Reduction of the structure group
||It has been suggested that this article be merged with G-structure. (Discuss) Proposed since August 2012.|
In mathematics, in particular the theory of principal bundles, one can ask if a principal -bundle over a group "comes from" a subgroup of . This is called reduction of the structure group (to ), and makes sense for any map , which need not be an inclusion map (despite the terminology).
Note that these do not always exist, nor if they exist are they unique.
As a concrete example, every even-dimensional real vector space is the underlying real space of a complex vector space: it admits a linear complex structure. A real vector bundle admits an almost complex structure if and only if it is the underlying real bundle of a complex vector bundle. This is a reduction along the inclusion GL(n,C) → GL(2n,R)
In terms of transition maps, a G-bundle can be reduced if and only if the transition maps can be taken to have values in H. Note that the term reduction is misleading: it suggests that H is a subgroup of G, which is often the case, but need not be (for example for spin structures): it's properly called a lifting.
More abstractly, "G-bundles over X" is a functor in G: given a map H → G, one gets a map from H-bundles to G-bundles by inducing (as above). Reduction of the structure group of a G-bundle B is choosing an H-bundle whose image is B.
The inducing map from H-bundles to G-bundles is in general neither onto nor one-to-one, so the structure group cannot always be reduced, and when it can, this reduction need not be unique. For example, not every manifold is orientable, and those that are orientable admit exactly two orientations.
If H is a Lie subgroup of G, then there is a natural one-to-one correspondence between reductions of a G-bundle B to H and global sections of the fiber bundle B/H obtained by quotienting B by the right action of H. Specifically, the fibration B → B/H is a principal H-bundle over B/H. If σ : X → B/H is a section, then the pullback bundle BH = σ−1B is a reduction of B.
- is an orientation, and this is possible if and only if the bundle is orientable
- is a volume form; since is a deformation retract, a volume form exists if and only if a bundle is orientable
- is a pseudo-volume form, and this is always possible
- is a Riemannian metric; as is the maximal compact subgroup (so the inclusion is a deformation retract), this is always possible
- is a pseudo-Riemannian metric; there is the topological obstruction to this reduction
- is an almost complex structure
- (where is the group of n×n invertible quaternionic matrices acting on on the left and Sp(1)=Spin(3) the group of unit quaternions acting on from the right) is an almost quaternionic structure
- (which is not an inclusion: it's a 2-fold covering space) is a spin structure.
- decomposes a vector bundle as a Whitney sum (direct sum) of sub-bundles of rank k and n − k.
Many geometric structures are stronger than G-structures; they are G-structures with an integrability condition. Thus such a structure requires a reduction of the structure group (and can be obstructed, as below), but this is not sufficient. Examples include complex structure, symplectic structure (as opposed to almost complex structures and almost symplectic structures).
G-bundles are classified by the classifying space BG, and similarly H-bundles are classified by the classifying space BH, and the induced G-structure on an H-bundle corresponds to the induced map . Thus given a G-bundle with classifying map , the obstruction to the reduction of the structure group is the class of as a map to the cofiber ; the structure group can be reduced if and only if the class of is null-homotopic.
When is a homotopy equivalence, the cofiber is contractible, so there is no obstruction to reducing the structure group, for example for .
Conversely, the cofiber induced by the inclusion of the trivial group is again , so the obstruction to an absolute parallelism (trivialization of the bundle) is the class of the bundle.
Structure over a point
As a simple example, there is no obstruction to reducing the structure group of a -space to an -space, thinking of a -space as a -bundle over a point, as in that case the classifying map is null-homotopic, as the domain is a point. Thus there is no obstruction to "reducing the structure group" of a vector space: thus every vector space admits an orientation, and so forth.
- Indeed, it is a bifunctor in G and X.
- In classical field theory, such a section describes a classical Higgs field (arXiv: hep-th/0510158).
- It is a gravitational field in gauge gravitation theory (arXiv: gr-qc/0512115)
- Besse 1987, §14.61
- Steenrod, N. (1972). The Topology of Fibre Bundles. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
- Hirzebruch, F. (1966). Topological Methods in Algebraic Geometry. Berlin: Springer.
- Kobayashi, S.; Nomizu, K. (1963). Foundations of Differential Geometry, Vol.1. New York: Interscience Publ.
- Giachetta, G.; Mangiarotti, L.; Sardanashvily, G. (2009). Advanced Classical Field Theory. Singapore: World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-283-895-7.
- Besse, Arthur (1987). Einstein Manifolds. ISBN 978-3-540-74120-6.