Reid v. Covert

Reid v. Covert
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued May 3, 1956 Reargued February 27, 1957 Decided June 10, 1957
Full case name	Reid, Superintendent, District of Columbia Jail v. Clarice Covert
Citations	354 U.S. 1 (more) 77 S. Ct. 1222; 1 L. Ed. 2d 1148; 1957 U.S. LEXIS 729
Holding
The Constitution supersedes all treaties ratified by the United States Senate. The military may not try the civilian wife of a soldier under military jurisdiction.
Court membership
Chief Justice Earl Warren Associate Justices Hugo Black · Felix Frankfurter William O. Douglas · Harold H. Burton Tom C. Clark · John M. Harlan II William J. Brennan, Jr. · Charles E. Whittaker
Case opinions
Plurality	Black, joined by Warren, Douglas, Brennan
Concurrence	Frankfurter
Concurrence	Harlan
Dissent	Clark, joined by Burton
Whittaker took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
U.S. Const. Art. VI

Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the Constitution supersedes international treaties ratified by the United States Senate. According to the decision, "this Court has regularly and uniformly recognized the supremacy of the Constitution over a treaty," although the case itself was with regard to an executive agreement, not a "treaty" in the U.S. legal sense, and the agreement itself has never been ruled unconstitutional.

Background

The case involved Mrs. Covert, who had been convicted by a military tribunal of murdering her husband. At the time of Mrs. Covert's alleged offense, an executive agreement was in effect between the United States and United Kingdom which permitted United States' military courts to exercise exclusive jurisdiction over offenses committed in Great Britain by American servicemen or their dependents.

Opinion of the Court

The Court found: "No agreement with a foreign nation can confer power on the Congress, or on any other branch of Government, which is free from the restraints of the Constitution." The Court's core holding of the case is that U.S. Citizen civilians abroad have the right to Fifth Amendment and Sixth Amendment constitutional protections.^{[citation needed]}

The Court found it unconstitutional to adjudge U.S. citizen civilians in military courts, under UCMJ.^{[citation needed]}

The Court agreed with the petitioners, concluding that as United States citizens they were entitled to the protections of the Bill of Rights, notwithstanding that they committed crimes in foreign soil. The Court distinguished Reid from the Insular Cases: The "Insular Cases" can be distinguished from the present cases in that they involved the power of Congress to provide rules and regulations to govern temporarily territories with wholly dissimilar traditions and institutions.

Justice Black declared: "The concept that the Bill of Rights and other constitutional protections against arbitrary government are inoperative when they become inconvenient or when expediency dictates otherwise is a very dangerous doctrine and if allowed to flourish would destroy the benefit of a written Constitution and undermine the basis of our government."

Justice Harlan's concurrence reaffirmed the application of Fifth Amendment and Sixth Amendment rights of Dependents of armed services members.^{[citation needed]}

The case made Mrs. Covert's lawyer, Frederick Bernays Wiener, famous in legal history; the case represents the only time a lawyer lost in the Supreme Court of the United States but prevailed on rehearing.^{[citation needed]}

See also

• Botiller v. Dominguez
• Wilson v. Girard

Further reading

• Green, Sedgwick W. (1958). "The Treaty Making Power and the Extraterritorial Effect of the Constitution: Reid v. Covert and the Girard". Minnesota Law Review 42: 825. 

External links

Works related to Reid v. Covert at Wikisource

• Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957).