Renewable energy in the United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Sources of total United States renewable energy, 2012 (US EIA)
US renewable electricity generated in 2012, by source (US EIA)
The Shepherds Flat Wind Farm is a 845 megawatt (MW) wind farm in the U.S. state of Oregon.

Renewable energy in the United States accounted for 13.2 percent of the domestically produced electricity in 2012,[1] and 11.2 percent of total energy generation.[2] Renewable energy reached a major milestone in the first quarter of 2011, when it contributed 11.7 percent of total U.S. energy production (2.245 quadrillion BTUs of energy), surpassing energy production from nuclear power (2.125 quadrillion BTUs).[3] 2011 was the first year since 1997 that renewables exceeded nuclear in US total energy production.[4]

Hydroelectric power is currently the largest producer of renewable power in the U.S. It produced around 6.2% of the nation's total electricity in 2010 which was 60.2% of the total renewable power in the U.S.[5] The United States is the fourth largest producer of hydroelectricity in the world after China, Canada and Brazil. The Grand Coulee Dam is the 5th largest hydroelectric power station in the world.

U.S. wind power installed capacity now exceeds 60,000 MW and supplies 4% of the nation's electricity.[6][7] Texas is firmly established as the leader in wind power development, followed by Iowa and California.[8] Since the U.S. pioneered the technology with Solar One, several solar thermal power stations have also been built. The largest of these solar thermal power stations is the SEGS group of plants in the Mojave Desert with a total generating capacity of 354 MW, making the system the largest solar plant of any kind in the world.[9] The largest photovoltaic power plant in North America is the over 200 MW Agua Caliente Solar Project in Yuma County, Arizona. The Geysers in Northern California is the largest complex of geothermal energy production in the world.

The development of renewable energy and energy efficiency marks "a new era of energy exploration" in the United States, according to President Barack Obama.[10] In a joint address to the Congress on February 24, 2009, President Obama called for doubling renewable energy within the next three years.[11] In his 2012 State of the Union address, President Barack Obama restated his commitment to renewable energy and mentioned the long-standing Interior Department commitment to permit 10,000 MW of renewable energy projects on public land in 2012.[12]

Rationale for renewables[edit]

Renewable energy technologies encompass a broad, diverse array of technologies, including solar photovoltaics, solar thermal power plants and heating/cooling systems, wind farms, hydroelectricity, geothermal power plants, and ocean power systems and the use of biomass.

The report Outlook On Renewable Energy In America explains that America needs renewable energy, for many reasons:

America needs energy that is secure, reliable, improves public health, protects the environment, addresses climate change, creates jobs, and provides technological leadership. America needs renewable energy. If renewable energy is to be developed to its full potential, America will need coordinated, sustained federal and state policies that expand renewable energy markets; promote and deploy new technology; and provide appropriate opportunities to encourage renewable energy use in all critical energy market sectors: wholesale and distributed electricity generation, thermal energy applications, and transportation.[13]

In 2009, President Barack Obama in the inaugural address called for the expanded use of renewable energy to meet the twin challenges of energy security and climate change. Those were the first references ever to the nation's energy use, to renewable resources, and to climate change in an inauguration speech of a U.S. president. President Obama looked to the near future, saying that as a nation, the United States will "harness the sun and the winds and the soil to fuel our cars and run our factories."[14]

The president's New Energy For America plan calls for a federal investment of $150 billion over the next decade to catalyze private efforts to build a clean energy future. Specifically, the plan calls for renewable energy to supply 10% of the nation's electricity by 2012, rising to 25% by 2025.[14]

In his joint address to Congress in 2009, Obama stated that: "We know the country that harnesses the power of clean, renewable energy will lead the 21st. century....Thanks to our recovery plan, we will double this nation’s supply of renewable energy in the next three years... It is time for America to lead again".[11]

In a 2010 Chicago Council on Global Affairs public opinion survey, an overwhelming 91 percent believed "investing in renewable energy" is important for the United States to remain economically competitive with other countries, with 62 percent considering this very important. The same poll found strong support for tax incentives to encourage development of renewable energy sources specifically as a way to reduce foreign energy imports. Eight in ten (80 percent) favored tax incentives, 47 percent strongly, and only 17 percent were opposed.[15]

As of 2011, new evidence has emerged that there are considerable risks associated with traditional energy sources, and that major changes to the mix of energy technologies is needed:

Several mining tragedies globally have underscored the human toll of the coal supply chain. New EPA initiatives targeting air toxics, coal ash, and effluent releases highlight the environmental impacts of coal and the cost of addressing them with control technologies. The use of fracking in natural gas exploration is coming under scrutiny, with evidence of groundwater contamination and greenhouse gas emissions. Concerns are increasing about the vast amounts of water used at coal-fired and nuclear power plants, particularly in regions of the country facing water shortages. Events at the Fukushima nuclear plant have renewed doubts about the ability to operate large numbers of nuclear plants safely over the long term. Further, cost estimates for “next generation” nuclear units continue to climb, and lenders are unwilling to finance these plants without taxpayer guarantees.[16]

Current trends[edit]

Percentage of electricity in the US generated from renewable sources 1950-2012; hydropower in blue and other renewable sources in red.
The US Energy Information Administration projects renewable sources to supply 16% of US electricity by 2040.

Renewable energy in the United States accounted for 12.1 percent of the domestically produced electricity in 2012.[17] California is a leading state and around 20 percent of California's electricity comes from renewable sources.[18]

The United States has some of the best renewable energy resources in the world, which have the potential to meet a rising and significant share of the nation's energy demand. A quarter of the U.S. land area has winds strong enough to generate electricity at the same price as natural gas and coal.[19]

Many of the new technologies that harness renewables — including wind, solar, geothermal, and biofuels — are, or soon will be, economically competitive with the fossil fuels that meet 85 percent of U.S. energy needs. Dynamic growth rates are driving down costs and spurring rapid advances in technologies.[19] Energy technologies also receive government subsidies. In 2010, federal government subsidies for electricity production from renewables, fossil fuels, and nuclear were $6560 million, $1843 million and $2499 million respectively.[5]

All but four U.S. states now have incentives in place to promote renewable energy, while more than a dozen have enacted new renewable energy laws in recent years.[19]

Renewable energy suffered a political setback in the United States in September 2011 with the bankruptcy of Solyndra, a company that had received a $535 million federal loan guarantee.[20][21]

Renewable generation (Billion kWh, TWh)[17][22]
Year Hydro Geothermal Waste Wood CSP Utility PV Rooftop PV Onshore Wind Offshore Wind Renewable
Total
U.S.
Total
 % Renewable
2002 264.33 14.49 15.04 38.66 0.555 10.34 0 343.44 3858.45 8.90%
2003 275.81 14.24 15.81 37.53 0.534 11.19 0 355.29 3883.18 9.15%
2004 268.42 14.81 15.42 38.12 0.575 14.14 0 351.48 3970.56 8.85%
2005 270.32 14.69 15.42 38.86 0.550 17.81 0 357.65 4055.42 8.82%
2006 289.25 14.57 16.10 38.76 0.508 26.59 0 385.77 4064.70 9.49%
2007 247.51 14.64 16.52 39.01 0.612 34.45 0 352.75 4156.74 8.49%
2008 254.83 14.84 17.73 37.30 0.864 55.36 0 417.72 4119.39 10.14%
2009 273.44 15.01 18.16 36.05 0.74 0.16 1.93 74.12 0 419.59 3950.31 10.62%
2010 257.08 15.67 18.59 37.61 0.82 0.46 3.21 94.95 0 428.38 4125.06 10.38%
2011 325.07 16.70 19.79 36.95 1.81 119.75 0 520.07 4105.73 12.67%
2012 276.24 15.56 19.82 37.8 4.33 140.82 0 513.4 4047.76 12.22%

The United States uses about 4,000 billion kWh/year of electricity, in 2012, and about 98 Quadrillion btu/year (30,000 billion kWh). Due to efficiency improvements this is expected to drop to 15,000 billion kWh by 2050. The United States has the potential of installing 11 million MW of onshore wind power and 4 million MW of offshore wind power, capable of generating over 47,000 billion kWh. Solar has the potential of installing 10 to 20 million MW of concentrated solar power in the Southwest, capable of generating over 10,000 billion kWh. Other than geothermal, no other resources come close to providing the energy demands of the United States in a post fossil fuel world.[23][not in citation given]

Monthly renewable data.[24] for 2012 shows the yearly profile of renewable energy generation. Monthly Renewable Electric Energy 2012.jpg Using data from Electric Power Annual 2012 [25] the expected renewable generating capabilities for different fuel sources is shown in the chart. A total of 173.45 Gigawatts of renewable would be available by 2017. This is up 17.65 Gigawatts from 2012. Expected Renewable Generating Capability 2013-2017.jpg Using this generating capability and the capacity factors from 2012 data will result in a total of 540.14 Giga Kilowatt hours (G Kwhrs) of renewable electric energy in 2017. This is up 45.57 G Kwhrs from 2012.Expected Renewable Energy 2013-2017.jpg

In 2012 the mix of each states renewable electric generation as a percentage of its total renewable energy generation is shown in the following chart.[26] 2012 USA STATES RENEWABLE ELECTRICAL GENERATION

Hydroelectricity[edit]

The Hoover Dam when completed in 1936 was both the world's largest electric-power generating station and the world's largest concrete structure.

Hydroelectric power is currently the largest producer of renewable power in the U.S. It produced around 6.3% of the nation's total electricity in 2013 which was 51.5% of the total renewable power in the U.S.[5] The United States is the fourth largest producer of hydroelectricity in the world after China, Canada and Brazil. The Grand Coulee Dam is the 5th largest hydroelectric power station in the world and another six U.S. hydro plants are among the 50 largest in the world. The amount of hydroelectric power generated is strongly affected by changes in precipitation and surface runoff.

Hydroelectric plants exist in at least 34 US states. Hydroelectricity projects such as Hoover Dam, Grand Coulee Dam, and the Tennessee Valley Authority have become iconic large construction projects.

Name Year of completion Total Capacity (MW)
1 Grand Coulee 1942/1980 6,809[27]
2 Chief Joseph Dam 1958/73/79 2,620
3 Robert Moses Niagara Power Plant 1961 2,515
4 John Day Dam 1949 2,160
5 Bath County PSP 1985 2,100
6 Hoover Dam 1936/1961 2,080
7 The Dalles Dam 1981 2,038

The contribution over the last ten years of hydroelectric power to the renewable power generation and to the total US power generation is shown below along with the yearly profile of the hydroelectric power generation for 2013. This shows the typical variations over the months of the year due to resource availability and needs.

Tenyearhydrofacts.gif
HYDRO Electric Generation in the United States[28]
Year Summer Capacity (GW) Electrical energy (G kWh) Capacity factor Yearly growth of Generating Capacity Yearly growth of produced Energy Portion of renewable electrical energy Portion of total electrical energy
2013 79.02 269.14 0.389 0.41% -2.57% 51.51% 6.63%
2012 78.7 276.24 0.401 0.06% -13.50% 55.85% 6.82%
2011 78.65 319.36 0.464 -0.23% 22.74% 62.21% 7.79%
2010 78.83 260.2 0.377 0.39% -4.85% 60.88% 6.31%
2009 78.52 273.45 0.398 0.76% 7.31% 65.47% 6.92%
2008 77.93 254.83 0.373 0.05% 2.96% 66.90% 6.19%
2007 77.89 247.51 0.363 0.09% -14.43% 70.18% 5.95%
2006 77.82 289.25 0.424 0.36% 7.00% 74.97% 7.12%
2005 77.54 270.32 0.398 -0.13% 0.71% 75.57% 6.67%
2004 77.64 268.42 0.395 -1.33% -2.68% 76.36% 6.76%

Wind power[edit]

The 781 MW Roscoe Wind Farm in Texas, at sunrise.
Landowners typically receive $3,000 to $5,000 per year in rental income from each wind turbine, while farmers continue to grow crops or graze cattle up to the foot of the turbines.[29]

U.S. wind power installed capacity now exceeds 60,007 MW.[7] This capacity is exceeded only by China. Shepherds Flat Wind Farm in Oregon is currently the largest wind farm in the world, completed in 2012, with the nameplate capacity of 845 MW.[30] The second largest Wind farm is Roscoe Wind Farm (781 MW) in Texas in the US and completed in 2009.[31]

The U.S. wind industry generates tens of thousands of jobs and billions of dollars of economic activity.[32] Wind projects boost local tax bases, and revitalize the economy of rural communities by providing a steady income stream to farmers with wind turbines on their land.[29] GE Energy is the largest domestic wind turbine manufacturer.[29] In 2010 it also received $4986 million in federal funding, which is 42% of all federal funding for electrity generation.[5]

There are currently 8,900 MW in nearly 100 projects under construction in the 2012.[33] The United States has the potential of installing 10 million MW of onshore wind power and 4 million MW of offshore wind.[34] The U.S. Department of Energy’s report 20% Wind Energy by 2030 envisioned that wind power could supply 20% of all U.S. electricity, which included a contribution of 4% from offshore wind power.[32] Additional transmission lines will need to be added, to bring power from windy states to the rest of the country.[35] In August 2011, a coalition of 24 governors asked the Obama administration to provide a more favorable business climate for the development of wind power.[36]

These are some of the largest wind farms in the United States, as of 2014:

Largest wind farms in the US
Wind farm Current
capacity
(MW)
Notes
Alta (Oak Creek-Mojave) 1,320 [37]
Buffalo Gap Wind Farm 523.3 [38][39]
Capricorn Ridge Wind Farm 662.5 [38][39]
Cedar Creek Wind Farm 551
Fowler Ridge Wind Farm 599.8 [40]
Horse Hollow Wind Energy Center 735.5 [38][39]
Meadow Lake Wind Farm 500 [40]
Roscoe Wind Farm 781.5 [41]
Shepherds Flat Wind Farm 845
Sweetwater Wind Farm 585.3 [38]

The contribution over the last ten years of wind electric power to the renewable power generation and to the total US power generation is shown below along with the yearly profile of the wind electric power generation for 2013. This shows the typical variations over the months of the year due to wind availability.

Windprofile12013.gif
Wind Electric Generation in the United States[28]
Year Summer Capacity (GW) Electrical energy (G kWh) Capacity factor Yearly growth of Generating Capacity Yearly growth of produced Energy Portion of renewable electrical energy Portion of total electrical energy
2013 60.37 167.67 0.317 2.18% 19.07% 32.09% 4.13%
2012 59.08 140.82 0.272 29.33% 17.17% 28.47% 3.48%
2011 45.68 120.18 0.300 16.71% 26.97% 23.41% 2.93%
2010 39.14 94.65 0.276 14.11% 28.10% 22.15% 2.29%
2009 34.3 73.89 0.246 39.15% 33.47% 17.69% 1.87%
2008 24.65 55.36 0.256 49.21% 60.70% 14.53% 1.34%
2007 16.52 34.45 0.238 45.81% 29.56% 9.77% 0.83%
2006 11.33 26.59 0.268 30.08% 49.30% 6.89% 0.65%
2005 8.71 17.81 0.233 34.83% 25.95% 4.98% 0.44%
2004 6.46 14.14 0.250 7.67% 26.36% 4.02% 0.36%

Solar thermal power[edit]

Looking north towards the Ivanpah Solar Power Facility's eastern boiler tower from Interstate 15 in California.

In 2012, the Bureau of Land Management made available 97.9 million acres of land for solar projects, adequate for 10 million MW of solar power tower or 20 million MW of parabolic trough. Of this, 17 "Solar Energy Zones", were identified, which could produce from 42,554 MW - 76,577 MW.[42]

Solar Energy Generating Systems[edit]

Solar Energy Generating Systems (SEGS) is the name given to nine solar power plants in the Mojave Desert. SEGS I-VII are located at Kramer Junction, and SEGS VIII and IX are at Harper Lake and Barstow respectively. The SEGS power plants were commissioned between 1984 and 1991.[9]

The installation uses parabolic trough solar thermal technology along with natural gas to generate electricity. The facility has a total of 400,000 mirrors and covers 1,000 acres (4 km²). The plants have a total generating capacity of 354 MW, making the system the largest solar plant of any kind in the world.[9]

Nevada Solar One[edit]

Nevada Solar One generates 64MW of power and in Boulder City, Nevada, and was built by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), and Solargenix Energy. Nevada Solar One started producing electricity in June 2007.

Nevada Solar One uses parabolic troughs as thermal solar concentrators, heating tubes of liquid which act as solar receivers. These solar receivers are specially coated tubes made of glass and steel. About 19,300 of these 4 metre long tubes are used in the newly built power plant. Nevada Solar One also uses a technology that collects extra heat by putting it into phase-changing molten salts. This energy can then be drawn on at night.[43]

Solar thermal power plants designed for solar-only generation are well matched to summer noon peak loads in prosperous areas with significant cooling demands, such as the south-western United States. Using thermal energy storage systems, solar thermal operating periods can even be extended to meet base-load needs.[44]

Under construction[edit]

The Ivanpah Solar Power Facility is a 392 megawatt (MW) solar power facility which is under construction in south-eastern California.[45] The Solana Generating Station is a 280 MW solar power plant which is under construction near Gila Bend, Arizona, about 70 miles (110 km) southwest of Phoenix. The Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project is a 110 megawatt (MW) solar thermal power project currently under construction near Tonopah, about 190 miles (310 km) northwest of Las Vegas.[46]

Land use issues[edit]

Solar thermal power plants are large, but when looking at electricity output versus total size, they use less land than hydroelectric dams (including the size of the lake behind the dam) or coal plants (including the amount of land required for mining and excavation of the coal).[47] Some of the land in the eastern portion of the Mojave Desert is to be preserved, but the solar industry is more interested in areas of the western desert, "where the sun burns hotter and there is easier access to transmission lines".[48]

Generation[edit]

The contribution to the US electric grid over the last ten years of solar thermal electric power to the renewable power generation and to the total US power generation is shown below along with the yearly profile of the solar thermal power generation for 2013. This shows the typical variations over the months of the year due to sunlight availability. Before 2008 most of solar generated electric energy was from thermal systems. By 2011, photovoltaics had overtaken thermal.

SolarThermalProfile.gif
Solar Thermal Electric Generation in the United States[28]
Year Summer Capacity (GW) Electrical energy (G kWh) Capacity factor Yearly growth of Generating Capacity Yearly growth of produced Energy Portion of renewable electrical energy Portion of total electrical energy
2013 1.24 0.926 0.178 160.50% 5.71% 0.18% 0.02%
2012 0.476 0.876 0.238 1.06% 8.68% 0.18% 0.02%
2011 0.471 0.806 0.239 2.15% 0.16% 0.02%
2010 0.789 0.245 7.35% 0.18% 0.02%
2009 0.735 0.236 -6.73% 0.18% 0.02%
2008 0.788 0.195 32.21% 0.21% 0.02%
2007 0.596 20.89% 0.17% 0.01%
2006 0.493 -7.85% 0.13% 0.01%
2005 0.535 -5.98% 0.15% 0.01%
2004 0.569 0.16% 0.01%

Solar photovoltaic power[edit]

Nellis Solar Power Plant at Nellis Air Force Base. These panels track the sun in one axis.

The US added an estimated 3.3 GW of capacity in 2012.[49] Key projects include:

The Copper Mountain Solar Facility is a 48 megawatt (MW) solar photovoltaic (PV) power plant in Boulder City, Nevada.[50] Sempra Generation began construction of the plant in January 2010 and on December 1, 2010, the company announced that it had finished the project and the facility was generating electricity.[50]

The 32 MW Long Island Solar Farm (LISF) is the largest photovoltaic array in the eastern U.S. It earned the Best Photovoltaic Project of Year Award from the New York Solar Energy Industries Association. The LISF is made up of 164,312 solar panels which provide enough electricity for roughly 4,500 households. Additionally, the project will cause the abatement of more than 30,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions per year.[51]

The 25 MW DeSoto Next Generation Solar Energy Center in Florida consists of over 90,000 solar panels.[52]

The Nellis Solar Power Plant was completed in December, 2007. It is located at Nellis Air Force Base in Clark County, Nevada. It includes approximately 70,000 solar panels and the peak power generation capacity of the plant is approximately 15 megawatts.[53][54]

There are also many large plants under construction. The Desert Sunlight Solar Farm is a 550 MW solar power plant under construction in Riverside County, California, that will use thin-film solar photovoltaic modules made by First Solar.[55] The Topaz Solar Farm is a 550 MW photovoltaic power plant, being built in San Luis Obispo County, California.[56] The Blythe Solar Power Project is a 500 MW photovoltaic station under construction in Riverside County, California. The Agua Caliente Solar Project is a 290 megawatt photovoltaic solar generating facility being built in Yuma County, Arizona. The California Valley Solar Ranch (CVSR) is a 250 megawatt (MW) solar photovoltaic power plant, which is being built by SunPower in the Carrizo Plain, northeast of California Valley.[57]

Many schools and businesses have building-integrated photovoltaic solar panels on their roof. Most of these are grid connected and use net metering laws to allow use of electricity in the evening that was generated during the daytime. New Jersey leads the nation with the least restrictive net metering law, while California leads in total number of homes which have solar panels installed. Many were installed because of the million solar roof initiative.[58] California has decided that it is not moving forward fast enough on photovoltaic generation and in 2008 enacted a feed-in tariffs. Washington state has a feed-in tariff of 15 ¢/kWh which increases to 54 ¢/kWh if components are manufactured in the state.[59] Hawaii and Michigan are also considering feed in tariffs.

The contribution to the US electric grid over the last ten years of solar photovoltaic electric power to the renewable power generation and to the total US power generation is shown below along with the yearly profile of the photovoltaic power generation for 2013. This shows the typical variations over the months of the year due to sunlight availability. Before 2008 most of solar generated electric energy was from thermal systems. By 2011, photovoltaics had overtaken thermal.

SolarPVProfile.gif
Solar Photovoltaic Electric Generation in the United States[28]
Year Summer Capacity (GW) Electrical energy (G kWh) Capacity factor Yearly growth of Generating Capacity Yearly growth of produced Energy Portion of renewable electrical energy Portion of total electrical energy
2013 4.98 8.33 0.194 85.13% 141.45% 1.59% 0.21%
2012 2.69 3.45 0.203 156.19% 241.58% 0.70% 0.09%
2011 1.05 1.01 0.191 138.77% 0.20% 0.02%
2010 0.423 0.203 169.43% 0.10% 0.01%
2009 0.157 0.206 106.58% 0.04% 0.00%
2008 0.076 0.225 375.00% 0.02% 0.00%
2007 0.016 6.67% 0.00% 0.00%
2006 0.015 -6.25% 0.00% 0.00%
2005 0.016 166.67% 0.00% 0.00%
2004 0.006 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Geothermal power[edit]

Existing and planned US geothermal power generation, as of February 2013

The USA is the world leader in online capacity and the generation of electricity from geothermal energy.[60] According to 2005 state energy data, geothermal energy provided approximately 16 billion kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity—0.37% of the electricity consumed in the U.S. As of May 2007, geothermal electric power was generated in five U.S. states: Alaska, California, Hawaii, Nevada, and Utah. According to the Geothermal Energy Association's recent report, there were 75 new geothermal power projects underway in 12 states as of May 2007 . This is an increase of 14 projects in an additional three states compared to a survey completed in November 2006.[60]

The most significant catalyst behind new industry activity is the Energy Policy Act of 2005. This Act made new geothermal plants eligible for the full federal production tax credit, previously available only to wind power projects. It also authorized and directed increased funding for research by the Department of Energy, and gave the Bureau of Land Management new legal guidance and secure funding to address its backlog of geothermal leases and permits.[60]

Installed geothermal capacity in megawatts (MW) by state as of February 2013:[61]

State Capacity (MW) Share of U.S total
California 2,732.2 80.7%
Nevada 517.5 15.3%
Utah 48.1 1.4%
Hawaii 38.0 1.1%
Oregon 33.3 1.0%
Idaho 15.8 0.5%
Alaska 0.7 <0.1%
Wyoming 0.3 <0.1%
Total 3,385.9 100%

The contribution over the last ten years of geothermal power to the renewable power generation and to the total US power generation is shown below along with the yearly profile of the geothermal power generation for 2013.

MonthlyGeothermalProfile.gif
Geothermal Electric Generation in the United States[28]
Year Summer Capacity (GW) Electrical energy (G kWh) Capacity factor Yearly growth of Generating Capacity Yearly growth of produced Energy Portion of renewable electrical energy Portion of total electrical energy
2013 2.688 16.517 0.701 3.70% 6.14% 3.16% 0.41%
2012 2.592 15.562 0.685 7.60% 1.61% 3.15% 0.38%
2011 2.409 15.316 0.726 0.17% 0.64% 2.98% 0.37%
2010 2.405 15.219 0.722 0.97% 1.40% 3.56% 0.37%
2009 2.382 15.009 0.719 6.86% 1.14% 3.59% 0.38%
2008 2.229 14.84 0.760 0.68% 1.39% 3.90% 0.36%
2007 2.214 14.637 0.755 -2.64% 0.47% 4.15% 0.35%
2006 2.274 14.568 0.731 -0.48% -0.84% 3.78% 0.36%
2005 2.285 14.692 0.734 6.18% -0.80% 4.11% 0.36%
2004 2.152 14.811 0.786 0.89% 2.68% 4.21% 0.37%

Solar water heating[edit]

More than 1.5 million homes and businesses currently use solar water heating in the United States, representing a capacity of over 1,000 megawatts (MW) of thermal energy generation. Another 400 MW is likely to be installed over the next 3–5 years, according to the US Department of Energy. Assuming that 40 percent of existing homes in the United States have adequate access to sunlight, 29 million solar water heaters could be installed.[62]

Solar water heaters can operate in any climate. Performance varies depending on how much solar energy is available at the site, as well as how cold the water coming into the system is. The colder the water, the more efficiently the system operates.[62]

Solar water heaters reduce the need for conventional water heating by about two-thirds and pay for their installation within 4 to 8 years with electricity or natural gas savings. Compared to those with electric water heaters, Florida homeowners with solar water heaters save 50 to 85 percent on their water heating bills, according to the Florida Solar Energy Center.[62]

Biomass[edit]

In the twelve months through April 2013, biomass generated 57 million megawatt-hours, 1.4% of total US electricity. It was the largest source of total renewable energy in the US, and the third-largest renewable source of electrical power in the US, after hydropower and wind.[63]

Biomass is biological material derived from living, or recently living organisms, such as plants and trees and utilizes wastes or plant matter specifically grown to generate electricity or produce heat. The main advantage of using grown fuels, as opposed to fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas and oil, is that while they are growing they absorb the near-equivalent in carbon dioxide (an important greenhouse gas) to that which is later released in their burning. Although there is some debate over the net carbon neutrality and near term affects of using the biomass for energy a key difference is the relatively short carbon recycle period of grown biomass (several years or decades) as opposed to the millions of years it took to turn carbon into fossil fuels. With proper conservation and growing techniques biomass can be an important renewable energy source.

Biomass can be utilized for all three major energy needs: electricity, heating/cooling and transportation fuels. However, each usage is distinctly different from the others, especially regarding efficiency - the percentage of energy utilized from the biomass source. Whereas pellets for heating can be up to 90% efficient, bio-electricity plants are comparable to coal power plants, with around 30% efficiency, and biofuels from crops or algae even less.

Biomass electric generation data is best summarized in two categories: 1) Wood and wood derived fuels including wood/wood waste solids (including paper pellets, railroad ties, utility poles, wood chiips, bark and wood waste solids), wood waste liquids (red liquor, sludge wood, spent sulfite liquor, and other wood based liquids), and black liquor. and, 2) Other biomass fuels include municipal solid waste, landfill gas, sludge waste agricultural byproducts, other biomass solids, other biomass liquids, and other biomass gases (including digester gases, methane, and other biomass gases). The contribution from these two categories over the last ten years of biomass electric power to the renewable power generation and to the total US power generation is shown below along with the yearly profile of the electric power generation for 2013. This shows the typical variations over the months of the year due to fuel availability and needs.

Monthlywoodprofile.gif
Wood and Wood Derived Fuel Electric Generation in the United States[28]
Year Summer Capacity (GW) Electrical energy (G kWh) Capacity factor Yearly growth of Generating Capacity Yearly growth of produced Energy Portion of renewable electrical energy Portion of total electrical energy
2013 8.201 39.937 0.531 9.23% 5.71% 7.64% 0.98%
2012 7.508 37.779 0.591 6.09% 0.88% 7.64% 0.93%
2011 7.077 37.449 0.625 0.57% 0.75% 7.30% 0.91%
2010 7.037 37.172 0.633 1.41% 3.11% 8.70% 0.90%
2009 6.939 36.05 0.593 1.09% -3.35% 8.63% 0.91%
2008 6.864 37.3 0.620 2.39% -4.39% 9.79% 0.91%
2007 6.704 39.014 0.664 5.21% 0.65% 11.06% 0.94%
2006 6.372 38.762 0.694 2.89% -0.24% 10.05% 0.95%
2005 6.193 38.856 0.716 0.18% 1.94% 10.86% 0.96%
2004 6.182 38.117 0.704 5.30% 1.57% 10.84% 0.96%
Monthlyotherbiomassprofile.gif
Other Biomass Electric Generation in the United States[28]
Year Summer Capacity (GW) Electrical energy (G kWh) Capacity factor Yearly growth of Generating Capacity Yearly growth of produced Energy Portion of renewable electrical energy Portion of total electrical energy
2013 5.04 19.96 0.452 4.76% 0.69% 3.82% 0.49%
2012 4.811 19.823 0.470 6.06% 3.13% 4.01% 0.49%
2011 4.536 19.222 0.484 3.82% 1.61% 3.74% 0.47%
2010 4.369 18.917 0.494 1.20% 2.57% 4.43% 0.46%
2009 4.317 18.443 0.488 3.13% 4.00% 4.42% 0.47%
2008 4.186 17.734 0.484 1.26% 7.32% 4.66% 0.43%
2007 4.134 16.525 0.456 10.92% 2.65% 4.68% 0.40%
2006 3.727 16.099 0.493 3.27% 4.40% 4.17% 0.40%
2005 3.609 15.42 0.488 2.27% -0.01% 4.31% 0.38%
2004 3.529 15.421 0.499 -6.09% -2.47% 4.39% 0.39%

Biofuels[edit]

Information on pump, California.

Most cars on the road today in the U.S. can run on blends of up to 10% ethanol, and motor vehicle manufacturers already produce vehicles designed to run on much higher ethanol blends. Ford, DaimlerChrysler, and GM are among the automobile companies that sell “flexible-fuel” cars, trucks, and minivans that can use gasoline and ethanol blends ranging from pure gasoline up to 85% ethanol (E85). By mid-2006, there were approximately six million E85-compatible vehicles on U.S. roads.[64]

The challenge is to expand the market for biofuels beyond the farm states where they have been most popular to date.[65] Flex-fuel vehicles are assisting in this transition because they allow drivers to choose different fuels based on price and availability. The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, which calls for 15.2 billion US gallons (58,000,000 m3) of biofuels to be used annually by 2012, will also help to expand the market.[64]

The expanding ethanol and biodiesel industries are providing jobs in plant construction, operations, and maintenance, mostly in rural communities. According to the Renewable Fuels Association, the ethanol industry created almost 154,000 U.S. jobs in 2005 alone, boosting household income by $5.7 billion. It also contributed about $3.5 billion in tax revenues at the local, state, and federal levels.[64] On the other hand, in 2010, the biofuel industry received $6644 million in federal government support.[5]

Wave Power[edit]

PB150 PowerBuoy with peak-rated power output of 150 kW.

Wave power in the United States is under development in several locations off the east & west coasts as well as Hawaii. It has moved beyond the research phase and is producing reliable energy. Its use to-date has been for situations where other forms of energy production are not economically viable and as such, the power output is currently modest. But major installations are planned to come on-line within the next few years.

Renewable energy research[edit]

There are numerous organizations within the academic, federal, and commercial sectors conducting large scale advanced research in the field of renewable energy. This research spans several areas of focus across the renewable energy spectrum. Most of the research is targeted at improving efficiency and increasing overall energy yields.[66] Multiple federally supported research organizations have focused on renewable energy in recent years. Two of the most prominent of these labs are Sandia National Laboratories and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), both of which are funded by the United States Department of Energy and supported by various corporate partners.[67] Sandia has a total budget of $2.4 billion [68] while NREL has a budget of $375 million.[69]

Both Sandia National Laboratories and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), have heavily funded solar research programs. British Petroleum was also heavily invested in solar research programs until 2008 when the company began scaling back its solar operations. The company finally shut down its forty-year-old solar business after executives decided solar power production is not economically competitive.[70] The NREL solar program has a budget of around $75 million [71] and develops research projects in the areas of photovoltaic (PV) technology, solar thermal energy, and solar radiation.[72] The budget for Sandia’s solar division is unknown, however it accounts for a significant percentage of the laboratory’s $2.4 billion budget.[73] Several academic programs have focused on solar research in recent years. The Solar Energy Research Center (SERC) at University of North Carolina (UNC) has the sole purpose of developing cost effective solar technology. In 2008, researchers at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) developed a method to store solar energy by using it to produce hydrogen fuel from water.[74] Such research is targeted at addressing the obstacle that solar development faces of storing energy for use during nighttime hours when the sun is not shining. In February 2012, North Carolina-based Semprius Inc., a solar development company backed by German corporation Siemens, announced that they had developed the world’s most efficient solar panel. The company claims that the prototype converts 33.9% of the sunlight that hits it to electricity, more than double the previous high-end conversion rate.[75]

Wind energy research dates back several decades to the 1970s when NASA developed an analytical model to predict wind turbine power generation during high winds.[76] Today, both Sandia National Laboratories and National Renewable Energy Laboratory have programs dedicated to wind research. Sandia’s laboratory focuses on the advancement of materials, aerodynamics, and sensors.[77] The NREL wind projects are centered on improving wind plant power production, reducing their capital costs, and making wind energy more cost effective overall.[78] The Field Laboratory for Optimized Wind Energy (FLOWE) at Caltech was established to research renewable approaches to wind energy farming technology practices that have the potential to reduce the cost, size, and environmental impact of wind energy production.[79]

As the primary source of biofuels in North America, many organizations are conducting research in the area of ethanol production. On the Federal level, the USDA conducts a large amount of research regarding ethanol production in the United States. Much of this research is targeted toward the effect of ethanol production on domestic food markets.[80] The National Renewable Energy Laboratory has conducted various ethanol research projects, mainly in the area of cellulosic ethanol.[81] Cellulosic ethanol has many benefits over traditional corn based-ethanol. It does not take away or directly conflict with the food supply because it is produced from wood, grasses, or non-edible parts of plants.[82] Moreover, some studies have shown cellulosic ethanol to be more cost effective and economically sustainable than corn-based ethanol.[83] Sandia National Laboratories conducts in-house cellulosic ethanol research [84] and is also a member of the Joint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI), a research institute founded by the United States Department of Energy with the goal of developing cellulosic biofuels.[85]

Over $1 billion of federal money has been spent on the research and development of hydrogen fuel in the United States.[86] Both the National Renewable Energy Laboratory [87] and Sandia National Laboratories [88] have departments dedicated to hydrogen research.

Policy and promotion in the United States[edit]

In his January 24, 2012, State of the Union address, President Barack Obama restated his commitment to renewable energy. Obama said that he “will not walk away from the promise of clean energy.” Obama called for a commitment by the Defense Department to purchase 1,000 MW of renewable energy. He also mentioned the long-standing Interior Department commitment to permit 10,000 MW of renewable energy projects on public land in 2012.[12]

Wind Powering America[edit]

Wind Powering America (WPA) is an initiative of the United States Department of Energy (DOE) that seeks to increase the use of wind energy throughout the United States. WPA collaborates with key state and regional stakeholders, including farmers, ranchers, Native Americans, rural electric cooperatives, consumer-owned utilities, and schools to break down barriers associated with wind energy development.

Throughout its history, WPA has focused on states with strong potential for wind energy generation but with few operational projects. WPA provides fair and unbiased information about the challenges, benefits, and impacts of wind technology implementation. This information allows policymakers, organizations, and citizens to make educated and informed decisions about wind energy implementation in their communities.

Solar America Initiative[edit]

The Solar America Initiative (SAI)[89] is a part of the Federal Advanced Energy Initiative to accelerate the development of advanced photovoltaic materials with the goal of making it cost-competitive with other forms of renewable electricity by 2015.

The U.S. Department of Energy Solar Energy Technology Program (SETP) will achieve the goals of the SAI through partnerships and strategic alliances by focusing primarily on four areas:

  • Market Transformation — activities that address marketplace barriers and offer the opportunity for market expansion
  • Device and Process Proof of Concept — R&D activities addressing novel devices or processes with potentially significant performance or cost advantages
  • Component Prototype and Pilot-Scale Production — R&D activities emphasizing development of prototype PV components or systems produced at pilot-scale with demonstrated cost, reliability, or performance advantages
  • System Development and Manufacturing — collaborative R&D activities among industry and university partners to develop and improve solar energy technologies

California Solar Initiative[edit]

As part of Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's Million Solar Roofs Program, California has set a goal to create 3,000 megawatts of new, solar-produced electricity by 2017 - moving the state toward a cleaner energy future and helping lower the cost of solar systems for consumers. This is a comprehensive $2.8 billion program.[90]

The California Solar Initiative offers cash incentives on solar PV systems of up to $2.50 a watt. These incentives, combined with federal tax incentives, can cover up to 50% of the total cost of a solar panel system.[90] It should also be noted that there are many financial incentives to support the use of renewable energy in other US states.[91]

EPA initiatives[edit]

To promote energy efficiency and environmentally sensitive energy generation, Environmental Protection Agency facilities in the United States are using renewable energy technologies to supplement or replace a large portion of their energy requirements at the following facilities:

  • Ada, Oklahoma (geothermal heat pump)
  • Ann Arbor, Michigan (fuel cell)
  • Chicago, Illinois, Regional Office (photovoltaic array)
  • Corvallis, Oregon (photovoltaic array)
  • Edison, New Jersey (solar water heating)
  • Gulf Breeze, Florida (solar lighting)
  • Golden, Colorado (wind power and transpired solar collector)
  • Manchester, Washington (wind power)
  • Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (photovoltaic solar panels and street lights).[92]

Green Power Partnership[edit]

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has named the top 20 partners in its Green Power Partnership that are generating their own renewable energy on-site. Combined, the top 20 partners are generating more than 736 million kilowatt-hours of renewable energy on-site each year, enough to power more than 61,000 average U.S. homes.[93]

Renewable portfolio standards[edit]

A Renewable Portfolio Standard refers to legislation that creates a market in tradeable renewable or green electricity certificates. Electricity distributors or wholesaler purchasers of electricity are required to source a specified percentage of their electricity (portfolio) from renewable generation sources. Liable entities that fall short of their quota can purchase certificates from accredited suppliers who have generated renewable electricity and obtained and registered certificates to sell on that market.

Sales to the grid[edit]

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 requires all public electric utilities to facilitate net metering upon request by customers.[94] This allows homes and businesses performing distributed generation to pay only the net cost of electricity from the grid: electricity used minus electricity produced locally and sent back into the grid. For intermittent renewable energy sources, like wind and solar, this effectively uses the grid as a giant battery to smooth over lulls and fill in production gaps.

Some jurisdictions go one step further and have instituted feed-in tariff, which allows any power customer to actually make money by producing more renewable energy than is consumed locally.

Renewable energy organizations[edit]

The American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE), is a non-profit organization with headquarters in Washington DC. It was founded in 2001 as a unifying forum for bringing renewable energy into the mainstream of American’s economy and lifestyle. In 2010 ACORE had over 700 member organizations.[95] In 2007, ACORE published Outlook On Renewable Energy In America, a two volume report about the future of renewable energy in the United States.[96] It has been said that this report exposes a "new reality for renewable energy in America."[97]

The Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) is a non-profit organization which promotes environmentally sustainable societies. Founded in 1984 by a group of Congressional Members, EESI seeks to be a catalyst that moves society away from environmentally damaging fossil fuels and toward a clean energy future. EESI presents policy solutions that will result in decreased global warming and air pollution; improvements in public health, energy security and rural economic development opportunities; increased use of renewable energy sources and improved energy efficiency.

An important part of the mission of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) is the transfer of NREL-developed technologies to renewable energy markets. NREL's Technology Transfer Office supports laboratory scientists and engineers in the successful and practical application of their expertise and the technologies they develop. R&D staff and facilities are recognized and valued by industry, as demonstrated through many collaborative research projects and licensed technologies with public and private partners. NREL's innovative technologies have also been recognized with 39 R&D 100 Awards.

The Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) is an organization dedicated to research, publication, consulting, and lecturing in the general field of sustainability, with a special focus on profitable innovations for energy and resource efficiency. RMI is headquartered in Snowmass, Colorado, and also maintains offices in Boulder, Colorado. RMI has recently published the book Winning the Oil Endgame.

Statistics[edit]

Data from the US DOE Energy Information Administration/Electric Power Annual 2012 files,[98] the Electric Power Monthly of 3/14 for 2013 data[99] and the most recent DOE Energy Information Agency (EIA) full year files[100] provide a good summary of progress being made in renewables.

Electricity Production by Renewables in 2013
Power Source Summer Capacity (GW) % of total Capacity Capacity factor Annual Energy (billion kWh)  % of annual production
Hydro 79.02 7.42 0.389 269.14 6.63
Wind 60.37 5.67 0.317 167.67 4.13
Wood 8.201 0.77 0.354 39.937 0.98
Biomass 5.04 0.47 0.452 19.96 0.47
GeoThermal 2.688 0.25 0.701 16.517 0.41
Solar 6.22 0.58 0.17 9.25 0.23
Total 161.67 15.18 0.309 522.46 12.87
Electricity Production by Renewables in 2012
Power Source Number of Generators Summer Capacity (GW) % of total Capacity Capacity factor Annual Energy (billion kWh)  % of annual production
Hydro 4,023 78.7 7.4 0.40 276.24 6.82
Wind 947 59.0 5.5 0.272 140.82 3.48
Wood 351 7.5 0.70 0.575 37.8 0.93
Biomass 1766 4.8 0.45 0.471 19.82 0.49
GeoThermal 197 2.6 0.24 0.683 15.56 0.38
Solar 553 3.2 0.3 0.154 4.33 0.11
Total 7,837 155.8 14.66 0.362 494.57 12.22
Yearly US Renewable Electricity Production (billion kWh) by Source
Year All US Total Renewable
Hydro Wind Wood Bio
other
Geo
Thermal
Solar Total  % of US Total
2013 4,058.21 269.14 167.67 39.94 19.96 16.52 9.25 522.46 12.87
2012 4,047.76 276.24 140.82 37.8 19.82 15.56 4.33 494.57 12.22
2011 4,100.7 319.4 120.2 37.4 19.2 15.3 1.814 513.4 12.52
2010 4,125.1 260.2 94.7 37.2 18.9 15.2 1.212 427.4 10.36
2009 3,950.3 273.4 73.9 36.1 18.4 15.0 0.891 417.7 10.57
2008 4,119.4 254.8 55.4 37.3 17.7 14.8 0.864 380.9 9.25
2007 4,156.7 247.5 34.5 39.0 16.5 14.6 0.612 352.7 8.49
2006 4,064.7 289.2 26.6 38.8 16.1 14.6 0.508 385.8 9.49
2005 4,055.4 270.3 17.8 38.9 15.4 14.7 0.550 357.7 8.82
2004 3,970.6 268.4 14.1 38.1 15.4 14.8 0.575 351.5 8.85
2003 3,883.2 275.8 11.2 37.5 15.8 14.4 0.534 355.3 9.15
2002 3,858.5 264.3 10.4 38.7 15.0 14.5 0.555 343.4 8.90
2001 3,736.6 217.0 6.7 35.2 14.5 13.7 0.543 287.7 7.70
2000 3,802.1 275.6 5.6 37.6 23.1 14.1 0.493 356.5 9.38
1999 3,694.8 319.5 4.5 37.0 22.6 14.8 0.495 399.0 10.80
1998 3,620.3 323.3 3.0 36.3 22.4 14.8 0.502 400.4 11.06
  1. Bio Other includes Waste, Landfill Gas, and Other.
  2. Solar includes Photovoltaics and Thermal.

Potential resources[edit]

A 2012 report by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory evaluates the potential energy resources for each state of the United States.[101][102]

Total Technical Potential
Type Resource Capacity (GW) Potential (TWh)
Solar Urban utility-scale PV 1,200 2,200
Rural utility-scale PV 153,000 280,600
Rooftop PV 664 800
Concentrating solar power 38,000 116,100
Total 192,922 399,810
Wind Onshore wind power 11,000 32,700
Offshore wind power 4,200 17,000
Total 15,178 49,760
Bioenergy Biomass/biofuel/methane 62 488
Total 62 488
Geothermal Hydrothermal power systems 38 300
Enhanced geothermal systems 3,976 31,300
Total 4,014 31,653
Hydro Hydropower 60 259
Total 60 259
Total 212,236 481,970

In 2010, the U.S. used 3,754 TWh of electricity. Total energy used in 2010 was 98.16 Quadrillion Btu (28,800 TWh, but over 30% is thermal losses).

Technical Potential for each State
Solar Wind
Urban Utility Scale PV Rural Utility Scale PV Rooftop PV Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) Onshore Wind Power Offshore Wind Power
State MW GWh MW GWh MW GWh MW GWh MW GWh MW GWh
Alabama 20,453 35,851 2,114,792 3,706,839 12,516 15,476 0 0 118 283 0 0
Alaska 112 166 9,005,193 8,282,976 1,292 NA 0 0 493,346 1,373,433 NA NA
Arizona 52,611 121,306 5,147,087 11,867,694 14,880 22,736 3,527,624 12,544,334 10,904 26,036 NA NA
Arkansas 15,957 28,961 2,747,478 4,986,389 6,773 8,485 0 0 9,200 22,892 NA NA
California 111,404 246,008 4,010,367 8,855,917 75,908 106,411 2,725,676 8,490,916 34,110 89,862 654,833 2,662,580
Colorado 19,167 43,471 4,514,218 10,238,084 11,797 16,162 3,097,836 9,154,524 387,219 1,096,036 NA NA
Connecticut 4,833 7,717 12,293 19,628 5,903 6,616 0 0 27 62 7,171 26,545
Delaware 9,120 14,856 167,170 272,333 1,876 2,185 0 0 10 22 15,038 60,654
Florida 39,850 72,787 2,812,653 5,137,347 49,407 63,987 130 359 0.40 1 9,649 34,684
Georgia 24,274 43,167 3,088,465 5,492,183 24,607 31,116 0 0 130 323 58,629 220,807
Hawaii 1,667 3,725 20,674 38,033 2,729 NA 5,539 15,370 2,468 7,787 736,945 2,836,735
Idaho 12,051 23,195 2,045,422 3,936,848 3,224 4,051 1,267,223 3,502,877 18,076 44,320 NA NA
Illinois 63,597 103,552 4,969,164 8,090,985 26,312 30,086 0 0 249,882 649,468 15,872 66,070
Indiana 61,175 98,815 3,018,749 4,876,186 14,856 17,151 0 0 148,228 377,604 45 166
Iowa 15,574 27,092 4,020,606 6,994,159 7,191 8,646 0 0 570,714 1,723,588 NA NA
Kansas 15,218 31,706 6,959,792 14,500,149 6,872 8,962 2,884,816 7,974,256 952,371 3,101,576 NA NA
Kentucky 16,271 26,515 1,119,323 1,823,977 10,538 12,312 0 0 61 147 NA NA
Louisiana 32,391 55,669 2,394,054 4,114,605 11,840 14,368 0 0 410 935 340,615 1,200,699
Maine 1,925 3,216 658,689 1,100,327 2,141 2,443 0 0 11,251 28,743 147,418 631,960
Maryland 18,180 28,551 373,097 585,949 12,738 14,850 0 0 1,483 3,632 51,909 200,852
Massachusetts 10,959 17,470 51,568 82,205 10,316 11,723 0 0 1,028 2,827 184,076 799,344
Michigan 33,570 50,845 3,443,547 5,215,640 21,520 23,528 0 0 59,042 143,908 422,577 1,739,801
Minnesota 20,128 33,370 6,510,103 10,792,814 12,486 14,322 0 0 489,271 1,428,525 29,215 100,455
Mississippi 15,243 26,366 2,879,856 4,981,252 6,968 8,614 0 0 0 0 3,213 10,172
Missouri 18,076 30,549 3,156,806 5,335,269 13,081 16,160 0 0 274,355 689,519 NA NA
Montana 6,115 11,371 4,402,766 8,187,341 1,877 2,194 557,224 1,540,288 944,005 2,746,272 NA NA
Nebraska 6,808 12,954 4,869,920 9,266,757 4,228 5,337 1,753,455 4,846,929 917,999 3,011,253 NA NA
Nevada 10,785 24,894 3,732,055 8,614,454 7,137 10,767 2,557,909 8,295,753 7,247 17,709 NA NA
New Hampshire 2,351 3,790 35,578 57,364 2,062 2,299 0 0 2,135 5,706 3,456 14,478
New Jersey 25,301 44,307 251,127 439,774 13,691 15,768 0 0 132 317 101,935 429,808
New Mexico 30,991 71,356 7,087,301 16,318,543 4,223 6,513 4,860,165 16,812,349 492,084 1,399,157 NA NA
New York 32,764 52,803 926,127 1,492,566 25,149 28,780 0 0 25,781 63,566 146,077 614,280
North Carolina 37,894 68,346 2,346,827 4,232,790 23,096 28,420 0 0 808 2,037 306,020 1,269,627
North Dakota 2,744 4,871 5,482,940 9,734,448 1,622 1,917 13,042 36,050 770,195 2,537,825 NA NA
Ohio 57,143 86,496 2,395,600 3,626,182 27,475 30,064 0 0 54,920 129,143 41,804 170,561
Oklahoma 25,619 50,041 4,782,752 9,341,920 9,337 12,443 1,812,952 5,068,036 516,822 1,521,652 NA NA
Oregon 12,992 25,783 1,884,815 3,740,479 7,842 8,323 1,017,332 2,812,126 27,100 68,767 225,008 962,723
Pennsylvania 36,196 56,162 356,630 553,356 19,902 22,215 0 0 3,307 8,231 5,674 23,571
Rhode Island 1,160 1,788 8,844 13,636 1,534 1,711 0 0 47 130 20,965 89,115
South Carolina 19,099 33,835 1,555,141 2,754,973 11,531 14,413 0 0 185 428 133,217 542,218
South Dakota 2,442 4,574 5,344,810 10,008,873 1,682 2,083 589,556 1,629,660 882,413 2,901,858 NA NA
Tennessee 28,598 50,243 1,266,995 2,225,990 16,227 19,685 0 0 309 766 NA NA
Texas 154,251 294,684 20,411,044 38,993,582 60,256 78,717 7,743,420 22,786,750 1,901,530 5,552,400 271,443 1,101,063
Utah 14,057 30,492 2,390,260 5,184,878 5,645 7,514 1,638,154 5,067,547 13,104 31,552 NA NA
Vermont 1,058 1,632 35,487 54,728 1,030 1,115 0 0 2,949 7,796 NA NA
Virginia 15,664 27,451 1,074,135 1,882,467 18,669 22,267 0 0 1,794 4,589 89,073 361,054
Washington 19,313 33,690 996,410 1,738,151 13,494 13,599 58,502 161,713 18,479 47,250 120,964 488,025
Washington, D.C.DC 5 8 0 0 2,100 2,490 0 0 0 0 NA NA
West Virginia 2,009 3,024 35,004 52,694 3,810 4,220 0 0 1,883 4,952 NA NA
Wisconsin 34,930 54,939 3,205,830 5,042,259 12,262 13,939 0 0 103,757 255,266 80,672 317,755
Wyoming 3,604 7,232 2,854,267 5,727,224 1,170 1,551 1,955,846 5,406,407 552,073 1,653,857 NA NA
TOTAL 1,217,699 2,231,694 152,973,829 280,613,217 664,825 818,733 38,066,401 116,146,245 10,954,759 32,784,005 4,223,514 16,975,802
Technical Potential for each State
Bioenergy Geothermal Hydro Electricity[103] Total use[104]
Biomass/Biofuel Methane Hydrothermal Enhanced Geothermal Hydropower Total 2010 2010
State MW GWh MW GWh MW GWh MW GWh MW GWh GWh GWh GWh
Alabama 1,420 11,193 194 1,533 0 0 67,921 535,490 937 4,103 4,310,767 90,873 574,000
Alaska 65 513 8 62 1,958 15,437 NA NA 5,405 23,676 9,696,264 6,247 188,000
Arizona 138 1,088 106 837 1,056 8,330 157,172 1,239,148 298 1,303 25,832,811 72,833 410,000
Arkansas 1,824 14,381 135 1,063 0 0 79,734 628,622 1,391 6,093 5,696,886 48,194 330,000
California 1,574 12,408 1,967 15,511 16,605 130,921 170,495 1,344,179 6,855 30,024 21,984,738 258,531 2,293,000
Colorado 370 2,913 155 1,224 1,135 8,954 158,759 1,251,658 1,778 7,789 21,820,815 52,918 445,000
Connecticut 63 495 53 415 0 0 7,113 56,078 211 922 118,478 30,392 221,000
Delaware 65 512 49 385 0 0 2,894 22,813 7 31 373,792 11,606 75,000
Florida 1,226 9,664 468 3,693 0 0 47,458 374,161 156 682 5,697,366 231,210 1,284,000
Georgia 1,862 14,682 282 2,221 0 0 44,800 353,206 454 1,988 6,159,694 140,672 925,000
Hawaii 66 524 25 200 2,617 20,632 NA NA 594 2,602 2,925,608 10,017 80,000
Idaho 733 5,776 23 183 2,182 17,205 125,984 993,257 4,283 18,758 8,546,469 22,798 156,000
Illinois 3,518 27,738 536 4,222 0 0 85,750 676,056 1,115 4,883 9,653,061 144,761 1,154,000
Indiana 1,895 14,942 378 2,978 0 0 55,081 434,258 547 2,394 5,824,494 105,994 841,000
Iowa 3,488 27,502 181 1,425 0 0 76,914 606,390 643 2,818 9,391,621 45,445 437,000
Kansas 1,535 12,104 96 753 0 0 125,530 989,676 573 2,508 26,621,690 40,421 342,000
Kentucky 894 7,048 162 1,274 0 0 61,474 484,659 972 4,255 2,360,187 93,569 579,000
Louisiana 1,778 14,016 109 857 0 0 61,425 484,271 553 2,423 5,887,844 85,080 1,191,000
Maine 542 4,273 16 125 0 0 47,828 377,075 894 3,916 2,152,079 11,532 119,000
Maryland 267 2,102 156 1,227 0 0 10,990 86,649 186 814 924,626 65,335 434,000
Massachusetts 133 1,045 140 1,104 0 0 11,698 92,227 273 1,197 1,009,141 57,123 409,000
Michigan 1,187 9,358 322 2,539 0 0 58,073 457,850 270 1,181 7,644,650 103,649 820,000
Minnesota 2,583 20,362 131 1,030 0 0 46,903 369,785 287 1,255 12,761,917 67,800 547,000
Mississippi 1,802 14,210 137 1,077 0 0 70,910 559,056 505 2,211 5,602,959 49,687 349,000
Missouri 1,501 11,838 272 2,148 0 0 105,967 835,445 1,643 7,198 6,928,126 86,085 565,000
Montana 625 4,925 19 147 831 6,548 208,943 1,647,304 3,321 14,547 14,160,936 13,423 118,000
Nebraska 2,064 16,272 95 751 0 0 117,706 927,996 717 3,142 18,091,391 29,849 247,000
Nevada 37 289 41 325 5,749 45,321 160,093 1,262,175 193 846 18,272,533 33,773 189,000
New Hampshire 121 954 49 390 0 0 13,231 104,314 397 1,741 191,036 10,890 87,000
New Jersey 154 1,212 293 2,311 0 0 4,469 35,230 125 549 969,276 79,179 717,000
New Mexico 76 595 45 354 1,641 12,933 179,855 1,417,978 311 1,363 36,041,142 22,428 199,000
New York 705 5,558 374 2,950 0 0 47,615 375,401 1,532 6,711 2,642,615 144,624 1,093,000
North Carolina 1,632 12,870 479 3,780 0 0 53,366 420,741 693 3,037 6,041,648 136,415 793,000
North Dakota 1,038 8,186 4 30 0 0 104,037 820,226 79 347 13,143,900 12,956 141,000
Ohio 1,396 11,009 427 3,363 0 0 62,902 495,922 695 3,046 4,555,786 154,145 1,124,000
Oklahoma 524 4,128 122 965 0 0 98,892 779,667 689 3,016 16,781,869 57,846 455,000
Oregon 1,750 13,793 113 891 2,308 18,200 115,944 914,105 4,152 18,184 8,583,374 46,026 286,000
Pennsylvania 801 6,314 905 7,132 0 0 41,520 327,341 1,911 8,368 1,012,689 148,964 1,102,000
Rhode Island 18 143 60 474 0 0 1,458 11,492 14 59 118,549 7,799 58,000
South Carolina 886 6,985 181 1,430 0 0 46,183 364,105 431 1,889 3,720,276 82,479 487,000
South Dakota 1,063 8,380 30 235 0 0 116,942 921,973 239 1,047 15,478,682 11,356 111,000
Tennessee 773 6,095 252 1,984 0 0 54,335 428,380 1,312 5,745 2,738,888 103,522 660,000
Texas 2,039 16,078 748 5,898 0 0 384,355 3,030,251 686 3,006 71,862,428 358,458 3,449,000
Utah 55 434 54 428 1,647 12,982 119,150 939,381 806 3,528 11,278,736 28,044 224,000
Vermont 62 492 26 203 0 0 4,518 35,617 390 1,710 103,293 5,595 43,000
Virginia 998 7,866 317 2,498 0 0 36,877 290,737 835 3,657 2,602,587 113,806 733,000
Washington 1,562 12,312 192 1,514 323 2,547 71,413 563,024 6,221 27,249 3,089,074 90,380 597,000
Washington, D.C.DC 8 62 1 5 0 0 89 698 0.19 1 3,264 11,877 54,000
West Virginia 305 2,407 36 281 0 0 33,153 261,376 1,006 4,408 333,362 32,032 217,000
Wisconsin 1,423 11,222 263 2,073 0 0 82,087 647,173 1,455 2,287 6,346,913 68,752 528,000
Wyoming 64 503 6 50 174 1,373 135,728 1,070,079 1,289 4,445 13,872,721 17,113 157,000
TOTAL 50,707 399,774 11,232 88,551 38,227 301,382 3,975,735 31,344,696 60,329 258,953 481,963,052 3,754,493 28,636,000

Note: Total use is inflated to create an oil equivalence.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ US Energy Information Administration, Electric Power Monthly, January 2013.
  2. ^ US Energy Information Administration,Energy monthly, accessed 6 Nov. 2013.
  3. ^ Ron Pernick and Clint Wilder (2012). "Clean Tech Nation". p. 5. 
  4. ^ US Energy Information Administration, Total Energy.
  5. ^ a b c d e "Direct Federal Financial Interventions and Subsidies in Energy in Fiscal Year 2010". Energy Information Administration. Retrieved 29 April 2012. 
  6. ^ US Energy Information Administration, [1], September 2013.
  7. ^ a b "AWEA 4th quarter 2012 Public Market Report". American Wind Energy Association (AWEA). January 2013. Retrieved January 30, 2013. 
  8. ^ American Wind Energy Association, Annual U.S. wind power rankings track industry's rapid growth
  9. ^ a b c SEGS I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII & IX
  10. ^ President Obama Touts Clean Energy on Earth Day
  11. ^ a b Remarks of President Barack Obama -- Address to Joint Session of Congress
  12. ^ a b Lindsay Morris (25 January 2012). "Obama: Sticking to "Promise of Clean Energy"". Renewable Energy World. 
  13. ^ American Council On Renewable Energy, (2007). The Outlook on Renewable Energy in America Volume II: Joint Summary Report page 7
  14. ^ a b President Obama Calls for Greater Use of Renewable Energy
  15. ^ "Large Majorities in US and Europe Endorse Focus on Renewable Energy". World Public Opinion. January 18, 2012. 
  16. ^ Synapse Energy Economics (November 16, 2011). "Toward a Sustainable Future for the U.S. Power Sector: Beyond Business as Usual 2011". 
  17. ^ a b US Energy Information Administration, Electric Power Monthly
  18. ^ "Renewables Portfolio Standard Quarterly Report 1st and 2nd Quarter 2012". California Public Utilities Commission. Retrieved 26 March 2013. 
  19. ^ a b c Renewables Becoming Cost-Competitive With Fossil Fuels in the U.S.
  20. ^ John Broder (October 10, 2011). "The Year of Peril and Promise in Energy Production". New York Times. 
  21. ^ U.S. Rejected Solyndra Restructuring Bid Before Shutdown, Committee Finds
  22. ^ Renewable Energy Capacity and Generation
  23. ^ Annual Energy Outlook 2012
  24. ^ Table 1.1 retrieved 2014-1-17
  25. ^ Electric Power Annual Planned Generating Capability Changes, by Energy Source, 2013-2017 retrieved 2014-1-27
  26. ^ Detailed State Data retrieved 2014-1-15
  27. ^ "Generation Records Fall at Grand Coulee Dam". U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Archived from the original on 2006-10-07. Retrieved 2006-11-18. 
  28. ^ a b c d e f g [2] retrieved 2014-3-26
  29. ^ a b c American Wind Energy Association (2009). Annual Wind Industry Report, Year Ending 2008 pp. 9–10.
  30. ^ Shepherds Flat to be largest wind farm
  31. ^ 9 of the World’s Most Amazing Wind Farms
  32. ^ a b "Strengthening America’s Energy Security with Offshore Wind". U.S. Department of Energy. April 2012. 
  33. ^ "AWEA 1st Quarter 2012 Public Market Report". American Wind Energy Association (AWEA). May 2012. Retrieved 2012-07-30. 
  34. ^ Industry Statistics
  35. ^ Big Power Line Project Proposed To Transport Iowa Wind Energy
  36. ^ "24 governors ask President to focus on wind energy deployment". Renewable Energy World. 25 August 2011. 
  37. ^ Terra-Gen Press Release, 17 April 2012
  38. ^ a b c d Drilling Down: What Projects Made 2008 Such a Banner Year for Wind Power?
  39. ^ a b c AWEA: U.S. Wind Energy Projects – Texas
  40. ^ a b AWEA: U.S. Wind Energy Projects – Indiana
  41. ^ E.ON Delivers 335-MW of Wind in Texas
  42. ^ Solar Energy Development PEIS Information Center
  43. ^ Nevada: Solar energy advances discussed
  44. ^ Spain pioneers grid-connected solar-tower thermal power
  45. ^ Steven Mufson. Solar power project in Mojave Desert gets $1.4 billion boost from stimulus funds Washington Post, February 23, 2010.
  46. ^ "DOE Finalizes $737 Million Loan Guarantee to Tonopah Solar Energy for Nevada Project" (Press release). Loan Programs Office (LPO), Dept. of Energy (DOE). September 28, 2011. Retrieved 29 September 2011. 
  47. ^ Solel (2007).Ten facts about solar thermal power Retrieved December 18, 2008.
  48. ^ A Mojave power failure A shortfall in Mojave protection bill, Los Angeles Times, editorial, December 26, 2009.
  49. ^ "Global Market Outlook for Photovoltaics 2013 - 2017". European Photovoltaic Industry Association. Retrieved 2014-03-19. 
  50. ^ a b America's Largest PV Power Plant Is Now Live (December 6, 2010), Renewable Energy World.
  51. ^ "Long Island Solar Farm Opens in Upton". Long Island Press. November 21, 2011. 
  52. ^ FPL Commissions DeSoto Next Generation Solar Energy Center
  53. ^ Nellis activates Nations largest PV Array
  54. ^ Largest U.S. Solar Photovoltaic System Begins Construction at Nellis Air Force Base
  55. ^ "DOE Closes on Four Major Solar Projects". Renewable Energy World. 30 September 2011. 
  56. ^ Steve Leone (7 December 2011). "Billionaire Buffett Bets on Solar Energy". Renewable Energy World. 
  57. ^ "NRG Energy Completes Acquisition of 250-Megawatt California Valley Solar Ranch from SunPower". MarketWatch. 30 September 2011. 
  58. ^ Million Solar Roofs Initiative
  59. ^ Washington State Passes Progressive Renewable Energy Legislation
  60. ^ a b c Geothermal Energy Association, 6 Million American Households to be Powered by Geothermal Energy, New Survey Reports
  61. ^ "2012 Annual US Geothermal Power Production and Development Report". Geothermal Energy Association. February 2013. 
  62. ^ a b c Environmental and Energy Study Institute, Solar water heating
  63. ^ US Energy Information Administration, Table 1.1.A. Net Generation by Other Renewable Sources: Total (All Sectors), 2003-April 2013, Table 1.1. Net Generation by Energy Source: Total (All Sectors), 2003-April 2013, accessed 20 July 2013.
  64. ^ a b c Worldwatch Institute and Center for American Progress (2006). American energy: The renewable path to energy security
  65. ^ "The craze for maize", The Economist, May 12, 2007, pp.33-34
  66. ^ S.C.E. Jupe, A. Michiorri, P.C. Taylor (2007). "Increasing the energy yield of generation from new and renewable energy sources". Renewable energy 14 (2): 37–62. 
  67. ^ "Defense-scale supercomputing comes to renewable energy research". Sandia National Laboratories. Retrieved 2012-04-016. 
  68. ^ "Sandia National Laboratories". Sandia National Laboratories. Retrieved 2012-04-016. 
  69. ^ *Chakrabarty, Gargi, April 16th, 2009. "Stimulus leaves NREL in cold" Denver Post”
  70. ^ Chumley, Cheryl. "BP Gives Up on Solar Power". Heartlander Magazine. Heartlander Magazine. Retrieved 28 November 2012. 
  71. ^ "Stimulus leaves NREL in cold". Denver Post. Retrieved 2012-04-16. 
  72. ^ "Solar Research". NREL. Retrieved 2012-04-16. 
  73. ^ "Photovoltaics". Sandia. Retrieved 2012-04-16. 
  74. ^ "'Major discovery' from MIT primed to unleash solar revolution". MIT News. Retrieved 2012-04-17. 
  75. ^ "Breakthrough: World’s most efficient solar panel". SmartPlanet. Retrieved 2012-04-17. 
  76. ^ "Wind energy research reaps rewards". NASA. Retrieved 2012-04-17. 
  77. ^ "Wind energy". Sandia. Retrieved 2012-04-17. 
  78. ^ "Wind research". NREL. Retrieved 2012-04-17. 
  79. ^ "Wind resource evaluation at the Caltech Field Laboratory for Optimized Wind Energy (FLOWE)". Caltech. Retrieved 2012-04-17. 
  80. ^ American Coalition for Ethanol (2008-06-02). "Responses to Questions from Senator Bingaman". American Coalition for Ethanol. Retrieved 2012-04-02. 
  81. ^ National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2007-03-02). "Research Advantages: Cellulosic Ethanol". National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Retrieved 2012-04-02. 
  82. ^ M.R. Schmer, K.P. Vogel, R.B. Mitchell, R.K. Perrin (2008). "Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105 (2): 464–469. 
  83. ^ Charles E. Wyman (2007). "What is (and is not) vital to advancing cellulosic ethanol". Trends in Biotechnology 25 (4): 153–157. 
  84. ^ Sandia National Laboratories. "Biomass". Sandia National Laboratories. Retrieved 2012-04-17. 
  85. ^ Joint BioEnergy Initiative. "About JBEI". Sandia National Laboratories. Retrieved 2012-04-17. 
  86. ^ Jeff Wise. "The Truth about hydrogen". Popular Mechanics. Retrieved 2012-04-17. 
  87. ^ NREL. "Hydrogen". NREL. Retrieved 2012-04-17. 
  88. ^ Sandia. "Hydrogen". Sandia. Retrieved 2012-04-17. 
  89. ^ EERE: Solar Energy Technologies Program Home Page
  90. ^ a b California Public Utilities Commission, The California Solar Initiative
  91. ^ Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency, Financial Incentives in the USA
  92. ^ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Onsite Renewable Technologies
  93. ^ Los Angeles County Sanitation District
  94. ^ "Net Metering". Archived from the original on 9 May 2009. 
  95. ^ American Council on Renewable Energy, Member Benefits
  96. ^ American Council On Renewable Energy, (2007). The Outlook On Renewable Energy In America
  97. ^ 635 GW Possible with U.S. Political Shift Renewable Energy Access, 2 May 2007.
  98. ^ Electric Power Annual 2012 retrieved 2014-1-15
  99. ^ [3] retrieved 2014-3-29
  100. ^ Detailed State Data retrieved 2014-1-15
  101. ^ U.S. Renewable Energy Technical Potentials
  102. ^ NREL Study Shows Renewable Energy Potential in Every State
  103. ^ 2010 Electricity Consumption
  104. ^ Total Energy Consumption 2010

External links[edit]