Ronald Inden

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Ronald Inden
Occupation Professor Emeritus, History and of South Asian Languages and Civilizations
Employer University of Chicago
Known for Ancient and Medieval India
Hindu Thought
Cultural Studies
Orientalism

Ronald Inden is an American Indologist, and professor emeritus in the Departments of History and of South Asian Languages and Civilizations at the University of Chicago and is a major scholar in South Asian and post-colonial studies. Inden has been a lifelong resident of Hyde Park, the Chicago community which contains the University.

Education[edit]

He was educated at the Lab School, then the University of Chicago itself

Career[edit]

Inden has spent the bulk of his professional career at University of Chicago.

Although his early work focused on Bengali history and culture and was fairly conventional in scope and methods, beginning in the 1980s his scholarship became increasingly theoretical, wide-ranging, iconoclastic and ambitious.

Inspired by Edward Said's Orientalism, he began a critical investigation of how social scientific knowledge was shaped by the colonial conditions of its production. Imagining India was a critical survey of the field of Indology and argued that most scholarship consistently failed to treat Indians as rational subjects and knowing actors who were intelligently involved in the creation of their social worlds. "The immense learning and analytical sharpness of the book is evident from the very first chapter"[1] Post-Orientalist Strategies explored ways of knowing India that are not so limited by colonialism and its legacies.

R. G. Collingwood's works, including An Essay on Philosophical Method and The Idea of History, were especially influential in Inden's thought during this period. He took Collingwood's notion of a "scale of forms" and used it to develop an approach opposed to a "hierarchy of essences". In general, in Inden's work the past two decades, the focus has been on the limitations of what he calls essentializing or substantializing discourses which understand agents as more or less reflections of a single, internally consistent idea. He argues that Indology returns to a small number of relatively fixed themes to make sense out of India. India, in this Indological version, is feminine, jungle-like, religious, caste-riven, village-based, irrational and, fundamentally, the opposite of the West. Inden, on the contrary, emphasizes that there's an irreducible tension in scholarship and that India and the West need to be understood as both "opposites" and "distincts" and that they have "differences in quality" as well as "differences in kind". Essentializing forms of knowledge emphasize only the differences in quality and the extent to which the West and India are opposites.[2]

Inden's more recent research takes up the ways that national and ethnic identities in 20th century India were articulated with references to changes in local and global ruling class relations.

References[edit]

  1. ^ Prakash: 601.
  2. ^ Inden 1990: Introduction.

Publications[edit]

Reviews of Imagining India'[edit]

  • Mani, Lata. The Journal of Asian Studies Vol. 50, No. 2 (May, 1991), pp. 435–436
  • Mines, Mattison. American Ethnologist Vol. 20, No. 2 (May, 1993), pp. 415–416
  • Prakash, Gyan. The American Historical Review Vol. 97, No. 2 (Apr., 1992), pp. 601–602
  • Raheja, Gloria Goodwin. American Anthropologist New Series, Vol. 94, No. 1 (Mar., 1992), pp. 235–236
  • Quigley, Declan. Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 25, No. 2 (1991), pp. 403-406.

External links[edit]