Roger Pilon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Roger Pilon (born November 28, 1942)[1] is Vice President for Legal Affairs for the Cato Institute, and an American libertarian legal theorist. In particular, he has developed a libertarian version of the rights theory of his teacher, noted philosopher Alan Gewirth.

Education[edit]

Roger Pilon has three philosophy degrees: a bachelor's degree from Columbia University and a masters and doctorate, both from the University of Chicago. He also earned a law degree at the George Washington University.

General background[edit]

Pilon is the publisher of the Cato Supreme Court Review. His writing has appeared in such newspapers as the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, and the Los Angeles Times. He also frequently appears on television shows and testifies before Congress. In addition, Pilon held five senior posts in the administration of Ronald Reagan.

He is married to Juliana Geran Pilon.[2]

Interpretation of the U.S. Constitution[edit]

Pilon believes that the government only has power to regulate conduct that violates other people's rights. This view is in the tradition of John Locke's view of natural rights. An example of this is the use of contraceptives. Pilon reasons that since people using contraceptives (see Griswold v. Connecticut) were not violating anyone's rights, the state had no authority to regulate such activity. However, Pilon believes abortion is not a constitutionally-protected right. He reasons that everyone, he hopes, would agree that killing a baby one day after it is born is murder. Then, what is the difference between one day after and one day before? The answer is there is no principle difference. Then, what about two months before or three? This sort of line drawing, Pilon reasons, is meant to be left to the political branches.[3]

Pilon believes that Congress should be kept within its enumerated powers. He believes the Supreme Court has failed to limit Congress with the so-called spending power and the commerce power. He refers to it as the "so-called spending power" because nowhere in the Constitution is it an independent power. Therefore, Congress can spend money only to further its otherwise enumerated powers. One of those powers is the power to regulate commerce among the states, nations, and Indian tribes.

Pilon believes that the court was incorrect in Wickard to assert that Congress can regulate activity that, aggregated together, has a substantial effect on interstate commerce. Pilon reasons that everything has some effect on commerce; therefore, the court's reasoning essentially makes Congress's power unlimited. Pilon states, however, that United States v. Lopez fixed this problem to a small degree, but, then again, Gonzales v. Raich weakened that decision.

Works[edit]

  • Pilon, Roger (1979). "Ordering Rights Consistently: Or What We Do and Do Not Have Rights To". Georgia Law Review 13: 1171–96. 
  • Roger Pilon, A Theory of Rights: Toward Limited Government (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago, 1979).
  • Alan Gewirth, Reason and Morality (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978)
  • Alan Gewirth, "The Basis and Content of Human Rights," Georgia Law Review 13 (1979): 1148)

References[edit]

External links[edit]