Exorcism of Roland Doe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Robbie Mannheim)
Jump to: navigation, search

In the late 1940s, priests of the Catholic Church performed a series of exorcisms on an anonymous boy, documented under the pseudonym "Roland Doe" or "Robbie Mannheim". The boy, born circa 1936, was the supposed victim of demonic possession, and the events were recorded by the attending priest, Raymond Bishop. Subsequent supernatural claims surrounding the events went on to inspire the 1971 novel The Exorcist by William Peter Blatty and the 1973 film adaptation.[1]

Origin of claims[edit]

In mid 1949, several newspaper articles printed anonymous reports of an alleged possession and exorcism.[2] The source for these reports is thought to be the family's former pastor, Luther Miles Schulze.[1] According to one account, a total of "forty-eight people witnessed this exorcism, nine of them Jesuits."[3]

According to author Thomas B. Allen, Jesuit priest Walter H. Halloran was one of the last surviving eyewitnesses of the events and participated in the exorcism. Allen wrote that a diary kept by attending priest Raymond Bishop detailed the exorcism performed on the pseudonymously identified "Roland Doe" aka "Robbie". Speaking in 2013, Allen "emphasized that definitive proof that the boy known only as "Robbie" was possessed by malevolent spirits is unattainable. Maybe he instead suffered from mental illness or sexual abuse — or fabricated the entire experience." According to Allen, Halloran also "expressed his skepticism about potential paranormal events before his death."[4] When asked in an interview to make a statement on whether the boy had been possessed, Halloran responded saying "No, I can’t go on record, I never made an absolute statement about the things because I didn’t feel I was qualified."[1]

Early life[edit]

Roland was born into a German Lutheran family. During the 1940s the family lived in Cottage City, Maryland.[1] According to Allen, Roland was an only child and depended upon adults in his household for playmates, primarily his Aunt Harriet. His aunt, who was a spiritualist, introduced Roland to the Ouija board when he expressed interest in it.[5]

Exorcisms[edit]

According to Thomas B. Allen, after Aunt Harriet's death the family experienced strange noises, furniture moving on its own accord and ordinary objects flying or levitating when the boy was nearby. The family turned to their Lutheran pastor, Luther Miles Schulze, for help. Long interested in parapsychology, Schulze arranged for the boy to spend a night in his home in order to observe him.[5] When parapsychologist J.B. Rhine learned that Schulze claimed he witnessed household objects and furniture seemingly moving by themselves, Rhine "wondered if Schulze “unconsciously exaggerated” some of the facts."[1] Schulze advised the boy's parents to "see a Catholic priest".[5]

According to the traditional story, the boy then underwent a number of exorcisms. Edward Hughes, a Roman Catholic priest, conducted an exorcism on Roland at Georgetown University Hospital, a Jesuit institution.[1]

During the exorcism, the boy allegedly slipped one of his hands out of the restraints; broke a bedspring from under the mattress, and used it as an impromptu weapon, slashing the priest's arm and resulting in the exorcism ritual being halted. The family traveled to St. Louis, where Roland's cousin contacted one of his professors at St. Louis University, Raymond J. Bishop, who in turn spoke to William S. Bowdern, an associate of College Church. Together, both priests visited Roland in his relatives' home, where they allegedly observed a shaking bed, flying objects, the boy speaking in a guttural voice, and exhibiting an aversion to anything sacred. Bowdern was granted permission from the archbishop to perform another exorcism.

Before the next exorcism ritual began, another priest, Walter Halloran, was called to the psychiatric wing of the hospital, where he was asked to assist Bowdern.[6] William Van Roo, a third Jesuit priest, was also there to assist.[6] Halloran stated that during this scene words such as "evil" and "hell", along with other various marks, appeared on the teenager's body.[6] Ostensibly, during the Litany of the Saints portion of the exorcism ritual, the boy's mattress began to shake.[5] Moreover, Roland broke Halloran's nose during the process.[6] Halloran told a reporter that after that rite was over, the anonymous subject of the exorcism went on to lead "a rather ordinary life."[6]

Investigations and explanations[edit]

In his 1993 book Possessed: The True Story of an Exorcism, author Thomas B. Allen offered "the consensus of today's experts" that "Robbie was just a deeply disturbed boy, nothing supernatural about him."[7]

Author Mark Opsasnick questioned many of the supernatural claims associated with the story, proposing that "Roland Doe" was simply a spoiled, disturbed bully who threw deliberate tantrums to get attention or to get out of school. Opasnick reports that Halloran, who was present at the exorcism, never heard the boy's voice change, and he thought the boy merely mimicked Latin words he heard clergymen say, rather than gaining a sudden ability to speak Latin. Opasnick reported that when marks were found on the boy's body, Halloran failed to check the boy's fingernails to see if he had made the marks himself. Opsasnick also questioned the story of Hughes attempts to exorcise the boy and his subsequent injury, saying he could find no evidence that such an episode had actually occurred.[1] According to Opasnick, individuals connected to the incident were influenced by their own specializations:

"To psychiatrists, Rob Doe suffered from mental illness. To priests this was a case of demonic possession. To writers and film/video producers this was a great story to exploit for profit. Those involved saw what they were trained to see. Each purported to look at the facts but just the opposite was true — in actuality they manipulated the facts and emphasized information that fit their own agendas."

Opsasnik wrote that after he located and spoke with neighbors and childhood friends of the boy, he concluded that "the boy had been a very clever trickster, who had pulled pranks to frighten his mother and to fool children in the neighborhood."[8]

Skeptic Joe Nickell wrote that there was "simply no credible evidence to suggest the boy was possessed by demons or evil spirits" and maintains that the symptoms of possession can be "childishly simple" to fake. Nickell dismissed suggestions that supernatural forces made scratches or markings or caused words to appear on the teenager’s body in unreachable places, saying, "A determined youth, probably even without a wall mirror, could easily have managed such a feat-if it actually occurred. Although the scratched messages proliferated, they never again appeared on a difficult-to-reach portion of the boy’s anatomy." On one occasion the boy was reportedly seen scratching the words “hell” and “christ” on his chest by using his own fingernails.[8] According to Nickell:

"Nothing that was reliably reported in the case was beyond the abilities of a teenager to produce. The tantrums, “trances,” moved furniture, hurled objects, automatic writing, superficial scratches, and other phenomena were just the kinds of things someone of R’s age could accomplish, just as others have done before and since. Indeed, the elements of “poltergeist phenomena,” “spirit communication,” and “demonic possession"-taken both separately and, especially, together, as one progressed to the other-suggest nothing so much as role-playing involving trickery."

Nickell also dismissed stories of the boy's prodigious strength, saying he showed "nothing more than what could be summoned by an agitated teenager" and criticized popular accounts of the exorcism for what he termed a "stereotypical storybook portrayal" of the devil.[8]

Religious perspectives[edit]

Two Christian academics, Terry D. Cooper, a professor of psychology, and Cindy K. Epperson, a professor of sociology, wrote that advocates of possession believe that "although they are not frequent, exorcisms are necessary for casting out the demonic" and "cases of genuine possession cannot be explained by psychiatry". Cooper and Epperson devoted a chapter of their book Evil: Satan, Sin, and Psychology to the case and dismissed skeptical explanations in favor of a theological perspective regarding the nature of evil.[9]

Literature and film[edit]

This exorcism case inspired the 1971 novel The Exorcist by William Peter Blatty, which in turn was adapted into the classic 1973 film of the same name.[10] The case also inspired the 2000 movie Possessed, which is said to be closer to the "real" story since it is based on Allen's book.[10] A documentary was also made of the case, titled In the Grip of Evil.[11] Another documentary movie was made in 2010 named "The Haunted Boy: The Secret Diary of the Exorcist" where a group of investigators travels to the location in question and uncovers the diary that is said to be kept by William S. Bowdern.[12]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e f g Opasnick, Mark. "The Cold Hard Facts Behind the Story that Inspired "The Exorcist"". Strange Magazine #20. Retrieved 2014-09-25. 
  2. ^ Brinkley, William (20 August 1949). "Priest Frees Mt. Rainier Boy Reported Held in Devil's Grip". Washington Post. Retrieved 8 April 2014. 
  3. ^ The dark side of God: a quest for the lost heart of Christianity. Element. June 1999. ISBN 9781862044586. Retrieved 2010-04-03. 
  4. ^ Zagier, Alan Scher. "Exorcism of 1949 continues to fascinate St. Louis". AP.org. Associated Press. Retrieved 24 September 2014. 
  5. ^ a b c d Thomas B. Allen (11 November 2013), Possessed: The True Story of an Exorcism, BookCountry, ISBN 978-1-4630-0367-8 
  6. ^ a b c d e "Jesuit Priest Walter Halloran". The Washington Post. 2005-03-09. Retrieved 2007-12-31. 
  7. ^ Dennis Drabelle., "Book World; The Demon Within: Was It . . . Satan?.", The Washington Post. Washingtonpost Newsweek Interactive. 1993. HighBeam Research 27 Sep. 2014, "Allen is careful to delineate the symptoms of possession, thus softening the blow when, at the end of the book, he offers the consensus of today's experts: Robbie was just a deeply disturbed boy, nothing supernatural about him." 
  8. ^ a b c Nickell, Joe. "Exorcism! Driving Out the Nonsense". Skeptical Inquirer, Volume 25.1, January / February 2001. Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Retrieved 25 September 2014. 
  9. ^ Evil: Satan, Sin, and Psychology. Paulist Press. 2008-09-02. ISBN 9780809145362. Retrieved 2010-04-02. 
  10. ^ a b Cinema of the occult: new age, satanism, Wicca, and spiritualism in film. Rosemont Publishing & Printing Corp. 2008-12-31. ISBN 9780934223959. Retrieved 2010-04-04. 
  11. ^ In the Grip of Evil. Retrieved 2010-04-04. 
  12. ^ "The Haunted Boy: The Secret Diary of the Exorcist (Video 2010)". IMDb. 1 October 2010. Retrieved 24 September 2014. 

External links[edit]