Raoul Berger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Raoul Berger (1901 – 2000) was an attorney and professor at The University of California at Berkeley and Harvard University School of Law. While at Harvard, he was the Charles Warren Senior Fellow in American Legal History.

He was born in Ukraine and migrated to the U.S., as a child, with his parents in 1904. He first pursued studies as a concert violinist at the Institute of Musical Art in New York that culminated in his joining the Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra as its 2nd Concert Master (1928-1932) and the 1st violinist of the Cincinnati String Quartet (1929-1932).[1] After earning his A.B. from the University of Cincinnati in 1932, he abandoned his professional music career to study law at Northwestern University School of Law, from which he graduated at age 35. He practiced law in Chicago before enrolling at Harvard University School of Law where he earned his Master of Laws degree (LL.M.) in 1938.[1] Upon his graduation, Berger worked first for the Securities and Exchange Commission, then as Special Assistant to the U.S. Attorney General, and, finally, as Counsel to the Alien Property Custodian during World War II. Following the war, he entered private practice in Washington, D.C. where he remained until 1961.[1] Berger began teaching law at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law in 1962 as its Regents' Professor and later became the Charles Warren Senior Fellow in American Legal History at Harvard University School of Law from 1971 to 1976.[1]

His notable work was in the area of constitutional scholarship. Berger has written extensively about Impeachment, Executive Privilege, and the Fourteenth Amendment.

His publications include:

Berger was a popular academic critic of the doctrine of "executive privilege" and was viewed as playing a significant role in undermining President Richard Nixon's constitutional arguments during the impeachment process.[2]

But Berger unleashed a firestorm of controversy within the legal academy with his next book, Government by Judiciary. In it, Berger claimed that the Warren Court's expansive interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment alternately distorted and ignored the intentions of the framers of that amendment as disclosed by the historical record. Berger drew further heat by presenting arguments that the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment did not intend it to forbid segregated schooling.[2] The book is widely credited as the first work of legal scholarship from an originalist perspective, although some originalists disagree with the conclusions Berger draws from the historical record.[3] Berger further posited that the Warren Court expanded the authority of the judiciary without constitutional warrant.

Though Berger identified himself as a political liberal and had gained favor with the left during the Nixon years, after publication of Government by Judiciary Berger was widely assumed to be a right-wing figure both politically and jurisprudentially, despite Berger's own protestations to the contrary.[2]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d "Berger, Raoul. Papers, 1921-2000: Finding Aid,". Harvard Law School Library, Cambridge, MA 02138. 
  2. ^ a b c Crapanzano, Vincent (2000). Serving the Word: Literalism in America from the Pulpit to the Bench. New York: The New Press. pp. 246–251. ISBN 1-56584-673-7. 
  3. ^ Bennett, Robert & Solum, Lawrence (2011). Constitutional Originalism: A Debate. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. pp. 160–165, 195. ISBN 0-8014-4793-3.