Same-sex marriage in Montana
The state of Montana has recognized same-sex marriage since a federal court ruled the state's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional on November 19, 2014. It had previously denied marriage rights to same-sex couples by statute since 1997 and in its constitution since 2004.
On November 2, 2004, Montana voters approved Initiative 96, a state initiated constitutional amendment that prohibited the recognition of same-sex marriage, as well as anything "identical or substantially similar to marital status" in the state of Montana.
Rolando v. Fox
Four same-sex couples represented by the ACLU and local attorneys filed a lawsuit in federal court in Great Falls on May 21, 2014, challenging the Montana Constitution's definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman and related statutes. The plaintiffs in the suit, Rolando v. Fox', include three couples (Shauna and Nicole Goubeaux, Ben Milano and Chase Weinhandl, Sue Hawthorne and Adel Johnson) who married in Hawaii, Iowa, and Washington state. A fourth couple, Angela and Tonya Rolando, were denied a marriage license by the Cascade County Clerk of Court. Governor Steve Bullock has expressed support for the plaintiffs. Attorney General Timothy C. Fox is defending the state. On October 15, citing the recent decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Latta v. Otter, which ended bans on same-sex marriage in Idaho and Nevada, they asked the court for summary judgment. Their brief compared the texts of Montana's ban with those of Idaho and Nevada and used the Latta decision to counter the state's arguments. Judge Brian Morris ruled for the plaintiffs on November 19, 2014, and his injunction against the state's enforcement of its ban on same-sex marriage took effect immediately. Attorney General Fox announced plans to appeal the decision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Donaldson v. State of Montana
In July 2010, seven same-sex couples in Montana filed a lawsuit against the state. The suit contends that even with the ban on same-sex marriage, the state constitution's guarantees of privacy, dignity, and the pursuit of life's basic necessities and its guarantees of equal protection and due process require the state to offer same-sex couples the same rights and protections it offers to different-sex couples through marriage. A state District Court heard arguments in January 2011 in the case, Donaldson v. State of Montana. The city of Bozeman backed their suit. The Court ruled against the plaintiffs on April 19, 2011, and the plaintiffs, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) appealed that decision to the Montana Supreme Court on August 4, arguing that the marriage amendment does not preclude providing rights other than the name "marriage" to same-sex couples. On December 17, 2012, that court in a 4-3 decision denied the plaintiffs request to find Montana's entire "statutory scheme" unconstitutional, but invited them to renew their suit in District Court by specifying the statutes they are challenging.
The Montana Supreme Court in Snetsinger v. Montana University System (2004) ruled that the state university's policy of denying insurance coverage to same-sex domestic partners of its gay and lesbian employees violated the state constitution's equal protection requirements. Montana has provided benefits to same-sex partners of state employees since 2005.
In 2009, a domestic partnership bill was proposed. The domestic partnership bill would have provided for basic rights such as hospital visitation access for one's partner and joint property ownership. The bill was swiftly killed in the legislature.
|% support||% opposition||% no opinion|
|New York Times/CBS News/YouGov||September 20-October 1, 2014||549 likely voters||± 4.5%||45%||41%||14%|
|MSU Billings||October 2013||410 adults||± 5%||46.6%||42.6%||10.8%|
|Public Policy Polling||June 21-23, 2013||807 registered voters||± 3.4%||42%||48%||10%|
|Public Policy Polling||February 15-17, 2013||1,011 voters||± 3.1%||43%||49%||8%|
|Public Policy Polling||April 26-29, 2012||934 voters||± 3.2%||41%||48%||11%|
|Public Policy Polling||November 28-30, 2011||1,625 voters||± 2.4%||37%||51%||12%|
- LGBT rights in Montana
- Civil union in the United States
- Domestic partnership in the United States
- Status of same-sex marriage
- Timeline of same-sex marriage
- State Laws Prohibiting Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships
- 40-1-103. Formalities.
- 40-1-401. Prohibited marriages -- contracts.
- CNN: Election 2004 - Ballot Measures, accessed April 7, 2011.
- King, Jon (May 21, 2014). "Lawsuit Filed to End Montana Defenition of Marriage, Governor Bullock Applauds". KGVO. Retrieved October 15, 2014.
- "Montana judge asked to decide on gay marriage". Billings Gazette. Associated Press. October 15, 2014. Retrieved October 15, 2014.
- Johnson, Chris (November 19, 2014). "Judge strikes down Montana ban on same-sex marriage". Washington Blade. Retrieved November 19, 2014.
- Garcia, Michelle (2010-07-22). "Gay Montana Couples Sue State". Advocate.com. Retrieved 2010-07-23.
- Billings Gazette: "Gay couples argue for same rights as wedded people," January 25, 2011, accessed April 14, 2011
- KTVM: "Bozeman Commission Backs Same-Sex Couples," September 27, 2010, accessed April 14, 2011
- Independent Record (Helena): Matt Gouras, "Judge rules against gay couples seeking rights," April 21, 2011, accessed April 21, 2011
- KTVM.com: Lauren Maschmedt, "ACLU Takes Same-Sex Case To State Supreme Court," August 4, 2011, accessed August 4, 2011
- Geidner, Chris (December 17, 2012). "Montana Supreme Court Rejects Broad Equal Benefits Claim By Gay Couples". Buzz Feed. Retrieved December 17, 2012.
- Justia.com: Snetsinger v. Montana University System, accessed April 25, 2011
- National Conference of State Legislatures: "States offering benefits for same-sex partners of state employees", accessed April 16, 2011
- HOUSE BILL NO. 590
- HB 590
- Missoula County, Montana approves health benefits for domestic partners
- Missoula City Council Unanimously Approves Same-Sex – Domestic Partner Registration [AUDIO]
- Missoula City Council passes domestic partnership registry resolution