at the REXX Language Association's 15th International REXX Symposium in Böblingen, Germany, in May 2004.
On October 12, 2004, IBM announced their plan to release their Object REXX implementation's sources under the Common Public License. Recent releases of Object REXX contain an ActiveX WSH scripting engine implementing this version of the Rexx language.
On February 22, 2005, the first public release of Open Object Rexx (ooRexx) was announced. This product contains a WSH scripting engine which allows for programming of the Windows operating system and applications with Rexx in the same fashion in which Visual Basic and Java/J++ are implemented by the default WSH installation and Perl, Tcl, Python third-party scripting engines.
A command-line Rexx interpreter is also installed with ooRexx, and it is also possible to run ooRexxScript programs from the command line by means of the CScript command (WScript may also be run from the command line) invoking the Windows Scripting Host.
A Rexx IDE, RxxxEd, has been developed for Windows. RxSock for network communication as well as other add-ons to and implementations of Regina Rexx have been developed, and a Rexx interpreter for the Windows command line is supplied in most Resource Kits for various versions of Windows and works under all of them as well as MS-DOS.
Portable Rexx by Kilowatt and Personal Rexx by Quercus are two Rexx interpreters designed for MS-DOS and can of course be run under Windows as well using a command prompt.
Spelling and capitalization
Originally the language was called Rex (Reformed Executor); the extra "X" was added to avoid collisions with other products' names. The expansion to Restructured Extended Executor is a backronym. REX was originally all uppercase because the mainframe code was uppercase oriented. The style in those days was to have all-caps names, partly because almost all code was still all-caps then. For the product it became REXX, and both editions of Mike Cowlishaw's book use all-caps. By the 1990s it was largely written Rexx or, with small caps: REXX. IBM documents use REXX, and the ANSI standard uses REXX; Mike Cowlishaw expressed in an email dated 2012-08-01 on the RexxLA list his order of preference to be: (a) REXX, (b) Rexx, (c) REXX.
||This section is written like a manual or guidebook. (December 2012)|
The loop control structure in Rexx begins with a
DO and ends with an
END but comes in several varieties. NetRexx uses the keyword
LOOP instead of
DO for looping, while ooRexx treats
DO as equivalent when looping.
Rexx supports a variety of traditional structured-programming loops while testing a condition either before (
do while) or after (
do until) the list of instructions are executed:
do while [condition] [instructions] end
do until [condition] [instructions] end
Like most languages, Rexx can loop while incrementing an index variable and stop when a limit is reached:
do index = start [to limit] [by increment] [for count] [instructions] end
The increment may be omitted and defaults to 1. The limit can also be omitted, which makes the loop continue forever.
Rexx permits counted loops, where an expression is computed at the start of the loop and the instructions within the loop are executed that many times:
do expression [instructions] end
Rexx can even loop until the program is terminated:
do forever [instructions] end
A program can break out of the current loop with the
leave instruction, which is the normal way to exit a
do forever loop, or can short-circuit it with the
Most unusually, Rexx allows both conditional and repetitive elements to be combined in the same loop:
do index = start [to limit] [by increment] [for count] [while condition] [instructions] end
do expression [until condition] [instructions] end
Testing conditions with
if [condition] then
ELSE clause is optional.
Or, to put it more concisely:
if [condition] then do
For single instructions,
END can also be omitted:
if [condition] then
Or, in another concise version:
if [condition] then [instruction]
Indentation is optional, but it helps improve the readability.
Testing for multiple conditions
SELECT is Rexx's CASE structure, like many other constructs derived from PL/I. Like some implementations of CASE constructs in other dynamic languages, Rexx's
WHEN clauses specify full conditions, which need not be related to each other. In that, they are more like cascaded sets of
IF-THEN-ELSEIF-THEN-...-ELSE code than they are like the C or Java
when [condition] then
[instruction] or NOP
when [condition] then
[instructions] or NOP
[instructions] or NOP
NOP instruction performs "no operation", and is used when the programmer wishes to do nothing in a place where one or more instructions would be required.
The OTHERWISE clause is optional. If omitted and no WHEN conditions are met, then the SYNTAX condition is raised.
Variables in Rexx are typeless, and initially are evaluated as their names, in upper case. Thus a variable's type can vary with its use in the program:
say hello /* => HELLO */ hello = 25 say hello /* => 25 */ hello = "say 5 + 3" say hello /* => say 5 + 3 */ interpret hello /* => 8 */ drop hello say hello /* => HELLO */
Unlike many other programming languages, classic Rexx has no direct support for arrays of variables addressed by a numerical index. Instead it provides compound variables. A compound variable consists of a stem followed by a tail. A . (dot) is used to join the stem to the tail. If the tails used are numeric, it is easy to produce the same effect as an array.
do i = 1 to 10 stem.i = 10 - i end
Afterwards the following variables with the following values exist: stem.1 = 9, stem.2 = 8, stem.3 = 7...
Unlike arrays, the index for a stem variable is not required to have an integer value. For example, the following code is valid:
i = 'Monday' stem.i = 2
In Rexx it is also possible to set a default value for a stem.
stem. = 'Unknown' stem.1 = 'USA' stem.44 = 'UK' stem.33 = 'France'
After these assignments the term
stem.3 would produce
The whole stem can also be erased with the DROP statement.
This also has the effect of removing any default value set previously.
By convention (and not as part of the language) the compound
stem.0 is often used to keep track of how many items are in a stem, for example a procedure to add a word to a list might be coded like this:
add_word: procedure expose dictionary. parse arg w n = dictionary.0 + 1 dictionary.n = w dictionary.0 = n return
It is also possible to have multiple elements in the tail of a compound variable. For example:
m = 'July' d = 15 y = 2005 day.y.m.d = 'Friday'
Multiple numerical tail elements can be used to provide the effect of a multi-dimensional array.
Features similar to Rexx compound variables are found in many other languages (including associative arrays in AWK, hashes in Perl and Hashtables in Java). Most of these languages provide an instruction to iterate over all the keys (or tails in Rexx terms) of such a construct, but this is lacking in classic Rexx. Instead it is necessary to keep auxiliary lists of tail values as appropriate. For example, in a program to count words the following procedure might be used to record each occurrence of a word.
add_word: procedure expose count. word_list parse arg w . count.w = count.w + 1 /* assume count. has been set to 0 */ if count.w = 1 then word_list = word_list w return
and then later:
do i = 1 to words(word_list) w = word(word_list,i) say w count.w end
At the cost of some clarity it is possible to combine these techniques into a single stem:
add_word: procedure expose dictionary. parse arg w . dictionary.w = dictionary.w + 1 if dictionary.w = 1 /* assume dictionary. = 0 */ then do n = dictionary.0+1 dictionary.n = w dictionary.0 = n end return
do i = 1 to dictionary.0 w = dictionary.i say i w dictionary.w end
Rexx provides no safety net here, so if one of the words happens to be a whole number less than
dictionary.0 this technique will fail mysteriously.
Recent implementations of Rexx, including IBM's Object REXX and the open source implementations like ooRexx include a new language construct to simplify iteration over the value of a stem, or over another collection object such as an array, table or list.
do i over stem. say i '-->' stem.i end
PARSE instruction is particularly powerful; it combines some useful string-handling functions. Its syntax is:
parse [upper] origin [template]
where origin specifies the source:
arg(arguments, at top level tail of command line)
linein(standard input, e.g. keyboard)
pull(Rexx data queue or standard input)
source(info on how program was executed)
with: the keyword
withis required to indicate where the expression ends
and template can be:
- list of variables
- column number delimiters
- literal delimiters
upper is optional; if specified, data will be converted to upper case before parsing.
Using a list of variables as template
myVar = "John Smith" parse var myVar firstName lastName say "First name is:" firstName say "Last name is:" lastName
displays the following:
First name is: John Last name is: Smith
Using a delimiter as template:
myVar = "Smith, John" parse var myVar LastName "," FirstName say "First name is:" firstName say "Last name is:" lastName
also displays the following:
First name is: John Last name is: Smith
Using column number delimiters:
myVar = "(202) 123-1234" parse var MyVar 2 AreaCode 5 7 SubNumber say "Area code is:" AreaCode say "Subscriber number is:" SubNumber
displays the following:
Area code is: 202 Subscriber number is: 123-1234
A template can use a combination of variables, literal delimiters, and column number delimiters.
The INTERPRET instruction evaluates its argument and treats its value as a Rexx statement. Sometimes INTERPRET is the clearest way to perform a task, but it is often used where clearer code is possible using, e.g.,
The INTERPRET instruction is powerful and one of the major reasons why writing Rexx compilers is not trivial.
The other reasons being Rexx's (decimal) arbitrary precision arithmetic (including fuzzy comparisons), use of the PARSE statement with programmatic templates, stemmed arrays, and sparse arrays. -->
/* demonstrate INTERPRET with square(4) => 16 */ X = 'square' interpret 'say' X || '(4) ; exit' SQUARE: return arg(1)**2
This displays 16 and exits. Because variable contents in Rexx are strings, including rational numbers with exponents and even entire programs, Rexx offers to interpret strings as evaluated expressions.
This feature could be used to pass functions as function parameters, such as passing SIN or COS to a procedure to calculate integrals.
Rexx offers only basic math functions like ABS, DIGITS, MAX, MIN, SIGN, RANDOM, and a complete set of hex plus binary conversions with bit operations. More complex functions like SIN had to be implemented from scratch or obtained from third party external libraries. Some external libraries, typically those implemented in traditional languages, did not support extended precision.
Later versions (non-classic) support
CALL variable constructs. Together with the built-in function
VALUE, CALL can be used in place of many cases of
INTERPRET. This is a classic program:
/* terminated by input "exit" or similar */ do forever ; interpret linein() ; end
A slightly more sophisticated "Rexx calculator":
X = 'input BYE to quit' do until X = 'BYE' ; interpret 'say' X ; pull X ; end
PULL is shorthand for
parse upper pull. Likewise,
ARG is shorthand for
parse upper arg.
The power of the INTERPRET instruction had other uses. The Valour software package relied upon Rexx's interpretive ability to implement an OOP environment. Another use was found in an unreleased Westinghouse product called Time Machine that was able to fully recover following a fatal error.
say digits() fuzz() form() /* => 9 0 SCIENTIFIC */ say 999999999+1 /* => 1.000000000E+9 */ numeric digits 10 /* only limited by available memory */ say 999999999+1 /* => 1000000000 */ say 0.9999999999=1 /* => 0 (false) */ numeric fuzz 3 say 0.99999999=1 /* => 1 (true) */ say 0.99999999==1 /* => 0 (false) */ say 100*123456789 /* => 1.23456789E+10 */ numeric form engineering say 100*123456789 /* => 12.34567890E+9 */ numeric digits 50 n=2 r=1 do forever /* Newton's method */ rr=(n/r+r)/2 if r=rr then leave r=rr end say "root" n '=' r /*root 2=1.414213562373095048801688724209698078569671875377*/ numeric digits 50 e=2.5 f=0.5 do n=3 f=f/n ee=e+f if e=ee then leave e=ee end say "e=" e /*e=2.7182818284590452353602874713526624977572470936998*/
The SIGNAL instruction is intended for abnormal changes in the flow of control (see the next section). However, it can be misused and treated like the GOTO statement found in other languages (although it is not strictly equivalent, because it terminates loops and other constructs). This can produce difficult-to-read code.
Error handling and exceptions
It is possible in Rexx to intercept and deal with errors and other exceptions, using the SIGNAL instruction. There are seven system conditions: ERROR, FAILURE, HALT, NOVALUE, NOTREADY, LOSTDIGITS and SYNTAX. Handling of each can be switched on and off in the source code as desired.
The following program will run until terminated by the user:
signal on halt; do a = 1 say a do 100000 /* a delay */ end end halt: say "The program was stopped by the user" exit
Many Rexx programmers believe that relying on the default value of symbols is dangerous and employ
signal on novalue or a similar statement. This intercepts uses of undefined variables, which would otherwise get their own (upper case) name as their value. Regardless of the state of the
NOVALUE condition, the status of a variable can always be checked with the built-in function
SYMBOL returning VAR for defined variables.
||Positive RC from a system command|
||Negative RC for a system command (e.g. command doesn't exist)|
||An unset variable was referenced|
||Input or output error (e.g. read attempts beyond end of file)|
||Invalid program syntax, or some other error condition|
||Significant digits are lost (ANSI Rexx, not in TRL second edition)|
When a condition is handled by
SIGNAL ON, the
RC system variables can be analyzed to understand the situation. RC contains the Rexx error code and SIGL contains the line number where the error arose.
Beginning with Rexx version 4 conditions can get names, and there's also a
CALL ON construct. That's handy if external functions do not necessarily exist:
ChangeCodePage: procedure /* protect SIGNAL settings */ signal on syntax name ChangeCodePage.Trap return SysQueryProcessCodePage() ChangeCodePage.Trap: return 1004 /* windows-1252 on OS/2 */
- Mark Hessling (2012-10-25). "Regina Rexx Interpreter". SourceForge project regina-rexx. Retrieved 2014-02-10.
- "Catalog of All Documents (filter=rexx)". IBM library server. 2005. Retrieved 2014-02-10.
- M. F. Cowlishaw (1984). "The design of the REXX language". IBM Systems Journal, VOL 23. NO 4, 1984 (PDF). IBM Research. p. 333. doi:10.1147/sj.234.0326. Retrieved 2014-01-23.
Could there be a high astonishment factor associated with the new feature? If a feature is accidentally misapplied by the user and causes what appears to him to be an unpredictable result, that feature has a high astonishment factor and is therefore undesirable. If a necessary feature has a high astonishment factor, it may be necessary to redesign the feature.
- M. F. Cowlishaw. "IBM REXX Brief History". IBM. Retrieved 2006-08-15.
- M. F. Cowlishaw (1981-02-18). "REX -- A Command Programming Language". SHARE. Retrieved 2006-08-15.
- Lundin, Leigh; Woodruff, Mark (1987-04-23). "T/REXX, a REXX compiler for CMS". U.S. Copyright Office (Washington, DC: Independent Intelligence Incorporated) (TXu000295377).
- "Rexx Implementations". RexxLA. Archived from the original on 2006-09-24. Retrieved 2006-08-15.
- Howard Fosdick (2005). Rexx Programmer's Reference. Wiley Publishing. p. 390. ISBN 0-7645-7996-7.
- M. F. Cowlishaw (1990). The Rexx Language - A Practical Approach to Programming (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-780651-5.
- Callaway, Merrill. The Rexx Cookbook: A Tutorial Guide to the Rexx Language in OS/2 & Warp on the IBM Personal Computer. Whitestone, 1995. ISBN 0-9632773-4-0.
- Cowlishaw, Michael. The Rexx Language: A Practical Approach to Programming. Prentice Hall, 1990. ISBN 0-13-780651-5.
- Cowlishaw, Michael. The NetRexx Language. Prentice Hall, 1997. ISBN 0-13-806332-X.
- Daney, Charles. Programming in REXX. McGraw-Hill, TX, 1990. ISBN 0-07-015305-1.
- Deuring, Johannes. REXX Grundlagen für die z/OS Praxis. Germany, 2005. ISBN 3-486-20025-9.
- Ender, Tom. Object-Oriented Programming With Rexx. John Wiley & Sons, 1997. ISBN 0-471-11844-3.
- Fosdick, Howard. Rexx Programmer's Reference. Wiley/Wrox, 2005. ISBN 0-7645-7996-7.
- Gargiulo, Gabriel. REXX with OS/2, TSO, & CMS Features. MVS Training, 1999 (third edition 2004). ISBN 1-892559-03-X.
- Goldberg, Gabriel and Smith, Philip H. The Rexx Handbook . McGraw-Hill, TX, 1992. ISBN 0-07-023682-8.
- Goran, Richard K. REXX Reference Summary Handbook. CFS Nevada, Inc.,1997. ISBN 0-9639854-3-4.
- IBM Redbooks. Implementing Rexx Support in Sdsf. Vervante, 2007. ISBN 0-7384-8914-X.
- Kiesel, Peter C. Rexx: Advanced Techniques for Programmers. McGraw-Hill, TX, 1992. ISBN 0-07-034600-3.
- Marco, Lou ISPF/REXX Development for Experienced Programmers. CBM Books, 1995. ISBN 1-878956-50-7
- O'Hara, Robert P. and Gomberg, David Roos. Modern Programming Using Rexx. Prentice Hall, 1988. ISBN 0-13-597329-5.
- Rudd, Anthony S. Practical Usage of Rexx. Ellis Horwood Ltd., 1991. ISBN 0-13-682790-X.
- Schindler, William. Down to Earth Rexx. Perfect Niche Software, 2000. ISBN 0-9677590-0-5.