Recognition of same-sex unions in Nevada
|Legal recognition of
† Not yet in effect
Nevada has recognized same-sex unions since October 1, 2009 through domestic partnerships, after the state legislature enacted legislation over Governor Jim Gibbons's veto. The state maintains a domestic partnership registry that enables same-sex couples to enjoy the same rights as married couples. It allows opposite-sex couples to establish domestic partnerships as well. Same-sex marriage is banned by the Constitution since 2002.
Same-sex marriage ban
In 2013, the state legislature began work on legislation that repeals the constitutional ban and substituting a gender neutral definition of marriage. The Senate approved the legislation on April 22 on a 12–9 vote. and the Assembly passed the resolution on May 23 by a 27-14 vote. It requires approval by the 2015 legislature and by voters in the 2016 election to take effect.
Senate Bill 283, legislation creating domestic partnerships in which unmarried couples–both same-sex couples and different-sex couples–would have most of the rights of married couples was sponsored by openly gay Democratic Senator David Parks of Las Vegas. To attract support he modified his original draft so that the legislation exempted both private and public employers from having to provide health care benefits to their employees' domestic partners. It passed the Senate on April 21, 2009, on a 12-9 vote. The Nevada Assembly passed the legislation 26–14 on May 15. Neither house of the legislature had passed the bill with the two-thirds vote needed to override the governor's veto. On May 25, Republican Governor Jim Gibbons vetoed the legislation. In his veto message he wrote: "I believe because the voters have determined that the rights of marriage should apply only to married couples, only the voters should determine whether those rights should equally apply to domestic partners."
The Domestic Partnership Responsibilities Act provides many of the state-level rights, responsibilities, obligations, entitlements and benefits of marriage under the name domestic partnership. They differ from marriage in failing to qualify as marriages for federal government purposes and in lacking a requirement that businesses and governments provide health benefits to the domestic partners of their employees if they do so for the spouses of their married employees. However, on June 26, 2013, the United States Supreme Court ruled on United States v. Windsor, which challenged the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The Court declared DOMA unconstitutional, reasoning that it violates the protections of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as well as the equal protection guarantee of the Fourteenth Amendment, which "makes that Fifth Amendment right all the more specific and all the better preserved and understood". Because of the Court's ruling in United States v. Windsor, federal government benefits are extended to same-sex couples and their children in states where same-sex marriage is legalized. The Domestic Partnership Responsibilities Act would now fail to qualify domestic partnerships as marriages only for the purpose of requiring businesses and governments to provide the health benefits stated above because of the Supreme Court's ruling in United States v. Windsor.
Nevada domestic partnerships differ from marriage in that a couple forming a domestic partnership must share a common residence. Domestic partners must be at least 18 years old, the same age required for marriage. While someone who wishes to marry can do so at age 16 with the consent of one parent, no comparable exception is provided for someone who wishes to enter into a domestic partnership before the age of 18.
Some rights provided by a Nevada domestic partnership are:
- Hospital visitation, health care decision–making, and information–access rights
- Inheritance rights, including the right to administer the estate of an intestate domestic partner, and Business succession rights
- Rights regarding cemetery plots, disposition of remains, anatomical donations, and ordering of autopsies
- A surviving domestic partner may bring a wrongful death action based on the death of the other partner
- Community property, domestic violence and testimonial privileges rules apply
- Dissolution laws apply (with only a few exceptions)
- Domestic partners may sue on behalf of the community
- Certain property transfers between partners are not taxed
- State veterans benefits apply
- Appointed and elected officials' domestic partners are subject to the same laws and regulations that apply to officials’ spouses
- Employment benefits, including sick leave to care for a domestic partner; wages and benefits when a domestic partner is injured, and to unpaid wages upon the death of a domestic partner; unemployment and disability insurance benefits; workers' compensation coverage
- Insurance rights, including rights under group policies, policy rights after the death of a domestic partner, conversion rights and continuing coverage rights
- Rights related to adoption, child custody and child support
In May 2009 the Las Vegas Review-Journal polled Nevadans for their opinion on the domestic partnership bill and found that 38 percent favored it, while 50 percent opposed it and 12 percent were undecided. Self-identified Democrats supported the domestic partner legislation 46 percent to 36 percent. Similarly, independents showed 47 percent support and 42 percent opposition. Republicans expressed much stronger opposition, 71 percent; only 23 percent of Republicans supported the bill.
An April 2011 Public Policy Polling survey found that 74% of Nevada voters supported legal recognition of same-sex couples, with 33% supporting same-sex marriage and 41% supporting civil unions, while 25% opposed all legal recognition and 2% were not sure.
An August 2011 Public Policy Polling survey found that 45% of Nevada voters supported legalizing same-sex marriage, with 44% thinking it should be illegal, and 11% were not sure. In a separate question, 77% of Nevada voters supported legal recognition of same-sex couples, with 39% supporting same-sex marriage and 38% supporting civil unions, while 22% opposed all legal recognition and 2% were not sure.
An August 2012 Public Policy Polling survey found that 47% of Nevada voters supported legalizing same-sex marriage, with 42% thinking it should be illegal, and 11% were not sure. In a separate question, 80% of Nevada voters supported legal recognition of same-sex couples, with 40% supporting same-sex marriage and 40% supporting civil unions, while 17% opposed all legal recognition and 2% were not sure.
A February 2013 poll found majority support for same-sex marriage among Nevada voters. The Retail Association of Nevada poll found that 54% were in favor of it, while 43% were opposed.
A poll released in October 2013 by the Retail Association of Nevada found that 57% of Nevada voters favor removing the constitutional marriage amendment in order to allow same-sex couples to legally marry, while 36% are opposed.
On April 10, 2012, Lambda Legal filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada. In the case of Sevcik v. Sandoval, it argued that "No legitimate ... interest exists to exclude same-sex couples from the historic and highly venerated institution of marriage, especially where the State already grants lesbians and gay men access to almost all substantive spousal rights and responsibilities through registered domestic partnership." The cases raises equal protect claims but does not assert a fundamental right to marry. On November 29, Judge Robert C. Jones ruled against the plaintiffs, holding that "the maintenance of the traditional institution of civil marriage as between one man and one woman is a legitimate state interest". The decision has been appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which will consider it in conjunction with a similar Hawaii case, Jackson v. Abercrombie.
- Amendments to the Constitution of Nevada must be approved twice by voters if initiated by the people, or twice by the legislature and once by voters if initiated by the legislature.
- "Senate Bill No. 283" (PDF). Retrieved 2013-12-02.
- "Senate Joint Resolution 13". Leg.state.nv.us. Retrieved 2013-12-02.
- "Nev. senate panel amends, passes gay marriage bill". Reno Gazette-Journal. April 11, 2013.
- Chereb, Sandra (April 22, 2013). "Gay marriage resolution advances in Nevada". Reno Gazette-Journal. Retrieved April 23, 2013.
- "Nevada Assembly backs resolution to end ban on gay marriage". Las Vegas Sun. May 23, 2013.
- Hagar, Ray (April 28, 2013). "Long road ahead for marriage equality in Nevada". Reno Gazette-Journal. Retrieved May 24, 2013.
- Vogel, Ed (May 25, 2009). "Gibbons vetoes domestic partner bill". Las Vegas Review-Journal. Retrieved May 23, 2013.
- Ryan, Cy (May 30, 2009). "Senate overrides governor’s veto of domestic partners bill". Las Vegas Sun. Retrieved May 23, 2013.
- Friess, Steve (June 1, 2009). "Nevada Partnership Bill Now Law". New York Times. Retrieved 23 May 2013.
- "Domestic partnership certificates issued in Nevada". USA Today. October 1, 2009. Retrieved May 23, 2013.
- "Domestic Partnerships in Nevada, April 5, 2012". LGBT Topics. ACLU of Nevada. Retrieved May 23, 2013.
- United States v. Windsor (US 2013)
- "Nevada Marriage Age Requirements Laws". Law.findlaw.com. Retrieved 2013-12-02.
- "Showdown expected in Nevada over partner bill". 365gay.com. Retrieved 2013-12-02.
- "Sandoval still trounces Reid in re-do" (PDF). Retrieved 2013-12-02.
- "NV supports prostitution, gay marriage, but not online poker" (PDF). Retrieved 2013-12-02.
- "Heller hanging on over Berkley". Public Policy Polling. Retrieved 2012-08-28.
- "54% Support Repealing Ban On Marriage Equality In Nevada". Gayapolis News. Retrieved 2013-02-26.
- "57% Of Nevadans Favor Repeal Of Gay Marriage Ban". On Top Magazine. October 4, 2013.
- "RAN Poll Shows Nevadans Optimistic about State's Economy, but Recovery Not Felt by Most Households". Retail Association of Nevada.
- MetroWeekly: Chris Geidner, "Lambda Legal Files Federal Lawsuit Seeking Marriage Equality in Nevada," April 10, 2012, accessed June 4, 2012
- Geidner, Chris (November 29, 2012). "Federal Judge Rules Nevada Can Ban Same-Sex Couples From Marriage". BuzzFeed Politics. Retrieved November 30, 2012.
- "Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals allows Hawaii and Nevada marriage cases to be heard on a parallel track". Equality on Trial. January 7, 2013.