Re Residential Tenancies Act, 1979
| Reference re Residential Tenancies Act | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hearing: November 25, 26, 1980 Judgment: May 28, 1981 |
|||
|
|||
| Court membership | |||
|
Chief Justice: Bora Laskin |
|||
| Reasons given | |||
|
Majority by: Dickson J. |
|||
Reference re Residential Tenancies Act, [1981] 1 S.C.R. 714 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the jurisdiction of superior courts provided by section 96 of the Constitution Act, 1867. The Court formulated a three step test for determining whether an administrative body was encroaching upon the jurisdiction of the superior courts.
Contents |
[edit] Test Formulated by Court
Justice Dickson, writing for the majority, suggested the test.
- Firstly, it must be determined "whether the power or jurisdiction conforms to the power or jurisdiction exercised by superior, district or county courts at the time of Confederation."[1]
- Secondly, the test asks "whether the function itself is different when viewed in that setting. In particular, can the function still be considered to be a 'judicial' function."[2]
- Thirdly, the test asks the court to "review the tribunal's function as a whole in order to appraise the impugned function in its entire institutional context."[3]
In this case, it was determined that Ontario's Residential Tenancies Act was not valid provincial legislation.
[edit] Subsequent case law
The test was later applied in Massey-Ferguson Industries v. Govt. of Sask., [1981] 2 S.C.R. 413, and eventually modified in Sobeys Stores v. Yeomans, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 238.
[edit] See also
[edit] Notes
[edit] External links
- Full text of Supreme Court of Canada decision at LexUMand CanLII
| This article about Canadian law is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |