Revolving door (politics)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The revolving door is the movement of personnel between roles as legislators and regulators and the industries affected by the legislation and regulation and on within lobbying companies. In some cases the roles are performed in sequence but in certain circumstances may be performed at the same time. Political analysts claim that an unhealthy relationship can develop between the private sector and government, based on the granting of reciprocated privileges to the detriment of the nation and can lead to regulatory capture.

Contents

[edit] Overview

The metaphor of a revolving door has been used to describe people switching jobs, from working as lawmakers, to being lobbyists, and vice versa.

The benefits to government when recruiting people from industry include:

  • Experience – supporters of the flow of employees between government and the private sector justify the flow as understandable, given the government requires people with knowledge of the private sector and the private sector values people with experience in government.
  • Influence - individuals who are influential in the private sector may be beneficial to a government with interests that desires cooperation with the private sector.
  • Political support - political donations and endorsements can be granted a by vested interest to a government, if the government employs people who are loyal to the vested interest.

The benefits to industry from recruiting or working with people with senior government experience includes:

  • Access to government, including influential politicians[1]
  • Favorable policy and regulation.[2]
  • Insider knowledge
  • Award contracts for governmental work

Analysts claim the lobbying industry is especially affected by the revolving door concept, as the main asset for a lobbyist is contacts with and influence on government officials. This industrial climate is attractive for ex-government officials. It can also mean substantial monetary rewards for the lobbying firms and government projects and contracts in the hundreds of millions for those they represent.[3][4]

[edit] Jurisdictions

Regulation relating to this phenomenon and the related issues of lobbying and the funding of political parties varies considerably around the world. Here are details for a few sample jurisdiction:-

[edit] Australia

In Australia, this is of significant public debate as many state leaders have become private consultants for corporations. There is no legislation against this revolving door in Australia.

[edit] France

A law in the penal code of France governing public officials who move between the public and private sectors[5] requires a three-year wait between working in the government and taking a job in the private sector.

[edit] Japan

The institutionalized practice of placing retiring bureaucrats into senior positions of industries they once regulated, known as Amakudari, has increasingly been recognized for its corrupting influence on government. In April 2007, a law to phase out Amakudari will prohibit ministries from attempting to place bureaucrats in industry in 2009. However, the law also removed a two-year ban that prevented retiring officials from taking jobs with companies they had official dealings with during the five years prior to retirement.

[edit] United Kingdom

The movement of senior civil servants and government ministers into business roles is overseen by the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (ACOBA), but this is not a statutory body and has only advisory powers. The Channel Four Dispatches programme 'Cabs for Hire', broadcast in early 2010, which showed several sitting members of Parliament and former ministers offering their influence and contacts in an effort to get lobbying jobs, has generated renewed concern about this issue. A Transparency International UK report on the subject, published in May 2011, called for ACOBA to be replaced by a statutory body with greater powers to regulate the post-public employment of former ministers and crown servants.[6] It also argued that the Committee should be more representative of society.

[edit] United States

"Under current law, government officials who make contracting decisions must either wait a year before joining a military contractor or, if they want to switch immediately, must start in an affiliate or division unrelated to their government work. One big loophole is that these restrictions do not apply to many high-level policy makers..., who can join corporations or their boards without waiting." [7]

Democratic Congressman Dick Gephardt became a lobbyist in 2007 after leaving his Congressional post.

Examples of individuals who have moved between roles in this way in sensitive areas include Dick Cheney (military contracting),[8] Linda Fisher (pesticide and biotech), Philip Perry (homeland security), Pat Toomey[9], Dan Coats,[10][dead link] and former FCC commissioner Meredith Attwell Baker[11][12] (media lobbying). High-profile U.S. Representative Democratic Dick Gephardt left his congressional post to become a lobbyist and his lobbying agency Gephardt Government Affairs Group earned close to $7 million in revenues in 2010 from clients including Goldman Sachs, Boeing, Visa Inc., Ameren Corporation, and Waste Management Inc..[13]

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ David Sirota, "A Bipartisan Brothel With a Revolving Door Entry" Huffington Post. Retrieved May 12, 2011
  2. ^ Chuck Raasch, "Revolving door spins faster than ever in D.C" USA Today (April 14, 2005). Retrieved May 12, 2011
  3. ^ Timothy J. Burger, "The Lobbying Game: Why the Revolving Door Won't Close" Time (February 16, 2006). Retrieved May 12, 2011
  4. ^ "Revolving Door: Methodology" Center for Responsive Politics. Retrieved May 12, 2011
  5. ^ "Article 432-13 du code pénal" Légifrance, service public de la diffusion du droit. Retrieved March 6, 2011 (French)
  6. ^ 'Cabs for Hire? Fixing the Revolving Door Between Government and Business' Transparency International UK (May 2011), p. 6. Retrieved 8 January 2012.
  7. ^ Leslie Wayne, Pentagon Brass and Military Contractors' Gold" The New York Times (June 29, 2004). Retrieved 2008-01-03
  8. ^ Robert Bryce, "Cheney's Multi-Million Dollar Revolving Door" Mother Jones (2000-08-02). Retrieved December 13, 2008
  9. ^ Pat Toomey's employment history Center for Responsive Politics. Retrieved May 12, 2011
  10. ^ Matthew Tully, "Revolving door should be closed on Dan Coats" Indianapolis Star (October 22, 2010)
  11. ^ Edward Wyatt, "F.C.C. Commissioner Leaving to Join Comcast" The New York Times (May 11, 2011). Retrieved May 12, 2011
  12. ^ Meredith Atwell Baker's employment history Center for Responsive Politics. Retrieved May 12, 2011
  13. ^ THOMAS B. EDSALL (2011). "The Trouble With That Revolving Door". The New York Times. http://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/18/the-trouble-with-that-revolving-door/. Retrieved 2012-01-14. 

[edit] External links

[edit] Video

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export
Languages