A revolving door typically consists of three or four doors that hang on a central shaft and rotate around a vertical axis within a cylindrical enclosure. Revolving doors are energy efficient as they prevent drafts (via acting as an airlock), thus preventing increases in the heating or cooling required for the building. At the same time, revolving doors allow large numbers of people to pass in and out.
Around the central shaft of the revolving door, there are usually three or four panels called "wings" or "leaves." Large diameter revolving doors can accommodate strollers and wheeled luggage racks. The tallest revolving door in Europe is currently 5.2m high with 4 wings.
Some "revolving door displays" incorporate a small glass enclosure, permitting small objects such as sculpture, fashion mannequins, or plants to be displayed to pedestrians passing through. Such enclosures can either be mounted at the central pivot, or attached to the revolving door wings.
The wings of revolving doors usually incorporate glass, to allow people to see and anticipate each other while passing through the door. Manual revolving doors rotate with pushbars, causing all wings to rotate. Revolving doors typically have a "speed control" (governor) to prevent people from spinning the doors too fast.
Automatic revolving doors are powered above/below the central shaft, or along the perimeter. Automatic revolving doors have safety sensors, but there has been at least one fatality recorded.
Skyscraper design requires some sort of draft block, such as revolving doors, to prevent the chimney effect of the tall structure from sucking in air at high speed at the base and ejecting it through vents in the roof while the building is being heated, or sucking in air through the vents and ejecting it through the doors while being cooled, both effects due to convection. Modern revolving doors permit the individual doors of the assembly to be unlocked from the central shaft to permit free flowing traffic in both directions, but this feature is typically used only during emergencies, or to admit oversize objects. Normally, the revolving door is always closed so that wind and drafts cannot blow into the building, to efficiently minimize heating and air conditioning loads.
In right hand traffic countries, revolving doors typically revolve counter-clockwise (as seen from above), allowing people to enter and exit only on the right side of the door. In left hand traffic countries such as Australia and New Zealand, revolving doors revolve clockwise, but door rotations are mixed in Britain. Direction of rotation is often enforced by the door governor mechanism, or by the orientation of the door seal brush (weatherstrips).
Revolving doors can also be used as security devices to restrict entry to a single person at a time if the spacing between the doors is small enough. This is in contrast to a normal door which allows a second person to easily "tailgate" an authorized person. Extreme security can require bullet-proof glass.
Sometimes a revolving door is designed for one-way traffic. An example is the now-common usage in airports to prevent a person from bypassing airport security checkpoints by entering the exit. Such doors are designed with a brake that is activated by a sensor should someone enter from the incorrect side. The door also revolves backwards to permit that person to exit, while also notifying security of the attempt.
Turnstile exit-only doors are also often used in subways and other rapid transit facilities to prevent people from bypassing fare payment. They are similarly used at large sports stadiums, theme parks, and other such venues, to allow pedestrians to exit freely, but not to enter without paying admission fees. These doors usually work mechanically, with the door panels constructed of horizontal bars which pass through a "wall" of interlacing (interdigitated) bars, allowing the door leaves to pass through, but blocking people from illegally entering through the exit.
In 1942, the Cocoanut Grove, a popular nightclub in Boston, Massachusetts (USA), went up in flames killing 492 people. One of the main reasons cited for the large number of casualties was the single revolving door located at the entrance. As the mob of panicking patrons attempted to use the door as an escape it soon became jammed, trapping countless people between the door and the crowd pushing towards it. As a result, many people died from smoke inhalation, not being able to escape the burning nightclub.
In 1943 it became a Massachusetts state law requirement to either flank a revolving door with an outward swinging hinged door or to make the revolving door collapsible (so it becomes a double partition collapsing at 180°) allowing people to pass on either side. American revolving doors are now collapsible. Some jurisdictions require them to be flanked by at least one hinged door either by common practice or required by law. For example, the Ontario Building Code 220.127.116.11. asserts that revolving doors needs to "(a) be collapsible, (b) have hinged doors providing equivalent exiting capacity located adjacent to it".
Theophilus Van Kannel, of Philadelphia, was granted US patent 387,571 on August 7, 1888 for a "Storm-Door Structure". The patent drawings filed show a three-partition revolving door. The patent describes it as having "three radiating and equidistant wings . . . provided with weather-strips or equivalent means to insure a snug fit". The door "possesses numerous advantages over a hinged-door structure . . .it is perfectly noiseless . . . effectually prevents the entrance of wind, snow, rain or dust . . ." "Moreover, the door cannot be blown open by the wind . . . there is no possibility of collision, and yet persons can pass both in and out at the same time." The patent further lists, "the excluding of noises of the street" as another advantage of the revolving door. It goes on to describe how a partition can be hinged so as to open to allow the passage of long objects through the revolving door. The patent itself does not use the term "revolving door". Van Kannel was reportedly motivated by his phobia of opening doors for others, especially women.
In 1889, the Franklin Institute of Philadelphia awarded the John Scott Legacy Medal to Van Kannel for his contribution to society. In 1899, the world’s first wooden revolving door was installed at Rector’s, a restaurant on Times Square in Manhattan, located on Broadway between West 43rd and 44th Streets. In 2007 Theophilus Van Kannel was inducted into the National Inventors Hall of Fame for this invention.
Research into the air and energy exchanges associated with revolving door usage have been carried out on a few occasions. The earliest such study was carried out in 1936 by A. M. Simpson, who worked for the van Kannel revolving door company at the time. Simpson's study was followed by a study by Schutrum et al. in 1961, and more recently a study by van Schijndel et al. in 2003. These studies have focused on providing detailed measurements of the quantities of air and heat transferred inside the compartments of a door as it revolves. With the exception of the study by van Schijndel et al., which was purely theoretical, the measurements carried out for the other studies were used to provide design charts enabling engineers to estimate the quantity of air transferred by a door in function of the revolution rate and temperature contrast. Unfortunately, none of these studies appear to be referenced by existing design codes.
Although the aforementioned studies provide useful results, these results are also specific to the type of door which they were acquired for, namely 2m x 2m doors with four compartments. Although it appears that these dimensions were standard for four-compartment doors at the time, this is not the case anymore nowadays. A more recent experimental study carried out at Imperial College London's Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, has provided more insight into the flow physics by which air is transferred across a revolving door.
Airflows and energy losses through revolving doors also occur as a result of leakages past the seals of the door. Leakages are common to any type of opening in an otherwise closed space, but have been investigated in the context of revolving doors by Zmeureanu et al. and by Schutrum et al. before that. The first study concluded that to avoid significant leakages, the seals of the doors should be maintained and periodically replaced if needed. The second study produced design charts for estimating the leakage rate through a revolving door. Unlike the curves for estimating the transfer rate also published in this study, the curves for estimating the leakage rate are more generic. As such these design curves still form the basis of the target leakage rates for revolving doors recommended by the ASHRAE standard 90.1 in the USA.
While preferred by building owners for energy conservation, revolving doors may be avoided by some people due to the perceived greater physical effort in using them.
- Revolving Doors - Sustainability @ MIT
- building.co.uk. "Cost study: Belgrave house". building.co.uk. Retrieved 2014-05-07.
- "About automatic door accident at Roppongi Hills - MORI BUILDING". Web.archive.org. Archived from the original on 2008-01-26. Retrieved 2009-07-08.
- "Roadside". brianlucas.ca.
- "Men walk out of the Australia Stock Exchange". pond5.com.
- "Which side of the road do they drive on?". Brianlucas.ca. Retrieved 2009-07-08.
- "esp@cenet — Original document". V3.espacenet.com. Retrieved 2009-07-08.
- Mars, Roman. "Why Don't People Use Revolving Doors?". Slate Magazine. The Slate Group. Retrieved 7 November 2013.
- International Revolving Door Company Overview at the Wayback Machine (archived November 7, 2007)
- The city in slang: New York life and popular speech. Irving Lewis Allen. Publisher: New York ; Oxford University Press, 1993. Page 126. ISBN 0-19-509265-1
- "Inventors Hall of Fame".
- Simpson, A. M. and Atkinson, K. B. InfInfiltration Problem of Multiple Entrances. Heating, piping and air conditioning, vol. 8 no. 6 pp 345 - 351, 1936
- Simpson, A. M. Infiltration Characteristics of Entrance Doors. Journal of refrigerating engineering, vol. 31 no. 6 pp 345 -350, 1936
- Schutrum, L. F., Ozisik, N., Baker, J. T. and Humphreys, C. M. Air Infiltrations through Revolving Doors, ASHRAE transactions, vol. 3 no. 1 pp. 43 - 50, 1961
- Van Schijndel, H., Zmeureanu, R., Stathopoulos, T. Simulation of Air Infiltration through Revolving Doors, Proceedings of Building simulations 2003 conference, pp. 1193 - 2000, 2003
- Beardmore, A. The Revolving Door Since 1881: Architecture in Detail, Boon Edam P.V., 2000
- Allgayer, D. M. and Hunt, G. R., Air Movement by Revolving Doors, Proceedings of the RoomVent 2004 conference, 2004
- Allgayer, D. M. and Hunt, G. R., Hybrid Ventilation by Revolving Doors, Proceedings of the HealthyBuildings 2006 conference, vol. 4 pp. 215 - 220, 2006
- Allgayer, D. M. Air and Heat Movement by Revolving Doors, PhD Thesis, Imperial College London, 2006
- Zmeureanu, R., Stathopoulos, T., Schopmeijer, M. E. D. Air Leakage Through the Building Envelope via Revolving Doors, Proceedings of the International conference on building envelopes, systems and technology, pp. 467 - 472, 2001
- ASHRAE ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-1999: Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings, USA, 1999
- Cullum, B.A. "Modifying Habits Towards Sustainability: A Study of Revolving Door Usage on the MIT Campus". MIT. Retrieved 7 November 2013.
- Alan Beadmore, The Revolving Door since 1881: Architecture in Detail, 2000, ISBN 90-901374-3-2
- Harvey E. Van Kannel and Joanne Fox Marshall, T. Van Kannel, the inventor : his autobiography and journal, 1988, Library of Congress control number 88091258
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Revolving doors.|